Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
Making use of Chebyshev polynomials, we obtain upper bound estimate for the second Hankel determinant of a subclass $\mathcal{N}_{σ}^μ\left( λ,t\right) $ of bi-univalent function class $σ.$
Results & Lemmas (7)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 1
Lemma 1. [34] If the function is given by the series (1.7), then the following sharp estimate holds: (1.8)
Lemma 1. [34] If the function $p \in \mathcal{P}$ is given by the series (1.7), then the following sharp estimate holds:
$$|c_k| \le 2, \qquad k = 1, 2, \cdots.$$
(1.8)
Lemma 2
Lemma 2. [20] If the function is given by the series (1.7), then for some x, z with and. In this present paper, we consider a subclass of…
Lemma 2. [20] If the function $p \in \mathcal{P}$ is given by the series (1.7), then
$$2c_2 = c_1^2 + x(4 - c_1^2)$$
$$4c_3 = c_1^3 + 2c_1(4 - c_1^2)x - c_1(4 - c_1^2)x^2 + 2(4 - c_1^2)(1 - |x|^2)z$$
for some x, z with $|x| \le 1$ and $|z| \le 1$ .
In this present paper, we consider a subclass $\mathcal{N}_{\sigma}^{\mu}(\lambda, t)$ of analytic and bi-univalent functions using the Chebyshev polynomials expansions and find the second Hankel determinant estimates. Further we discuss its consequences.
Theorem 1
Theorem 1. Let of the form (1.1) be in. Then where and
Theorem 1. Let $f \in \sigma$ of the form (1.1) be in $\mathcal{N}^{\mu}_{\sigma}(\lambda; t)$ . Then
$$|a_{2}a_{4} - a_{3}^{2}| \leq \begin{cases} K(2^{-}, t) & ; M_{1} \geq 0 \text{ and } M_{2} \geq 0 \\ \max\left\{\frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda + \mu)^{2}}, K(2^{-}, t)\right\} & ; M_{1} > 0 \text{ and } M_{2} < 0 \\ \frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda + \mu)^{2}} & ; M_{1} \leq 0 \text{ and } M_{2} \leq 0 \\ \max\left\{K(c_{0}, t), K(2^{-}, t)\right\} & ; M_{1} < 0 \text{ and } M_{2} > 0 \end{cases}$$
where
$$K(2^{-}, t) = \frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda + \mu)^{2}} + \frac{M_{1} + 3M_{2}}{6(\lambda + \mu)^{4}(2\lambda + \mu)^{2}(3\lambda + \mu)},$$
$$K(c_{0}, t) = \frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda + \mu)^{2}} - \frac{3M_{2}^{2}}{8M_{1}(\lambda + \mu)^{4}(2\lambda + \mu)^{2}(3\lambda + \mu)}, \qquad c_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{-6M_{2}}{M_{1}}}$$
and
$$\begin{split} M_1 &:= M_1(\lambda,\,\mu;\,t) &= 16t^2 \left| 3(2t^2-1)(\lambda+\mu)^3 - (\mu^2+3\mu+2)(3\lambda+\mu)t^2 \right| (2\lambda+\mu)^2 \\ &- 24t \left[ t^2(3\lambda+\mu) + (4t^2-1)(\lambda+\mu)(2\lambda+\mu) \right] (\lambda+\mu)^2 (2\lambda+\mu) \\ &- 24t^2\lambda^2(\lambda+\mu)^3, \\ M_2 &:= M_2(\lambda,\,\mu;\,t) &= 8t \left[ t^2(2\lambda+\mu)(3\lambda+\mu) + (4t^2-1)(\lambda+\mu)(2\lambda+\mu)^2 \right] \end{split}$$
Corollary 1
Corollary 1. Let of the form (1.1) be in. Then where and
Corollary 1. Let $f \in \sigma$ of the form (1.1) be in $\mathcal{B}_{\sigma}(\lambda, t)$ . Then
$$|a_{2}a_{4} - a_{3}^{2}| \leq \begin{cases} K(2^{-}, t) & ; M_{3} \geq 0 \text{ and } M_{4} \geq 0 \\ \max\left\{\frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda+1)^{2}}, K(2^{-}, t)\right\} & ; M_{3} > 0 \text{ and } M_{4} < 0 \\ \frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda+1)^{2}} & ; M_{3} \leq 0 \text{ and } M_{4} \leq 0 \\ \max\left\{K(c_{0}, t), K(2^{-}, t)\right\} & ; M_{3} < 0 \text{ and } M_{4} > 0 \end{cases}$$
where
$$K(2^{-}, t) = \frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda + 1)^{2}} + \frac{M_{3} + 3M_{4}}{6(\lambda + 1)^{4}(2\lambda + 1)^{2}(3\lambda + 1)},$$
$$K(c_{0}, t) = \frac{4t^{2}}{(2\lambda + 1)^{2}} - \frac{3M_{4}^{2}}{8M_{3}(\lambda + 1)^{4}(2\lambda + 1)^{2}(3\lambda + 1)}, \qquad c_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{-6M_{4}}{M_{3}}}$$
and
$$M_{3} = 16t^{2} |3(2t^{2} - 1)(\lambda + 1)^{3} - 6(3\lambda + 1)t^{2}| (2\lambda + 1)^{2}$$
$$-24t [t^{2}(3\lambda + 1) + (4t^{2} - 1)(\lambda + 1)(2\lambda + 1)] (\lambda + 1)^{2}(2\lambda + 1)$$
$$-24t^{2}\lambda^{2}(\lambda + 1)^{3},$$
$$M_{4} = 8t [t^{2}(2\lambda + 1)(3\lambda + 1) + (4t^{2} - 1)(\lambda + 1)(2\lambda + 1)^{2}$$
$$+t(2\lambda + 1)^{2}(\lambda + 1) - 2t(\lambda + 1)^{2}(3\lambda + 1)] (\lambda + 1)^{2}.$$
Corollary 2
Corollary 2. Let of the form (1.1) be in. Then where and
Corollary 2. Let $f \in \sigma$ of the form (1.1) be in $\mathcal{B}^{\mu}_{\sigma}(t)$ . Then
$$|a_{2}a_{4} - a_{3}^{2}| \leq \begin{cases} K(2^{-}, t) & ; M_{5} \geq 0 \text{ and } M_{6} \geq 0 \\ \max\left\{\frac{4t^{2}}{(2+\mu)^{2}}, K(2^{-}, t)\right\} & ; M_{5} > 0 \text{ and } M_{6} < 0 \\ \frac{4t^{2}}{(2+\mu)^{2}} & ; M_{5} \leq 0 \text{ and } M_{6} \leq 0 \\ \max\left\{K(c_{0}, t), K(2^{-}, t)\right\} & ; M_{5} < 0 \text{ and } M_{6} > 0 \end{cases}$$
where
$$K(2^{-}, t) = \frac{4t^{2}}{(2+\mu)^{2}} + \frac{M_{5} + 3M_{6}}{6(1+\mu)^{4}(2+\mu)^{2}(3+\mu)},$$
$$K(c_{0}, t) = \frac{4t^{2}}{(2+\mu)^{2}} - \frac{3M_{6}^{2}}{8M_{5}(1+\mu)^{4}(2+\mu)^{2}(3+\mu)}, \qquad c_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{-6M_{6}}{M_{5}}}$$
and
$$M_5 = 16t^2 |3(2t^2 - 1)(1 + \mu)^3 - (\mu^2 + 3\mu + 2)(3 + \mu)t^2 | (2 + \mu)^2$$
$$-24t [t^2(3 + \mu) + (4t^2 - 1)(1 + \mu)(2 + \mu)] (1 + \mu)^2 (2 + \mu)$$
$$-24t^2 (1 + \mu)^3,$$
$$M_6 = 8t [t^2(2 + \mu)(3 + \mu) + (4t^2 - 1)(1 + \mu)(2 + \mu)^2$$
$$+t(2 + \mu)^2 (1 + \mu) - 2t(1 + \mu)^2 (3 + \mu)] (1 + \mu)^2.$$
Corollary 3 · coeff
Corollary 3. Let of the form (1.1) be in. Then where, the value of, which is approximately, is root of equation for and.
Corollary 3. Let $f \in \sigma$ of the form (1.1) be in $\mathcal{B}_{\sigma}(t)$ . Then
$$|a_2 a_4 - a_3^2| \le \begin{cases} t^2 (1 - t^2), & \frac{1}{2} < t \le t_{0_1}; \\ \frac{t(260t^4 + 84t^3 - 139t^2 - 18t + 9)}{8(18t^3 + 42t^2 - 17t - 9)}, & t_{0_1} < t < 1, \end{cases}$$
where, the value of $t_{0_1}$ , which is approximately $t_{0_1} = 0.603615$ , is root of equation $M_1 = 0$ for $\lambda = \mu$ and $\frac{1}{2} < t < 1$ .
Corollary 4 · coeff
Corollary 4. Let of the form (1.1) be in. Then Remark 5. For specializing the parameters involving in Theorem 1, the results discussed are…
Corollary 4. Let $f \in \sigma$ of the form (1.1) be in $\mathcal{S}_{\sigma}^{*}(t)$ . Then
$$|a_2 a_4 - a_3^2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{8t^2}{3}, & \frac{1}{2} < t \le \frac{7 + \sqrt{401}}{44}; \\ t^2 + \frac{t(2 + t - 11t^2)^2}{3(22t^2 - 7t - 4)}, & \frac{7 + \sqrt{401}}{44} < t < 1. \end{cases}$$
Remark 5. For specializing the parameters involving in Theorem 1, the results discussed are improve the results of Mustafa [28].
Acknowledgment: We record our sincere thanks to the referees for their insightful suggestions to improve the results as well as the present form of the article.
Definitions (1)
Def 1
Definition 1. For, and, a function given by (1.1) is said to be in the class if the following subordinations hold for all: (1.3) and where…
Definition 1. For $\lambda \geq 1$ , $\mu \geq 0$ and $t \in (1/2, 1]$ , a function $f \in \sigma$ given by (1.1) is said to be in the class $\mathcal{N}_{\sigma}^{\mu}(\lambda, t)$ if the following subordinations hold for all $z, w \in \mathbb{D}$ :
$$(1 - \lambda) \left(\frac{f(z)}{z}\right)^{\mu} + \lambda f'(z) \left(\frac{f(z)}{z}\right)^{\mu - 1} \prec H(z, t) := \frac{1}{1 - 2tz + z^2}$$
(1.3)
and
$$(1 - \lambda) \left(\frac{g(w)}{w}\right)^{\mu} + \lambda g'(w) \left(\frac{g(w)}{w}\right)^{\mu - 1} \prec H(w, t) := \frac{1}{1 - 2tw + w^2},\tag{1.4}$$
where the function $g = f^{-1}$ is defined by (1.2).
We note that if $t = \cos \alpha$ , where $\alpha \in (-\pi/3, \pi/3)$ , then
$$H(z,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2\cos\alpha z + z^2} = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(n+1)\alpha}{\sin\alpha} z^n \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}).$$
Thus
$$H(z,t) = 1 + 2\cos\alpha z + (3\cos^2\alpha - \sin^2\alpha)z^2 + \dots \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}).$$
It also can be write
$$H(z,t) = 1 + U_1(t)z + U_2(t)z^2 + \dots \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}, \quad t \in (-1,1))$$
(1.5)
where
$$U_{n-1} = \frac{\sin(n \operatorname{arc} \cos t)}{\sqrt{1 - t^2}} \quad (n \in \mathbb{N})$$
are the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind and we have
$$U_n(t) = 2tU_{n-1}(t) - U_{n-2}(t),$$
and
$$U_1(t) = 2t$$
, $U_2(t) = 4t^2 - 1$ , $U_3(t) = 8t^3 - 4t$ , $U_4(t) = 16t^4 - 12t^2 + 1$ , .... (1.6)
The generating function of the first kind of Chebyshev polynomial $T_n(t)$ , $t \in [-1, 1]$ is given by
$$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} T_n(t)z^n = \frac{1-tz}{1-2tz+z^2} \qquad (z \in \mathbb{D}).$$
The first kind of Chebyshev polynomial $T_n(t)$ and second kind of Chebyshev polynomial $U_n(t)$ are connected by:
$$\frac{dT_n(t)}{dt} = nU_{n-1}(t); \quad T_n(t) = U_n(t) - tU_{n-1}(t); \quad 2T_n(t) = U_n(t) - U_{n-2}(t).$$
The class $\mathcal{N}^{\mu}_{\sigma}(\lambda, t)$ was introduced and studied by Bulut et al. [9]. Also, they discussed initial coefficient estimates and Fekete-Szegö bounds for the class $\mathcal{N}^{\mu}_{\sigma}(\lambda, t)$ and it's subclasses given in the following remark.
Remark 1. For $\mu = 1$ , we get the class $\mathcal{N}_{\sigma}^{1}(\lambda, t) = \mathcal{B}_{\sigma}(\lambda, t)$ consists of functions $f \in \sigma$ satisfying the condition
$$(1 - \lambda)\frac{f(z)}{z} + \lambda f'(z) \prec H(z, t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tz + z^2} \qquad (z \in \mathbb{D})$$
and
$$(1 - \lambda)\frac{g(w)}{w} + \lambda g'(w) \prec H(w, t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tw + w^2} \qquad (w \in \mathbb{D})$$
where the function $g = f^{-1}$ is defined by (1.2). This class was introduced and studied by Bulut et al. [10] (see also [28]).
Remark 2. For $\lambda = 1$ , we have a class $\mathcal{N}^{\mu}_{\sigma}(1,t) = \mathcal{B}^{\mu}_{\sigma}(t)$ consists of bi-Bazilevič functions:
$$f'(z)\left(\frac{f(z)}{z}\right)^{\mu-1} \prec H(z,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tz + z^2} \qquad (z \in \mathbb{D})$$
and
$$g'(w)\left(\frac{g(w)}{w}\right)^{\mu-1} \prec H(w,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tw + w^2} \qquad (w \in \mathbb{D})$$
where the function $g = f^{-1}$ is defined by (1.2).
Remark 3. For $\lambda = 1$ and $\mu = 1$ , we have the class $\mathcal{N}_{\sigma}^{1}(1,t) = \mathcal{B}_{\sigma}(t)$ consists of functions f satisfying the condition
$$f'(z) \prec H(z,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tz + z^2}$$
$(z \in \mathbb{D})$
and
$$g'(w) \prec H(w,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tw + w^2}$$
$(w \in \mathbb{D})$
where the function $g = f^{-1}$ is defined by (1.2).
Remark 4. For $\lambda = 1$ and $\mu = 0$ , we have the class $\mathcal{N}_{\sigma}^{0}(1,t) = \mathcal{S}_{\sigma}^{*}(t)$ consists of functions f satisfying the condition
$$\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \prec H(z,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tz + z^2} \qquad (z \in \mathbb{D})$$
and
$$\frac{wg'(w)}{g(w)} \prec H(w,t) = \frac{1}{1 - 2tw + w^2} \qquad (w \in \mathbb{D})$$
where the function $g = f^{-1}$ is defined by (1.2).
Next we state the following lemmas we shall use to establish the desired bounds in our study. Let $\mathcal{P}$ denote the class of functions p(z) of the form
$$p(z) = 1 + c_1 z + c_2 z^2 + c_3 z^3 + \cdots, (1.7)$$
which are analytic in the open unit disc $\mathbb{D}$ .
Function classes studied:
Coefficient bounds & claims (8)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
N^mu_sigma(lambda, t): |a2*a4-a3^2| <= K(2-,t) or 4t^2/(2lambda+mu)^2 or max{K(c0,t),K(2-,t)} depending on signs of M1 and M2 [Theorem 1]
coefficient_bound
B_sigma(t): |a2a4-a3^2| <= t^2(1-t^2) for 1/2<t<=t01 approx 0.603615; second branch for t01<t<1 [Corollary 3]
coefficient_bound
S*_sigma(t): |a2a4-a3^2| <= 8t^2/3 for 1/2<t<=(7+sqrt(401))/44; second branch for larger t [Corollary 4]
function_family
Class N^mu_sigma(lambda, t): f in sigma: (1-lambda)(f(z)/z)^mu + lambda*f'(z)*(f(z)/z)^{mu-1} subordinate to H(z,t), and same for inverse g=f^{-1}; lambda>=1, mu>=0, t in (1/2,1]
function_family
Class B_sigma(lambda, t) = N^1_sigma(lambda, t): mu=1 case: (1-lambda)f(z)/z + lambda*f'(z) subordinate to H(z,t)
function_family
Class B^mu_sigma(t) = N^mu_sigma(1,t): lambda=1 case: f'(z)*(f(z)/z)^{mu-1} subordinate to H(z,t)
function_family
Class B_sigma(t) = N^1_sigma(1,t): lambda=1, mu=1: f'(z) subordinate to H(z,t)
function_family
Class S*_sigma(t) = N^0_sigma(1,t): lambda=1, mu=0: zf'(z)/f(z) subordinate to H(z,t)
Related Papers