Ma-Minda φ-classes studied in this paper:
Abstract
Given a domain $Ω$ in the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$ and a univalent function $q$ defined in an open unit disk $\mathbb{D}$ with nice boundary behaviour, Miller and Mocanu studied the class of admissible functions $Ψ(Ω,q)$ so that the differential subordination $ψ(p(z),zp(z),z^2p''(z);z)\prec h(z)$ implies $p(z)\prec q(z)$ where $p$ is an analytic function in $\mathbb{D}$ with $p(0)=1$, $ψ:\mathbb{C}^3\times \mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{C}$ and $Ω=h(\mathbb{D})$. This paper investigates the properties o
Results & Lemmas (16)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1.2.
Theorem 1.2. [11, p. 28] Let ψ ∈Ψn(Ω, q) with q(0) = a. If p ∈H[a, n] satisfies ψ(p(z), zp′(z), z2p′′(z); z) ∈Ω then p(z) ≺q(z). Miller and…
Theorem 1.2. [11, p. 28] Let ψ ∈Ψn(Ω, q) with q(0) = a. If p ∈H[a, n] satisfies ψ(p(z), zp′(z), z2p′′(z); z) ∈Ω then p(z) ≺q(z). Miller and Mocanu [11] in their monograph discussed the class of admissible functions Ψ(Ω, q) when the function q maps D onto a disk or a half-plane. These two special classes together with Theorem 1.2 lead to several important and interesting results in the theory of differential subordinations. However the aim of this paper is to consider differential implications with
Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 2.1. Let p ∈H1. (i) If ψ ∈Ψ(Ω, ez), then ψ(p(z), zp′(z), z2p′′(z); z) ∈Ω ⇒ p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 2.1. Let p ∈H1. (i) If ψ ∈Ψ(Ω, ez), then ψ(p(z), zp′(z), z2p′′(z); z) ∈Ω ⇒ p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1, it is easy to deduce that for any p ∈H1, we have |p2(z) −p(z) + (1 + e)zp′(z)| < e−1 ⇒ p(z) ≺ez. In the similar fashion, by…
Theorem 2.1, it is easy to deduce that for any p ∈H1, we have |p2(z) −p(z) + (1 + e)zp′(z)| < e−1 ⇒ p(z) ≺ez. In the similar fashion, by taking ψ(r, s, t; z) = 1 + s/r2 and Ωas above, it is easily seen that |ψ(r, s, t; z) −1| = |s/r2| = |meiθe−eiθ| = me−cos θ ≥me−1 ≥e−1 whenever r = eeiθ, s = meiθr and Re (1 + t/s) ≥m(1 + cosθ), where θ ∈[0, 2π) and m ≥1. This implies that ψ(r, s, t; z) /∈Ωand hence ψ ∈Ψ(Ω, ez). Thus for any p ∈H1, we have
Theorem 3.1.
Theorem 3.1. If n is a non-negative integer, 0 ≤α < 1 and p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β zp′(z) pn(z) ≺1 + (1 −α)z, where β ≥ ( e(1…
Theorem 3.1. If n is a non-negative integer, 0 ≤α < 1 and p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β zp′(z) pn(z) ≺1 + (1 −α)z, where β ≥ ( e(1 −α) when n = 0 en−1(1 −α) when n ̸= 0 then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1 is applicable if we show that ψ ∈Ψ(Ω, ez), that is, ψ(r, s, t; z) ̸∈Ωwhenever r = eeiθ, s = meiθr and Re (1 + t/s) ≥m(1 + cos…
Theorem 2.1 is applicable if we show that ψ ∈Ψ(Ω, ez), that is, ψ(r, s, t; z) ̸∈Ωwhenever r = eeiθ, s = meiθr and Re (1 + t/s) ≥m(1 + cos θ), where z ∈D, θ ∈[0, 2π) and m ≥1. A simple calculation yields |ψ(r, s, t; z) −1| = βmecos θ ≥βe−1 ≥1 −α. Hence ψ(r, s, t; z) /∈Ωwhich gives ψ ∈Ψ(Ω, ez). Using Theorem 2.1, we get p(z) ≺ez. Case (ii). When n ̸= 0, the function ψ(r, s, t; z) = 1 + βs/rn satisfies |ψ(r, s, t; z) −1| = βme−(n−1) cos θ ≥βe−(n−1) ≥1 −α whenever r = eeiθ, s = meiθr and Re (1 + t/s)
Theorem 3.3.
Theorem 3.3. If n is any non-negative integer and p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β zp′(z) pn+1(z) ≺2 + z 2 −z, where β ≥2en then p(z)…
Theorem 3.3. If n is any non-negative integer and p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β zp′(z) pn+1(z) ≺2 + z 2 −z , where β ≥2en then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 3.5.
Theorem 3.5. Let α, β be positive real numbers satisfying α(e−1)+βe ≥e and p ∈H1. If the following subordination (1 −α)p(z) + αp2(z) +…
Theorem 3.5. Let α, β be positive real numbers satisfying α(e−1)+βe ≥e and p ∈H1. If the following subordination (1 −α)p(z) + αp2(z) + βzp′(z) ≺1 + z holds, then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 3.6.
Theorem 3.6. Let p ∈H1. Then both the following conditions are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + βzp′(z) ≺(2 + 2z)/(2 −z) for β ≥(e + 2 − √…
Theorem 3.6. Let p ∈H1. Then both the following conditions are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + βzp′(z) ≺(2 + 2z)/(2 −z) for β ≥(e + 2 − √ 2(e −1))/(e( √ 2 −1)) ≈2.0323. (b) p(z) + βzp′(z)/p(z) ≺(2 + 2z)/(2 −z) for β ≥(e + 2 − √ 2(e −1))/( √ 2 −1) ≈5.52436.
Theorem 4.1.
Theorem 4.1. If n is any positive integer and p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β(zp′(z))n ≺ez, where β ≥ ( en+1 + en when n is odd en+1…
Theorem 4.1. If n is any positive integer and p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β(zp′(z))n ≺ez, where β ≥ ( en+1 + en when n is odd en+1 −en when n is even then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 4.2.
Theorem 4.2. If p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β zp′(z) pn+1(z) ≺ez, where β ≥en+1 −en and n is any non-negative integer, then p(z)…
Theorem 4.2. If p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination 1 + β zp′(z) pn+1(z) ≺ez, where β ≥en+1 −en and n is any non-negative integer, then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 4.4.
Theorem 4.4. Let p ∈H1, then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + βzp′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 + 1 ≈8.38906.…
Theorem 4.4. Let p ∈H1, then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + βzp′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 + 1 ≈8.38906. (b) p(z) + βzp′(z)/p(z) ≺ez for β ≥e + e−1 ≈3.08616.
Theorem 4.5.
Theorem 4.5. Let n be any positive integer and βn be a positive root of the equation (4.1) e1+n −x(−1 + n) 2 − e2+2nn −x2n + xe1+n(1 −n…
Theorem 4.5. Let n be any positive integer and βn be a positive root of the equation (4.1) e1+n −x(−1 + n) 2 − e2+2nn −x2n + xe1+n(1 −n + n2) ln(e + e−nx) = 0. If p ∈H1 satisfies the subordination p(z) + β zp′(z) pn+1(z) ≺ez, for β > βn then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 4.6.
Theorem 4.6. Let p ∈H1. Then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + β(zp′(z))2 ≺ez for β ≥e3 −e…
Theorem 4.6. Let p ∈H1. Then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + β(zp′(z))2 ≺ez for β ≥e3 −e ≈17.3673. (b) p(z) + β(zp′(z))2/p(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 −1 ≈6.38906. (c) p(z) + β(zp′(z))2/p2(z) ≺ez for β ≥e −e−1 ≈2.3504.
Theorem 4.7.
Theorem 4.7. Let p ∈H1. Then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p2(z) + βzp′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 + e−1…
Theorem 4.7. Let p ∈H1. Then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p2(z) + βzp′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 + e−1 ≈7.75694. (b) p2(z) + βzp′(z)/p(z) ≺ez for β ≥e + e−2 ≈2.85362. (c) p2(z) + βzp′(z)/p2(z) ≺ez for β > β∗≈104.122, where β∗is a positive root of the equation 6e6 + 5xe3 −x2 + (−2e6 −5xe3 + x2) ln(e3 + x) = 0.
Theorem 4.8.
Theorem 4.8. Let p ∈H1, then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + βzp(z)p′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e3 + e…
Theorem 4.8. Let p ∈H1, then each of the following subordinations are sufficient for p(z) ≺ez: (a) p(z) + βzp(z)p′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e3 + e ≈22.8038. (b) p2(z) + βzp(z)p′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e3 + 1 ≈21.0855. (c) p3(z) + βzp(z)p′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e3 + e−1 ≈20.4534.
Theorem 4.9.
Theorem 4.9. Let p ∈H1 and satisfies the subordination p2(z) + p(z) −1 + βzp′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 + e−1 −e + 1 ≈6.03865. Then p(z) ≺ez.
Theorem 4.9. Let p ∈H1 and satisfies the subordination p2(z) + p(z) −1 + βzp′(z) ≺ez for β ≥e2 + e−1 −e + 1 ≈6.03865. Then p(z) ≺ez.
Related Papers