🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

medical imaging
Ma-Minda φ-classes studied in this paper:
Abstract

The association of subordination and special functions is used to find sharp estimates on the parameter $β$ such that the analytic function $p(z)$ is subordinate to certain functions having positive real part whenever $p(z)+βz p'(z)$ is subordinate to the Janowski function. Further, when the traditional approach of solving higher order differential subordination implications failed, the concept of admissibility is employed to establish certain second and third order differential subordination re

Results & Lemmas (12)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1.3 Lemma 1.3. [23, Theorem 3.4h, p.132] Let be analytic and and v be analytic in a domain with whenever. Set and. Suppose that - (i) either…
Lemma 1.3. [23, Theorem 3.4h, p.132] Let $q : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C}$ be analytic and $\psi$ and v be analytic in a domain $U \supseteq q(\mathbb{D})$ with $\psi(w) \neq 0$ whenever $w \in q(\mathbb{D})$ . Set $$Q(z) := zq'(z)\psi(q(z))$$ and $h(z) := v(q(z)) + Q(z), z \in \mathbb{D}$ . Suppose that - (i) either h(z) is convex, or Q(z) is starlike univalent in $\mathbb D$ and - (ii) $\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{zh'(z)}{Q(z)}\right) > 0, z \in \mathbb{D}.$ If p is analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ , with p(0) = q(0), $p(\mathbb{D}) \subset U$ and $$v(p(z)) + zp'(z)\psi(p(z)) \prec v(q(z)) + zq'(z)\psi(q(z))$$ then $p \prec q$ , and q is the best dominant.
Theorem 1.4 Theorem 1.4. [15, Theorem 1(a)] Let a, b and c be non-zero real numbers such that. Then,
Theorem 1.4. [15, Theorem 1(a)] Let a, b and c be non-zero real numbers such that $0 < a \le b \le c$ . Then, $$1 - \frac{ab}{b+c} \le \sigma(zF(a,b;c;z)) \le 1 - \frac{ab}{2c}.$$
Theorem 2.1 Theorem 2.1. We assume (2.1) and (2.2) where. Let p be an analytic function defined on with p(0) = 1 and satisfying. If, then (a), where…
Theorem 2.1. We assume $$\chi(\beta, A, B) := -\frac{A - B}{\beta + 1} \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{\Gamma(j)}{(j-1)!(1+\beta+j\beta)} B^j + \frac{\beta}{\beta+1} + \frac{1}{\beta+1}$$ (2.1) and $$\xi(\beta, A, B) := \frac{(A - B)}{\beta + 1} \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{\Gamma(j)}{(j - 1)!(1 + \beta + j\beta)} (-B)^j - \frac{\beta}{\beta + 1} - \frac{1}{\beta + 1}$$ (2.2) where $-1 \le B < A \le 1$ . Let p be an analytic function defined on $\mathbb D$ with p(0) = 1 and satisfying $$p(z) + \beta z p'(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}$$ . If $\beta \geq \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , then (a) $p(z) \prec e^z$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$e\chi(\beta, A, B) = 1$$ and $\xi(\beta, A, B) = e$ respectively. (2.3) (b) $p(z) \prec \phi_s(z)$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$\chi(\beta, A, B) + \sin 1 = 1 \quad and \quad \xi(\beta, A, B) - \sin 1 = 1 \quad respectively. \tag{2.4}$$ (c) $p(z) \prec \phi_0(z)$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$\chi(\beta, A, B) = 2(\sqrt{2} - 1)$$ and $\xi(\beta, A, B) = 2$ respectively. (2.5) (d) $p(z) \prec \phi_c(z)$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$3\chi(\beta, A, B) = 1$$ and $\xi(\beta, A, B) = 3$ respectively. (2.6) (e) $p(z) \prec \phi_{Ne}(z)$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$3\chi(\beta, A, B) = 1$$ and $3\xi(\beta, A, B) = 5$ respectively. (2.7) (f) $p(z) \prec \phi_q(z)$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$\chi(\beta, A, B) = \sqrt{2} - 1$$ and $\xi(\beta, A, B) = \sqrt{2} + 1$ respectively. (2.8) (g) $p(z) \prec \sqrt{1+z}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$\chi(\beta, A, B) = 0 \text{ and } \xi(\beta, A, B) = \sqrt{2} \text{ respectively.}$$ (2.9) (h) $p(z) \prec e^{e^z-1}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$\chi(\beta, A, B) = e^{e^{-1}-1}$$ and $\xi(\beta, A, B) = e^{e^{-1}}$ respectively. (2.10) (i) $p(z) \prec 1 + \tanh z$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of equations $$\chi(\beta, A, B) + \tanh 1 = 1 \quad and \quad \xi(\beta, A, B) - \tanh 1 = 1 \quad respectively. \tag{2.11}$$ All the estimates on $\beta$ are sharp.
Corollary 2.3 · subord. Corollary 2.3. Let, where. Assume Then. - (a) if, where and are positive roots of the equations given in (2.3). - (b) if, where and are…
Corollary 2.3. Let $p(z) = \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}$ , where $f \in A$ . Assume $$\frac{z}{f(z)}\left((1+\beta)f'(z) + \beta z \left(f''(z) - \frac{f'(z)^2}{f(z)}\right)\right) \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}$$ Then. - (a) $f \in S_e^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.3). - (b) $f \in S_s^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.4). - (c) $f \in S_R^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.5). - (d) $f \in S_c^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.6). - (e) $f \in S_{Ne}^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.7). - (f) $f \in S_q^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.8). - (g) $f \in S_L^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.9). - (h) $f \in S_B^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.10). - (i) $f \in S_{tanh}^*$ if $\beta \ge \max\{\beta_1, \beta_2\}$ , where $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$ are positive roots of the equations given in (2.11). The study of univalent funtions and differential subordination is a very vast domain and it is difficult to obtain all the subordination implications following the same methods. A great deal of research is being done in this direction to explore different ways to solve higher order differential subordination relations. Miller and Mocanu in their monograph mentioned the concept of admissible functions. Recently, authors in [29] studied first and second order differential subordination using this approach.
Theorem 2.9 Theorem 2.9. [20] Let and be a set in. If and Then, p(z) is subordinate to. Motivated by the above mentioned definitions and theorems, the…
Theorem 2.9. [20] Let $p \in \mathcal{H}[1, n]$ and $\Omega$ be a set in $\mathbb{C}$ . If $\psi \in \Psi[\Omega; e^z]$ and $$\psi(p(z), zp'(z), z^2p''(z); z) \subset \Omega.$$ Then, p(z) is subordinate to $e^z$ . Motivated by the above mentioned definitions and theorems, the following subordination implication is established. In the following two results, we have taken $q(z) = e^z$ .
Theorem 2.10 Theorem 2.10. Let p(z) denote an analytic function with p(0) = 1 and. Then,
Theorem 2.10. Let p(z) denote an analytic function with p(0) = 1 and $\alpha \ge e(e-1) + 1$ . Then, $$|1 + \alpha z p'(z) + z^2 p''(z)| < e \implies p(z) \prec e^z.$$
Theorem 2.12 Theorem 2.12. [6] Assume with and satisfying the inequalities and, for, and. If, and then p is subordinate to q. For, the following result…
Theorem 2.12. [6] Assume $p \in \mathcal{H}[a, n]$ with $n \geq 2$ and $q \in \mathcal{Q}(a)$ satisfying the inequalities $$\operatorname{Re} \frac{wq''(z)}{q'(z)} \ge 0$$ and $\left| \frac{zp'(z)}{q'(w)} \right| \le k$ , for $k \geq n$ , $z \in \mathbb{D}$ and $w \in \partial \mathbb{D} \setminus \mathbf{E}(q)$ . If $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}$ , $\psi \in \Psi_n[\Omega; q]$ and $$\psi(p(z), zp'(z), z^2p''(z), z^3p'''(z); z) \subset \Omega,$$ then p is subordinate to q. For $q(z) = e^z$ , the following result is a particular case of above theorem.
Theorem 2.13 Theorem 2.13. Assume with satisfy the inequality for and. If, and then.
Theorem 2.13. Assume $p \in \mathcal{H}[1, n]$ with $n \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfy the inequality $$|zp'(z)| \le n,$$ for $z \in \mathbb{D}$ and $w \in \partial \mathbb{D} \setminus \mathbf{E}(q)$ . If $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}$ , $\psi \in \Psi_n[\Omega; q]$ and $$\psi(p(z), zp'(z), z^2p''(z), z^3p'''(z); z) \subset \Omega,$$ then $p(z) \prec e^z$ .
Theorem 2.14 Theorem 2.14. Let and let be non-negative real numbers. Then, the following relations are sufficient for. (i), where (ii), where
Theorem 2.14. Let $0 < A \le 1$ and let $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ be non-negative real numbers. Then, the following relations are sufficient for $p(z) \prec e^z$ . (i) $$1 + \alpha z^3 p'''(z) + \beta z^2 p''(z) + \gamma z p'(z) \prec 1 + Az$$ , where $$\gamma \ge \begin{cases} Ae + \alpha + \beta^2/8\alpha, & when \ \beta \le 4\alpha \\ Ae - \alpha + \beta, & when \ \beta \ge 4\alpha. \end{cases}$$ (ii) $$1 + \alpha (z^3 p'''(z)/zp'(z)) + \beta (zp'(z)/p(z) + 1) \prec 1 + Az$$ , where $$\begin{cases} \beta - \alpha - \beta^2 / 8\alpha \ge A, & \text{when } \beta \le 4\alpha \\ \alpha \ge A, & \text{when } \beta \ge 4\alpha. \end{cases}$$
Theorem 2.15 Theorem 2.15. Let be non-negative real numbers. Then, the following relations are sufficient for. (i), where (ii), where
Theorem 2.15. Let $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ be non-negative real numbers. Then, the following relations are sufficient for $p(z) \prec e^z$ . (i) $1 + \alpha z^3 p'''(z) + \beta z^2 p''(z) + \gamma z p'(z) \prec e^z$ , where $$\gamma \geq \begin{cases} e(e-1) + \alpha + \beta^2/8\alpha, & when \ \beta \leq 4\alpha \\ e(e-1) - \alpha + \beta, & when \ \beta \geq 4\alpha. \end{cases}$$ (ii) $1 + \alpha (z^3 p'''(z)/z p'(z)) + \beta (z p'(z)/p(z) + 1) \prec e^z$ , where $$\begin{cases} \beta \ge \alpha + \beta^2/8\alpha + e - 1, & \text{when } \beta \le 4\alpha \\ \alpha \ge e - 1, & \text{when } \beta \ge 4\alpha. \end{cases}$$
Theorem 2.16 Theorem 2.16. Let be non-negative real numbers and. Then, the following relations are sufficient for. (i), where (ii), where
Theorem 2.16. Let $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ be non-negative real numbers and $\beta_0 \approx 0.475319$ . Then, the following relations are sufficient for $p(z) \prec e^z$ . (i) $\alpha z^3 p'''(z) + \beta z^2 p''(z) + \gamma z p'(z) \prec \phi_{SG}(z)$ , where $$\gamma \ge \begin{cases} \beta_0 e + \alpha + \beta^2 / 8\alpha, & when \ \beta \le 4\alpha \\ \beta_0 e - \alpha + \beta, & when \ \beta \ge 4\alpha. \end{cases}$$ (ii) $\alpha(z^3p'''(z)/zp'(z)) + \beta(zp'(z)/p(z) + 1) \prec \phi_{SG}(z)$ , where $$\begin{cases} \beta \ge \beta_0 + \alpha + \beta^2 / 8\alpha, & \text{when } \beta \le 4\alpha \\ \alpha \ge \beta_0, & \text{when } \beta \ge 4\alpha. \end{cases}$$
Corollary 2.17 Corollary 2.17. As an application, we obtain sufficient conditions for the function to be exponential starlike in by substituting p(z) =…
Corollary 2.17. As an application, we obtain sufficient conditions for the function $f \in \mathcal{A}$ to be exponential starlike in $\mathbb{D}$ by substituting p(z) = zf'(z)/f(z).

Definitions (8)

Def 1.1 Definition 1.1. (Gauss Hypergeometric Function): For |z| < 1 and parameters and, the hypergeometric function is defined by the convergent…
Definition 1.1. (Gauss Hypergeometric Function): For |z| < 1 and parameters $a,b \in \mathbb{C}$ and $c \notin \{0 \cup \mathbb{Z}_-\}$ , the hypergeometric function ${}_2F_1(a,b;c;z)$ is defined by the convergent power series $$F(a,b;c;z) = {}_{2}F_{1}(a,b;c;z) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a)_{k}(b)_{k}}{(c)_{k}k!} z^{k}.$$ (1.1) The function F(a, b; c; z) is analytic in $\mathbb{C}$ and is one of the solutions of the differential equation $$z(1-z)y'' + [c - (a+b+1)z]y' - aby = 0$$ at z=0. The differential of the function F(a,b;c;z) satisfies the relation $$\frac{\partial F(a,b;c;z)}{\partial z} = \frac{ab}{c}F(a+1,b+1;c+1;z).$$
Def 1.2 Definition 1.2. (Order of Starlikeness): For an analytic function f, its order of starlikeness with respect to zero is defined as follows:…
Definition 1.2. (Order of Starlikeness): For an analytic function f, its order of starlikeness with respect to zero is defined as follows: $$\sigma(f) := \inf_{z \in \mathbb{D}} \operatorname{Re} \left( \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right) \in [-\infty, 1]$$ In the proof of our first result, the following results are used:
Def 2.4 Definition 2.4. Consider the analytic functions having Taylor series expansion. Then, denote the class of all such functions for some and…
Definition 2.4. Consider the analytic functions having Taylor series expansion $f(z) = a + a_n z^n + a_{n+1} z^{n+1} + \cdots$ . Then, $\mathcal{H}[a, n]$ denote the class of all such functions for some $a \in \mathbb{C}$ and fixed integer n.
Def 2.5 Definition 2.5. [6, Definition 1, p.440] Let be analytic and. Then, the function, satisfying the third order differential subordination…
Definition 2.5. [6, Definition 1, p.440] Let $\psi(r, s, t, u; z) : \mathbb{C}^4 \times \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}$ be analytic and $h \in \mathcal{U}$ . Then, the function $p \in \mathcal{A}$ , satisfying the third order differential subordination relation $$\psi(p(z), zp'(z), z^2p''(z), z^3p'''(z); z) \prec h(z)$$ is called its solution. Analogous result for the second order differential subordination is stated as below:
Def 2.6 Definition 2.6. [23] Let be analytic and h be a univalent function. For, the subordination relation is known as the second order…
Definition 2.6. [23] Let $\psi(r, s, t; z) : \mathbb{C}^3 \times \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}$ be analytic and h be a univalent function. For $p \in \mathcal{A}$ , the subordination relation $$\psi(p(z), zp'(z), z^2p''(z); z) \prec h(z)$$ is known as the second order differential subordination. Using the concept of admissibility, authors in [20] derived the admissibility conditions for the class associated with exponential function as follows:
Def 2.7 Definition 2.7. Let be the domain. The class is defined as the class of all those functions such that whenever, for, and. Extending the…
Definition 2.7. Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}$ be the domain. The class $\Psi_n[\Omega; e^z]$ is defined as the class of all those functions $\psi : \mathbb{C}^3 \times \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C}$ such that $$\psi(r, s, t; z) \notin \Omega$$ whenever $(r, s, t; z) \in \text{Dom } \psi$ , $$r = e^{e^{i\theta}}, s = me^{i\theta}r, \operatorname{Re}\left(1 + \frac{t}{s}\right) \ge m(1 + \cos\theta),$$ for $z \in \mathbb{D}$ , $\theta \in (0, 2\pi)$ and $m \ge 1$ . Extending the existing work done and using the results given in [6], we formulated an additional condition involving third order differential subordination parameter. Henceforth, the admissibility conditions for the exponential function are restated as follows:
Def 2.8 Definition 2.8. Let and. For, the admissibility conditions are given as follows: whenever,, and for,, and.
Definition 2.8. Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}$ and $n \geq 1$ . For $q(z) = e^z$ , the admissibility conditions are given as follows: $$\psi(r, s, t, u; z) \notin \Omega$$ whenever $(r, s, t, u; z) \in \text{Dom } \psi$ , $r = e^{e^{i\theta}}, s = me^{i\theta}r, \text{Re}\left(1 + \frac{t}{s}\right) \ge m(1 + \cos\theta)$ , and $\text{Re}\left(\frac{u}{s}\right) \ge m\cos 2\theta$ for $z \in \mathbb{D}$ , $\theta \in (0, 2\pi)$ , $\cos 2\theta \ge 0$ and $m \ge 1$ .
Def 2.11 Definition 2.11. [23] Let be the collection of all those points such that as. Then, denote the class of all functions q, which are analytic…
Definition 2.11. [23] Let $\mathbf{E}(q)$ be the collection of all those points $\zeta \in \partial \mathbb{D}$ such that $q(z) \to \infty$ as $z \to \zeta$ . Then, $\mathcal{Q}$ denote the class of all functions q, which are analytic and univalent on $\overline{\mathbb{D}} \setminus \mathbf{E}(q)$ .
Function classes studied:

Registry evidence (34)

Family memberships and relations in the registry that this paper supports.

₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Mocanu α-convex
Mocanu α-convex
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
₁F₁(a; c; z) — Kummer confluent hy
₂F₁(a, b; c; z) — Gauss hypergeome
Mocanu α-convex
Janowski S*[A,B] extremal
Mocanu α-convex

Related Papers

On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
The second and third Hankel determinants for certain classes of functions
2026
Sharp Bohr-Type inequalities for certain classes of close-to-convex functions
2026
Sharp Estimates of Logarithmic Coefficients for a Certain Class of Starlike Func
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for Analytic Functions Subordinate to the Cusp Domai
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 278 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback