🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

In this paper we study class $\mathcal{S}^+$ of univalent functions $f$ such that $\frac{z}{f(z)}$ has real and positive coefficients. For such functions we give estimates of the Fekete-Szegő functional and sharp estimates of their initial coefficients and logarithmic coefficients. Also, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for $f\in \mathcal{S}^+$ to be starlike of order $1/2$.

Results & Lemmas (7)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1. Theorem 1. For each f ∈S+ we have −1 ≤a3 −γa2 2 ≤ ( 1 + 2e−2γ/(1−γ), 0 ≤γ ≤ ν0 1+ν0 = 0.456278... 2(1 −γ) (ν0+1)2 2ν0+1, ν0 1+ν0 ≤γ < 1.…
Theorem 1. For each f ∈S+ we have −1 ≤a3 −γa2 2 ≤ ( 1 + 2e−2γ/(1−γ), 0 ≤γ ≤ ν0 1+ν0 = 0.456278 . . . 2(1 −γ) (ν0+1)2 2ν0+1 , ν0 1+ν0 ≤γ < 1. where ν0 = 0.83927 . . . is the positive real root of the equation (6) 2(2ν + 1)e−2ν = 1.
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. Let f ∈S+ and let γ1, γ2, γ3 be its logarithmic coefficients. Then (a) −1 ≤γ1 ≤0; (b) −1 2 ≤γ2 ≤ (ν0+1)2 2(2ν0+1) = 0.631464...,…
Theorem 2. Let f ∈S+ and let γ1, γ2, γ3 be its logarithmic coefficients. Then (a) −1 ≤γ1 ≤0; (b) −1 2 ≤γ2 ≤ (ν0+1)2 2(2ν0+1) = 0.631464 . . ., where ν0 = 0.83927 . . . is the solution of the equation (6); (c) −1 4 ≤γ3 ≤1 3. Some of these results are the best possible.
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. If f(z) = z + a2z2 + a3z3 + · · · belongs to the class U+(λ), 0 < λ ≤1, then we have −(1 + λ) ≤a2 ≤0, −λ ≤a3 ≤1 + λ + λ2, −(1 +…
Theorem 3. If f(z) = z + a2z2 + a3z3 + · · · belongs to the class U+(λ), 0 < λ ≤1, then we have −(1 + λ) ≤a2 ≤0, −λ ≤a3 ≤1 + λ + λ2, −(1 + λ + λ2 + λ4) ≤a4 ≤4λ 3 r 2λ 3 , a5 ≥  −λ/3, 0 < λ ≤4/27 −9λ2/4, 4/27 ≤λ ≤1 . All these inequalities are sharp.
Corollary 1. Corollary 1. Let f(z) = z + a2z2 + a3z3 + · · · belong to the class S+. Then we have the next sharp inequalities −2 ≤a2 ≤0, −1 ≤a3 ≤3, −4…
Corollary 1. Let f(z) = z + a2z2 + a3z3 + · · · belong to the class S+. Then we have the next sharp inequalities −2 ≤a2 ≤0, −1 ≤a3 ≤3, −4 ≤a4 ≤4 3 r 2 3, −9 4 ≤a5 ≤5. We note that upper bound for a5 follows from de Brange’s theorem. 3. Relation with starlike functions In this section we study the relation between the class S+ and the class of starlike functions.
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. Let f ∈A and satisfy the condition (1). Then the condition (11) ∞ X n=1 (2n −1)bn ≤1 is necessary and sufficient for f to be in…
Theorem 4. Let f ∈A and satisfy the condition (1). Then the condition (11) ∞ X n=1 (2n −1)bn ≤1 is necessary and sufficient for f to be in the class S⋆(1/2).
Theorem 5. Theorem 5. Let f ∈S+ and let b1 = 0, then f ∈S⋆.
Theorem 5. Let f ∈S+ and let b1 = 0, then f ∈S⋆.
Theorem 6. Theorem 6. Let f ∈S+. Then the function (12) g(z) = z + 1 2  z f(z) −1 −b1z  is univalent in D. More precisely, Re g′(z) > 0 (z ∈D), g…
Theorem 6. Let f ∈S+. Then the function (12) g(z) = z + 1 2  z f(z) −1 −b1z  is univalent in D. More precisely, Re g′(z) > 0 (z ∈D), g ∈S⋆and g ∈U.

Related Papers

Simple proofs of certain inequalities with logarithmic coefficients of univalent
2023
On the difference of initial logarithmic coefficients for the class of univalent
2023
On the difference of coefficients of univalent functions
2020
New upper bounds of the third Hankel determinant for some classes of univalent f
2019
Hankel determinant of second order for some classes of analytic functions
2019
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,507 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback