Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
In this paper, we obtain the Fekete-Szegö problem for the $k$-th $(k\geq1)$ root transform of the analytic and normalized functions $f$ satisfying the condition \begin{equation*} 1+\frac{α-π}{2 \sin α}< {\rm Re}\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right\} < 1+\fracα{2\sin α} \quad (|z|<1), \end{equation*} where $π/2\leq α<π$. Afterwards, by the above two-sided inequality we introduce and investigate a certain subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions in the disk $|z|<1$ and obtain upper bounds for t
Results & Lemmas (10)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 1.1 · coeff
Lemma 1.1. Let and. Then if, and only if, where (1.3) The function is convex univalent and has the form (1.4) where Also we have where Very…
Lemma 1.1. Let $f(z) \in A$ and $\pi/2 \le \alpha < \pi$ . Then $f \in \mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ if, and only if,
$$\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}-1\right) \prec \mathcal{B}_{\alpha}(z) \quad (z \in \Delta),$$
where
(1.3)
$$\mathcal{B}_{\alpha}(z) := \frac{1}{2i\sin\alpha} \log\left(\frac{1+ze^{i\alpha}}{1+ze^{-i\alpha}}\right) \quad (z \in \Delta).$$
The function $\mathcal{B}_{\alpha}(z)$ is convex univalent and has the form
(1.4)
$$\mathcal{B}_{\alpha}(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} A_n z^n \quad (z \in \Delta),$$
where
$$A_n := \frac{(-1)^{(n-1)} \sin n\alpha}{n \sin \alpha} \quad (n = 1, 2, \ldots).$$
Also we have $\mathcal{B}_{\alpha}(\Delta) = \Omega_{\alpha}$ where
$$\Omega_{\alpha} := \left\{ \zeta \in \mathbb{C} : \frac{\alpha - \pi}{2 \sin \alpha} < \operatorname{Re} \left\{ \zeta \right\} < \frac{\alpha}{2 \sin \alpha}, \quad \frac{\pi}{2} \le \alpha < \pi \right\}.$$
Very recently Sun et al. (see [22]) and Kwon and Sim (see [11]) have studied the class $\mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ . Sun et al. showed if the function f of the form (1.1) belongs to the class $\mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ , then $|a_n| \leq 1$ while the estimate is not sharp. Subsequently, Kwon and Sim obtained sharp estimates on the initial coefficients $a_2$ , $a_3$ , $a_4$ and $a_5$ of the functions f belonging to the class $\mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ . The coefficient estimate problem for each of the Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients $|a_n|$ (n = 6, 7, ...) is still an open question. Also, the logarithmic coefficients of the function $f \in \mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ were estimated by Kargar, see [7].
It is interesting to mention this subject that Brannan and Taha [4] introduced certain subclass of the bi-univalent function class $\Sigma$ , denoted by $\mathcal{S}_{\Sigma}^(\gamma)$ similar to the class of the starlike functions of order $\gamma$ (0 $\leq \gamma < 1$ ). For each function $f \in \mathcal{S}_{\Sigma}^(\gamma)$ they found non-sharp estimates for the initial Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients. Recently, motivated by the Brannan and Taha's work, many authors investigated the coefficient bounds for various subclasses of the bi-univalent function class $\Sigma$ , see for instance [5, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21].
In this paper, motivated by the aforementioned works, we introduce and investigate a certain subclass of $\Sigma$ similar to the class $\mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ as follows.
Lemma 1.2 · coeff
Lemma 1.2. (see [13]) Let the function p be of the form belongs to the class. Then for any complex number we have The result is sharp for…
Lemma 1.2. (see [13]) Let the function p be of the form belongs to the class $\mathcal{P}$ . Then for any complex number $\mu$ we have
$$|p_2 - \mu p_1^2| \le \begin{cases} -4\mu + 2, & \text{if } \mu \le 0; \\ 2, & \text{if } 0 \le \mu \le 1; \\ 4\mu - 2, & \text{if } \mu \ge 1. \end{cases}$$
The result is sharp for the cases $\mu < 0$ or $\mu > 1$ if and only if $p(z) = \frac{1+z}{1-z}$ or one of its rotations. If $0 < \mu < 1$ , then the equality holds if and only if $p(z) = \frac{1+z^2}{1-z^2}$ or one of its rotations. For the case $\mu = 0$ , the equality holds if and only if
$$p(z) = \frac{1}{2}(1+\nu)\frac{1+z}{1-z} + \frac{1}{2}(1-\nu)\frac{1-z}{1+z} \quad (0 \le \nu \le 1),$$
or one of its rotations. If $\mu = 1$ , the equality holds if and only if
$$\frac{1}{p(z)} = \frac{1}{2}(1+\nu)\frac{1+z}{1-z} + \frac{1}{2}(1-\nu)\frac{1-z}{1+z} \quad (0 \le \nu \le 1),$$
or one of its rotations.
4
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we derive the Fekete-Szegö coefficient functional associated with the k-th root transform for functions in the class $\mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ . In Section 3 we propose to find the estimates on the Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients $|a_2|$ , $|a_3|$ and Fekete-Szegö problem for functions in the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Sigma}(\alpha)$ which we introduced in Definition 1.1.
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1. Let and. If F is the k-th root transform of the function f defined by (2.1), then for any complex number we have (2.4) where,…
Theorem 2.1. Let $\pi/2 \le \alpha < \pi$ and $f \in \mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ . If F is the k-th $(k \ge 1)$ root transform of the function f defined by (2.1), then for any complex number $\mu$ we have
(2.4)
$$|b_{2k+1} - \mu b_{k+1}^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2k} \left( 1 - \cos \alpha - \frac{2\mu + k - 1}{k} \right), & \text{if } \mu \le \delta_1; \\ \frac{1}{2k}, & \text{if } \delta_1 \le \mu \le \delta_2; \\ \frac{1}{2k} \left( \cos \alpha + \frac{2\mu + k - 1}{k} - 1 \right), & \text{if } \mu \ge \delta_2, \end{cases}$$
where $\delta_1 := (1 - k(1 + \cos \alpha))/2$ , $\delta_2 := (1 + k(1 - \cos \alpha))/2$ and $b_{2k+1}$ and $b_{k+1}$ are defined by (2.3). The result is sharp.
Corollary 2.1 · coeff
Corollary 2.1. Let and. Then for any complex number we have The result is sharp. Putting in the Corollary 2.1 we get the following.
Corollary 2.1. Let $\alpha \in [\pi/2, \pi)$ and $f \in \mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ . Then for any complex number $\mu$ we have
$$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}(1 - \cos \alpha) - \mu, & \text{if } \mu \le -\frac{1}{2}\cos \alpha; \\ \frac{1}{2}, & \text{if } -\frac{1}{2}\cos \alpha \le \mu \le 1 - \frac{1}{2}\cos \alpha; \\ \frac{1}{2}(\cos \alpha - 1) + \mu, & \text{if } \mu \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2}\cos \alpha. \end{cases}$$
The result is sharp.
Putting $\alpha = \pi/2$ in the Corollary 2.1 we get the following.
Corollary 2.2 · coeff
Corollary 2.2. Let the function f be given by (1.1) satisfies the inequality 6 Then for any complex number we have the following sharp…
Corollary 2.2. Let the function f be given by (1.1) satisfies the inequality
$$\left| \operatorname{Re} \left\{ \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right\} - 1 \right| < \frac{\pi}{4} \quad (z \in \Delta).$$
6
Then for any complex number $\mu \in \mathbb{C}$ we have the following sharp inequalities
$$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2} - \mu, & \text{if } \mu \le 0; \\ \frac{1}{2}, & \text{if } 0 \le \mu \le 1; \\ \mu - \frac{1}{2}, & \text{if } \mu \ge 1. \end{cases}$$
If we let $\alpha \to \pi^-$ in the Corollary 2.1, then we have:
Corollary 2.3 · coeff
Corollary 2.3. If the function f of the form (1.1) is starlike of order 1/2, then for any complex number the following sharp inequalities…
Corollary 2.3. If the function f of the form (1.1) is starlike of order 1/2, then for any complex number $\mu \in \mathbb{C}$ the following sharp inequalities hold true.
$$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \begin{cases} 1 - \mu, & \text{if } \mu \le \frac{1}{2}; \\ \frac{1}{2}, & \frac{1}{2} \le \mu \le \frac{3}{2}; \\ \mu - 1, & \text{if } \mu \ge \frac{3}{2}. \end{cases}$$
From (2.7) and (2.8) and the first case of the Lemma 1.2 we get
Corollary 2.4 · coeff
Corollary 2.4. If a function of the form (1.1) belongs to the class ( ), then the following sharp inequalities hold. and.
Corollary 2.4. If a function $f \in A$ of the form (1.1) belongs to the class $\mathcal{M}(\alpha)$ ( $\pi/2 \leq \alpha < \pi$ ), then the following sharp inequalities hold.
$$|a_2| \le 1$$
and $|a_3| \le \frac{1}{2}(1 - \cos \alpha)$ .
Theorem 3.1 · coeff
Theorem 3.1. Let the function f given by (1.1) be in the class and. Then and for any real number we have
Theorem 3.1. Let the function f given by (1.1) be in the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Sigma}(\alpha)$ and $\pi/2 \leq \alpha < \pi$ . Then
$$|a_2| \le \sqrt{\frac{2}{2 + \cos \alpha}}$$
and for any real number $\mu$ we have
$$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}, & \text{if } |1 - \mu| \le \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2} \cos \alpha \right); \\ \frac{|1 - \mu|}{1 + \frac{1}{2} \cos \alpha}, & \text{if } |1 - \mu| \ge \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2} \cos \alpha \right). \end{cases}$$
Corollary 3.1 · coeff
Corollary 3.1. Let f of the form (1.1) be in the class. Then If we let in the Theorem 3.1, we get the following.
Corollary 3.1. Let f of the form (1.1) be in the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Sigma}(\alpha)$ . Then
$$|a_3| \le \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{2}\cos\alpha} \quad (\pi/2 \le \alpha < \pi).$$
If we let $\alpha \to \pi^-$ in the Theorem 3.1, we get the following.
Corollary 3.2 · coeff
Corollary 3.2. If the function f of the form (1.1) belongs to the class, then and where is real.
Corollary 3.2. If the function f of the form (1.1) belongs to the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Sigma}(1/2)$ , then $|a_2| \leq 1$ and
$$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}, & \text{if } |1 - \mu| \le \frac{1}{4}; \\ 2|1 - \mu|, & \text{if } |1 - \mu| \ge \frac{1}{4}, \end{cases}$$
where $\mu$ is real.
Definitions (1)
Def 1.1
Definition 1.1. Let. A function is said to be in the class, if the following inequalities hold: and where g is defined by (1.2). Remark…
Definition 1.1. Let $\pi/2 \leq \alpha < \pi$ . A function $f \in \Sigma$ is said to be in the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Sigma}(\alpha)$ , if the following inequalities hold:
$$1 + \frac{\alpha - \pi}{2\sin\alpha} < \operatorname{Re}\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right\} < 1 + \frac{\alpha}{2\sin\alpha} \quad (z \in \Delta)$$
and
$$1 + \frac{\alpha - \pi}{2 \sin \alpha} < \operatorname{Re} \left\{ \frac{w g'(w)}{g(w)} \right\} < 1 + \frac{\alpha}{2 \sin \alpha} \quad (w \in \Delta),$$
where g is defined by (1.2).
Remark 1.1. Upon letting $\alpha \to \pi^-$ it is readily seen that a function $f \in \Sigma$ is in the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Sigma}(1/2)$ if the following inequalities are satisfied:
$$\operatorname{Re}\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right\} > \frac{1}{2} \quad (z \in \Delta)$$
and
$$\operatorname{Re}\left\{\frac{wg'(w)}{g(w)}\right\} > \frac{1}{2} \quad (w \in \Delta),$$
where g is defined by (1.2).
The following lemma will be useful.
Function classes studied:
Coefficient bounds & claims (7)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
b_{2k+1} - mu*b_{k+1}^2 (Fekete-Szego for k-th root transform) ≤ 1/(2*k) * (1 - cos(alpha) - (2*mu+k-1)/k) for class M(alpha) (sharp) [Theorem 2.1]
coefficient_bound
b_{2k+1} - mu*b_{k+1}^2 ≤ 1/(2*k) for class M(alpha) (sharp) [Theorem 2.1]
coefficient_bound
a3 - mu*a2^2 (Fekete-Szego, k=1) ≤ 1/2 for class M(alpha) (sharp) [Corollary 2.1]
coefficient_bound
a3 - mu*a2^2 (Fekete-Szego for bi-univalent class) ≤ 1/2 for class MSigma(alpha) [Theorem 3.1]
coefficient_bound
|a2| ≤ sqrt(2/(2 + cos(alpha))) for class MSigma(alpha) [Theorem 3.1]
function_family
Class M(alpha): f in A satisfying 1+(alpha-pi)/(2*sin(alpha)) < Re(z*f'(z)/f(z)) < 1+alpha/(2*sin(alpha)), pi/2 <= alpha < pi
function_family
Class MSigma(alpha): f in Sigma (bi-univalent) satisfying the M(alpha) two-sided inequality both for f and its inverse g=f^{-1}
Related Papers