🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to introduce a new comprehensive subclass of analytic close-to-convex functions and derive Fekete-Szegö inequalities for functions belonging to this new class by using a different way. Various known special cases of our results are also pointed out.

Results & Lemmas (14)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1. Theorem 1. For 0 ≤β < 1, let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class S∗(β). Then for any real number µ, a3 −µa2 2 ≤(1 −β) max 1,…
Theorem 1. For 0 ≤β < 1, let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class S∗(β). Then for any real number µ, a3 −µa2 2 ≤(1 −β) max {1, |3 −2β −4µ (1 −β)|} .
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. If f ∈C and if µ is real, then a3 −µa2 2 ≤           
Theorem 2. If f ∈C and if µ is real, then a3 −µa2 2 ≤           
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. Let f ∈C(α, β) and be given by (1.1). Then for 0 ≤α, β < 1, 3 a3 −µa2 2 ≤          
Theorem 3. Let f ∈C(α, β) and be given by (1.1). Then for 0 ≤α, β < 1, 3 a3 −µa2 2 ≤          
Lemma 1. Lemma 1. [11] Let p ∈P with p (z) = 1 + c1z + c2z2 + · · ·. Then |cn| ≤2 (n ≥1).
Lemma 1. [11] Let p ∈P with p (z) = 1 + c1z + c2z2 + · · · . Then |cn| ≤2 (n ≥1) .
Lemma 2. Lemma 2. [17] Let p ∈P with p (z) = 1 + c1z + c2z2 + · · ·. Then for any complex number ν c2 −νc2 1 ≤2 max 1, |2ν −1|, and the result is…
Lemma 2. [17] Let p ∈P with p (z) = 1 + c1z + c2z2 + · · · . Then for any complex number ν c2 −νc2 1 ≤2 max {1, |2ν −1|} , and the result is sharp for the functions given by p (z) = 1 + z2 1 −z2 and p (z) = 1 + z 1 −z.
Lemma 3. Lemma 3. [18] Let the function g defined by g(z) = z + ∞ X k=2 bkzk (z ∈U) (2.1) belongs to the function class S∗(β) (0 ≤β < 1). Then we…
Lemma 3. [18] Let the function g defined by g(z) = z + ∞ X k=2 bkzk (z ∈U) (2.1) belongs to the function class S∗(β) (0 ≤β < 1). Then we have |b2| ≤2 (1 −β) and |b3| ≤(1 −β) (3 −2β) .
Lemma 4. Lemma 4. Let the function f given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Kλ,δ (α, β). Then (1 + λ −δ + 2λδ) |a2| ≤2 −α −β (2.2) and 3 (1 +…
Lemma 4. Let the function f given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Kλ,δ (α, β) . Then (1 + λ −δ + 2λδ) |a2| ≤2 −α −β (2.2) and 3 (1 + 2λ −2δ + 6λδ) |a3| ≤(3 −2α −β) (3 −2β) . (2.3)
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Kλ,δ (α, β). Then, for any complex number µ, 3 (1 + 2λ −2δ + 6λδ) a3 −µa2…
Theorem 4. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Kλ,δ (α, β) . Then, for any complex number µ, 3 (1 + 2λ −2δ + 6λδ) a3 −µa2 2
Corollary 1. Corollary 1. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Uβ λ,α. Then, for any complex number µ, 3 (1 + 2λ) a3 −µa2 2
Corollary 1. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Uβ λ,α. Then, for any complex number µ, 3 (1 + 2λ) a3 −µa2 2
Corollary 2. Corollary 2. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Uβ λ. Then, for any complex number µ, 3 (1 + 2λ) a3 −µa2 2
Corollary 2. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Uβ λ . Then, for any complex number µ, 3 (1 + 2λ) a3 −µa2 2
Corollary 3. Corollary 3. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class C(α, β). Then, for any complex number µ, 3 a3 −µa2 2
Corollary 3. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class C(α, β). Then, for any complex number µ, 3 a3 −µa2 2
Theorem 5. Theorem 5. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Kλ,δ (α, β). Then 3 (1 + 2λ −2δ + 6λδ) a3 −µa2 2 ≤          
Theorem 5. Let f (z) given by (1.1) belongs to the function class Kλ,δ (α, β) . Then 3 (1 + 2λ −2δ + 6λδ) a3 −µa2 2 ≤          
Theorem 3.1 Theorem 3.1] with a different way.
Theorem 3.1] with a different way.
Corollary 4. Corollary 4. In Theorem 5, letting δ = 0; δ = 0, α = 0; δ = λ = 0; or δ = λ = 0, α = β = 0, we have [3, Theorem 1], [2, Theorem 3.1],…
Corollary 4. In Theorem 5, letting δ = 0; δ = 0, α = 0; δ = λ = 0; or δ = λ = 0, α = β = 0, we have [3, Theorem 1], [2, Theorem 3.1], Theorem 3 and Theorem 2, respectively. References [1] H.R. Abdel-Gawad and D.K. Thomas, The Fekete-Szeg¨o problem for strongly close-to-convex functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1992), 345–349. [2] M.H. Al-Abbadi and M. Darus, The Fekete-Szeg¨o theorem for a certain class of analytic functions, Sains Malays. 40 (4) (2011), 385–389. [3] M.H. Al-Abbadi and M. Da
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Subordination Associated with Laguerre polynomial
2026
Coefficient problems of Starlike Functions Related to a Balloon-Shaped Domain
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for the Exponential Starlike class
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,343 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback