Abstract
In the present paper two certain subclasses of the starlike functions associated with the vertical strip are considered. The main aim of this paper is to investigate some basic properties of these classes such as, subordination relations, sharp inequalities for sums involving logarithmic coefficients and estimate of logarithmic coefficients.
Results & Lemmas (10)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 1.1.
Lemma 1.1. (see [27]) Let φ, ϕ ∈H be any convex univalent functions in ∆. If f(z) ≺φ(z) and g(z) ≺ϕ(z), then f(z) ∗g(z) ≺φ(z) ∗ϕ(z) (z ∈∆),…
Lemma 1.1. (see [27]) Let φ, ϕ ∈H be any convex univalent functions in ∆. If f(z) ≺φ(z) and g(z) ≺ϕ(z), then f(z) ∗g(z) ≺φ(z) ∗ϕ(z) (z ∈∆), where ”*” denotes the Hadamard product. In this paper, some subordination relations among the classes S(α, β) and M(δ) are presented. These relations are then used to obtain sharp estimates for sums involving their logarithmic coefficients. Also, the estimate of logarithmic coefficients for functions belonging to these subclasses are determined. 2. Main Results
Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 2.1. Let f(z) ∈A, α < 1 and β > 1. Also let Pα,β(z) be defined by (1.5). If f(z) ∈S(α, β), then (2.1) log f(z) z ≺bPα,β(z), where…
Theorem 2.1. Let f(z) ∈A, α < 1 and β > 1. Also let Pα,β(z) be defined by (1.5). If f(z) ∈S(α, β), then (2.1) log f(z) z ≺bPα,β(z), where (2.2) bPα,β(z) := Z z 0 Pα,β(t) −1 t
Corollary 2.1.
Corollary 2.1. Let f(z) ∈S(α, β). Then f(z) z ≺exp bPα,β(z) (z ∈∆), where bPα,β(z) is given by (2.2).
Corollary 2.1. Let f(z) ∈S(α, β). Then f(z) z ≺exp bPα,β(z) (z ∈∆), where bPα,β(z) is given by (2.2).
Theorem 2.2.
Theorem 2.2. For α < 1 and β > 1, the logarithmic coefficients of f ∈S(α, β) satisfy the following inequality (2.5) ∞ X n=1 |γn|2 ≤(β −α)2…
Theorem 2.2. For α < 1 and β > 1, the logarithmic coefficients of f ∈S(α, β) satisfy the following inequality (2.5) ∞ X n=1 |γn|2 ≤(β −α)2 4π2 π4 45 −Li4 e−2πi 1−α β−α −Li4
Theorem 2.3.
Theorem 2.3. Let f ∈A belongs to the class S(α, β) and γn be the logarithmic coefficients of f. Then (2.9) |γn| ≤β −α nπ sin π(1 −α) β −α
Theorem 2.3. Let f ∈A belongs to the class S(α, β) and γn be the logarithmic coefficients of f. Then (2.9) |γn| ≤β −α nπ sin π(1 −α) β −α
Corollary 2.2.
Corollary 2.2. If f ∈S(α, β) when β →+∞, then |γn| ≤β −α nπ sin π(1 −α) β −α ≤β −α nπ × π(1 −α) β −α = 1 −α n (n ≥1). Indeed, if f ∈S∗(α)…
Corollary 2.2. If f ∈S(α, β) when β →+∞, then |γn| ≤β −α nπ sin π(1 −α) β −α ≤β −α nπ × π(1 −α) β −α = 1 −α n (n ≥1). Indeed, if f ∈S∗(α) (0 ≤α < 1) and γn is the corresponding logarithmic coeffi- cients, then we have |γn| ≤(1 −α)/n for n ≥1. Next, we have the following.
Theorem 2.4.
Theorem 2.4. Let π/2 ≤δ < π. Also let Bδ(z) and An be defined by (1.8) and (1.10), respectively. If f(z) ∈M(δ), then log f(z) z ≺ Z z 0…
Theorem 2.4. Let π/2 ≤δ < π. Also let Bδ(z) and An be defined by (1.8) and (1.10), respectively. If f(z) ∈M(δ), then log f(z) z ≺ Z z 0 Bδ(t) t dt. Moreover, (2.10) eBδ(z) :=
Corollary 2.3.
Corollary 2.3. If f(z) ∈M(δ), then f(z) z ≺exp eBδ(z) (z ∈∆), where eBδ(z) is of the form (2.10).
Corollary 2.3. If f(z) ∈M(δ), then f(z) z ≺exp eBδ(z) (z ∈∆), where eBδ(z) is of the form (2.10).
Theorem 2.5.
Theorem 2.5. Let f ∈A belongs to the class M(δ) and π/2 ≤δ < π. Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy the inequality (2.11) ∞ X n=1…
Theorem 2.5. Let f ∈A belongs to the class M(δ) and π/2 ≤δ < π. Then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy the inequality (2.11) ∞ X n=1 |γn|2 ≤ 1 16 sin2 δ π4 45 −Li4 e−2iδ −Li4 e2iδ ,
Theorem 2.6.
Theorem 2.6. Let π/2 ≤δ < π. If f ∈A belongs to the class M(δ), then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy |γn| ≤1 2n (n ≥1).
Theorem 2.6. Let π/2 ≤δ < π. If f ∈A belongs to the class M(δ), then the logarithmic coefficients of f satisfy |γn| ≤1 2n (n ≥1).
Related Papers