🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give some applications of Zalcman's Rescalling Lemma.

Results & Lemmas (8)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1.1 · coeff Theorem 1.1. (Hurwitz's theorem) Let Ω be an open connected set in C <sup>n</sup> and gj(z) a sequence of holomorphic functions on Ω,…
Theorem 1.1. (Hurwitz's theorem) Let Ω be an open connected set in C <sup>n</sup> and {gj(z)} a sequence of holomorphic functions on Ω, converging uniformly on compact sets to a holomorphic function g. Then if gj(z) 6= 0 for all j, and all z, and g is nonconstant, we have g(z) 6= 0 for all z ∈ Ω. The theorem of Montel is easy consequence of Zalcman's lemma [10]. 1 <sup>2020</sup> Mathematics Subject Classification. 32A19. Key words and phrases. Zalcman's Lemma, normal families, holomorphic functions of several complex variables.
Theorem 1.2 Theorem 1.2. (Montel's theorem) Let be a family of holomorphic functions on an open set that omit two fixed complex values. Then, each…
Theorem 1.2. (Montel's theorem) Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of holomorphic functions on an open set $\Omega \subseteq C^n$ that omit two fixed complex values. Then, each sequence of functions in $\mathcal{F}$ has a subsequence which converges uniformly on compact subsets.
Theorem 1.3 Theorem 1.3. (Schotthy's theorem). Let M > 0 and be given. Then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on r and f(0) such that the…
Theorem 1.3. (Schotthy's theorem). Let M > 0 and $r \in [0,1)$ be given. Then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on r and f(0) such that the following implication holds: If f is holomorphic in the unit ball B, omits 0 and 1 from its range, and if |f(0)| < M, then |f(z)| < C for all $z \in B(0,r) = z \in C^n : |z| < r$ .
Theorem 1.4 Theorem 1.4. (Carathéodory's theorem) Let be a family of functions holomorphic on. Suppose that for some, there exist for each distinct…
Theorem 1.4. (Carathéodory's theorem) Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions holomorphic on $\Omega \subset C^n$ . Suppose that for some $\varepsilon > 0$ , there exist for each $f \in \mathcal{F}$ distinct points $a_f, b_f \in C$ such that for all $z \in \Omega$ , $f(z) \neq a_f, b_f$ and $$s(a_f, \infty)s(a_f, b_f)s(\infty, b_f) > \varepsilon$$ . Then $\mathcal{F}$ is normal on $\Omega$ .
Theorem 1.5 Theorem 1.5. (Fatou's theorem) Let a(z) and b(z) be functions holomorphic on Ω ⊂ C <sup>n</sup> such that a(z) 6= b(z) for each z ∈ Ω. Let…
Theorem 1.5. (Fatou's theorem) Let a(z) and b(z) be functions holomorphic on Ω ⊂ C <sup>n</sup> such that a(z) 6= b(z) for each z ∈ Ω. Let F be a family of functions holomorphic on Ω such that for each z ∈ Ω $$f(z) \neq a(z)$$ $f(z) \neq b(z)$ for all f ∈ F. Then F is normal on Ω.
Theorem 1.7 Theorem 1.7. (R. Nevanlinna) [7, Theorem 17.3.10., p. 274] Let g be an entire function. Then g has at most two totally ramified (finite)…
Theorem 1.7. (R. Nevanlinna) [7, Theorem 17.3.10., p. 274] Let g be an entire function. Then g has at most two totally ramified (finite) values. Let f be a holomorphic function on an open connected set Ω in C <sup>n</sup>. Define the value set by $$A_f(a) = \{z \in \Omega : f(z) = a\} = f^{-1}[\{a\}].$$
Theorem 1.8 Theorem 1.8. (Hurwitz's theorem). [12, Corollary p.80] Let Ω be an open connected set in C <sup>n</sup> and let fj be a sequence of…
Theorem 1.8. (Hurwitz's theorem). [12, Corollary p.80] Let Ω be an open connected set in C <sup>n</sup> and let {fj} be a sequence of holomorphic functions on Ω, converging uniformly on compact sets to a nonconstant holomorphic function f. If Af<sup>j</sup> (a) = ∅ for all j then A<sup>f</sup> (a) = ∅. Let ζ, v ∈ C <sup>n</sup>, v 6= 0. The set $$\{\xi \in C^n : \xi = \zeta + \lambda v, \lambda \in C\}$$ is called a complex line in C n. The restriction of an entire (holomorphic in C <sup>n</sup>) function g to a complex line {ξ = ζ + λv, λ ∈ C} clearly is an entire g(ζ + λ · v) of complex variable λ in C. Mimic the proof given in the one-dimensional case in [13, Theorem p. 219] we can prove the following normality criterion. The original result due to Lappan [9] corresponds to normal functions.
Theorem 1.9 Theorem 1.9. family of holomorphic functions on a domain is normal on if and only if for each compact set, there exists a set containing at…
Theorem 1.9. family $\mathcal{F}$ of holomorphic functions on a domain $\Omega \subset C^n$ is normal on $\Omega$ if and only if for each compact set $K \subset \Omega$ , there exists a set $E = E(K) \subset C$ containing at least three distinct values and a finite constant M = M(K) > 0 for which $$(1.1) f^{\sharp}(z) \le M \quad z \in K, f(z) \in E$$ for all $f \in \mathcal{F}$ .

Definitions (1)

Def 1.6 Definition 1.6. Let g(λ) be an entire (holomorphic in C) function, if the equation g(λ) = a, a ∈ C, has no simple roots then a called a…
Definition 1.6. Let g(λ) be an entire (holomorphic in C) function, if the equation g(λ) = a, a ∈ C, has no simple roots then a called a totally ramified values. Note that an omitted value trivially satisfies this definition, but that it will be useful to distinguish between omitted values and non-omitted totally ramified values.

Related Papers

An improvement of Zalcman's lemma in $C^n$
2020
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback