🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
control theory
Abstract

In this paper we discuss convexity, its average principle, an extrinsic average variational method in the Calculus of Variations, an average method in Partial Differential Equations, a link of convexity to $p$-subharmonicity, subsolutions to the $p$-Laplace equation, uniqueness, existence, isometric immersions in multiple settings. In particular, we show that a convex function on $\mathbb{R}^n$ is a $p$-subharmonic function, for every $p > 1$, and a $C^2$ convex function on a Riemannian manifold

Results & Lemmas (13)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1.1 Theorem 1.1. A convex function on a Riemannian manifold M is p-subharmonic, for every p > 1. Theorem 1.1 is a real analog of a well-known…
Theorem 1.1. A $C^2$ convex function on a Riemannian manifold M is p-subharmonic, for every p > 1. Theorem 1.1 is a real analog of a well-known result in complex geometry due to Greene and Wu [GW]
Theorem 1.2 Theorem 1.2. On a Kähler manifold, every convex function is plurisubharmonic. Recall a real-valued function f on a complex manifold is said…
Theorem 1.2. On a Kähler manifold, every $C^2$ convex function is plurisubharmonic. Recall a $\mathbb{C}^2$ real-valued function f on a complex manifold is said to be plurisub-harmonic if the Levi form Lf of f $$Lf \equiv 4 \sum_{\alpha,\beta} \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial z^{\alpha} \partial \overline{z}^{\beta}} dz^{\alpha} d\overline{z}^{\beta} \ge 0,$$ where $\{z^{\alpha}=x^{\alpha}+\sqrt{-1}\,y^{\alpha}\}\$ is a local (complex) coordinate system in M, $dz^{\alpha}=dx^{\alpha}+\sqrt{-1}\,dy^{\alpha}$ , $\frac{\partial}{\partial z^{\alpha}}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\alpha}}-\sqrt{-1}\frac{\partial}{\partial y^{\alpha}})$ , and $d\overline{z}^{\alpha}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial \overline{z}^{\alpha}}$ are complex conjugates of $dz^{\alpha}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial z^{\alpha}}$ respectively. If f is a submersion, i.e. $|df| \neq 0$ everywhere, then one can extend the range of p:
Theorem 1.3 Theorem 1.3. A convex function on a Riemannian manifold M that is a submersion, is p-subharmonic for every. This result is sharp (cf.…
Theorem 1.3. A $C^2$ convex function on a Riemannian manifold M that is a submersion, is p-subharmonic for every $p \ge 1$ . This result is sharp (cf. Counter-Example 4.1). As immediate consequences of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, we have
Corollary 1.1 Corollary 1.1. Every concave function on a Riemannian manifold M is p-superharmonic, for any p > 1, and every concave submersive function…
Corollary 1.1. Every $C^2$ concave function on a Riemannian manifold M is p-superharmonic, for any p > 1, and every $C^2$ concave submersive function on M is p-superharmonic, for any $p \ge 1$ .
Corollary 1.2 Corollary 1.2. Let, i=1,2 and p be as in the assumption and conclusion of Theorem 1.1 or 1.2 respectively. Let, then,, and are…
Corollary 1.2. Let $f_i$ , i=1,2 and p be as in the assumption and conclusion of Theorem 1.1 or 1.2 respectively. Let $\lambda > 0$ , then $\lambda f_1$ , $f_1 + f_2$ , and $\max\{f_1, f_2\}$ are p-subharmonic functions.
Corollary 1.3 Corollary 1.3. Let an increasing sequence of functions and p be as in the Corollary 1.2. Then is p-subharmonic. <span…
Corollary 1.3. Let an increasing sequence of functions $\{f_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty}$ and p be as in the Corollary 1.2. Then $\lim_{i\to\infty} f_i$ is p-subharmonic. <span id="page-4-2"></span>If M is Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^n$ , then one can drop the $C^2$ assumption on f:
Theorem 1.4 Theorem 1.4. A convex function on is p-subharmonic, for every p > 1, and a convex function on with the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure, is…
Theorem 1.4. A convex function on $\mathbb{R}^n$ is p-subharmonic, for every p > 1, and a convex function on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure $\mathcal{L}^n(\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : |df| = 0\}) = 0$ , is p-subharmonic, for every $p \ge 1$ , This result is sharp (cf. Counter-Example 4.1). In this paper we combine the link between convex functions and p-subharmonic functions, and the estimates on the growth of p-subharmonic functions (cf.[WLW2], or $\S 2$ ) to prove Liouville type theorems for convex functions. We recall for a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-balanced growth (or, simply, is p-balanced) if f has one of the following: p-finite, p-mild, p-obtuse, p-moderate, or p-small growth, and has p-imbalanced growth (or, simply, is p-imbalanced) otherwise (cf. [WLW2], or $\S 2$ ). As further applications, we have the following.
Theorem 5.1 Theorem 5.1. [Louiville Type Theorem for Convex Functions] Every p-balanced nonnegative convex function on a complete noncompact Riemannian…
Theorem 5.1. [Louiville Type Theorem for Convex Functions] Every p-balanced nonnegative $C^2$ convex function on a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold is constant for p > 1. Corollary 5.1 Every $L^q$ - nonnegative $C^2$ convex function on a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold is constant for q > p - 1 > 0.
Theorem 2.1 Theorem 2.1. ([W6], Theorem 5.4.). For a given, a function, or differential form or bundle-valued differential form f is p-moderate (2.4)…
Theorem 2.1. ([W6], Theorem 5.4.). For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function, or differential form or bundle-valued differential form f is p-moderate (2.4) $\Leftrightarrow$ p-small (2.6) $\Rightarrow$ p-mild (2.2) $\Rightarrow$ p-obtuse (2.3) or equiavalently, $p-acute \quad \Rightarrow \quad p-severe \quad \Rightarrow \quad p-large \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad p-immoderate.$ Hence, for a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , f is $$p$$ - balanced $\Rightarrow$ either $p$ - finite (2.1) or $p$ - obtuse (2.3) $$p-\text{imbalanced} \Rightarrow \text{both} p-\text{infinite} \text{ and } p-\text{immoderate}$$ . If in addition, $\int_{B(x_0;r)} |f|^q dv$ is convex in r, then the following four types of growth are all equivalent: f is p-mild, p-obtuse, p-moderate, and p-small (resp. p-severe, p-acute, p-immoderate, and p-large), i.e., f is $$(2.2)$$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $(2.3)$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $(2.4)$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $(2.6)$ for the same value of $q \in \mathbb{R}$ . In particular, we have
Corollary 2.1 Corollary 2.1. ([W6, Corollary 5.1]) Every function or differential form or bundle-valued differential form f on M has p-balanced growth,,…
Corollary 2.1. ([W6, Corollary 5.1]) Every $L^q$ function or differential form or bundle-valued differential form f on M has p-balanced growth, $p \ge 0$ , and in fact, has p-finite, p-mild, p-obtuse, p-moderate, and p-small growth, $p \ge 0$ , for the same value of q In [WLW 2], among many different types of inequalities on a complete noncompact Reimannian manifold M, we have the following uniqueness property.
Theorem 2.2 Theorem 2.2. (Liouville Property for solutions of ). Every solution of is constant provided f is p-balanced, i.e. f is one of the…
Theorem 2.2. (Liouville Property for solutions of $f \operatorname{div}(|\nabla f|^{p-2}\nabla f) \geq 0$ ). Every $C^2$ solution $f: M \to (-\infty, \infty)$ of $f \operatorname{div}(|\nabla f|^{p-2}\nabla f) \geq 0$ is constant provided f is p-balanced, i.e. f is one of the following: p-finite, p-mild, p-obtuse, p-moderate, or p-small, for some q > p - 1. In particular, every $C^2$ , $L^q$ solution f of $f \operatorname{div}(|\nabla f|^{p-2}\nabla f) \geq 0$ is constant for any q > p - 1.
Theorem 5.1 Theorem 5.1. (Louiville Type Theorem for Convex Functions). Every p-balanced nonnegative convex function on a complete noncompact…
Theorem 5.1. (Louiville Type Theorem for Convex Functions). Every p-balanced nonnegative $C^2$ convex function on a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold M is constant for p > 1. Proof of Theorem 5.1. Since f is a $C^2$ convex function on M, Theorem 1.1 implies that f is a p-subharmonic function for p > 1. This is equivalent to f is a subsolution of the p-Laplace equation, i.e., $\operatorname{div}(|df|^{p-2})df \geq 0$ . In view of $f \geq 0$ , we have $f\operatorname{div}(|df|^{p-2})df \geq 0$ . It follows from Theorem 2.2 that f is constant.
Corollary 5.1 Corollary 5.1. Every, convex function on a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold M is constant for any q > p - 1 > 0
Corollary 5.1. Every $C^2$ , $L^q$ convex function on a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold M is constant for any q > p - 1 > 0

Definitions (2)

Def 2.1 Definition 2.1. For a given, a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-finite growth (or, simply, is…
Definition 2.1. For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-finite growth (or, simply, is p-finite) if there exists $x_0 \in M$ such that <span id="page-5-4"></span>(2.1) $$\liminf_{r \to \infty} \frac{1}{r^p} \int_{B(x_0;r)} |f|^q \, dv < \infty,$$ and has p-infinite growth (or, simply, is p-infinite) otherwise. For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-mild growth (or, simply, is p-mild) if there exist $x_0 \in M$ , and a strictly increasing sequence of $\{r_j\}_0^{\infty}$ going to infinity, such that for every $l_0 > 0$ , we have <span id="page-5-2"></span>(2.2) $$\sum_{j=\ell_0}^{\infty} \left( \frac{(r_{j+1} - r_j)^p}{\int_{B(x_0; r_{j+1}) \setminus B(x_0; r_j)} |f|^q dv} \right)^{\frac{1}{p-1}} = \infty,$$ and has p-severe growth (or, simply, is p-severe) otherwise. For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-obtuse growth (or, simply, is p-obtuse) if there exists $x_0 \in M$ such that for every a > 0, we have <span id="page-5-3"></span>(2.3) $$\int_{a}^{\infty} \left(\frac{1}{\int_{\partial B(x_0;r)} |f|^q ds}\right)^{\frac{1}{p-1}} dr = \infty,$$ and has p-acute growth (or, simply, is p-acute) otherwise. For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-moderate growth (or, simply, is p-moderate) if there exist $x_0 \in M$ , and $\psi(r) \in \mathcal{F}$ , such that <span id="page-5-0"></span>(2.4) $$\limsup_{r \to \infty} \frac{1}{r^p \psi^{p-1}(r)} \int_{B(x_0;r)} |f|^q \, dv < \infty,$$ and has p-immoderate growth (or, simply, is p-immoderate) otherwise, where (2.5) $$\mathcal{F} = \{ \psi : [a, \infty) \longrightarrow (0, \infty) | \int_{a}^{\infty} \frac{dr}{r\psi(r)} = \infty \text{ for some } a \ge 0 \}.$$ (Notice that the functions in $\mathcal{F}$ are not necessarily monotone.) For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-small growth (or, simply, is p-small) if there exists $x_0 \in M$ , such that for every a > 0, we have <span id="page-5-1"></span>(2.6) $$\int_{a}^{\infty} \left( \frac{r}{\int_{B(x_0;r)} |f|^q \, dv} \right)^{\frac{1}{p-1}} dr = \infty \,,$$ and has p-large growth (or, simply, is p-large) otherwise.
Def 2.2 Definition 2.2. For a given, a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-balanced growth (or, simply, is…
Definition 2.2. For a given $q \in \mathbb{R}$ , a function or a differential form or a bundle-valued differential form f has p-balanced growth (or, simply, is p-balanced) if f has one of the following: p-finite, p-mild, p-obtuse, p-moderate, or p-small growth, and has p-imbalanced growth (or, simply, is p-imbalanced) otherwise. The above definitions of "p-balanced, p-finite, p-mild, p-obtuse, p-moderate, p-small" and their counter-parts "p-imbalanced, p-infinite, p-severe, p-acute, p-immoderate, p-large" growth depend on q, and q will be specified in the context in which the definition is used.
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,671 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback