🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the sharp bounds of the second Hankel determinant of Logarithmic coefficients for the starlike and convex functions with respect to symmetric points in the open unit disk.

Results & Lemmas (3)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 2.1 Lemma 2.1. [9] Let be a Schwarz function. Then,, and. We obtain the following sharp bound for for functions in the class.
Lemma 2.1. [9] Let $w(z) = c_1 z + c_2 z^2 + \cdots$ be a Schwarz function. Then $$|c_1| \le 1$$ , $|c_2| \le 1 - |c_1|^2$ , and $|c_3| \le 1 - |c_1|^2 - \frac{|c_2|^2}{1 + |c_1|}$ . We obtain the following sharp bound for $H_{2,1}(F_f/2)$ for functions in the class $\mathcal{S}_S^*$ .
Theorem 2.2 Theorem 2.2. Let. Then The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 2.2. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_S^*$ . Then $$|H_{2,1}(F_f/2)| \le \frac{1}{4}.$$ The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 2.4 Theorem 2.4. Let be of the form (1.1). Then The inequality is sharp.
Theorem 2.4. Let $f \in \mathcal{K}_S$ be of the form (1.1). Then $$|H_{2,1}(F_f/2)| \le \frac{1}{36}.$$ The inequality is sharp.
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback