🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Results & Lemmas (8)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1 Lemma 1 If p ∈P is od the form (12), then c1 = 2ζ1, (13) c2 = 2ζ2 1 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)ζ2 (14) and c3 = 2ζ3 1 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)(2ζ1 −ζ1ζ2)ζ2 + 2(1…
Lemma 1 If p ∈P is od the form (12), then c1 = 2ζ1, (13) c2 = 2ζ2 1 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)ζ2 (14) and c3 = 2ζ3 1 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)(2ζ1 −ζ1ζ2)ζ2 + 2(1 −|ζ1|2)(1 −|ζ2|2)ζ3 (15) for some ζ1, ζ2, ζ3 ∈D := {z ∈C : |z| ≤1}. For ζ1 ∈T, there is a unique function p ∈P with c1 as in (13), namely, p(z) = 1 + ζ1z 1 −ζ1z , z ∈D.
Lemma 2 Lemma 2 ([4]) For real numbers A, B, C, let Y (A, B, C):= max  |A + Bz + Cz2| + 1 −|z|2: z ∈D
Lemma 2 ([4]) For real numbers A, B, C, let Y (A, B, C) := max  |A + Bz + Cz2| + 1 −|z|2 : z ∈D
Theorem 1 Theorem 1 If f ∈S∗, then |Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2| ≤13 12. (20) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 1 If f ∈S∗, then |Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2| ≤13 12. (20) The inequality is sharp.
Lemma 2 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Lemma 2 for 0 < ζ1 ≤ζ0 1 we get Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤1 3ζ1(1 −ζ2 1) (−|A| + |B| + |C|) = ρ(ζ1), where ρ(t):= 1 12(−24t4 + 8t2 + 3), t ∈[0, 1].…
Lemma 2 for 0 < ζ1 ≤ζ0 1 we get Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤1 3ζ1(1 −ζ2 1) (−|A| + |B| + |C|) = ρ(ζ1), where ρ(t) := 1 12(−24t4 + 8t2 + 3), t ∈[0, 1]. Since ρ′(t) = 0 for t ∈(0, 1) holds only for t0 = √ 6/6 > ζ0 1, we see that the function ρ is increasing in [0, ζ0 1] and therefore
Theorem 2 Theorem 2 If f ∈C, then Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤1 33. (26) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 2 If f ∈C, then Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤1 33. (26) The inequality is sharp.
Lemma 2 Repeated OCR label — verify against source Lemma 2 for 0 < ζ1 < ζ0 1 we get Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤1 24ζ1(1 −ζ2 1) (−|A| + |B| + |C|) = ρ(ζ1), where ρ(t):= 1 144(−11t4 + 4t2 + 4), t ∈[0, 1].
Lemma 2 for 0 < ζ1 < ζ0 1 we get Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤1 24ζ1(1 −ζ2 1) (−|A| + |B| + |C|) = ρ(ζ1), where ρ(t) := 1 144(−11t4 + 4t2 + 4), t ∈[0, 1].
Theorem 3 Theorem 3 If f ∈P′, then Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤17 144. (32) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 3 If f ∈P′, then Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤17 144. (32) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 4 Theorem 4 If f ∈T, then Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤7 3. (38) The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 4 If f ∈T , then Γ1Γ3 −(Γ2)2 ≤7 3. (38) The inequality is sharp.

Related Papers

Second Hankel determinant of logarithmic coefficients of inverse strongly starli
2024
The sharp bound of the third Hankel determinant for Convex functions of order -1
2023
Successive Logarithmic Coefficients of Univalent Functions
2023
An evolutionary approach to the coefficient problems in the class of starlike fu
2023
Hankel, Toeplitz, and Hermitian-Toeplitz Determinants for Certain Close-to-conve
2022
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 293 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback