🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Ma-Minda φ-classes studied in this paper:

Results & Lemmas (9)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1 Lemma 1. ([6]) For a function of the form (6), the sharp inequality holds for each. Equality holds for the function.
Lemma 1. ([6]) For a function $p(z) \in P$ of the form (6), the sharp inequality $|p_n| \leq 2$ holds for each $n \geq 1$ . Equality holds for the function $p(z) = \frac{1+z}{1-z}$ .
Lemma 2 Lemma 2. ([7]) Let be a function of the form (6) and. Then If, then the inequality is sharp for the function or its rotations. If, then the…
Lemma 2. ([7]) Let $p(z) \in P$ be a function of the form (6) and $\mu \in \mathbb{C}$ . Then $$|p_n - \mu p_k p_{n-k}| \le 2 \max\{1, |2\mu - 1|\}, \ 1 \le k \le n - 1.$$ If $|2\mu - 1| \ge 1$ , then the inequality is sharp for the function $p(z) = \frac{1+z}{1-z}$ or its rotations. If $|2\mu - 1| < 1$ , then the inequality is sharp for the function $p(z) = \frac{1+z^n}{1-z^n}$ or its rotations.
Lemma 3 Lemma 3. ([10]) Let be a function of the form (6) and. Then
Lemma 3. ([10]) Let $p(z) \in P$ be a function of the form (6) and $\alpha, \beta, \gamma \in \Re$ . Then $$|\alpha p_1^3 - \beta p_1 p_2 + \gamma p_3| \le 2 |\alpha| + 2 |\beta - 2\alpha| + 2 |\alpha - \beta + \gamma|.$$
Theorem 1 · coeff Theorem 1. Let. Then and
Theorem 1. Let $f(z) \in S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ . Then $$|a_2| \le \frac{1}{2},$$ $|a_3| \le \frac{1}{2},$ $|a_4| \le \frac{25}{96},$ and $$|a_5| \le \frac{7}{24}.$$
Theorem 2 Theorem 2. Let. Then and
Theorem 2. Let $f(z) \in S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ . Then $$|\Gamma_1| \le \frac{1}{4},$$ $$|\Gamma_2| \le \frac{1}{4},$$ $$|\Gamma_3| \le \frac{41}{192},$$ and $$|\Gamma_4| \le \frac{197}{256}.$$
Theorem 3 Theorem 3. Let. Then
Theorem 3. Let $f(z) \in S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ . Then $$\left| H_{2,1} \left( \Gamma_{f^{-1}} \right) \right| \le \frac{95}{768}.$$
Theorem 4 Theorem 4. Let. Then
Theorem 4. Let $f(z) \in S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ . Then $$|H_{2,2}(\Gamma_{f^{-1}})| \le \frac{7691}{36864}.$$
Theorem 5 Theorem 5. Let. Then
Theorem 5. Let $f(z) \in S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ . Then $$\left|T_{2,1}\left(\Gamma_{f^{-1}}\right)\right| \le \frac{9}{32}.$$
Theorem 6 Theorem 6. Let. Then
Theorem 6. Let $f(z) \in S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ . Then $$\left| T_{2,2} \left( \Gamma_{f^{-1}} \right) \right| \le \frac{7165}{9216}.$$

Definitions (1)

Def 1 Definition 1. Let be the class of functions defined by where is an analytic univalent function and Remark 1. Changing the function in…
Definition 1. Let $S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ be the class of functions defined by $$\frac{zf'(z)}{h(z)} \prec \phi(z), z \in E,$$ where $\phi\left(z\right)=e^{z},$ is an analytic univalent function and $h\left(z\right)=\frac{f\left(z\right)-\overline{f\left(-z\right)}}{2}.$ Remark 1. Changing the function $\phi(z)$ in Definition 1 gives us more subclasses of starlike functions with respect to symmetric conjugate points: - (i) For $\phi(z) = \frac{1+z}{1-z}$ , which has been introduced and studied in [8]. - (ii) For $\phi(z) = \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}$ , $-1 \le B < A \le 1$ , which has been introduced and studied in [14]. - (iii) For $\phi(z) = \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}$ , $-1 \le B < A \le 1$ and considering the tilted factor $e^{i\alpha}$ , $|\alpha| < \frac{\pi}{2}$ , which has been defined and investigated in [25]. - (iv) For $\phi(z) = 1 + \sin z$ , which has been defined and studied in [26]. It is observed that there have been few studies on Hankel and Toeplitz determinants, whose entries are logarithmic coefficients of inverse functions for the subclass of univalent functions, particularly starlike functions with respect to other points, i.e., symmetric points, conjugate points, and symmetric conjugate points. We can refer the reader to [8, 9], who were among the early researchers who investigated these subclasses. Some researchers, including [14, 20, 21, 25–27], and references therein, have also carried out comprehensive studies related to these subclasses, which may provide diverse insights. Thus, inspired by the ideas of [11, 12, 18], in this paper, we aim to estimate the upper bounds of the initial Taylor coefficients $|a_n|$ , n=2,3,4,5, logarithmic coefficients of inverse functions $|\Gamma_n|$ , n=1,2,3,4, and the second order Hankel and Toeplitz determinants whose entries are logarithmic coefficients of inverse functions belonging to the new subclass $S_{SC}^*(e^z)$ , i.e., $|H_{2,1}(\Gamma_{f^{-1}})|$ , $|H_{2,2}(\Gamma_{f^{-1}})|$ , $|T_{2,1}(\Gamma_{f^{-1}})|$ , and $|T_{2,2}(\Gamma_{f^{-1}})|$ .
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 293 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback