🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

By using Jackson q-derivative, some characterizations in terms of convolutions for two classes of analytic functions in the open unit disc are given. Also, coefficient conditions and inclusion properties for functions in these classes are found.

Results & Lemmas (9)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Proposition 2 Proposition 2 If f ∈A, then and
Proposition 2  If f ∈A, then and
Theorem 3 Theorem 3 A function f of the form (1) in the class S∗,ζ(A, B) if and only if where C = Cθ = e−iθ+A A−B, θ ∈[0, 2π).
Theorem 3  A function f of the form (1) in the class S∗ ,ζ(A, B) if and only if where C = Cθ = e−iθ+A A−B , θ ∈[0, 2π).
Corollary 4 Corollary 4 A function f of the form (1) in the class S∗ ζ (A, B) if and only if where C = Cθ = e−iθ+A A−B, θ ∈[0, 2π).
Corollary 4  A function f of the form (1) in the class S∗ ζ (A, B) if and only if where C = Cθ = e−iθ+A A−B , θ ∈[0, 2π).
Corollary 6 Corollary 6 A function f of the form (1) is in the class Cζ(A, B) if and only if 1 z
Corollary 6  A function f  of the form (1) is in the class Cζ(A, B) if and only if 1 z
Theorem 3 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Theorem 3, we obtain the result obtained by Lashin [16]. 2 Letting ζ →1−1, A = [b(1 + m) −m] and B = −m with m = 1 −1 M and M > 1 2 in…
Theorem 3, we obtain the result obtained by Lashin [16]. 2 Letting ζ →1−1, A = [b(1 + m) −m] and B = −m with m = 1 −1 M and M > 1 2 in Corollaries 4 and 6, respectively, we obtain the results obtained by El-Ashwah [26,
Theorem 2.1 Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.4]. 3 Taking ζ →1−1, A = 1 −2α, B = −1 and eiθ = x(|x| = 1) in Corollaries 4 and 6, we obtain the results…
Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.4]. 3 Taking ζ →1−1, A = 1 −2α, B = −1 and eiθ = x(|x| = 1) in Corollaries 4 and 6, we obtain the results obtained by Silverman et al. [23, Theorems 1,2]. 4 Taking ζ →1−1and eiθ = x(|x| = 1) in Corollaries 4 and 6, respectively, we obtain the results obtained by Padmanabhan and Ganesan [27, Theorem 1,2].
Theorem 9 Theorem 9 A necessary and sufficient condition for the function f of the form (1) to be in the class S∗,ζ(n, A, B) is for all θ ∈[0, 2π)…
Theorem 9  A necessary and sufficient condition for the function f of the form (1) to be in the class S∗ ,ζ(n, A, B) is for all θ ∈[0, 2π) and z ∈U.
Theorem 10 Theorem 10 If the function f defined by (1) satisfies the inequality then f (z) ∈S∗,ζ(n, A, B).
Theorem 10  If the function f defined by (1) satisfies the inequality then f (z) ∈S∗ ,ζ(n, A, B).
Theorem 11 Theorem 11 S∗,ζ(n + 1, A, B) ⊂S∗,ζ(n, A, B).
Theorem 11  S∗ ,ζ(n + 1, A, B) ⊂S∗ ,ζ(n, A, B).

Definitions (1)

Def 1 Definition 1 For f ∈A, we say f belongs to class S∗,ζ(A, B), if and only if where 0 < ζ < 1, 0 ≤ ≤1, −1 ≤B < A ≤1, Dζ is Jackson…
Definition 1  For f ∈A , we say f belongs to class S∗ ,ζ(A, B) , if and only if where 0 < ζ < 1, 0 ≤ ≤1, −1 ≤B < A ≤1, Dζ is Jackson q-derivative with q = ζ and ≺ denotes the usual subordination (see [9–11]). It is noticed that, by giving specific values to A, B and  we obtain the following important subclasses studied by various authors in earlier works: 1. S∗ 0,q(1 −2α, −1) ≡S∗ q(α) and S∗ 1,q(1 −2α, −1) ≡Cq(α) are, respectively, the classes
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Sharp Coefficient Bounds for certain q-Starlike Functions
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Logarithmic coefficients for exponential classes of starlike and convex function
2025
Coefficient estimates for the class of q-starlike functions
2025
On compact sets possessing $q$-convex functions
2025
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 293 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback