🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

The present work is an attempt to give partial proofs of certain conjectures on the fifth coefficient of certain normalized analytic functions. Further, bounds on the sixth and seventh coefficients for the starlike functions related to a lune are also investigated. The non-sharp bound on third and fourth Hankel determinants are also obtained. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45; 30C50; 30C80

Results & Lemmas (10)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1. Theorem 1. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈U(λ). Then |a5| ≤1 2 2+2λ+5λ2 +6λ3 +4λ4. (2.1) We need the following lemma to prove our result.…
Theorem 1. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈U(λ). Then |a5| ≤1 2 2+2λ+5λ2 +6λ3 +4λ4 . (2.1) We need the following lemma to prove our result. Before proceeding further we recall that the class of functions p(z) = 1 + ∑∞ n=1 pnzn with ℜp(z) > 0,z ∈D is de- noted by P and they are related with the Schwarz function w : D →C by means of the relation w(z) = p(z)−1 p(z)+1.
Lemma 1 Lemma 1 ([25], Lemma 2.3, p. 507). Let p ∈P. Then for all n,m ∈N, |µpnpm −pm+n| ≤  2, 0 ≤µ ≤1; 2|2µ−1|, elsewhere. If 0 < µ < 1, then the…
Lemma 1 ([25], Lemma 2.3, p. 507). Let p ∈P. Then for all n,m ∈N, |µpnpm −pm+n| ≤  2, 0 ≤µ ≤1; 2|2µ−1|, elsewhere. If 0 < µ < 1, then the inequality is sharp for the function p(z) = (1+zm+n)/(1−zm+n). In the other cases, the inequality is sharp for the function ˆp0.
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈S ∗ q. Then
Theorem 2. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈S ∗ q . Then
Lemma 2 Lemma 2 ([14], Theorem 4(b), p. 678). A function p ∈P if and only if ∞ ∑ j=0    2zj + ∞ ∑ k=1 pkzk+j
Lemma 2 ([14], Theorem 4(b), p. 678). A function p ∈P if and only if ∞ ∑ j=0    2zj + ∞ ∑ k=1 pkzk+j
Lemma 3 Lemma 3 ([20], Proposition 6, p. 7). Let D:= z ∈C: |z| ≦1. Also, for any real numbers a, b and c, let the quantity Y(a,b,c):= maxz∈D …
Lemma 3 ([20], Proposition 6, p. 7). Let D := {z ∈C : |z| ≦1}. Also, for any real numbers a, b and c, let the quantity Y(a,b,c) := maxz∈D  |a+bz+cz2|+1−|z|2 . If ac ≧0, then Y(a,b,c) =        |a|+|b|+|c|
Lemma 4 Lemma 4 ([10], Lemma 1). Let p(z) = 1+ p1z+ p2z2 + p3z3 +··· ∈P. Then, for any real number µ, µp3 −p3 1 ≤          
Lemma 4 ([10], Lemma 1). Let p(z) = 1+ p1z+ p2z2 + p3z3 +··· ∈P. Then, for any real number µ, µp3 −p3 1 ≤          
Lemma 5 Lemma 5 ([1], Corollary 1, p. 68). Let p ∈P. Then |p3 −(µ+1)p1p2 +µp3 1| ≤  2, 0 ≤µ ≤1; 2|µ−1|, elsewhere.
Lemma 5 ([1], Corollary 1, p. 68). Let p ∈P. Then |p3 −(µ+1)p1p2 +µp3 1| ≤  2, 0 ≤µ ≤1; 2|µ−1|, elsewhere.
Lemma 6 Lemma 6 ([15], Libera and Zlotkiewicz). Let p(z) = 1+ p1z+ p2z2 +··· ∈P with p1 ≥0. Then 2p2 = p2 1 +x(4−p2 1) (3.7) and 4p3 = p3 1…
Lemma 6 ([15], Libera and Zlotkiewicz). Let p(z) = 1+ p1z+ p2z2 +··· ∈P with p1 ≥0. Then 2p2 = p2 1 +x(4−p2 1) (3.7) and 4p3 = p3 1 +2p1(4−p2 1)x−p1(4−p2 1)x2 +2(4−p2 1)(1−|x|2)y (3.8) for some x and y such that |x| ≤1 and |y| ≤1. To prove (3.6), we consider (23/22)p1p3 −p2
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈S ∗ q. Then |H3,1(f)| ≤2 3 ≈0.67.
Theorem 3. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈S ∗ q . Then |H3,1(f)| ≤2 3 ≈0.67.
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈S ∗ q. Then |H4,1(f)| ≤1.93977. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The first author was supported by the Basic Science…
Theorem 4. Let f(z) = z+a2z2 +a3z3 +··· ∈S ∗ q . Then |H4,1(f)| ≤1.93977. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The first author was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2019R1I1A3A01050861). The part of this work was completed during the second author’s visit to the Department of Applied Mathemat- ics, Pukyong National University (PKNU), Busan, South, Korea. The second author is thankful
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Sharp Coefficient Bounds for certain q-Starlike Functions
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Logarithmic coefficients for exponential classes of starlike and convex function
2025
Coefficient estimates for the class of q-starlike functions
2025
On compact sets possessing $q$-convex functions
2025
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 293 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback