🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Results & Lemmas (12)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1.1 Lemma 1.1 ([8]) The following inequality holds for t ∈(0,∞): lnt – 1 t < ψ(t) < lnt – 1 2t, (1.5) where ψ represents the digamma function,…
Lemma 1.1 ([8]) The following inequality holds for t ∈(0,∞): lnt – 1 t < ψ(t) < lnt – 1 2t , (1.5) where ψ represents the digamma function, that is the derivative of the logarithm of  func- tion.
Lemma 1.2 Lemma 1.2 ([6, Satz IX]) If Aj n∈N is a nonnegative real sequence with A1 = 1, such that jAj j∈N and jAj – (j + 1)Aj+1 j∈N are…
Lemma 1.2 ([6, Satz IX]) If {Aj}n∈N is a nonnegative real sequence with A1 = 1, such that {jAj}j∈N and {jAj – (j + 1)Aj+1}j∈N are nonincreasing sequences, then f (z) = ∞ j=1 Ajzj is star- like in U.
Lemma 1.3 Lemma 1.3 ([23, Corollary 7 and Theorem 8′]) Assume that 0 ≤jAj ≤··· ≤2A2 ≤1, or 2 ≥jAj ≥··· ≥2A2 ≥1, where f can be expressed by f (z) = z…
Lemma 1.3 ([23, Corollary 7 and Theorem 8′]) Assume that 0 ≤jAj ≤··· ≤2A2 ≤1, or 2 ≥jAj ≥··· ≥2A2 ≥1, where f can be expressed by f (z) = z + ∞ j=2 Ajzj, z ∈U, then the function f is close-to-convex with respect to –log(1 – z).
Lemma 1.4 Lemma 1.4 Assume that f (z) = z + ∞ j=1 A2j+1z2j+1, z ∈U, is an odd function such that 0 ≤(1 + 2j)A2j+1 ≤··· ≤3A3 ≤1, or 2 ≥(1 + 2j)A2j+1…
Lemma 1.4 Assume that f (z) = z + ∞ j=1 A2j+1z2j+1, z ∈U, is an odd function such that 0 ≤(1 + 2j)A2j+1 ≤··· ≤3A3 ≤1, or 2 ≥(1 + 2j)A2j+1 ≥··· ≥3A3 ≥1, for all n ∈N. Then, f ∈Cg∗⊂S. 2 Main results The first two theorems of this section contain some interesting and useful results involving the order of starlikeness and the order of convexity of Uσ,r. The proofs use the inequalities for the digamma function and its derivative that have been proved in [8].
Theorem 2.1 Theorem 2.1 Let σ ∈(–1,0) ∪(0,+∞) and r ∈C, such that ln(1 + σ) + ln2 – 1 1 + σ – 3 2 – ln|r| ≥0, (2.1) and 0 ≤α ≤3|σ| – 2|r| 3|σ| – |r|.…
Theorem 2.1 Let σ ∈(–1,0) ∪(0,+∞) and r ∈C, such that ln(1 + σ) + ln2 – 1 1 + σ – 3 2 – ln|r| ≥0, (2.1) and 0 ≤α ≤3|σ| – 2|r| 3|σ| – |r| . (2.2) Then, Uσ,r ∈S∗(α).
Theorem 2.2 Theorem 2.2 Let σ ∈(–1,0) ∪(0,+∞) and r ∈C, such that ln(σ + 1) + ln2 – 1 σ + 1 – 2 – ln|r| ≥0, (2.10) and 0 ≤α ≤3|σ| – 4|r| 3|σ| – 2|r|.…
Theorem 2.2 Let σ ∈(–1,0) ∪(0,+∞) and r ∈C, such that ln(σ + 1) + ln2 – 1 σ + 1 – 2 – ln|r| ≥0, (2.10) and 0 ≤α ≤3|σ| – 4|r| 3|σ| – 2|r|. (2.11) Then, Uσ,r ∈K(α).
Theorem 2.3 Theorem 2.3 Let σ ≥r with r ∈(0,+∞). Then, the function z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is starlike in U.
Theorem 2.3 Let σ ≥r with r ∈(0,+∞). Then, the function z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is starlike in U.
Theorem 2.4 Theorem 2.4 Let σ ≥r 2 with r ∈(0,+∞) and 32σ 2 + 32(1 – r)σ – 32r + 3r2 ≥0, (2.20) Then, z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is starlike in U.
Theorem 2.4 Let σ ≥r 2 with r ∈(0,+∞) and 32σ 2 + 32(1 – r)σ – 32r + 3r2 ≥0, (2.20) Then, z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is starlike in U.
Theorem 2.5 Theorem 2.5 Let σ ≥2r with r ∈(0,+∞). Then, the function z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is convex in U.
Theorem 2.5 Let σ ≥2r with r ∈(0,+∞). Then, the function z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is convex in U.
Theorem 2.6 Theorem 2.6 Let σ ≥r with r ∈(0,+∞), and suppose that 32σ 2 + 32(1 – 2r)σ + 9r2 – 64r ≥0, (2.30) Then, z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is convex function in…
Theorem 2.6 Let σ ≥r with r ∈(0,+∞), and suppose that 32σ 2 + 32(1 – 2r)σ + 9r2 – 64r ≥0, (2.30) Then, z 1+z ∗Uσ,r(z) is convex function in U.
Theorem 2.7 Theorem 2.7 If σ ≥r 4 with r ∈(0,+∞), then (zcos√z) ∗Uσ,r(z) is a close-to-convex func- tion in U with respect to –log(1 – z).
Theorem 2.7 If σ ≥r 4 with r ∈(0,+∞), then (zcos√z) ∗Uσ,r(z) is a close-to-convex func- tion in U with respect to –log(1 – z).
Theorem 2.8 Theorem 2.8 If σ ≥r 8 with r ∈(0,+∞), then (sinz) ∗Uσ,r(z2) z is a close-to-convex function in U with respect to log  1+z 1–z.
Theorem 2.8 If σ ≥r 8 with r ∈(0,+∞), then (sinz) ∗Uσ,r(z2) z is a close-to-convex function in U with respect to log  1+z 1–z.
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback