🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
cryptography
Abstract

Let $f=h+\overline{g}$ be a harmonic univalent map in the unit disk $\mathbb{D}$, where $h $ and $g$ are analytic. We obtain an improved estimate for the second coefficient of $h$. This indeed is the first qualitative improvement after the appearance of the papers by Clunie and Sheil-Small in 1984, and by Sheil-Small in 1990. Also, when the sup-norm of the dilatation is less than $1$, it is shown that the spherical area of the covering surface of $h$ is dominated by the spherical area of the cov

Results & Lemmas (12)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1. Theorem 1. If f = h + g ∈S0 H, then |a2| ≤20.9197. The proof of Theorem 1 is presented in Section 3. It requires several other basic…
Theorem 1. If f = h + g ∈S0 H, then |a2| ≤20.9197. The proof of Theorem 1 is presented in Section 3. It requires several other basic results which will be discussed in Section 2. For f = h + g ∈S0 H given by (1.1), it was shown in [3] that the analytic part h of f lies in Hardy spaces Hp for some small p > 0, namely, 0 < p < (2α0 + 2)−2 with α0 = supSH |a2|. Thus, determining sharp estimate for |a2| is an important problem. On the other hand, while the bound in Theorem 1 may not be sharp, it is
Corollary 2 Corollary 2, a new estimate on the second coefficient is obtained for functions belonging to a certain class of conformal mappings. In…
Corollary 2, a new estimate on the second coefficient is obtained for functions belonging to a certain class of conformal mappings. In Section 4, specifically in Theorem 4, we show that for a K–quasiconformal univalent harmonic map f = h + g (that is, |fz| ≤α|fz| a.e. on D, where α = (K −1)/(K + 1) with K ≥1), the spherical area As(h) is dominated by
Lemma 1. Lemma 1. Suppose that Q(z) = P∞ n=1 Anzn is given by (2.1) and f(z) = P∞ n=1 anzn analytic in D satisfy f(z) ≺Q(z) for z ∈D. Then |an| ≤An…
Lemma 1. Suppose that Q(z) = P∞ n=1 Anzn is given by (2.1) and f(z) = P∞ n=1 anzn analytic in D satisfy f(z) ≺Q(z) for z ∈D. Then |an| ≤An for n ≥1.
Lemma 2. Lemma 2. [16] If f ∈F, D = f(D) and a = d(0, ∂D), then f(z) ≺aQ(z). If D is a region in the complex plane, denote by Dc its complement C.…
Lemma 2. [16] If f ∈F, D = f(D) and a = d(0, ∂D), then f(z) ≺aQ(z). If D is a region in the complex plane, denote by Dc its complement C\D. As an immediate consequence of Lemma 2, here is a result which reveals an important geometric fact.
Corollary 1. Corollary 1. (Compare with [15, Theorem II]) Suppose that h ∈F, h(z) = P∞ n=1 anzn, h(D) = D, d(0, ∂D) = |a|, a ∈∂D, and Q(z) = P∞ n=1 Anzn…
Corollary 1. (Compare with [15, Theorem II]) Suppose that h ∈F, h(z) = P∞ n=1 anzn, h(D) = D, d(0, ∂D) = |a|, a ∈∂D, and Q(z) = P∞ n=1 Anzn is given by (2.1). Then |an| ≤|a|An for n ≥1. An important question to ask is whether the coefficient estimate is sharp. At least in
Theorem 2 · coeff Theorem 2 in the next section, we present better estimates for a2 and a3. 3. Coefficient estimates for hyperbolic conformal maps Here is…
Theorem 2 in the next section, we present better estimates for a2 and a3. 3. Coefficient estimates for hyperbolic conformal maps Here is our first basic result which gives better estimates for a2 and a3 than the estimates given by Corollary 1.
Theorem 2. Theorem 2. Suppose that h ∈F, h(z) = z + P∞ n=2 anzn, h(D) = D, and d(0, ∂D) = |a| for some a ∈∂D. Then a2 and a3 satisfy the following…
Theorem 2. Suppose that h ∈F, h(z) = z + P∞ n=2 anzn, h(D) = D, and d(0, ∂D) = |a| for some a ∈∂D. Then a2 and a3 satisfy the following inequalities: (3.1) 1 16 ≤|a|, |a2| ≤16|a| + 1 2|a|, and (3.2) |a3| ≤704|a|. If in addition D is hyperbolic, then |a| < 1.
Corollary 2. Corollary 2. If h ∈F and h(z) = z + P∞ n=2 anzn, then |a2| ≤16.5 and |a3| ≤704. Now, we are in a position to formulate an important general…
Corollary 2. If h ∈F and h(z) = z + P∞ n=2 anzn, then |a2| ≤16.5 and |a3| ≤704. Now, we are in a position to formulate an important general result. First note that if h(z) = P∞ n=1 anzn is analytic on D, h(D) = D and d(0, ∂D) = |a| for some a ∈∂D, then the function z (h(z) −a) /(−a) belongs to F. Furthermore, we remark that z(h(z) −a) is zero only at 0.
Theorem 3. Theorem 3. Suppose that h is conformal in D, h(D) = D is hyperbolic and d(0, ∂D) = |a|, where a ∈∂D and h(0) = h′(0) −1 = 0. Then 1 16.5…
Theorem 3. Suppose that h is conformal in D, h(D) = D is hyperbolic and d(0, ∂D) = |a|, where a ∈∂D and h(0) = h′(0) −1 = 0. Then 1 16.5 ≤|a| < 1.
Lemma 3. Lemma 3. Suppose that h(z) = z + a2z2 + · · · is analytic in D and misses the disk D(c, r):= z: |z−c| < r which touches the boundary ∂h(D).…
Lemma 3. Suppose that h(z) = z + a2z2 + · · · is analytic in D and misses the disk D(c, r) := {z : |z−c| < r} which touches the boundary ∂h(D). Then the function Ψ defined by Ψ(z) = c−h(z) c misses the disk D(0, ρ), where ρ = r/|c| > 1/16, and |a2| < 20.9197|c|.
Theorem 4. Theorem 4. Let f = h+g be a sense-preserving univalent harmonic mapping in D given by (1.1) with the dilatation ϕ. Suppose that α = ||ϕ||∞<…
Theorem 4. Let f = h+g be a sense-preserving univalent harmonic mapping in D given by (1.1) with the dilatation ϕ. Suppose that α = ||ϕ||∞< 1 and D = h(D) is hyperbolic. Then the spherical area of the covering surface of D satisfies 1 −α2 4 As(D) ≤As(Ω) := As(Ω, f) ≤4π, where f(D) = Ωand As(D) = ZZ D |h′(z)|2 dA (1 + |h(z)|2)2.
Theorem 5. Theorem 5. Let f = h + g ∈S0 H, f(D) = Ω, h(D) = D is hyperbolic, and a ∈∂D be the nearest point to the origin 0. Then (5.4) 1 16 ≤d(0, ∂D)…
Theorem 5. Let f = h + g ∈S0 H, f(D) = Ω, h(D) = D is hyperbolic, and a ∈∂D be the nearest point to the origin 0. Then (5.4) 1 16 ≤d(0, ∂D) ≤1 and (5.5) 1 16(1 −|µ(z)|) ≤d(f(z), ∂Ω) ≤2d(h(z), ∂D).
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Subordination Associated with Laguerre polynomial
2026
Coefficient problems of Starlike Functions Related to a Balloon-Shaped Domain
2026
Sharp Coefficient Estimates for the Exponential Starlike class
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #3,901 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback