🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

The main motive of this paper is to find an upper bound of the fourth Hankel determinant H4,1 f  for a subclass S, with hyperbolic domain.

Results & Lemmas (15)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1. Lemma 1. [18] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A, then c2 – νc2 1 ≤      –4ν + 2 (ν ≤0), 2 (0 ≤ν ≤1) 4ν – 2 (ν…
Lemma 1. [18] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A, then c2 – νc2 1 ≤      –4ν + 2 (ν ≤0), 2 (0 ≤ν ≤1) 4ν – 2 (ν ≥1).
Lemma 2. Lemma 2. [22] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N |µcncm – cn+m| ≤ ( 2 0 ≤µ ≤1 2|2µ – 1|…
Lemma 2. [22] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N |µcncm – cn+m| ≤ ( 2 0 ≤µ ≤1 2|2µ – 1| otherwise
Lemma 3. Lemma 3. [16] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N c3 1 – 2c1c2 + c3
Lemma 3. [16] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N c3 1 – 2c1c2 + c3
Theorem 1. Theorem 1. Let f(z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) and has the form (1). Then |an| ≤2T2 |1 –…
Theorem 1. Let f(z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) and has the form (1). Then |an| ≤2T2 |1 – b| n 1 – k2 , for all n ≥2 (9) These inqualities is sharp.
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5). Then for a real number µ, we have a3 –…
Theorem 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) . Then for a real number µ, we have a3 – µa2 2 ≤T2 |1 – b| 3 1 – k2     
Corollary 1. Corollary 1. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then for µ = 1,we have a3 – a2 2 ≤2T2 |1…
Corollary 1. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then for µ = 1,we have a3 – a2 2 ≤2T2 |1 – b| 3 1 – k2 . (19) 06
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then |a4 – a2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 – k2.…
Theorem 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then |a4 – a2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 – k2 . (20)
Corollary 2. Corollary 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then |a4 – µa2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 –…
Corollary 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then |a4 – µa2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 – k2 + (1 – µ) 2T4 1 – b 2 3 1 – k22 . (22)
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a2a4 – a2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 18 1 –…
Theorem 4. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a2a4 – a2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 18 1 – k22 . (23)
Corollary 3. Corollary 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a2a4 – µa2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 2 1 –…
Corollary 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a2a4 – µa2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 2 1 – k22  1 – 4 9µ  .
Theorem 5. Theorem 5. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then H3,1 f  ≤T6 1 – b 3 3 1 – k23…
Theorem 5. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then H3,1 f  ≤T6 1 – b 3 3 1 – k23 + 17T4 1 – b 2 18 1 – k22 . (26)
Theorem 6. Theorem 6. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a5 – a2 3 ≤4T2 1 – b  45 1 – k2.…
Theorem 6. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a5 – a2 3 ≤4T2 1 – b  45 1 – k2 . (28)
Theorem 7. Theorem 7. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then |a2a5 – a3a4| ≤2T4 1 – b 2 15 1 –…
Theorem 7. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then |a2a5 – a3a4| ≤2T4 1 – b 2 15 1 – k22 . (29)
Theorem 8. Theorem 8. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a3a5 – a2 4 ≤T4 1 – b 2 15 1 –…
Theorem 8. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a3a5 – a2 4 ≤T4 1 – b 2 15 1 – k22 . (30)
Theorem 9. Theorem 9. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then H4,1 f  ≤44T8 1 – b 4 1575 1 –…
Theorem 9. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then H4,1 f  ≤44T8 1 – b 4 1575 1 – k24 + 91T6 1 – b 3 750 1 – k23 . (31)
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 293 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback