🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Ma-Minda φ-classes studied in this paper:
Abstract

In this research article we consider two well known subclasses of starlike and bounded turning functions associated with nephroid domain. Our aims to find third Hankel determinant for these classes. 1

Results & Lemmas (16)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1. Lemma 1. If p(z) ∈P and it is of the form (1.3), then |cn| ≤ 2 for n ≥1, (2.1) |cn+k −δcnck| ≤    2 for 0 ≤δ ≤1, 2 |2δ −1| elsewhere.,
Lemma 1. If p(z) ∈P and it is of the form (1.3), then |cn| ≤ 2 for n ≥1, (2.1) |cn+k −δcnck| ≤    2 for 0 ≤δ ≤1, 2 |2δ −1| elsewhere. ,
Lemma 2. Lemma 2. [46]. If p(z) ∈P and is represented by (1.3), then c2 −νc2 1 ≤      −4ν + 2 (ν ≤0), 2 (0 ≤ν ≤1), 4ν −2 (ν ≥1).
Lemma 2. [46]. If p(z) ∈P and is represented by (1.3), then c2 −νc2 1 ≤      −4ν + 2 (ν ≤0), 2 (0 ≤ν ≤1), 4ν −2 (ν ≥1).
Lemma 3. Lemma 3. [47]. If p(z) ∈P and is represented by (1.3), then ac3 1 −bc1c2 + dc3 ≤2 |a| + 2 |b −2a| + 2 |a −b + d|. 3 Bounds of |H3,1 (f)|…
Lemma 3. [47]. If p(z) ∈P and is represented by (1.3), then ac3 1 −bc1c2 + dc3 ≤2 |a| + 2 |b −2a| + 2 |a −b + d| . 3 Bounds of |H3,1 (f)| for class S∗ Ne
Theorem 1. Theorem 1. Let f ∈S∗ Ne of the form (1.1). Then |a2| ≤ 1, |a3| ≤ 1 2, |a4| ≤ 7 18, |a5| ≤
Theorem 1. Let f ∈S∗ Ne of the form (1.1). Then |a2| ≤ 1, |a3| ≤ 1 2, |a4| ≤ 7 18, |a5| ≤
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then a3 −λa2 2 ≤      1−2λ 2, λ ≤0 1
Theorem 2. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then a3 −λa2 2 ≤      1−2λ 2 , λ ≤0 1
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then for ξ ∈C, we have a3 −ξa2 2 ≤1 2 max 1, |2ξ −1|.
Theorem 3. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then for ξ ∈C, we have a3 −ξa2 2 ≤1 2 max {1, |2ξ −1|} .
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then a3 −a2 2 ≤1 2. This results is sharp. Earthline J. Math. Sci. Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021),…
Theorem 4. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then a3 −a2 2 ≤1 2. This results is sharp. Earthline J. Math. Sci. Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021), 293-308
Theorem 5. Theorem 5. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then |a2a3 −a4| ≤7 18.
Theorem 5. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then |a2a3 −a4| ≤7 18.
Theorem 6. Theorem 6. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then a2a4 −a2 3 ≤4 9.
Theorem 6. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then a2a4 −a2 3 ≤4 9.
Theorem 7. Theorem 7. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then |H3,1 (f)| ≤377 648 ≃0.581 79.
Theorem 7. Let f(z) ∈S∗ Ne be of the form (1.1). Then |H3,1 (f)| ≤377 648 ≃0.581 79.
Theorem 8. Theorem 8. Let f ∈RNe of the form (1.1). Then |a2| ≤ 1 2, |a3| ≤ 1 3, |a4| ≤ 1 4, |a5| ≤
Theorem 8. Let f ∈RNe of the form (1.1). Then |a2| ≤ 1 2, |a3| ≤ 1 3, |a4| ≤ 1 4, |a5| ≤
Theorem 9. Theorem 9. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then for ξ ∈C, we have a3 −ξa2 2 ≤1 3 max  1, 3 |ξ| 4 .
Theorem 9. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then for ξ ∈C, we have a3 −ξa2 2 ≤1 3 max  1, 3 |ξ| 4  .
Theorem 10. Theorem 10. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then a3 −a2 2 ≤1 3.
Theorem 10. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then a3 −a2 2 ≤1 3.
Theorem 11. Theorem 11. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then |a2a3 −a4| ≤1 4.
Theorem 11. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then |a2a3 −a4| ≤1 4.
Theorem 12. Theorem 12. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then a2a4 −a2 3 ≤11 72.
Theorem 12. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then a2a4 −a2 3 ≤11 72.
Theorem 13. Theorem 13. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then |H3,1 (f)| ≤677 2160 ≃0.313 43.
Theorem 13. Let f(z) ∈RNe be of the form (1.1). Then |H3,1 (f)| ≤677 2160 ≃0.313 43.
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Sharp Coefficient Bounds for certain q-Starlike Functions
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Logarithmic coefficients for exponential classes of starlike and convex function
2025
Coefficient estimates for the class of q-starlike functions
2025
On compact sets possessing $q$-convex functions
2025
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 320 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback