Results & Lemmas (29)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 4
Theorem 4 of [16], under which the "singular" component is trivial, so that // is identically + °o outside of L ι n(T) and hence reduces…
Theorem 4 of [16], under which the "singular" component is trivial, so that // is identically + °o outside of L ι n(T) and hence reduces entirely to If*. This property implies the weak compactness in L ι n{T) of all the convex level sets of the functional //* (see Corollaries 2A and 2B). The sufficient condition for weak compactness which is obtained in this way may be regarded as a generalization of Nagumo's Theo- rem [12] in the calculus of variations, and it is also related to recent work of
THEOREM 1.
THEOREM 1. Assume that f(t, u(t)) is majorized by a summable
THEOREM 1. Assume that f(t, u(t)) is majorized by a summable
Theorem 2
Theorem 2] that If and If* are well-defined on L~(T) and L ι n(T), respectively, and that formulas (1.6) and (1.7) hold for p — oo and q —…
Theorem 2] that If and If* are well-defined on L~(T) and L ι n(T), respectively, and that formulas (1.6) and (1.7) hold for p — oo and q — 1. Thus for every w* G L ι n(T) and every measurable subset S of T one has ( /*(«, u*(t))dt = supjί [<u(t), iι*(t)> (2.6)
Theorem 1
Theorem 1 is satisfied if and only if WΦ 0, in which event If on LZ T) is the support function of W (regarded as a subset of Z£(T)*), so…
Theorem 1 is satisfied if and only if WΦ 0, in which event If on LZ{T) is the support function of W (regarded as a subset of Z£(T)*), so that If is the indicator of the closure of W in the weak topology induced on L~(T)* by Z£(T). Thus, if WΦ 0, the latter closure of W is by Corollary 1A the direct sum of W and a certain "singular cone." A different version of this result will be given in Corollaries 5B and 5C. Another important case of Corollary 1A occurs when C is all of Ln(T). We shall cover
THEOREM 2.
THEOREM 2. Assume that ΰeL~(T) and r > 0 have the property that f(t, ΰ(t) + x) is a summable function of t whenever < r, x e R n. Then…
THEOREM 2. Assume that ΰeL~(T) and r > 0 have the property that f(t, ΰ(t) + x) is a summable function of t whenever \x\ < r, x e R n. Then f*(t,u*(t)) is majorized by a summable function of t for at least one u* e L ι n(T), so that the hypothesis of Theorem 1 is satisfied. Moreover, in this case If is continuous (in the I/Z{T) norm) at u whenever \\u — ΰ\\ < r, and in formula (2.4) one has (2.13) δ*(vs)^v3(u) + r\\v,\\.
Theorem 2
Theorem 2 is thereby proved. The following corollary generalizes Theorem 4 of [16], where we imposed the more restrictive condition that…
Theorem 2 is thereby proved. The following corollary generalizes Theorem 4 of [16], where we imposed the more restrictive condition that f(t, x) be (finite and) essentially bounded as a function of t for every x e R n.
COROLLARY 2
COROLLARY 2A. Assume that f(t, x) is a summable function of teT for every xeR n. Then If on L~(T) and If* on L ι n(T) are well- defined…
COROLLARY 2A. Assume that f(t, x) is a summable function of teT for every xeR n. Then If on L~(T) and If* on L ι n(T) are well- defined convex functionals conjugate to each other with respect to the pairing (1.5), and If is finite and continuous throughout L™(T). Furthermore, the conjugate function 1/ on L~(T)* reduces to If* on Ln(T), in the sense that i;(v) = iAuη if v is an "absolutely continuous 97 functional corresponding to a function u* e L
COROLLARY 2
COROLLARY 2B (Weak Compactness). Let g be a normal convex integrand on T x R n whose conjugate g* has the property that g*(t, y) is…
COROLLARY 2B (Weak Compactness). Let g be a normal convex integrand on T x R n whose conjugate g* has the property that g*(t, y) is summable in t for every y e R n. Then Ig is a well-defined convex functional from Un(T) to R ι U {+ 00}, not identically +°°. Moreover, for every aeL~(T) and aeR 1 the convex level set
COROLLARY 2
COROLLARY 2C. The subgradient formula given in Corollary IB is also valid if there exists a function ΰeL~(T) satisfying the hy- pothesis of…
COROLLARY 2C. The subgradient formula given in Corollary IB is also valid if there exists a function ΰeL~(T) satisfying the hy- pothesis of Theorem 2. Moreover, for every such ΰ the subgradient set dlf(ΰ) may actually be identified with a nonempty, weakly compact subset of L ι n(T): a functional veLζ(T)* belongs to dlf(u) if and only if the "singular" component of v vanishes, and function u* e L\{T) corresponding to v satisfies (1.12).
THEOREM 3.
THEOREM 3. Let F and G be arbitrary, locally convex Hausdorff topological vector spaces with duals F* and G*. Let g be a lower
THEOREM 3. Let F and G be arbitrary, locally convex Hausdorff topological vector spaces with duals F* and G*. Let g be a lower
COROLLARY 3
COROLLARY 3A. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 3, if there is a point of the range of A at which g is finite and continuous,, then for every…
COROLLARY 3A. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 3, if there is a point of the range of A at which g is finite and continuous,, then for every yeF the subgradient set dk{y)(zF* is the image of the subgradient set dg(Ay) in G* under the transformation A*.
THEOREM 4.
THEOREM 4. Assume that ΰ e Cn(T) and r > 0 have the property that f(t, ΰ(t) + x) is a summable function of t whenever < r, x 6 R n. Then Jf…
THEOREM 4. Assume that ΰ e Cn(T) and r > 0 have the property that f(t, ΰ(t) + x) is a summable function of t whenever \x\ < r, x 6 R n. Then Jf is a well-defined, lower semicontinuous, convex functional from Cn(T) to R 1 U {+ °°}, and Jf is finite and continuous at every ueCn(T) such that \\u — ΰ\\ < r. Furthermore, Jf on Mn(T) satisfies
COROLLARY 4
COROLLARY 4A. Assume that f(t, x) is a summable function of t for every xeR n. Then the functional Jf on Cn T) is well-defined, finite,…
COROLLARY 4A. Assume that f(t, x) is a summable function of t for every xeR n. Then the functional Jf on Cn{T) is well-defined, finite, continuous and convex. The conjugate functional J* on Mn(T) is given by
COROLLARY 4
COROLLARY 4B. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 4, a measure μeMn(T) belongs to the subgradient set djf(u), where ueCn(T), if and only if…
COROLLARY 4B. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 4, a measure μeMn(T) belongs to the subgradient set djf(u), where ueCn(T), if and only if there exists an absolutely continuous measure μ'eCn{T) satisfying (3.11) —(ί) e dft(u(t)) for almost every t , dt such that the linear functional on Cn{T) corresponding to μ — μ r attains its maximum over the set E at u. In fact, if u has the property that the function f(t, u(t) + x) is summable in t for every x in some neighborhood of 0 in R
LEMMA 1.
LEMMA 1. The recession function h of f* is a normal convex integrand on T x R n.
LEMMA 1. The recession function h of f* is a normal convex integrand on T x R n.
Theorem 2
Theorem 2]. To state the main result of this section, we recall that the multifunction D: t —> D(t) is said to be lower semicontinuous from…
Theorem 2]. To state the main result of this section, we recall that the multifunction D: t —> D(t) is said to be lower semicontinuous from T to R n if, whenever U is an open subset of R n and tQ is an element of T such that D(tQ) Π U Φ 0 , there exists a neighborhood V of tQ such that D(t) n U Φ 0 for every teV. We shall say that D is fully lower semicontinuous if D is lower semicontinuous and, in ad- dition, one has x0 e cl D(tQ) whenever there are neighborhoods U and
THEOREM 5.
THEOREM 5. Assume that T is a compact space with no nonempty open sets of measure zero, and that the multifunction D: t —> D(t) is fully…
THEOREM 5. Assume that T is a compact space with no nonempty open sets of measure zero, and that the multifunction D: t —> D(t) is fully lower semicontinuous, with int D(t) Φ 0 for every t. Assume further that \ I /(ί, x) \dt< + oo JV whenever V is an open subset of T and x is a point of R n having a neighborhood U such that U c D(t) for all te V.
LEMMA 2.
LEMMA 2. Let D: £ —> D(t) aR n be a multifunction such that D(t) is for each t a convex set with int D(t) Φ 0, and let (4.5) G = (t, x) int…
LEMMA 2. Let D: £ —> D(t) aR n be a multifunction such that D(t) is for each t a convex set with int D(t) Φ 0 , and let (4.5) G = {(t, x)\xe int D(t)} c Γ x R n . (a) D is lower semicontinuous if and only if G = int G; (b) D is fully lower semicontinuous if and only if G — int cl G.
Theorem 4
Theorem 4 is satisfied if the ΰ in that hypothesis is taken to be any function satisfying (4.3). In this way we obtain the fact that Jf is…
Theorem 4 is satisfied if the ΰ in that hypothesis is taken to be any function satisfying (4.3). In this way we obtain the fact that Jf is a well-defined, lower semicontinuous convex functional from Cn(T) to R ι U {+ °°} such that Jf is finite and continuous at each element u of Cn(T) satisfying (4.3). Our next step is to show that the functions satisfying (4.3) con- stitute the interior of the set E in (3.6). They are certainly contained in int E by the above. On the other hand, let ΰ be a func
Theorem 6
Theorem 6 furnishes an integral representation of <?£- which can be substituted in (4.13): (4.14) δUμ - μ') = ( δξw(d(μ ~ μ')ldθ f)dθ f,…
Theorem 6 furnishes an integral representation of <?£- which can be substituted in (4.13): (4.14) δUμ - μ') = ( δξw(d(μ ~ μ')ldθ f)dθ f , where Q(t) = cl D(t), and θ f is any nonnegative measure in M^T) with respect to which μ — μ' is absolutely continuous. Since μ f is absolutely continuous with respect to dt, we can take dθ' be of the form dt + dθ, where θ is an arbitrary, singular, nonnegative measure in M^T) with respect to which the singular part v of μ is absolutely continuous. By virtue o
THEOREM 6.
THEOREM 6. Assume T is compact. Let Q: T—*R n be a lower semicontinuous multifunction such that Q(t) is for every t a non- empty, closed…
THEOREM 6. Assume T is compact. Let Q: T—*R n be a lower semicontinuous multifunction such that Q(t) is for every t a non- empty, closed convex set. Let ft = f(t, •) be the indicator of Q(t), so that /* is the support function of Q{t), and let (4.19) K= {ue Cn(T) \ u{t) e Q(t), VteT} .
Theorem 3.2
Theorem 3.2]. To show that / and /* are normal convex integrands, it suffices by [17, Theorem 3] to show that the multifunction Q is…
Theorem 3.2]. To show that / and /* are normal convex integrands, it suffices by [17, Theorem 3] to show that the multifunction Q is measurable. The measurability of Q follows in fact from lower semicontinuity, as has been observed by Castaing: for any closed set W(zR n, one has {teT\Q(t)Π WΦ 0 } = U Π{teT\Q(t)f] W?Φ0}
Theorem 5
Theorem 5 about subgradients. Let N: T—> R n be a multifunction such that N(t) is for each t a convex cone containing the origin. A measure…
Theorem 5 about subgradients. Let N: T—> R n be a multifunction such that N(t) is for each t a convex cone containing the origin. A measure v e Mn{T) will be called N-valued, if one has (dv/dθ)(t) e N(t) except for a set of θ- measure zero, where M s a nonnegative measure in Mγ(T) with respect to which v is absolutely continuous. (Note that this defi- nition does not depend on the particular θ, inasmuch as N(t) is closed under multiplication by nonnegative scalars.) We shall be interested in the
COROLLARY 5
COROLLARY 5A. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 5, a measure μeMn(T) belongs to the subgradίent set dJf(u), where ueCn(T), if and only if…
COROLLARY 5A. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 5, a measure μeMn(T) belongs to the subgradίent set dJf(u), where ueCn(T), if and only if dμ/dt satisfies (3.11'), u(t) belongs to cl D(t) for every t, and the singular component v of μ is N-valued in the above sense, where N(t) is the normal cone (5.1) to cl D(t) at u{t).
COROLLARY 5
COROLLARY 5B. Let Q:T-+R n be a measurable multifunction such that Q(t) is for each t a nonempty, closed, convex set, and let ft = f(t, •)…
COROLLARY 5B. Let Q:T-+R n be a measurable multifunction such that Q(t) is for each t a nonempty, closed, convex set, and let ft = f(t, •) be the support function of Q(t). Assume that the hypothesis of Theorem 5 is satisfied by f (which is a normal convex integrand). Let W be the convex subset of Mn{T) consisting of all the absolutely continuous measures μ such that (5.5) ^~{t) e Q(t) for almost every t. dt Then Jf is the support function of W on Cn{T), and the following conditions on a measure
COROLLARY 5
COROLLARY 5C. The conclusions of Corollary 5B remain valid if, instead of assuming that Q is measurable, and that the hypothesis of Theorem…
COROLLARY 5C. The conclusions of Corollary 5B remain valid if, instead of assuming that Q is measurable, and that the hypothesis of Theorem 5 is satisfied by f, one assumes the following: T is com- pact (with no nonempty open sets of measure zero),the set D(t) has a nonempty interior which is independent of t, and for each x in this interior f(t, x) is summable (measurable) function of t.
COROLLARY 5
COROLLARY 5D. Let the assumptions of either Corollary 5B or
COROLLARY 5D. Let the assumptions of either Corollary 5B or
Corollary 5
Corollary 5C be satisfied, and let W denote the set of all measures μ G Mn(T) for which condition (b) of Corollary 5B holds. Then the set…
Corollary 5C be satisfied, and let W denote the set of all measures μ G Mn(T) for which condition (b) of Corollary 5B holds. Then the set (5.8) Wa,a = iμ e W I ί adμ ^ o\ is weak* compact in Mn(T) for any aeCn(T) satisfying (5.9) -a(t) e int D(t) for every teT , and any real number a.
COROLLARY 6
COROLLARY 6A. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 6, the normal cone to the convex set K at a point ue K is the set of all N-valued measures…
COROLLARY 6A. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 6, the normal cone to the convex set K at a point ue K is the set of all N-valued measures μeMn(T), where N{t) is for each t the normal cone to Q(t) at u(t). Added in proof. See [23] for additional references and results along the lines of this paper. REFERENCES 1. N. Bourbaki, Espaces Vectorίels Topologiques, Hermann et Cie., Paris, 1953. 2. C. Castaing, Sur les multi-applications measurables, These, Faculte des Sciences, Caen, 1967. This has partly
Related Papers