Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
Let A,B,D,E belong to [-1, 1] and let p(z) be an analytic function with fixed initial coefficient defined in the open unit disk. Conditions on A,B,D,and E are determined so that 1+αzp'(z) being subordinated to (1+Dz)/(1+Ez) implies that p(z) is subordinated to (1+Az)/(1+Bz) and other similar implications involving 1+αzp'(z)/p(z), αp2(z)+λzp'(z),αp(z)+(1-α)p2(z)+λzp'(z),and (1-α)p(z)+{alpha}(1+zp'(z)/p(z)). Also, sufficient conditions for Janowski starlikeness with fixed second coefficient are ob
Results & Lemmas (24)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 1.1
Lemma 1.1. [2] Let with. Let with associated domain D. If and, then for.
Lemma 1.1. [2] Let $p \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu,n}$ with $0 < \mu \le 2$ . Let $\psi \in \Psi_{\mu,n}$ with associated domain D. If $(p(z), zp'(z)) \in D$ and $\operatorname{Re} \psi(p(z), zp'(z)) > 0$ , then $\operatorname{Re} p(z) > 0$ for $z \in \mathbb{D}$ .
Lemma 2.1
Lemma 2.1. Suppose that,, and. Assume that where. In addition for all n > 1, let If and then (2.1)
Lemma 2.1. Suppose that $-1 \le B < A \le 1$ , $-1 \le E < D \le 1$ , and $\alpha E < 0$ . Assume that
$$G = n (2 + \mu') + (2 - \mu'),$$
$$H = (n - 1) (2 + \mu') + (2 - \mu'),$$
where $0 < \mu' = 2\mu/(A - B) \le 2$ . In addition for all n > 1, let
$$((D-E)(1-B)^{2} + \alpha E(A-B))^{2} G^{2} + (D-E)^{2}(1+B)^{4}H^{2}$$
$$(2.2) \leq \alpha^2 (A-B)^2 G^2 + 2(D-E)(1+B)^2 ((D-E)(1-B)^2 - \alpha E(A-B))GH.$$
If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu,n}$ and
$$(2.3) 1 + \alpha z p'(z) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then
(2.1)
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}.$$
Theorem 2.1 · coeff
Theorem 2.1. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.1 hold. If satisfies then. For and, by taking,, and in Theorem 2.1, we get the following result.
Theorem 2.1. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.1 hold. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$1 + \alpha \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \left( 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then $f \in S^*[A, B]$ .
For $0 \le \lambda < 1$ and $\delta \le 1$ , by taking $\alpha = 1$ , $A = -B = \lambda$ , and $D = -E = \delta$ in Theorem 2.1, we get the following result.
Corollary 2.1
Corollary 2.1. Let. If satisfies where. Then. If we take n = 1 and, then Corollary 2.1 reduces to [3, Corollary 2.4] for.
Corollary 2.1. Let $0 \le \lambda < 1$ . If $f \in \mathcal{A}_{n,h}$ satisfies
$$\left| \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \left( 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right) \right| < \delta \left| 2 + \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \left( 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right) \right|,$$
where $\delta = (\lambda G) / \sqrt{((1+\lambda)^2 - \lambda)^2 G^2 + (1-\lambda)^4 H^2 - 2(1-\lambda)^2 ((1+\lambda)^2 + \lambda) GH}$ . Then $f \in S^*[\lambda]$ .
If we take n = 1 and $\mu = A = -B$ , then Corollary 2.1 reduces to [3, Corollary 2.4] for $\alpha = \lambda$ .
Corollary 2.2 · coeff
Corollary 2.2. If satisfies then.
Corollary 2.2. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$\left|\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\left(1+\frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)}-\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)\right|<\frac{1-\lambda}{2},$$
then $f \in S_{\lambda}^*$ .
Corollary 2.3 · coeff
Corollary 2.3. If satisfies where, and. Then.
Corollary 2.3. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$\left| \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \left( 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right) \right| < \delta,$$
where $\delta = (1 - \lambda)G/(G - H)$ , and $0 \le \lambda < 1$ . Then $f \in S^*(\lambda)$ .
Corollary 2.4
Corollary 2.4. If satisfies Then.
Corollary 2.4. If $f \in A$ satisfies
$$\left| \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \left( 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right) \right| < 1 - \lambda.$$
Then $f \in S^*(\lambda)$ .
Lemma 2.2
Lemma 2.2. Suppose that,, and. Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition for all n > 1, let If and then.
Lemma 2.2. Suppose that $-1 \le B < A \le 1$ , $0 < E < D \le 1$ , and $\alpha E < 0$ . Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition for all n > 1, let
$$((D-E)(1+A)^2 - E(A-B))^2 G^2 + (D-E)^2 (1-A)^4 H^2$$
$$(2.8) \leq (A-B)^2 G^2 + 2(D-E)(1-A)^2 ((D-E)(1+A)^2 + E(A-B))GH.$$
If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu,n}$ and
$$1 + \frac{zp'(z)}{p^2(z)} \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}$$
.
Theorem 2.2 · coeff
Theorem 2.2. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.2 hold. If satisfies then.
Theorem 2.2. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.2 hold. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$\frac{1+zf''(z)/f'(z)}{zf'(z)/f(z)} \prec \frac{1+Dz}{1+Ez},$$
then $f \in S^*[A, B]$ .
Corollary 2.5
Corollary 2.5. If, where, where, then.
Corollary 2.5. If $f \in F_c$ , where $c = (1-\lambda)G/|(2-\lambda)^2G - \lambda^2H|$ , where $0 \le \lambda < 1$ , then $f \in S^*(\lambda)$ .
Corollary 2.6 · coeff
Corollary 2.6. If satisfies (2.9) where, and, then.
Corollary 2.6. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
(2.9)
$$\left| 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right| < \delta \left| 1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} + \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right|,$$
where $\delta = (\lambda G)/\sqrt{((1+\lambda)^2 + \lambda)^2 G^2 + (1-\lambda)^4 H^2 - 2(1-\lambda)^2 ((1+\lambda)^2 - \lambda) GH}$ , and $0 \le \lambda < 1$ , then $f \in S^*[\lambda]$ .
Corollary 2.7
Corollary 2.7. If (2.9) holds with where, then.
Corollary 2.7. If (2.9) holds with
$$\delta = ((1 - \lambda)G) / \sqrt{(1 - \lambda)^2 (5 - 4\lambda)^2 G^2 + 16\lambda^2 H^2 - 8\lambda^2 (1 - \lambda)(3 - 4\lambda)GH},$$
where $0 \le \lambda < 1$ , then $f \in S_{\lambda}^*$ .
Lemma 2.3
Lemma 2.3. Suppose that,, and. Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let If and then Proof. Define the function as…
Lemma 2.3. Suppose that $-1 \le B < A \le 1$ , $-1 \le E < D \le 1$ , and $\alpha E < 0$ . Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let
$$\left( \left( (D-E)(1-A)(1-B) + \alpha E(A-B) \right)^2 - \alpha^2 (A-B)^2 \right) G^2 + (D-E)^2 (1+A)^2 (1+B)^2 H^2$$
$$\leq 2(D-E) \left( (D-E) \left( (1-AB)^2 + (A-B)^2 \right) + \alpha E(A-B)(1+A)(1+B) \right) GH.$$
If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu,n}$ and
$$(2.10) 1 + \alpha \frac{zp'(z)}{p(z)} \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}.$$
Proof. Define the function $q: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C}$ as (2.4). Then q is analytic on $\mathbb{D}$ and $q(z) = 1 + 2\mu'z^n + q_{n+1}z^{n+1} + \cdots \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu',n}$ , where $0 < \mu' = 2\mu/(A-B) \le 2$ . It follows from (2.4) and (2.10) that
$$\operatorname{Re}\left\{\frac{(D-E)\big((1-B)+(1+B)q(z)\big)\big((1-A)+(1+A)q(z)\big)+2\alpha(1-E)(A-B)zq'(z)}{(D-E)\big((1-B)+(1+B)q(z)\big)\big((1-A)+(1+A)q(z)\big)-2\alpha(1+E)(A-B)zq'(z)}\right\}>0.$$
Define $\psi: \mathbb{C}^2 \to \mathbb{C}$ by
$$\psi(r,s) = \frac{(D-E)((1-B)+(1+B)r)((1-A)+(1+A)r)+2\alpha(1-E)(A-B)s}{(D-E)((1-B)+(1+B)r)((1-A)+(1+A)r)-2\alpha(1+E)(A-B)s}.$$
Then $\psi$ is continuous of r and s on $D =: \mathbb{C}^2 - \{(r,s) : N'(r,s) = 0\}$ , where $N'(r,s) =: (D - E)((1-B) + (1+B)r)((1-A) + (1+A)r) - 2\alpha(1+E)(A-B)s$ . Note that $(1,0) \in D$ and $\text{Re } \{\psi(1,0)\} > 0$ . It also follows that for all $(i\rho,\sigma) \in D$ ,
$$\operatorname{Re}\left\{\psi(i\rho,\sigma)\right\} = \operatorname{Re}\left\{\frac{(D-E)[(1-B)+(1+B)i\rho][(1-A)+(1+A)i\rho]+2\alpha(1-E)(A-B)\sigma}{(D-E)[(1-B)+(1+B)i\rho][(1-A)+(1+A)i\rho]-2\alpha(1+E)(A-B)\sigma}\right\}.$$
Let
$$a = (D - E)(1 - A)(1 - B),$$
$$b = 2\alpha(1 - E)(A - B),$$
$$c = -(D - E)(1 + A)(1 + B),$$
$$d = 2(D - E)(1 - AB),$$
$$e = -2\alpha(1+E)(A-B).$$
Then Re $\psi(i\rho,\sigma)$ = Re $\{(a+b\sigma+c\rho^2+di\rho)/(a+e\sigma+c\rho^2+di\rho)\}$ . For Re $\psi(i\rho,\sigma)<0$ , we need to prove
$$a^{2} + a(b+e)\sigma + be\sigma^{2} + (2ac + d^{2} + c(b+e)\sigma)\rho^{2} + c^{2}\rho^{4} < 0.$$
Since $\sigma < -1/2$ , it follows that
$$2ac + d^{2} + (b+e)c\sigma \geqslant 2ac + d^{2} - \frac{1}{2}(b+e)c$$
$$= 2(D-E)((D-E)((1-AB)^{2} + (A-B)^{2})$$
$$-\alpha E(A-B)(1+A)(1+B)) \le 0,$$
(2.11)
provided $\alpha E < 0$ . Also, $\rho^2 \le -\left(\left(2(2+\mu')\sigma\right)/\left(n(2+\mu')\right) + (2-\mu')\right) + 1\right)$ where $\mu' = 2\mu/(A-B)$ , then the proof follows on lines similar to Lemma 2.1.
Theorem 2.3
Theorem 2.3. Let. If, and then. With n = 1, by taking p(z) = zf'(z)/f(z) where, and b = A - B, then for, theorem 2.3 reduces to the…
Theorem 2.3. Let $(0 < A \le 1)$ . If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu,n}$ , and
$$|zp'(z)/p(z)| < (AG)/\sqrt{(1-A)^2G^2 + (1+A)^2H^2 - 2(1+A^2)GH},$$
then $p(z) \prec 1 + Az$ .
With n = 1, by taking p(z) = zf'(z)/f(z) where $f \in A_b$ , and b = A - B, then for $A = 1 - \lambda$ , theorem 2.3 reduces to the following result
Corollary 2.8
Corollary 2.8. If satisfies then.
Corollary 2.8. If $f \in A$ satisfies
$$\left|1 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)} - \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right| < \frac{1-\lambda}{\lambda}, \quad (0 \le \lambda < 1),$$
then $f(z) \in S^*(\lambda)$ .
Lemma 2.4
Lemma 2.4. Suppose that Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let If and (2.13) then
Lemma 2.4. Suppose that $-1 \le B < A \le 1, -1 \le E < D \le 1,$
$$\begin{split} K &= \left( (D-1)(1+B)^2 - \alpha E(1+A)^2 \right)^2 - \alpha^2 (1+A)^4 \ge 0, \\ L &= \lambda (A-B) \left( E(D-1)(1+B)^2 + \alpha (1-E^2)(1+A)^2 \right) < 0, \\ M &= \left( (D-1)(1-B^2) - \alpha E(1-A^2) \right)^2 + 4\alpha E(D-1)(A-B)^2 - \alpha^2 (1-A^2)^2 \\ &- \lambda (A-B) \left( \alpha (1-E^2)(1+A)^2 + E(D-1)(1+B)^2 \right) > 0, \\ N &= \left( (D-1)(1-B)^2 - \alpha E(1-A)^2 \right)^2 - \left( \alpha (1-A)^2 - \lambda (A-B) \right)^2 \\ &- \lambda (A-B) \left( E^2 \left( 2\alpha (1-A)^2 - \lambda (A-B) \right) - 2E(D-1)(1-B)^2 \right). \end{split}$$
Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let
$$(2.12) NG^2 - 2MGH + KH^2 < 0$$
If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{u.n}$ and
(2.13)
$$\alpha p^2(z) + \lambda z p'(z) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}.$$
Theorem 2.4 · coeff
Theorem 2.4. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.4 hold. If satisfies then.
Theorem 2.4. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.4 hold. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$\alpha \left( \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} + \frac{z^2f''(z)}{f(z)} \right) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then $f \in S^*[A, B]$ .
Corollary 2.9
Corollary 2.9. If satisfies Re, then.
Corollary 2.9. If $f \in A$ satisfies
Re
$$\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} + \frac{z^2f''(z)}{f(z)}\right) > \delta$$
,
then $f \in S^*$ .
Lemma 2.5
Lemma 2.5. Suppose that Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let If and (2.16) then
Lemma 2.5. Suppose that $-1 \le B < A \le 1, -1 \le E < D \le 1,$
$$K = ((D-1)(1+B)^2 - (1-\alpha)E(1+A)^2)^2 - (1-\alpha)^2(1+A)^4 - \alpha(1+A)(1+B)$$
$$\times (2E(1+B)^2 + \alpha(1-E^2)(1+A)(1+B) + 2(1-\alpha)(1-E^2)(1+A)^2) \ge 0,$$
$$L = \lambda(A-B)(E(D-1)(1+B)^2 + \alpha(1-E^2)(1+A)(1+B)$$
$$+ (1 - \alpha)(1 - E^{2})(1 + A)^{2}) < 0$$
$$M = \left( \left( (D - 1)(1 - B^{2}) - E(1 - \alpha)(1 - A^{2}) \right)^{2} - (1 - \alpha)^{2}(1 - A^{2})^{2} \right.$$
$$- E(D - 1) \left( 2(1 - B^{2}) \left( (1 - \alpha)(1 - A^{2}) + \alpha(1 - AB) \right) \right.$$
$$- (1 - \alpha) \left( (A - B)^{2} + (1 - AB)^{2} \right) + \lambda(A - B)(1 + B)^{2} \right)$$
$$- (1 - E^{2}) \left( 2\alpha \left( (1 - \alpha)(1 - A^{2})(1 - AB) \right) + \alpha^{2} \left( (A - B)^{2} + (1 - AB)^{2} \right) \right.$$
$$+ \lambda(A - B)(1 + A) \left( (1 - \alpha)(1 + A) + \alpha(1 + B) \right) \right) > 0,$$
$$N = \left( \left( (D - 1)(1 - B)^{2} - (1 - \alpha)E(1 - A)^{2} \right)^{2} - (1 - \alpha)^{2}(1 - A)^{4} \right)$$
$$- (1 - E^{2}) \left( \left( \alpha(1 - A)(1 - B) - \lambda(A - B) \right)^{2} - 2(1 - \alpha)(1 - A)^{2} \right.$$
$$\times \left( \lambda(A - B) - \alpha(1 - A)(1 - B) \right) \right) + 2E(D - 1)(1 - B)^{2}$$
Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let
$$NG^2 - 2MGH + KH^2 \le 0$$
If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{u,n}$ and
(2.16)
$$\alpha p(z) + (1 - \alpha)p^{2}(z) + \lambda z p'(z) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}.$$
Theorem 2.5 · coeff
Theorem 2.5. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.5 hold. If satisfies then.
Theorem 2.5. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.5 hold. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} + \beta \frac{z^2 f''(z)}{f(z)} \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then $f \in S^*[A, B]$ .
Theorem 2.6 · coeff
Theorem 2.6. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.5 hold. If satisfies then.
Theorem 2.6. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.5 hold. If $f \in A_{n,b}$ satisfies
$$f'(z) + \beta z f''(z) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then $f'(z) \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}$ .
Lemma 2.6
Lemma 2.6. Suppose that Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let If and then
Lemma 2.6. Suppose that $-1 \le B < A \le 1, -1 \le E < D \le 1,$
$$K = (1+A)^{2}(1+B)^{2} ((D-1) - \alpha E)^{2} - \alpha^{2}) - (1-\alpha)(1+A)^{3}(1-E^{2})$$
$$\times (2\alpha(1+B) + (1-\alpha)(1+A)) \ge 0,$$
$$L = \alpha \Big( E(D-1)(1+B) + (1-E^{2}) (\alpha(1+B) + (1-\alpha)(1+A)) \Big) < 0,$$
$$M = \Big( (((D-1) - \alpha E)^{2} - \alpha^{2}) ((A-B)^{2} + (1-AB)^{2}) - (1+A)(E(D-1) + \alpha(1-E^{2})) \Big)$$
$$\times (2(1-\alpha)(1-A)(1-AB) + \alpha(1+B)(A-B)) - (1-\alpha)(1-E^{2})(1+A)$$
$$\times ((1-\alpha)(1-A)(1-A^{2}) + \alpha(1+A)(A-B)) \Big) > 0,$$
$$N = (1-A)^{2}(1-B)^{2} \Big( ((D-1) - \alpha E)^{2} - \alpha^{2} \Big) + (E^{2}-1) \Big( (1-\alpha)(1-A)^{2} - \alpha(A-B) \Big)^{2} + 2(1-A)(1-B)(E(D-1) + \alpha(1-E^{2})) (\alpha(A-B) - (1-\alpha)(1-A)^{2}).$$
Also let G and H as in (2.1). In addition, for all n > 1, let
$$NG^2 - 2MGH + KH^2 \le 0$$
If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{u,n}$ and
$$(2.18) (1-\alpha)p(z) + \alpha \left(1 + \frac{zp'(z)}{p(z)}\right) \prec \frac{1+Dz}{1+Ez},$$
then
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}$$
Theorem 2.7
Theorem 2.7. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.6 hold. If satisfies (2.20) then
Theorem 2.7. Let the conditions of Lemma 2.6 hold. If $p \in \mathcal{H}_{\mu,n}$ satisfies
(2.20)
$$1 + \frac{zp'(z)}{p(z)} < \frac{1+Dz}{1+Ez},$$
then
$$p(z) \prec \frac{1 + Az}{1 + Bz}.$$
Theorem 2.8
Theorem 2.8. Let the conditions of Lemma [2.6](#page-11-0) hold. If f ∈ An,b satisfies then f ∈ S ∗ [A, B]. Proof. The proof of this…
Theorem 2.8. Let the conditions of Lemma [2.6](#page-11-0) hold. If f ∈ An,b satisfies
$$(1 - 2\alpha)\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} + \alpha\left(2 + \frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)}\right) \prec \frac{1 + Dz}{1 + Ez},$$
then f ∈ S ∗ [A, B].
Proof. The proof of this theorem is derived from Lemma [2.6](#page-11-0) by letting p(z) = zf′ (z)/f(z), where f ∈ An,b and 0 < µ = nb ≤ A − B.
Function classes studied:
Related Papers