Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
In the past several subclasses of starlike functions are defined involving real part and modulus of certain expressions of functions under study, combined by way of an inequality. In the similar fashion, we introduce a new class $\mathcal{S}^*_{q}(α)$, consisting of normalized analytic univalent functions $f$ in the open unit disk $\mathbb{D}$, satisfying $$\RE\left(\dfrac{z f'(z)}{f(z)}\right) \geq \left|1+\dfrac{z f''(z)}{f'(z)} -\dfrac{z f'(z)}{f(z)}-α\right| \quad (0 \leq α<1).$$ Evidently,
Results & Lemmas (23)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1. Let for. Then (2.2)
Theorem 2.1. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^*(\alpha)$ for $0 \le \alpha < 1$ . Then
$$\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec q_{\alpha}(z) := \begin{cases} \frac{(1-2\alpha)z}{(1-z)(1-(1-z)^{1-2\alpha})}, & \alpha \neq 1/2\\ \frac{-z}{(1-z)\log(1-z)}, & \alpha = 1/2. \end{cases}$$
(2.2)
Theorem 2.2
Theorem 2.2. Let of the form (2.5) belongs to. Then
Theorem 2.2. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}$ of the form (2.5) belongs to $\mathcal{S}_q^*(\alpha)$ . Then
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} (n+\alpha-2)c_n < (1-\alpha).$$
Theorem 3.2 · coeff
Theorem 3.2. Let and. Then (i) (Growth Theorem): (ii) (Distortion Theorem): (iii) (Rotation Theorem):. Equality holds at some if and only…
Theorem 3.2. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ and $|z_0| = r < 1$ . Then
(i) (Growth Theorem): $-f_{\alpha}(-r) \leq |f(z_0)| \leq f_{\alpha}(r)$
$$\frac{(1+r)^{2\alpha-1}-1}{2\alpha-1} \le |f(z_0)| \le \frac{1-(1-r)^{2\alpha-1}}{2\alpha-1} \ (\alpha \ne 1/2); \ \log(1+r) \le |f(z_0)| \le -\log(1-r) \ (\alpha = 1/2).$$
(ii) (Distortion Theorem): $f'_{\alpha}(-r) \leq |f'(z_0)| \leq f'_{\alpha}(r)$
$$(1+r)^{2(\alpha-1)} \le |f(z_0)| \le (1-r)^{2(\alpha-1)}.$$
(iii) (Rotation Theorem): $|\arg(f(z_0)/z_0)| \le \max_{|z|=r} \arg(f_\alpha(z)/z)$ .
Equality holds at some $z_0 \neq 0$ if and only if f is a rotation of $f_{\alpha}$ .
Remark 3.3. Interestingly, the above Growth, Distortion and Rotation results hold in the case of $\mathcal{K}(\alpha)$ [6, Theorem 1, p. 139] as well. It is due to the fact that the classes $\mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ and $\mathcal{K}(\alpha)$ have the same extremal function $f_\alpha(z)$ .
3.1. Coefficient Estimates. From [7], we get $|a_2| \leq 1 - \alpha$ for functions in $\mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ and the extremal function is $f_\alpha(z)$ , defined in (3.2). Using Fekete-Szegö bounds for Ma-Minda class [14] and [7, Remark 4.1, p. 12], we obtain the following:
Theorem 3.4 · coeff
Theorem 3.4. Let. Then we have The result is sharp. Taking t = 0 and 1, respectively in the above result, we get the following
Theorem 3.4. Let $f \in S^*(q_\alpha)$ . Then we have
$$|a_3 - ta_2^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{(3 - 2\alpha)(1 - \alpha)}{3} - t(1 - \alpha)^2, & t \le \frac{3 - 4\alpha}{6(1 - \alpha)} \\ \frac{(1 - \alpha)}{2}, & \frac{3 - 4\alpha}{6(1 - \alpha)} \le t \le \frac{9 - 4\alpha}{6(1 - \alpha)} \\ t(1 - \alpha)^2 - \frac{(3 - 2\alpha)(1 - \alpha)}{3}, & t \ge \frac{9 - 4\alpha}{6(1 - \alpha)}. \end{cases}$$
The result is sharp.
Taking t = 0 and 1, respectively in the above result, we get the following
Corollary 3.5 · coeff
Corollary 3.5. Let. Then we have (i) The result is sharp and the extremal function is given by, given in (3.2) for and for. (ii). The…
Corollary 3.5. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ . Then we have
(i)
$$|a_3| \le \begin{cases} \frac{(2\alpha - 3)(\alpha - 1)}{3}, & \alpha \le 3/4\\ \frac{1 - \alpha}{2}, & \alpha \ge 3/4. \end{cases}$$
The result is sharp and the extremal function is given by $f_{\alpha}(z)$ , given in (3.2) for $\alpha \leq 3/4$ and $\tilde{f}_{\alpha}(z) = \sqrt{\frac{(1-z^2)^{2a-1}-1}{2a-1}}$ for $\alpha \geq 3/4$ .
(ii) $|a_3 - a_2^2| \le \frac{1-\alpha}{2}$ . The result is sharp for $\tilde{f}_{\alpha}(z)$ , defined in the above part (i) for $\alpha \ne 1/2$ and $f_{1/2}(z) := \sqrt{\log(1-z^2)}$ for $\alpha = 1/2$ .
Recall that inverse of a function $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_n z^n \in \mathcal{S}$ is given by $f^{-1}(f(z)) = z$ , $z \in \mathbb{D}$ and $f(f^{-1}(w)) = w$ ( $|w| < r_0, r_0 > 1/4$ ), for which
$$f^{-1}(w) = w - a_2 w^2 - (2a_2^2 - a_3)w^3 - (5a_3^2 - 5a_2 a_3 + a_4)w^4 + \cdots$$
(3.5)
Corollary 3.6
Corollary 3.6. Let and the inverse be given by. Then (i), (ii) The inequalities are sharp.
Corollary 3.6. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ and the inverse be given by $f^{-1}(w) = w + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} b_n w^n$ . Then
(i) $|b_2| \le 1 - \alpha$ ,
(ii)
$$|b_3| \le \begin{cases} 2(1-\alpha)^2 - \frac{(3-2\alpha)(1-\alpha)}{3}, & 0 \le \alpha \le 3/8\\ \frac{1-\alpha}{2}, & 3/8 \le \alpha \le 1. \end{cases}$$
The inequalities are sharp.
Theorem 3.7
Theorem 3.7. Let. Then, we have The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 3.7. Let $f \in S^*(q_\alpha)$ $(\alpha \in E(\alpha))$ . Then, we have
$$|\beta_n| \le \frac{1-\alpha}{2n}.$$
The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 3.8
Theorem 3.8. A function belongs to if and only if it satisfies where
Theorem 3.8. A function $f \in \mathcal{S}$ belongs to $\mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ if and only if it satisfies
$$\frac{1}{z}\left(f(z)*\frac{z-\lambda z^2}{(1-z)^2}\right) \neq 0 \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}),\tag{3.6}$$
where
$$\lambda := \lambda(\theta) = \begin{cases} \frac{1 - 2\alpha}{(1 - 2\alpha) - (e^{-i\theta} - 1)(1 - (1 - e^{i\theta})^{1 - 2\alpha})}, & \alpha \neq 1/2\\ (1 - (1 - e^{-i\theta})\log(1 - e^{i\theta}))^{-1}, & \alpha = 1/2, \end{cases}$$
$(\theta \in [-\pi, \pi]).$
Corollary 3.9 · coeff
Corollary 3.9. A function f ∈ S belongs to S ∗ (qα) if and only if it satisfies Consequently, the next result follows.
Corollary 3.9. A function f ∈ S belongs to S ∗ (qα) if and only if it satisfies
$$1 \neq \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \rho(\theta) a_n z^{n-1} := \begin{cases} \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{(e^{-i\theta} - 1)(1 - (1 - e^{i\theta})^{1-2\alpha})n - (1 - 2\alpha)}{(1 - 2\alpha) - (e^{-i\theta} - 1)(1 - (1 - e^{i\theta})^{1-2\alpha})} a_n z^{n-1}, & \alpha \neq 1/2 \\ \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{(1 - e^{-i\theta})\log(1 - e^{i\theta})n - 1}{1 - (1 - e^{-i\theta})\log(1 - e^{i\theta})} a_n z^{n-1}, & \alpha = 1/2. \end{cases}$$
Consequently, the next result follows.
Corollary 3.10 · coeff
Corollary 3.10. Let f ∈ S satisfies then f ∈ S<sup>∗</sup> (qα).
Corollary 3.10. Let f ∈ S satisfies
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |\rho(\theta)| |a_n| < 1,$$
then f ∈ S<sup>∗</sup> (qα).
Theorem 4.1
Theorem 4.1. Let 0 ≤ α < 1, then S ∗ q (α) ⊂ K(α). Proof. Let f ∈ S<sup>∗</sup> q (α), then inequality [ ](#page-1-0) yields which upon a…
Theorem 4.1. Let 0 ≤ α < 1, then S ∗ q (α) ⊂ K(α).
Proof. Let f ∈ S<sup>∗</sup> q (α), then inequality [\(1.2\)](#page-1-0) yields
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right) > -\operatorname{Re}\left(1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - \alpha\right),$$
which upon a straightforward calculation yields
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)}\right) > \alpha.$$
This completes the proof.
Silverman [21] introduced the class
$$\mathcal{G}_b := \left\{ f \in \mathcal{A} : \left| \frac{1 + z f''(z) / f'(z)}{z f'(z) / f(z)} - 1 \right| < b, \ 0 < b \le 1 \right\}.$$
In the following result we show the relation between the classes $\mathcal{G}_b$ and $\mathcal{S}_q^*$ .
Corollary 4.2
Corollary 4.2..
Corollary 4.2. $\mathcal{S}_q^* \subset \mathcal{G}_1$ .
Corollary 4.3
Corollary 4.3. Let, then f is -1-convex function.
Corollary 4.3. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^*$ , then f is -1-convex function.
Theorem 4.4
Theorem 4.4. We have whenever for, or whenever for.
Theorem 4.4. We have $S_q^(\alpha) \subset S^(q_\alpha) \subset S^*(\gamma)$ whenever $0 \le \gamma \le \frac{2\alpha-1}{2(1-2^{1-2\alpha})}$ for $\alpha \ne 1/2$ , or whenever $0 \le \gamma \le 1/\log 4$ for $\alpha = 1/2$ .
Theorem 4.5
Theorem 4.5. Let. Then we have (4.1) which also implies.
Theorem 4.5. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ . Then we have
$$\operatorname{Re} \frac{f(z)}{z} > \gamma(\alpha) := \begin{cases} \frac{3 - 2\alpha - 2^{2(1-\alpha)}}{4 - 2\alpha - 3 \cdot 2^{1-2\alpha}}, & \alpha \neq 1/2\\ \frac{2(1 - \log 4)}{2 - 3\log 4}, & \alpha = 1/2, \end{cases}$$
(4.1)
which also implies $S_q^(\alpha) \subset S^(q_\alpha) \subset \mathcal{Q}(\gamma(\alpha))$ .
Theorem 5.1 · radius
Theorem 5.1. Let. Then whenever, where is the smallest positive root of The result is sharp.
Theorem 5.1. Let $f \in \mathcal{SL}$ . Then $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ whenever $|z| < \tilde{r}(\alpha) < 1$ , where $\tilde{r}(\alpha)$ is the smallest positive root of
$$2(1-r)(\sqrt{1-r}-\alpha) - r = 0 \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1). \tag{5.1}$$
The result is sharp.
Theorem 5.2 · radius
Theorem 5.2. Let. Then whenever, where is the smallest positive root of
Theorem 5.2. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_l$ . Then $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ whenever $|z| < \tilde{r}(\alpha) < 1$ , where $\tilde{r}(\alpha)$ is the smallest positive root of
$$(1 - \log(1+r))(1-r)(1 - \log(1+r) - \alpha) - r = 0 \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1).$$
Theorem 5.3 · radius
Theorem 5.3. Let. We have in, where is the smallest positive root of (5.5)
Theorem 5.3. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_e$ . We have $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ in $|z| < \tilde{r}(\alpha)$ , where $\tilde{r}(\alpha)$ is the smallest positive root of
$$\begin{cases} 4(1-r^2)(e^{-r}-\alpha) - (1+r^2)^2 = 0, & 0 \le \alpha < 0.246646 \\ e^{-r}-\alpha - r = 0, & 0.246646 \le \alpha < 1. \end{cases}$$
(5.5)
Theorem 5.4
Theorem 5.4. Let. We have in, where is the smallest positive root of
Theorem 5.4. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_{SG}$ . We have $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ in $|z| < \tilde{r}(\alpha)$ , where $\tilde{r}(\alpha)$ is the smallest positive root of
$$\begin{cases} 4(1-r^2)(1+e^{-r})(2-\alpha(1+e^r)) - (1+r^2)^2(1+e^r) = 0, & 0 \le \alpha < 0.546407 \\ (1+e^{-r})(2-\alpha(1+e^r)) - r(1+e^r) = 0, & 0.546407 \le \alpha < 1. \end{cases}$$
Theorem 5.5 · radius
Theorem 5.5. Let. Then in, where is the smallest positive root of Proof. Let. Then for some Schwarz function, we have. To prove the result,…
Theorem 5.5. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_{S}^{}$ . Then $f \in \mathcal{S}_{q}^{}(\alpha)$ in $|z| < \tilde{r}(\alpha)$ , where $\tilde{r}(\alpha)$ is the smallest positive root of
$$(1 - \sin r)(1 - \sin r \cosh r - \alpha) - r \cosh r = 0 \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1).$$
Proof. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_S^*$ . Then for some Schwarz function $v(z) = Re^{it}$ $(0 \le R \le r = |z| < 1; 0 \le t \le 2\pi)$ , we have $zf'(z)/f(z) = 1 + \sin(v(z))$ . To prove the result, we show (1.2) holds for f considered here. For this we consider
$$\operatorname{Re}(1 + \sin(v(z))) - \left| \frac{zv'(z)\cos(v(z))}{1 + \sin(v(z))} - \alpha \right| \ge \operatorname{Re}(1 + \sin(v(z))) - \alpha - \frac{|z||v'(z)||\cos(v(z))|}{|1 + \sin(v(z))|}$$
(5.9)
A calculation shows that $\operatorname{Re}(1+\sin(\upsilon(z)))=1+\sin(R\cos t)\cosh(R\sin t)$ and $\sin(R\cos t)\geq -\sin R, \quad \cosh(R\sin t)\leq \cosh(R).$
Thus we have
$$\operatorname{Re}(1+\sin(v(z))) \ge 1-\sin R \cosh R \ge 1-\sin r \cosh r.$$
Also
$$\max_{|\upsilon(z)|=R}|\cos(\upsilon(z))|=\cosh R\leq \cosh r \text{ and } \min_{|\upsilon(z)|=R}|1+\sin(\upsilon(z))|=1-\sin R\geq 1-\sin r.$$
Using these inequalities in right side of the inequality (5.9) and further applying (5.6) with |z| = r, (5.9) finally reduces to
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(1+\sin(v(z))\right) - \left|\frac{zv'(z)\cos(v(z))}{1+\sin(v(z))} - \alpha\right| \ge 1-\sin r \cosh r - \alpha - \left(\frac{r\cosh r}{1-\sin r}\right) > 0,$$
provided $r < \tilde{r}(\alpha) \le \sqrt{2} - 1$ for every $0 \le \alpha < 1$ .
Theorem 5.6
Theorem 5.6. Let and. Then in, where is the smallest positive root of
Theorem 5.6. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_C$ and $0 \le \alpha < 3/4$ . Then $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ in $|z| < \tilde{r}(\alpha)$ , where $\tilde{r}(\alpha)$ is the smallest positive root of
$$(3 - 2r^2)(1 - r^2 - 2\alpha) - 6\sqrt{3}r(1+r) = 0 \quad (0 \le \alpha < 3/4).$$
Theorem 5.8
Theorem 5.8. Let. Then the following holds: - (i) f is starlike of order in whenever - (a) for, where is the smallest such r < 1 satisfying…
Theorem 5.8. Let $f \in S^*(q_\alpha)$ $(0 \le \alpha < 1)$ . Then the following holds:
- (i) f is starlike of order $\gamma$ in $|z| < \tilde{r}$ whenever
- (a) $\frac{2\alpha-1}{2(1-2^{1-2\alpha})} < \gamma < 1$ for $\alpha \neq 1/2$ , where $\tilde{r}$ is the smallest such r < 1 satisfying the equation
$$(2\alpha - 1)r - \gamma(1+r)(1 - (1+r)^{1-2\alpha}) = 0,$$
or whenever
(b) $\frac{1}{\log 4} < \gamma < 1$ for $\alpha = 1/2$ , where $\tilde{r}$ is the smallest such r < 1 satisfying the equation
$$r - \gamma(1+r)\log(1+r) = 0.$$
(ii) Let $\beta > 1$ then $f \in \mathcal{M}(\beta)$ in $|z| < r_0$ if there exists $r_0$ , the smallest such r < 1 satisfying the equation
$$(1-2\alpha)r - \beta(1-r)(1-(1-r)^{1-2\alpha}) = 0 \ (\alpha \neq 1/2) \quad or \quad r+\beta(1-r)(\log(1-r)) = 0 \ (\alpha = 1/2),$$
$else \ r_0 = 1.$
Theorem 5.10
Theorem 5.10. Let and. Then for, we have where given by (4.1) and is the smallest such r < 1 satisfying the equation
Theorem 5.10. Let $f \in S^*(q_\alpha)$ and $\beta \geq 1$ . Then for $|z| < \tilde{r}$ , we have
$$\left| \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - 1 \right| < \beta,$$
where $\gamma := \gamma(\alpha)$ given by (4.1) and $\tilde{r}$ is the smallest such r < 1 satisfying the equation
$$2(1-\gamma)r - \beta(1-r)(1-|1-2\gamma|r) = 0.$$
Definitions (2)
Def 1.1
Definition 1.1. For, we define below a class if f satisfies: We observe that the class. The identity function f(z) = z satisfies the…
Definition 1.1. For $f \in \mathcal{S}$ , we define below a class $\mathcal{S}_{q}^{*}(\alpha)$ if f satisfies:
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right) > \left|1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - \alpha\right| \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1). \tag{1.2}$$
We observe that the class $\mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha) \subseteq \mathcal{S}$ . The identity function f(z) = z satisfies the inequality (1.2) for all $0 \le \alpha < 1$ , hence $\mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha) \ne \emptyset$ . For $\alpha = 0$ , we set $\mathcal{S}_q^(0) =: \mathcal{S}_q$ . We also obtain $\mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ as a subclass of another fascinating class of starlike functions, which is introduced in the following section. The paper is structured as follows: In the next section, we show $f \in \mathcal{S}_q^*(\alpha)$ implies
$$\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec q_{\alpha}(z),$$
where $q_{\alpha}$ is given in (2.2). This function $q_{\alpha}(z)$ which is brought to day light by studying the class (1.2), is first introduced by MacGregor [9]. Using $q_{\alpha}(z)$ , MacGregor [9] also proved that convex functions of order $\alpha$ is starlike of order
$$\frac{2\alpha - 1}{2 - 2^{2(1-\alpha)}} \ (\alpha \neq 1/2) \ \text{ and } \ \frac{1}{\log 4} \ (\alpha = 1/2).$$
Apart from this, he [9] also proved $q_{\alpha}(z)$ to be univalent and
$$\min_{|z| < 1} \operatorname{Re} q_{\alpha}(z) = q_{\alpha}(-1),$$
can refer [12] also. We study this function in detail and obtain certain sharp coefficient bounds for functions in $\mathcal{S}^(q_\alpha)$ . In the sequel we discuss many inclusion and radius results pertaining to the classes $\mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha)$ and $\mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ .
2. Results related to
$$\mathcal{S}_q^*(\alpha)$$
We begin this section by showing the existence of some analytic function belonging to $\mathcal{S}_q^*(\alpha)$ apart from f(z) = z.
Example 1. Let $f_{\gamma}(z) = z + \gamma z^2$ . If $|\gamma| < r_0$ , where $r_0$ is the smallest such r < 1 satisfying the equation:
$$\alpha^{2}(2r-1)^{2}(r-1)^{3} - 33r^{2} + 57r^{3} - 48r^{4} + 16r^{5} + 2\alpha(r-1)^{2}r(2r-1) + (2r-1)(r-1)(\alpha+r-3\alpha r + 2\alpha r^{2})(2-4r) + 9r = 1 \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1),$$
then $f_{\gamma} \in \mathcal{S}_{q}^{*}(\alpha)$ . Moreover, $r_{0} \in (0, 1/4]$ .
Def 2.3
Definition 2.3. Let denote the class of analytic functions, satisfying We infer from Theorem 2.1,, so is non-empty. This class generalizes…
Definition 2.3. Let $\mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ denote the class of analytic functions $f \in \mathcal{S}$ , satisfying
$$\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec q_{\alpha}(z) \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}, \ 0 \le \alpha < 1). \tag{2.6}$$
We infer from Theorem 2.1, $\mathcal{S}_q^(\alpha) \subset \mathcal{S}^(q_\alpha)$ , so is non-empty. This class generalizes subclass of $\mathcal{S}$ , such as for $\alpha = 0$ , it reduces to $\mathcal{S}^(1/2)$ .
3. About
$$S^*(q_\alpha)$$
A function $f \in \mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ if and only if there exists an analytic function $s, s(z) \prec q_\alpha(z)$ such that
$$f(z) = z \exp \int_0^z \frac{s(t) - 1}{t} dt.$$
(3.1)
Specifically, for $s(z)=q_{\alpha}(z),$ the structural formula (3.1) yields
$$f_{\alpha}(z) = \begin{cases} \frac{1 - (1 - z)^{2\alpha - 1}}{2\alpha - 1}, & \alpha \neq 1/2; \\ -\log(1 - z), & \alpha = 1/2. \end{cases}$$
(3.2)
Taylor series of $f_{\alpha}(z)$ $(0 \le \alpha < 1)$ is given as follows
$$f_{\alpha}(z) = z + (1 - \alpha)z^{2} + (3 - 5\alpha + 2\alpha^{2})\frac{z^{3}}{3} + (6 - 13\alpha + 9\alpha^{2} - 2\alpha^{3})\frac{z^{4}}{6} + \cdots$$
$$= z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \left(\frac{\prod_{j=2}^{n} (j - 2\alpha)}{n!} z^{n}\right) \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1),$$
plays an extremal function for many cases in $\mathcal{S}^*(q_\alpha)$ . Interestingly, this function $f_\alpha(z)$ is also the extremal function for the class $\mathcal{K}(\alpha)$ see [4,12].

FIGURE 1. Image of unit disk $\mathbb{D}$ under the function $q_{\alpha}(z)$ for various $\alpha$ .
Remark 3.1. Using the results in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we deduce
$$p(z) + \frac{zp'(z)}{p(z)} \prec \frac{1 + (1 - 2\alpha)z}{1 - z} \Rightarrow p(z) \prec q_{\alpha}(z),$$
which further yields
$$1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} \prec \frac{1 + (1 - 2\alpha)z}{1 - z} \Rightarrow \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec q_{\alpha}(z).$$
(3.3)
The function $f_{\alpha}(z)$ , given by (3.2) is an extremal function for the above differential subordination implication. This result (3.3) is initially proved by MacGregor [9] and later in [12, p. 113–115], using the following:
$$\min_{|z|<1} (\operatorname{Re} q_{\alpha}(z)) = q_{\alpha}(-1) = \begin{cases} \frac{2\alpha - 1}{2 - 2^{2(1-\alpha)}}, & \alpha \neq 1/2\\ \frac{1}{\log 4}, & \alpha = 1/2, \end{cases}$$
(3.4)
and $\min_{|z|=r} \operatorname{Re} q_{\alpha}(z) = q_{\alpha}(-r), \, \max_{|z|=r} \operatorname{Re} q_{\alpha}(z) = q_{\alpha}(r)$
We first show that an analytic univalent function $q_{\alpha}(z)$ is a Ma-Minda function. We have $q_{\alpha}(0) = 1$ and $\operatorname{Re} q_{\alpha}(z) > 0$ ( $0 \le \alpha < 1$ ). A further calculation reveals $q'_{\alpha}(0) > 0$ . Now the Taylor series of $q_{\alpha}(z)$ is given as follows:
$$q_{\alpha}(z) = 1 + (1 - \alpha)z + (3 - 4\alpha + \alpha^2)\frac{z^2}{3} + (2 - 3\alpha + \alpha^2)\frac{z^3}{2} + (45 - 72\alpha + 26\alpha^2 + 2\alpha^3 - \alpha^4)\frac{z^4}{45} + \cdots,$$
shows the function is symmetric with respect to the real axis as it has real coefficients. For detail analysis for the geometry of functions defined on $\mathbb{D}$ , see [7]. The function $q_{\alpha}(z)$ is starlike with respect to $q_{\alpha}(0) = 1$ as we get
$$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{e^{i\theta}q_{\alpha}'(e^{i\theta})}{q_{\alpha}(e^{i\theta})-1}\right) > 0, \qquad (-\pi \le \theta \le \pi) \quad (0 \le \alpha < 1),$$
by performing a highly complex computation in Mathematica 11.0, which otherwise is not possible manually. Therefore $q_{\alpha}(z)$ is a Ma-Minda function as it satisfies all the conditions to be one. Figure 1 depicts $q_{\alpha}(\mathbb{D})$ for various $\alpha \in [0,1)$ .
Observation: It is clear that $q_0(z)$ is a convex function but it is not the case for every $q_{\alpha}$ . In fact, using Mathematica 11.0, graph of Re $\left(1 + \frac{zq_{\alpha}''(z)}{q_{\alpha}'(z)}\right)\Big|_{z=e^{i\theta}}$ $(-\pi \le \theta \le \pi)$ , is not positive for some $\alpha \in (0,1)$ . Thus we coin below a problem which is open at present.
Open Problem: Find the range of $\alpha$ in (0,1) for which $q_{\alpha}(\mathbb{D})$ is convex.
Based on certain subordination results proved in [8], we have $f(z)/z \prec f_{\alpha}(z)/z$ and the following:
Function classes studied:
Coefficient bounds & claims (6)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
S*(q_alpha): Let f in S*(q_alpha). Then |a_3 - t*a_2^2| <= ... (three-piece formula in t). The result is sharp. (sharp) [Theorem 3.4]
coefficient_bound
S*(q_alpha): Let f in S*(q_alpha). Then (i) |a_3| <= (2*alpha-3)*(alpha-1)/3 for alpha<=3/4; (1-alpha)/2 for alpha>=3/4. The result is sharp. (sharp) [Corollary 3.5(i)]
coefficient_bound
S*(q_alpha): Let f in S*(q_alpha). Then |a_3 - a_2^2| <= (1-alpha)/2. The result is sharp. (sharp) [Corollary 3.5(ii)]
coefficient_bound
S*(q_alpha): Let f in S*(q_alpha) (alpha in E(alpha)). Then |beta_n| <= (1-alpha)/(2n). The inequality is sharp. (sharp) [Theorem 3.7]
function_family
Class S*_q(alpha): f in S: Re(zf'(z)/f(z)) > |1 + zf''(z)/f'(z) - zf'(z)/f(z) - alpha| for 0 <= alpha < 1
function_family
Class S*(q_alpha): f in S: zf'(z)/f(z) subordinate to q_alpha(z) for 0 <= alpha < 1
Related Papers