Abstract
In the present paper, we will discuss the Hankel determinants $H(f) =a_2a_4-a_3^2$ of order 2 for normalized concave functions $f(z)=z+a_2z^2+a_3z^3+\dots$ with a pole at $p\in(0,1).$ Here, a meromorphic function is called concave if it maps the unit disk conformally onto a domain whose complement is convex. To this end, we will characterize the coefficient body of order 2 for the class of analytic functions $\varphi(z)$ on $|z|<1$ with $|\varphi|<1$ and $\varphi(p)=p.$ We believe that this is h
Results & Lemmas (9)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Proposition 1.1.
Proposition 1.1. Ωp ⊂Ωq for 0 < q < p < 1 and [ 0<p<1 Ωp = D ∪ −1 and 0<p<1 Ωp = −(1 + z)2/4: |z| ≤1. Note that the set −(1 + z)2/4: |z| ≤1…
Proposition 1.1. Ωp ⊂Ωq for 0 < q < p < 1 and [ 0<p<1 Ωp = D ∪{−1} and \ 0<p<1 Ωp = {−(1 + z)2/4 : |z| ≤1}. Note that the set {−(1 + z)2/4 : |z| ≤1} is a closed Jordan domain, bounded by a cardioid with an inward-pointing cusp at the origin. By the above observations, we have Ωp ⊂H(Cop). In view of the coefficient regions of an for Cop, one might suspect that H(Cop) = Ωp for 0 < p < 1 and, in particular, H(Cop) ⊂D. This is, however, not the case. To state our result, we set M(p) = sup{|H(f)| : f ∈
Theorem 1.2.
Theorem 1.2. Let 0 < p < 1. Then M(p) > 1. Moreover, 1 3p < M(p) < 1 3p + 2 3. In Section 3, we will prove the above proposition and the…
Theorem 1.2. Let 0 < p < 1. Then M(p) > 1. Moreover, 1 3p < M(p) < 1 3p + 2 3. In Section 3, we will prove the above proposition and the theorem. Indeed, we give a description of the variability region of H(f) for f ∈Cop in Proposition 3.1 below. As a preliminary, we give an explicit form of the coefficient body of order 2 for the class Bp in Section 2. Our basic idea is to employ an higher-order analogue of Dieusonn´e’s lemma. 2. Higher-order analogue of Dieudonn´e’s lemma and its application We
Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 2.1. Let 0 < p < 1. A triple (c0, c1, c2) of complex numbers is con- tained in the coefficient body X2(Bp) if and only if c0 = P −1(1…
Theorem 2.1. Let 0 < p < 1. A triple (c0, c1, c2) of complex numbers is con- tained in the coefficient body X2(Bp) if and only if c0 = P −1(1 −σ0), and c1 = P −2 1 + (P 2 −2)σ0 + σ2 0 + P −1(1 −|σ0|2)σ1 and c2 = P −3(1 −σ0) 1 + (P 2 −2)σ0 + σ2 0
Lemma 2.2
Lemma 2.2 (Dieudonn´e’s lemma). Let z0, τ0 ∈D with |τ0| ≤|z0| ̸= 0. Then the variability region of τ1 = ψ′(z0) for ψ ∈End(D) with ψ(0) = 0,…
Lemma 2.2 (Dieudonn´e’s lemma). Let z0, τ0 ∈D with |τ0| ≤|z0| ̸= 0. Then the variability region of τ1 = ψ′(z0) for ψ ∈End(D) with ψ(0) = 0, ψ(z0) = τ0 is the closed disk given by (2.3) τ1 −τ0 z0 ≤ |z0|2 −|τ0|2 |z0|(1 −|z0|2). We remark that equality holds in Dieudonn´e’s lemma if and only if ψ is a finite Blaschke product of degree at most 2 (cf. [7, Theorem 3.6]). The following result can be regarded as Dieudonn´e’s lemma of the second order (see [7, Theorem 3.7]).
Lemma 2.3.
Lemma 2.3. Let z0, τ0 ∈D with |τ0| < |z0| ̸= 0 and suppose that τ1 ∈C satisfies (2.3). Then the variability region of τ2 = ψ′′(z0)/2! for ψ…
Lemma 2.3. Let z0, τ0 ∈D with |τ0| < |z0| ̸= 0 and suppose that τ1 ∈C satisfies (2.3). Then the variability region of τ2 = ψ′′(z0)/2! for ψ ∈End(D) with ψ(0) = 0, ψ(z0) = τ0 and ψ′(z0) = τ1 is the closed disk described by τ2 −τ1 −τ0/z0 z0(1 −|z0|2) + τ0(τ1 −τ0/z0)2 |z0|2 −|τ0|2 + |z0||τ1 −τ0/z0|2 |z0|2 −|τ0|2 ≤|z0|(1 −|τ0/z0|2) (1 −|z0|2)2 . We remark that equality holds precisely when ψ is a finite Blaschke product of degree at most 3. In [7, Theorem 3.7], the above inequality is stated as a nece
Lemma 2.4.
Lemma 2.4. Let 0 < p < 1. A triple (c0, c1, c2) of complex numbers is contained in the coefficient body X2(Bp) if and only if c0 = p −pw0 1…
Lemma 2.4. Let 0 < p < 1. A triple (c0, c1, c2) of complex numbers is contained in the coefficient body X2(Bp) if and only if c0 = p −pw0 1 −p2w0 and c1 = (1 −p2)2w0 + p(1 −p2)(1 −|w0|2)w1 (1 −p2w0)2 and c2 = (1 −p2) (1 −p2w0)3 p(1 −p2)(1 −w0)w0 −(1 −p2)(1 + p2w0)(1 −|w0|2)w1 +p(w0 −p2)(1 −|w0|2)w2 1 + p(1 −p2w0)(1 −|w0|2)(1 −|w1|2)w2
Proposition 3.1.
Proposition 3.1. Let 0 < p < 1. Then the variability region of the second Hankel determinant H(f) of order 2 for f ∈Cop is given by H(Cop)…
Proposition 3.1. Let 0 < p < 1. Then the variability region of the second Hankel determinant H(f) of order 2 for f ∈Cop is given by H(Cop) = {Φp(σ0, σ1, σ2)/18P 3 : σ0, σ1, σ2 ∈D}. We note that the function Fζ given in (1.3) corresponds to the parameters (σ0, σ1, σ2) = ([ζ, p2], 0, 0). Since Φp(σ, 0, 0) = −18P(1 + (P 2 −2)σ + σ2), as a by-product, we have the following description of the set Ωp defined by (1.4).
Lemma 3.2.
Lemma 3.2. Ωp = −P −2 1 + (P 2 −2)σ + σ2: σ ∈D, where P = (1 + p2)/p, 0 < p < 1. The description of the Lemma can now be used to show…
Lemma 3.2. Ωp = {−P −2 1 + (P 2 −2)σ + σ2 : σ ∈D}, where P = (1 + p2)/p, 0 < p < 1. The description of the Lemma can now be used to show Propositition 1.1.
Proposition 3.1
Proposition 3.1 above, we obtain Φp(t, −1, 0) = −18P 1 + (P 2 −2)t + t2 −3 1 −7P 2 + 2P 4 + (3P 2 −2)t + t2 (1 −t2) + P 2(1 −t2) +…
Proposition 3.1 above, we obtain Φp(t, −1, 0) = −18P 1 + (P 2 −2)t + t2 −3 1 −7P 2 + 2P 4 + (3P 2 −2)t + t2 (1 −t2) + P 2(1 −t2) + 3t(P 2 −1 + t) (1 −t2). Setting hp(t) := −Φp(t, −1, 0)/18P 3 gives 18P 3hp(t) = −(P + 3)t4 −(3P 3 + 9P 2 −3P −6)t3 −(6P 4 −21P 2 −17P)t2
Related Papers