Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
In this article, we determine the radius of univalence of sections of normalized univalent harmonic mappings for which the range is convex (resp. starlike, close-to-convex, convex in one direction). Our result on the radius of univalence of section $s_{n,n}(f)$ is sharp especially when the corresponding mappings have convex range. In this case, each section $s_{n,n}(f)$ is univalent in the disk of radius $1/4$ for all $n\geq2$, which may be compared with classical result of Szegö on conformal ma
Results & Lemmas (6)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1.
Theorem 1. Let f = h + g ∈S0 H with series representation as in (3). Suppose that f belongs to any one of the following geometric…
Theorem 1. Let f = h + g ∈S0 H with series representation as in (3). Suppose that f belongs to any one of the following geometric subclasses of S0 H : S∗0 H , C0 H, S0 H(S) or the class of harmonic mappings convex in one direction. Then the section sn,m(f) is univalent in the disk |z| < rn,m. Here rn,m is the unique positive root of the equation ψ(n, m, r) = 0, where (4) ψ(n, m, r) = 1 12r 1 −r
Theorem 2.
Theorem 2. Let f = h + g ∈K0 H with series representation as in (3). Then the section sn,m(f) is univalent in the disk |z| < rn,m, where…
Theorem 2. Let f = h + g ∈K0 H with series representation as in (3). Then the section sn,m(f) is univalent in the disk |z| < rn,m, where rn,m is the unique positive root of the equation µ(n, m, r) = 0. Here (6) µ(n, m, r) = 1 −r (1 + r)3 − ∞ X k=n+1 k(k + 1) 2 rk−1
Lemma 1.
Lemma 1. The following identities are true for 0 < r < 1: (i) ∞ X k=n+1 krk−1 = rn (1 −r)2[1 + n(1 −r)]. (ii) ∞ X k=n+1 k2rk−1 = rn (1…
Lemma 1. The following identities are true for 0 < r < 1: (i) ∞ X k=n+1 krk−1 = rn (1 −r)2[1 + n(1 −r)]. (ii) ∞ X k=n+1 k2rk−1 = rn (1 −r)3[2 + (2n −1)(1 −r) + n2(1 −r)2].
Corollary 1. · radius
Corollary 1. Let f ∈S0 H satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 1. Then sn,n(f)(z) is univalent in the disk (i) |z| < 1/4, whenever n ≥7, (ii)…
Corollary 1. Let f ∈S0 H satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 1. Then sn,n(f)(z) is univalent in the disk (i) |z| < 1/4, whenever n ≥7, (ii) |z| < 1/2, whenever n ≥22, (ii) |z| < 3/4, whenever n ≥78. The bound for the radius of univalence rn,n of sn,n(f) for certain values of n are listed in Table 1. The following shearing theorem due to Clunie and Sheil-Small is needed for the proof of Theorem 2. Theorem D. [5, Theorem 5.3] A locally univalent harmonic function f = h + g in D is a univalent mappi
Lemma 2.
Lemma 2. If f = h + g ∈K0 H, r ∈(0, 1), t, ψ ∈R, then
Lemma 2. If f = h + g ∈K0 H, r ∈(0, 1), t, ψ ∈R, then
Corollary 2.
Corollary 2. Let f ∈K0 H satisfy the hypothesis of Theorem 2. Then sn,n(f; θ)(z) is univalent in the disk (i) |z| < 1/4, whenever n ≥2,…
Corollary 2. Let f ∈K0 H satisfy the hypothesis of Theorem 2. Then sn,n(f; θ)(z) is univalent in the disk (i) |z| < 1/4, whenever n ≥2, (ii) |z| < 1/2, whenever n ≥17, (ii) |z| < 3/4, whenever n ≥46.
Function classes studied:
Related Papers