Samuel L. Krushkal · 2024 📄 arXiv →
This paper is the final step in solving the problem of starlikeness of Teichmuller spaces in Bers' embedding. This step concerns the case of finite dimensional Teichmuller spaces ${\mathbf T}(g, n)$ of positive dimension (corresponding to punctured Riemann surfaces of finite conformal type $(g, n)$ with $2g - 2 + n > 0$).
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 2. For any domain $D^*$ satisfying the above assumptions on its boundary and for any t satisfying $|t| ||S_f||_{\mathbf{B}} < 2$ , the (univalent) solutions $w_t(z) = w(z,t)$ of the Schwarz equation
$$\left(\frac{w''}{w'}\right)' - \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{w''}{w'}\right)^2 = tS_f(z) \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}^*)$$
with $w_t(\infty) = \infty$ , $w_t'(\infty) = 1$ have equal Grunsky and Teichmüller norms given by
$$\varkappa(w_t) = k(w_t) = |t| ||S_f||_{\mathbf{B}}.$$
(4)
Proof. By the Ahlfors-Weill theorem [1], the functions $w_t(z)$ are univalent on $\mathbb{D}^*$ and have quasiconformal extensions to $\mathbb{D}$ with harmonic Beltrami coefficients
$$\nu_{w_t}(z) = -\frac{1}{2}(1 - |z|^2)^2 S_{w_t}(1/\overline{z}) = -\frac{t}{2}(1 - |z|^2)^2 S_f(1/\overline{z}), \quad |z| < 1.$$
(5)
Lemma 1 (actually, the equality (1)) allows one to establish by applying to the maps $w_t$ the arguments from [12], [13] that the harmonic Beltrami coefficients (5) are extremal in their equivalence classes and satisfy the equalities (4).
Remarks. Lemma 2 admits a straightforward extension to a more general situation, when the boundary curve L is the union of the finite collections of arcs of type L' and L''. Such a case appears in the proof of Theorem 1.
Note also that the common value of terms in (4) is equal to $1 - \alpha$ , where $\pi \alpha$ is the least inner angle of the interior domain D and that the maps $w_t$ with t satisfying $|t| ||S_f||_{\mathbf{B}} < 2$ do not have the extremal quasiconformal extension across the unit circle $\mathbb{S}^1$ of Teichmüller type
3. Proof of Theorem 1. Using the above lemmas, one can obtain the proof of Theorem 1 in the same line as the corresponding result for the spaces of closed Riemann surfaces in [?]. Consider the space $T(\Gamma) = \mathbf{T}(g,n)$ with $n \ge 1$ , formed by punctured Riemann surfaces X of type (g,n) and assume first that $\mathbf{T}(g,n) \ne \mathbf{T}(1,1)$ , hence dim $\mathbf{T}(g,n) > 1$ .
Fix a base point $X_0$ of the space $\mathbf{T}(g,n) = \mathbf{T}(X_0)$ represented as the quotient space $X_0 = \mathbb{D}^/\Gamma_0$ with a Fuchsian group $\Gamma_0$ acting discontinuously on $\mathbb{D}^$ and $\mathbb{D}$ , and take a surface $X \in \mathbf{T}(X_0)$ corresponding to a point $\varphi \in \mathbf{B}(\Gamma_0)$ with
$$\|\varphi\|_{\mathbf{B}(\Gamma_0)} > 2. \tag{6}$$
This point is represented by a quasifuchsian group $\Gamma_{\mu} = (f^{\mu})^{-1}\Gamma_{0}f^{\mu}$ , whose conjugating quasiconformal automorphism $f^{\mu}(z)$ of $\widehat{\mathbb{C}}$ (compatible with $\Gamma_{0}$ ) is conformal on $\mathbb{D}^{*}$ .
Consider the Ford fundamental polygon $P(\Gamma_{\mu})$ of this group in domain $(D^{\mu})^ = f^{\mu}(\mathbb{D}^)$ centered at $z = \infty$ . It has a finite number of sides (the arcs of the isometric circles of Moebius transformations $\gamma$ generating the group $\Gamma^{\mu}$ ); these sides are pairwise $\Gamma_{\mu}$ -equivalent.
In contrast to the case of closed Riemann surfaces, this polygon has a finite number of parabolic vertices $p_l$ corresponding to the punctures of $X_0$ . These vertices are located on
the boundary curve $f^{\mu}(\mathbb{S}^1)$ , and the inner angles of $P(\Gamma_{\mu})$ at these vertices are equal zero. Thus the boundary of polygon $P(\Gamma_{\mu})$ s not a quasiconformal curve, and we must use the appropriately truncated polygons.
Delete from $P(\Gamma_{\mu})$ the circular triangles $\Delta(p_l, \delta_l)$ chosen so that one of the vertices of $\Delta(p_l, \delta_l)$ is the puncture $p_l$ , his lateral sides emanate from $p_l$ and are orthogonal to the third side $\sigma_l$ of this triangle; here $\delta = \text{dist}(p_l, \sigma_l)$ . Set
$$P_{\delta}(\Gamma_0) = P(\Gamma_0) \setminus \bigcup \Delta(p_l, \delta_l),$$
and replace (smooth) the polygonal lines formed by the sides of $\Delta(p_l, \delta_l)$ opposite to vertices $p_l$ by a smooth line up to its endpoints.
Now, denoting the elements of $\Gamma_{\mu}$ by $\gamma_1 = 1, \gamma_2, \gamma_3, \ldots$ , numerated so that two successive transformations $\gamma_j, \gamma_{j+1}$ determine the adjacent polygons $\gamma_j P(\Gamma_{\mu}), \gamma_{j+1} P(\Gamma_{\mu})$ with a common side and choosing a sequence $\delta_n \to 0$ , we construct the following increasing collection of curvelinear polygons
$$\Omega_{l,1} = P_{\delta_1}(\Gamma_{\mu}), \quad \Omega_{l,2} = \gamma_1 P \delta_2(\Gamma_{\mu}) \bigcup \gamma_2 P \delta_2(\Gamma_{\mu}),
\Omega_{l,3} = \gamma_1 P \delta_3(\Gamma_{\mu}) \bigcup \gamma_2 P \delta_3(\Gamma_{\mu}) \bigcup \gamma_3 P \delta_3(\Gamma_{\mu}),
\Omega_{l,4} = \gamma_1 P \delta_4(\Gamma_{\mu}) \bigcup \gamma_2 P \delta_4(\Gamma_{\mu}) \bigcup \gamma_3 P \delta_4(\Gamma_{\mu}) \bigcup \gamma_4 P \delta_4(\Gamma_{\mu}), \dots ,$$
(7)
with vertices coming from the initial fundamental polygon $P(\Gamma_{\mu})$ . As $l \to 0$ , $j \to \infty$ , the domains $\Omega_{l,j}$ exhaust increasingly the domain $D_{\mu}^*$ .
Take the conformal maps $F_{j,l}$ of the disk $\mathbb{D}^*$ onto these domains and define their harmonic Beltrami coefficients
$$t\nu_{F_{j,l}}(z) = -\frac{t}{2}(1-|z|^2)^2 S_{F_{j,l}}(1/\overline{z}), \quad |z| < 1, \tag{8}$$
for t satisfying $|t| ||S_{F_{j,l}}||_{\mathbf{B}} < 2$ . Similar to Lemma 2, one obtains that all these harmonic coefficients are extremal in their equivalence classes; in addition, the corresponding maps $F_{j,l;t}$ have equal Teichmüller and Grunsky norms.
Since the domains (7) exhaust increasingly the Jordan (quasiconformal) domain $D_{\mu}$ , one obtains from the general Carathéodory theorem on convergence of conformal maps from the disk onto Jordan domains that the limit function
$$F(z) = \lim_{l \to 0, j \to \infty} F_{j,l}(z) \tag{9}$$
maps conformally the disk $\mathbb{D}^$ onto the exterior component $D_{\mu}^$ of domain of discontinuity of the group $\Gamma_{\mu}$ . Note that the convergence in (10) is uniform on the disk $\mathbb{D}^*$ in the spherical metric on $\widehat{\mathbb{C}}$ .
Our goal now is to establish that one of the extremal quoiconformal extensions $\widehat{F}^{\mu}$ of this limit function inherits the properties of the functions $F_{j,l}$ ; namely, its harmonic coefficient also is extremal. This is one of the crucial steps in the proof of Theorem 1.
It follows from (9) that the Beltrami coefficients (8) are convergent on the disk $\mathbb{D}$ to the harmonic Beltrami coefficient $\nu_{S_F}$ of function F; in addition, the general properties of quasiconformal maps imply
$$||S_F||_{\mathbf{B}} \le \lim_{l \to 0, j \to \infty} ||S_{F_{j,l}}||_{\mathbf{B}}.$$
(10)
We have to establish that in our situation generated by Riemann surfaces of finite type (g, n) we have in (10) the case of equality. This implies that for admissible |t| > 0 the
harmonic Beltrami coefficients $\nu_{tS_F}$ also are extremal in their equivalence classes (in the second distance $\widetilde{\tau}_{\mathbf{T}(\Gamma)}$ on $\mathbf{T}(\Gamma)$ coming from $\mathbf{T}$ ).
First observe that normalising the quasiconformal extensions $\widehat{F}(z)$ of univalent functions $F(z) = z + b_0 + b_1 z^{-1} + \dots$ on $\mathbb{D}^*$ to $\widehat{\mathbb{C}}$ additionally by $\widehat{F}(0) = 0$ , one obtains that their Teichmüller norm k(F) is plurisubharmonic on the universal Teichmüller space $\mathbf{T}$ (hence, also on $\mathbf{T}(\Gamma_{\mu})$ in both distances $\tau_{\mathbf{T}(\Gamma)}$ and $\widetilde{\tau}_{\mathbf{T}(\Gamma)}$ ; see, e.g., [10]).
Now we pass to the homotopy functions
$$F_{i,l,s}(z) = sF_{i,l}(z/s) = z + b_{0,i,l}s + b_{1,i,l}s^2z^{-1} + \dots$$
with $|s| \leq 1$ . The dilatations $k(F_{j,l,s})$ of these functions are circularly symmetric with respect to $s \in \mathbb{D}$ and hence continuous in |s| on [0,1].
But for any s with $|s| \in (0,1)$ , we have
$$||S_{F_{i,s}} - S_{F_s}||_{\mathbf{B}} \to 0 \quad \text{as} \quad j \to \infty,$$
and the plurisubharmonicity of $\varkappa(f^{\mu})$ on T implies
$$\lim_{s \to 1} \varkappa(F_{j,l,s}) = \varkappa(F_{j,l})$$
(cf. [11], [14]), while the properties of extremal quasiconformal maps yield for fixed l and j,
$$\lim_{s \to 1} k(F_{j,l,s}) = k(F_{j,l}).$$
In view of the relation between the norms $\varkappa(f)$ and k(f), all this results for $||S_F||_{\mathbf{B}} < 2$ in the relations
$$\lim_{s \to 1} k(F_{j,l,s}) = k(F_{j,l}) = \|\nu_{S_{F_{j,l}}}\|_{\infty},$$
which implies the desired equality in (10).
It follows also that all harmonic Beltrami coefficients $\nu_{tS_F}$ with norm less than 1 must be extremal in their equivalence classes, and therefore, as $\|\nu_{tS_F}\|_{\mathbf{B}} \to 1$ , the corresponding value $t_0$ must define a boundary point of both spaces $\mathbf{T}(\Gamma_{\mu})$ and $\mathbf{T}$ (i.e., $tS_F \to t_0S_F \in \partial T(\Gamma_{\mu})$ as $t \to t_0$ ).
This yields, since $\mathbf{T}(\Gamma)$ and its complementary domain in $\mathbf{B}(\Gamma)$ have a common boundary, that the subinterval of the ray $rS_F$ : r > 0 between the points $r_0S_F$ and $r_S_F$ (the second endpoint corresponds to the surface $D^_{\mu}/\Gamma_{\mu}$ obeying (6)) cannot lie entirely in $\mathbf{T}(\Gamma)$ . This proves the assertion of Theorem 2 for spaces $\mathbf{T}(g,n)$ of dimension greater than 1.
Now consider the one-dimensional case omitted above. In this case, there exist two one-dimensional Teichmüller spaces $\mathbf{T}(1,1)$ of punctured tori and $\mathbf{T}(0,4)$ with quadruples of punctures. These spaces are canonically isomorphic and either of those is conformally equivalent to the unit disk.
We need for these spaces the following result.We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.