🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

The main motive of this paper is to find an upper bound of the fourth Hankel determinant H4,1 f  for a subclass S, with hyperbolic domain.

Results & Lemmas (15)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1. Lemma 1. [18] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A, then c2 – νc2 1 ≤      –4ν + 2 (ν ≤0), 2 (0 ≤ν ≤1) 4ν – 2 (ν…
Lemma 1. [18] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A, then c2 – νc2 1 ≤      –4ν + 2 (ν ≤0), 2 (0 ≤ν ≤1) 4ν – 2 (ν ≥1).
Lemma 2. Lemma 2. [22] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N |µcncm – cn+m| ≤ ( 2 0 ≤µ ≤1 2|2µ – 1|…
Lemma 2. [22] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N |µcncm – cn+m| ≤ ( 2 0 ≤µ ≤1 2|2µ – 1| otherwise
Lemma 3. Lemma 3. [16] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N c3 1 – 2c1c2 + c3
Lemma 3. [16] If p (z) ∈P and of the form p(z) = z + P∞ n=2 an zn, z ∈A,, then, for all n, m ∈N c3 1 – 2c1c2 + c3
Theorem 1. Theorem 1. Let f(z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) and has the form (1). Then |an| ≤2T2 |1 –…
Theorem 1. Let f(z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) and has the form (1). Then |an| ≤2T2 |1 – b| n 1 – k2 , for all n ≥2 (9) These inqualities is sharp.
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5). Then for a real number µ, we have a3 –…
Theorem 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) . Then for a real number µ, we have a3 – µa2 2 ≤T2 |1 – b| 3 1 – k2     
Corollary 1. Corollary 1. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then for µ = 1,we have a3 – a2 2 ≤2T2 |1…
Corollary 1. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then for µ = 1,we have a3 – a2 2 ≤2T2 |1 – b| 3 1 – k2 . (19) 06
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then |a4 – a2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 – k2.…
Theorem 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1 and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then |a4 – a2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 – k2 . (20)
Corollary 2. Corollary 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then |a4 – µa2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 –…
Corollary 2. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then |a4 – µa2a3| ≤T2 |1 – b| 6 1 – k2 + (1 – µ) 2T4 1 – b 2 3 1 – k22 . (22)
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a2a4 – a2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 18 1 –…
Theorem 4. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a2a4 – a2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 18 1 – k22 . (23)
Corollary 3. Corollary 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a2a4 – µa2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 2 1 –…
Corollary 3. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a2a4 – µa2 3 ≤T4 1 – b 2 2 1 – k22  1 – 4 9µ  .
Theorem 5. Theorem 5. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then H3,1 f  ≤T6 1 – b 3 3 1 – k23…
Theorem 5. If f (z) ∈K – ST a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then H3,1 f  ≤T6 1 – b 3 3 1 – k23 + 17T4 1 – b 2 18 1 – k22 . (26)
Theorem 6. Theorem 6. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a5 – a2 3 ≤4T2 1 – b  45 1 – k2.…
Theorem 6. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a5 – a2 3 ≤4T2 1 – b  45 1 – k2 . (28)
Theorem 7. Theorem 7. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then |a2a5 – a3a4| ≤2T4 1 – b 2 15 1 –…
Theorem 7. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then |a2a5 – a3a4| ≤2T4 1 – b 2 15 1 – k22 . (29)
Theorem 8. Theorem 8. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then a3a5 – a2 4 ≤T4 1 – b 2 15 1 –…
Theorem 8. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then a3a5 – a2 4 ≤T4 1 – b 2 15 1 – k22 . (30)
Theorem 9. Theorem 9. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5), then H4,1 f  ≤44T8 1 – b 4 1575 1 –…
Theorem 9. If f (z) ∈K – SL a, b  where 0 < k < 1, and a, b are taken according to (4) and (5) , then H4,1 f  ≤44T8 1 – b 4 1575 1 – k24 + 91T6 1 – b 3 750 1 – k23 . (31)
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Subordination Associated with Laguerre polynomial
2026
Coefficient problems of Starlike Functions Related to a Balloon-Shaped Domain
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for the Exponential Starlike class
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #5,181 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback