🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

For some subclasses of close-to-star functions the sharp upper and lower bounds of the second and third-order Hermitian Toeplitz determinants are computed.

Results & Lemmas (8)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1 Theorem 1 Let F be a subclass of A such that F(2) ̸= ∅and A2(F) exists. Then 1 −A2 2(F) ≤T2,1( f ) ≤1. Both inequalities are sharp. Let…
Theorem 1 Let F be a subclass of A such that F(2) ̸= ∅and A2(F) exists. Then 1 −A2 2(F) ≤T2,1( f ) ≤1. Both inequalities are sharp. Let S∗be the subclass of S of starlike functions ([1]), i.e., f ∈S∗if f ∈A and Re zf ′(z) f (z) > 0, z ∈D. A function f ∈A is called close-to-star if there exist g ∈S∗and β ∈R such that Re eiβ f (z) g(z) > 0, z ∈D. (2) The class CST of all close-to-star functions which was introduced by Reade [36] bear the
Lemma 1 Lemma 1 If p ∈P is of the form (7), then |cn| ≤2, n ∈N. (8) Moreover c1 = 2ζ1 (9) and c2 = 2ζ 2 1 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)ζ2 (10) for some ζi ∈D, i ∈…
Lemma 1 If p ∈P is of the form (7), then |cn| ≤2, n ∈N. (8) Moreover c1 = 2ζ1 (9) and c2 = 2ζ 2 1 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)ζ2 (10) for some ζi ∈D, i ∈{1, 2}. For ζ1 ∈T, there is a unique function p ∈P with c1 as in (9), namely, p(z) = 1 + ζ1z 1 −ζ1z ,
Theorem 2 Theorem 2 If f ∈ST (i), then −3 ≤T2,1( f ) ≤1. Both inequalities are sharp. 123
Theorem 2 If f ∈ST (i), then −3 ≤T2,1( f ) ≤1. Both inequalities are sharp. 123
Theorem 3 Theorem 3 If f ∈ST (i), then T3,1( f ) ≤8. (15) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 3 If f ∈ST (i), then T3,1( f ) ≤8. (15) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 4 Theorem 4 If f ∈ST (i), then T3,1( f ) ≥−9. (17) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 4 If f ∈ST (i), then T3,1( f ) ≥−9. (17) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 5 Theorem 5 If f ∈ST (1), then −15 ≤T2,1( f ) ≤1. Both inequalities are sharp. We next compute the upper and lower bounds of T3,1( f ).
Theorem 5 If f ∈ST (1), then −15 ≤T2,1( f ) ≤1. Both inequalities are sharp. We next compute the upper and lower bounds of T3,1( f ).
Theorem 6 Theorem 6 If f ∈ST (1), then T3,1( f ) ≤176. (27) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 6 If f ∈ST (1), then T3,1( f ) ≤176. (27) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 7 Theorem 7 If f ∈ST (1), then T3,1( f ) ≥−442 + 208 √ 3 + 20  28 + 10 √ 3 −21  84 + 30 √ 3 9(−1 + 3 √ 3)
Theorem 7 If f ∈ST (1), then T3,1( f ) ≥−442 + 208 √ 3 + 20  28 + 10 √ 3 −21  84 + 30 √ 3 9(−1 + 3 √ 3)
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Subordination Associated with Laguerre polynomial
2026
Coefficient problems of Starlike Functions Related to a Balloon-Shaped Domain
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for the Exponential Starlike class
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #5,037 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback