Abstract
We introduce some classes of exponential compositions related to
Hausdorff's moment sequences. It turns out that one of these classes coincides
with the known class of analytic functions defined by the ^-difference operator.
We give sharp bounds for some functionals in the considered classes.
Results & Lemmas (20)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 1.
Lemma 1. Let /ii,/i2 £ AQ and let ui G G(hi), 0J2 G G(/i2). Then UJ1UJ2 G G(hih2).
Lemma 1. Let /ii,/i2 £ AQ and let ui G G(hi), 0J2 G G(/i2). Then UJ1UJ2 G G(hih2).
Lemma 2. · coeff
Lemma 2. Let (z,(g*u;)(z)) (2) and F(z) = (z,(g*h)(z)). (3) The equality in (1) holds for F ^ ^ 0 iff arg (^ * uj)k N-n = constant and…
Lemma 2. Let $(z, w) = Yl™k=o an,kZn'wk be a formal power series in two variables with an,k > 0 (n, k = 0,1,...), and let g,h G AQ . Then for any u G G(h) and iV=l,2,..., |{/}iv| < {F}N (1) where f(z) = $(z,(g*u;)(z)) (2) and F(z) = $(z,(g*h)(z)). (3) The equality in (1) holds for {F}^ ^ 0 iff arg{(^ * uj)k}N-n = constant and \{(g*w)k}N-n\ = {(g*h)k}N-n provided that an,k{(g*h)k}N-.n ^ 0, 0 < fc + n< N. Received July 11, 1995, revised September 4, 1995. 1991 Mathematics Subject Clas$
Lemma 3.
Lemma 3. Let g, h G AQ and UJ G G h). Let (z,w) = zew, and let f and F be defined by (2) and (3), respectively. Then M(r,f)/F(r) and…
Lemma 3. Let g, h G AQ and UJ G G{h). Let $(z,w) = zew, and let f and F be defined by (2) and (3), respectively. Then M(r,f)/F(r) and |/(re^)|/F(r) for any 0 G [0, 2IT) are non-increasing functions of r in (0,1). // 1/(^6^)1 = F{r) for some r G (0,1) and 6 G [0,27r), then f(z) = eieF(e-iez) for each zeE.$
Lemma 4.
Lemma 4. (see e.g., [15, Ch. 1]) // rj(x) and (p(x) are continuous and iy(x) is of bounded variation in [a, 6], and if fb n(x) = — I…
Lemma 4. (see e.g., [15, Ch. 1]) // rj(x) and (p(x) are continuous and iy(x) is of bounded variation in [a, 6], and if fb n(x) = — I (p(t)dv(t), x G [a, 6], Jx then pb pb I rj(x)dfi(x) = / rj(x)(f(x)du(x). J a J a
Lemma 5.
Lemma 5. If ^ x) is of bounded variation in [0,1], then
Lemma 5. If ^{x) is of bounded variation in [0,1], then
Theorem 1.
Theorem 1. A necessary and sufficient condition that the convolution of a fixed func- tion g G AQ and an arbitrary function f G AQ have the…
Theorem 1. A necessary and sufficient condition that the convolution of a fixed func- tion g G AQ and an arbitrary function f G AQ have the expression {f*g)(z)= / f(zx)dn(x), Jo zeE, (9) where rl du(t) rtx) = -f ^-, ^^(0,1], [XLL(X)}X=0 = IS(0)-IS(0+), (10) and u(t) is of bounded variation in [0,1], is that the sequence i+l-Z (ii) be bounded. Each function fi defined by (10) generates such a function g G AQ by (9) with f(z) = zn,n=l,2,....
Theorem 1
Theorem 1 that for every n = 1,2,..., an= xnd^ x) = / xn 1di/(x). Jo Jo As mentioned above, there is at most one such a function z/ which…
Theorem 1 that for every n = 1,2,..., an= xnd^{x) = / xn 1di/(x). Jo Jo As mentioned above, there is at most one such a function z/ which is of bounded variation and normalized in [0,1]. We conclude that for every admissible function g e AQ, there is at most one rep- resentation (9) which is valid for all functions / G AQ (or even for a fixed function / with {f}n 7^ 0, n > 1) if fi is defined by (10) and ri,)_rt«+o) + M»-o)| „,„_„_ Indeed, if there exists another function /i(a x)
Lemma 6.
Lemma 6. Let ii x), |/x| < oo, be nondecreasing in (0,1], and let JQ xd/i(x) < oo. Then the limit value [X/J,(X)]X-O+ exists and equals 0.
Lemma 6. Let ii{x), |/x| < oo, be nondecreasing in (0,1], and let JQ xd/i(x) < oo. Then the limit value [X/J,(X)]X-O+ exists and equals 0.
Lemma 6
Lemma 6 follows. Now let fjL(x) < 0 for 0 < x < b < 1. The formula for integration by parts gives rb rb x ix xdfi(x) = bfj,(b) - efjb(e) -…
Lemma 6 follows. Now let fjL(x) < 0 for 0 < x < b < 1. The formula for integration by parts gives rb rb x ix xdfi(x) = bfj,(b) - efjb(e) - / fi(x)da for any e G (0, b). It follows that rb / /jJ(x)dx > bfi(b) - / xdii(x) > -oo, Je Jo+ 0+ and therefore, the finite limit value /0 fi(x)dx exists. Hence, the finite limit value 7 = [£/jb(e)]e=o+ exists also. Clearly, 7 < 0. If 7 < 0, then for some c G (0, b) and a G (7,0), XIJ,(X). < a for each x G (0,c). Again using the formula for integratio
Theorem 2.
Theorem 2. ^4 necessary and sufficient condition that the convolution of a fixed func- tion g G AQ and an arbitrary function f G AQ has the…
Theorem 2. ^4 necessary and sufficient condition that the convolution of a fixed func- tion g G AQ and an arbitrary function f G AQ has the expression (f*9)(z)= I f(zx)dfi(x)i zeE, (13) where fi G M., is that the sequence {g}n, n>l is completely monotonic. Each function /i G M generates such a function g G AQ by (13) with f(z) = zn, n = 1,2,....
Corollary 1.
Corollary 1. Under the conditions of Theorem 2, /i G Mo iff the sequence g n, n > 1, is minimal completely monotonic.
Corollary 1. Under the conditions of Theorem 2, /i G Mo iff the sequence {g}n, n > 1, is minimal completely monotonic.
Theorem 3.
Theorem 3. Let h G ^4j, // G M, and let F be defined by (21). Then, for any f(z) = 2:exp /0 uj(xz)dfi(x) G ECh(^) with UJ G G(/I), (a) |…
Theorem 3. Let h G ^4j, // G M, and let F be defined by (21). Then, for any f(z) = 2:exp{/0 uj(xz)dfi(x)} G ECh(^) with UJ G G(/I), (a) |{/(z)}iv|<{}iv,iV>2, (b) \f(z)\<F(\z\),zzE. For some natural N > 2, let {h}n > 0 (n — 1,..., k) where k = min{A^ - 1, L(/x)} and L(IJL) ^ 0 is defined by (22). Then the equality in (a) holds iff {w}n = {Hze 7 '6)}^, for every n = 1,..., k and for some 9 G [0,2ir). If for some z = reie G E - {0} \f(z)\ = F(r), then for each z G E, f(z) = ei0F(e-i0z).
Lemma 2 · coeff
Lemma 2 gives equality in (a) if and only if arg ^ iv_1 = constant and tp 1 ^! = 4>1 N-1 for / = l,...,iV-1. Let I = N - 1. Then we get…
Lemma 2 gives equality in (a) if and only if arg{}iv_1 = constant and {tp 1}^! ={4>1}N-1 for / = l,...,iV-1. Let I = N - 1. Then we get |ai| = h > 0 and arg{(pz}Ar_1 = (JV-l)argai for I = 1,..., AT-l. The case k = 1 is trivial. If k > 1, then for every 1 = 2,..., iV-2, W 1}M-I ^S a sum 0^ Products of coefficients ai, a2,. •. and of a positive constant such
Theorem 4.
Theorem 4. EC (logx2) = 5*.
Theorem 4. EC (logx2) = 5*.
Theorem 5.
Theorem 5. For every q G (0,1), PSq = EC(nq) where iq G Mo and is defined by 'N x) = 2 xe[q -1) (30) /orfc = 0,l,....
Theorem 5. For every q G (0,1), PSq = EC(nq) where }iq G Mo and is defined by 'N{x) = \ogq2\ xe[q\qk-1) (30) /orfc = 0,l,....
Theorem 6.
Theorem 6. Let /JL G Mo, f G EC(ii), and let F^ be defined by (27). Then (a) f n < Ffi n,n>2, (b) M(r, f)/F^(r) and (re19) l/F^r) for any 9…
Theorem 6. Let /JL G Mo, f G EC(ii), and let F^ be defined by (27). Then (a) \{f}n\<{Ffi}n,n>2, (b) M(r, f)/F^(r) and \f (re19) l/F^r) for any 9 G [0,27r) are nonincreasing func- tions of r in (0,1). If\z\=r<l, (c) -FM(-r)<|/(z)|<^(r); (d) arg < max |C|=r -.^ ^^ / ^ nJ^ ^V, „9„9^(^)- Vo 1 xr sin 0 ^GIO^TT) J0 1 — 2xr cos 0 + :E2r2 c T/ie equality sign in (a) occurs iff f(z) = e-i$F4eiez) (32)$
Theorem 3
Theorem 3 and Lemma 3. If J0 xdfi(x) = 0, then f(z) = F^ z) = z. Otherwise, according to Theorem 3, the equality in (a) for some n > 2…
Theorem 3 and Lemma 3. If J0 xdfi(x) = 0, then f(z) = F^{z) = z. Otherwise, according to Theorem 3, the equality in (a) for some n > 2 implies that |{u;}i| = 1, where u G W is defined by (23). It follows that in this case LJ(Z) = uj*(el9z) for some 9 G [0,27r). The representation (25) implies that for each u G W < Re{uj(z)}, z G E, 1 + 1 . with equality iff w(z) = w*(eiez) where 9 = TT - argz (see e.g., [4, Ch. 7]). Using this, (23), and (27), we obtain the left-hand inequality in (c). O
Corollary 2.
Corollary 2. The Koebe domain for the class EC(fi) is the open disk centered at zero with the radius r(M)=exp -^ j^M*) - In particular, we…
Corollary 2. The Koebe domain for the class EC(fi) is the open disk centered at zero with the radius r(M)=exp{-^ j^M*)}- In particular, we have the well-known value r(logx2) = 1/4 for the class 5* and a new result r(fiq) = exp < 2(logg) Sfclo T+^ \ for the class PSq where fj,q is defined by (30).
Theorem 7.
Theorem 7. Let /i G Mo, then EC(fi) C GS iff f1 ^M < oo. (33) Jo 1 — x
Theorem 7. Let /i G Mo, then EC(fi) C GS iff f1 ^M < oo. (33) Jo 1 — x
Theorem 8. · coeff
Theorem 8. Let fj, G Mo and for some real numbers Xk, k = 1,..., n liny^Xklk xkdfi(x)) sinfc0 = O. (39) For each f G EC(fi), let n M(/) =…
Theorem 8. Let fj, G Mo and for some real numbers Xk, k = 1,..., n liny^Xklk xkdfi(x)) sinfc0 = O. (39) For each f G EC(fi), let n M(/) = X>*|2 (40) k=i where the logarithmic coefficients /?& are defined by (38). Finally, let F^ be defined by (27). Then F^ maximizes the functional M(/) on the class EC(fi). If the sum in (39) is not identically zero, then only the function F^ and its rotations maximize this functional on EC(fi). mm 0€p
Function classes studied:
Related Papers