🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Ma-Minda φ-classes studied in this paper:
Abstract

For starlike functions associated with a cardioid domain, we provide sharp bounds for the Zalcman functional a2a3 −a4 and the second and third Hankel determinants. Our result on the third Hankel determinant gives the negative answer to a conjecture given in [L. Shi et al., A study of third Hankel determinant problem for certain subfamilies of analytic functions involving cardioid domain, Mathematics, 7(5):418, 2019]. MSC: 30C45, 30C50

Results & Lemmas (6)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1. Lemma 1. (See [12,15].) Let p ∈P be given by (1.3). Then 2c2 = c2 1 + δ 4 −c2 1 , (1.4) 4c3 = c3 1 + 2  4 −c2 1  c1δ −
Lemma 1. (See [12,15].) Let p ∈P be given by (1.3). Then 2c2 = c2 1 + δ 4 −c2 1  , (1.4) 4c3 = c3 1 + 2  4 −c2 1  c1δ −
Lemma 2. Lemma 2. (See [5].) Let D:= z ∈C: |z| ⩽1, and for real numbers A, B, C, let Y (A, B, C):= max A + Bz + Cz2 + 1 −|z|2, z ∈D . If AC…
Lemma 2. (See [5].) Let D := {z ∈C: |z| ⩽1}, and for real numbers A, B, C, let Y (A, B, C) := max A + Bz + Cz2 + 1 −|z|2, z ∈D  . If AC ⩾0, then Y (A, B, C) =
Theorem 1. Theorem 1. Let f ∈S∗ car be given by (1.1). Then H2(2)(f)  ⩽4 9. The inequality is sharp for the function f1(z) = zez4/6+2z2/3 = z + 2…
Theorem 1. Let f ∈S∗ car be given by (1.1). Then H2(2)(f)  ⩽4 9. The inequality is sharp for the function f1(z) = zez4/6+2z2/3 = z + 2 3z3 + 7 18z5 + · · · .
Lemma 2 Lemma 2 gives H2(2)(f)  ⩽2 27c  4 −c2 |A| + |B| + |C|  = 19c4 −144c2 + 1728 3888:= g(c), and so max g(c), c ∈[0, 2] = g(0) = 4/9.…
Lemma 2 gives H2(2)(f)  ⩽2 27c  4 −c2 |A| + |B| + |C|  = 19c4 −144c2 + 1728 3888 := g(c), and so max{g(c), c ∈[0, 2]} = g(0) = 4/9. Using Lemma 2, we have the required result. To see that the bound |H2(2)(f)| ⩽4/9 is sharp, consider the function f1 : D →C defined as f1(z) = zez4/6+2z2/3 = z + 2 3z3 + 7
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. Let f ∈S∗ car be given by (1.1). Then H3(1)(f)  ⩽16 81. (2.7) The inequality is sharp for the function f2 defined by f2(z) =…
Theorem 2. Let f ∈S∗ car be given by (1.1). Then H3(1)(f)  ⩽16 81. (2.7) The inequality is sharp for the function f2 defined by f2(z) = ze4z3/9+z6/9 = z + 4 9z4 + · · · . (2.8)
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. Let f ∈S∗ car be given by (1.1). Then |a2a3 −a4| ⩽64 81. The inequality is sharp for the function f3 defined by f3(z) =…
Theorem 3. Let f ∈S∗ car be given by (1.1). Then |a2a3 −a4| ⩽64 81. The inequality is sharp for the function f3 defined by f3(z) = ze4z/3+z2/3 = z + 4 3z2 + 11 9 z3 + 68 81z4 + · · · .
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Subordination Associated with Laguerre polynomial
2026
Coefficient problems of Starlike Functions Related to a Balloon-Shaped Domain
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for the Exponential Starlike class
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,106 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback