🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

The goal of this manuscript to establish the best possible estimate on coefficient functionals like Hermitian-Toeplitz determinant of secoend order involving logarithmic coefficients, initial logarithmic inverse coefficients and initial order Schwarzian derivatives of the Ozaki close-to-convex functions.

Results & Lemmas (9)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1.1 Lemma 1.1. [ ](#page-12-16) Let w(z) = c1z + c2z <sup>2</sup> + c3z <sup>3</sup> + c4z <sup>4</sup> +... be a Schwarz function. Then,,.
Lemma 1.1. [\[6\]](#page-12-16) Let w(z) = c1z + c2z <sup>2</sup> + c3z <sup>3</sup> + c4z <sup>4</sup> + ... be a Schwarz function. Then $$|c_1| \le 1$$ , $|c_2| \le 1 - |c_1|^2$ , $|c_3| \le 1 - |c_1|^2 - \frac{|c_2|^2}{1 + |c_1|}$ .
Lemma 1.2 Lemma 1.2. [ ](#page-12-17) Let P be the class of analytic functions having the Taylor series of the form satisfying the condition ℜ(p(z))…
Lemma 1.2. [\[14\]](#page-12-17) Let P be the class of analytic functions having the Taylor series of the form $$p(z) = 1 + p_1 z + p_2 z^2 + p_3 z^3 + \cdots {(1.12)}$$ satisfying the condition ℜ(p(z)) > 0 (z ∈ D). Then $$2p_{2} = p_{1}^{2} + t\xi,$$ $$4p_{3} = p_{1}^{3} + 2p_{1}t\xi - p_{1}t\xi^{2} + 2t(1 - |\xi|^{2})\eta,$$ $$8p_{4} = p_{1}^{4} + 3p_{1}^{2}t\xi + (4 - 3p_{1}^{2})t\xi^{2} + p_{1}^{2}t\xi^{3} + 4t(1 - |\xi|^{2})(1 - |\eta|^{2})\gamma$$ $$+ 4t(1 - |\xi|^{2})(p_{1}\eta - p_{1}\xi\eta - \bar{\xi}\eta^{2}),$$ for some ξ, η, γ ∈ D and t = (4 − p 2 1 ).
Theorem 2.1 Theorem 2.1. Let the function f(z) = z + P<sup>∞</sup> <sup>n</sup>=2 anz n be in the class F. Then The upper and lower bound are sharp for…
Theorem 2.1. Let the function f(z) = z + P<sup>∞</sup> <sup>n</sup>=2 anz n be in the class F. Then $$-\frac{1}{16} \le T_{2,1}(F_f/\gamma) \le \frac{95}{256}.$$ The upper and lower bound are sharp for the functions f<sup>1</sup> and f<sup>2</sup> given by [\(1.1\)](#page-0-0) and [\(1.2\)](#page-0-1) respectively.
Theorem 2.2 · coeff Theorem 2.2. Let the function be in the class. Then All inequalities are sharp for the function given in (1.1).
Theorem 2.2. Let the function $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be in the class $\mathcal{F}$ . Then $$|\Gamma_1| \le \frac{3}{4}, \quad |\Gamma_2| \le \frac{11}{16}, \quad |\Gamma_3| \le \frac{7}{8}.$$ All inequalities are sharp for the function $f_1$ given in (1.1).
Theorem 2.3 · coeff Theorem 2.3. Let the function be in the class. Then The inequality is sharp for the function given by (1.2).
Theorem 2.3. Let the function $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be in the class $\mathcal{F}$ . Then The inequality is sharp for the function $f_2$ given by (1.2).
Theorem 2.4 · coeff Theorem 2.4. Let the function be in the class. Then (a), (b). Both the inequalities are sharp for the function given by (1.1).
Theorem 2.4. Let the function $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be in the class $\mathcal{F}$ . Then (a) $$|A_3 - A_2| \le 4$$ , (b) $$|\Gamma_3 - \Gamma_2| \le \frac{25}{16}$$ . Both the inequalities are sharp for the function given by (1.1).
Theorem 3.1 · coeff Theorem 3.1. Let be in the class. Then The upper and lower bound are sharp for the function and given by (1.3) and (1.4) respectively.
Theorem 3.1. Let $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be in the class $\mathcal{G}$ . Then $$-\frac{1}{144} \le T_{2,1}(F_f/\gamma) \le \frac{15}{256}.$$ The upper and lower bound are sharp for the function $g_1$ and $g_2$ given by (1.3) and (1.4) respectively.
Theorem 3.2 Theorem 3.2. Let f(z) = z + P<sup>∞</sup> <sup>n</sup>=2 anz n be in the class G. Then All three inequalities are sharp for the function…
Theorem 3.2. Let f(z) = z + P<sup>∞</sup> <sup>n</sup>=2 anz n be in the class G. Then $$|\Gamma_1| \le \frac{1}{4}, \quad |\Gamma_2| \le \frac{3}{16}, \quad |\Gamma_3| \le \frac{5}{24}.$$ All three inequalities are sharp for the function g<sup>1</sup> given by [\(1.3\)](#page-1-2).
Theorem 3.3 · coeff Theorem 3.3. Let the function be in the class. Then and. The both the inequalities are sharp for the function given by (1.3).
Theorem 3.3. Let the function $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be in the class $\mathcal{G}$ . Then $$|S_3| \le \frac{3}{2}$$ and $|S_4| \le 6$ . The both the inequalities are sharp for the function given by (1.3).
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback