Abstract
In this paper, by studying the famous theorem of Pang and Zalcman, we find a normal family and obtain a result, which is an improvement of Pang and Zalcman's theorem in some sense. Meanwhile, several examples are provided to show that our result's conditions are necessary.
Results & Lemmas (4)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1
Theorem 1. Let be a family of functions holomorphic on a domain D, all of whose zeros are of multiplicity (at least) 2. If there exist a…
Theorem 1. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions holomorphic on a domain D, all of whose zeros are of multiplicity (at least) 2. If there exist a non-zero constant b and a positive constant b such that for every $f \in \mathcal{F}$ ,
- (1) $f(z) = 0 \Rightarrow f''(z) = b$ ,
- (2) $f''(z) = b \Rightarrow 0 < |f'''(z)| \le M$ and
- (3) $f'^{2}(z) = Bf(z)$ whenever $z \in \overline{E}_{f''}(b)$ ,
where B is a non-constant, then $\mathcal{F}$ is normal in D.
Remark 1. Here, if f omits a constant b, we can say that all the zeros of f - b are of multiplicity $\infty$ .
Remark 2. For the special cases that $\mathcal{F}$ is holomorphic functions and k=2 of Theorem A, from $\overline{E}_f(0) = \overline{E}_{f''}(b)$ , it is easy to deduce $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies the condition (3) of Theorem 1. Thus, in some sense, our result is an improvement of Theorem A. Meanwhile, we know that the condition $\overline{E}_f(0) = \overline{E}_{f^{(k)}}(b)$ is not necessary for holomorphic functions in Theorem A.
Remark 3. We give an example to show that there exists a normal family $\mathcal{F}$ satisfying the conditions of Theorem 1.
Consider the family $\mathcal{F} = \{f_n, n = 1, 2, \ldots\}$ on the unit disc, where
$$f_n(z) = e^{\frac{z}{n}},$$
so that
$$f'_n(z) = \frac{1}{n} e^{\frac{z}{n}}$$
and $f''_n(z) = \frac{1}{n^2} e^{\frac{z}{n}}$ .
Let b be a non-zero constant and B = b. Then, it is easy to see the family $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies the conditions of Theorem 1 and $\mathcal{F}$ is normal on the unit disc.
Remark 4. The assumption $0 < |f''(z)| \le M$ cannot be replaced by $|f''(z)| \le M$ . We have a counter-example [11] to show it.
Consider the family $\mathcal{F} = \{f_n, n = 1, 2, \ldots\}$ on the unit disc, where
$$f_n(z) = \frac{1}{n^2}(e^{nz} + e^{-nz} - 2) = \frac{1}{n^2}e^{-nz}(e^{nz} - 1)^2,$$
so that
$$f_n^{(j)}(z) = n^{(j-2)}[e^{nz} + (-1)^j e^{-nz}], \quad j = 1, 2, \dots$$
It is easy to see all the zeros of $f_n$ are of multiplicity 2 and
$$f_n(z) = 0 \Leftrightarrow f_n''(z) = 2 \Rightarrow f_n'''(z) = 0.$$
While the family $\mathcal{F}$ is not normal on the unit disc.
Lemma 1
Lemma 1. Let be a family of functions holomorphic on the unit disc, all of whose zeros have multiplicity at least k, and suppose that there…
Lemma 1. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions holomorphic on the unit disc, all of whose zeros have multiplicity at least k, and suppose that there exists $A \geq 1$ such that $|f^{(k)}(z)| \leq A$ whenever f(z) = 0, if $\mathcal{F}$ is not normal, then there exist, for each $0 \leq \alpha \leq k$ ,
- (a) a number 0 < r < 1;
- (b) points $z_n$ , $z_n < r$ ;
- (c) functions $f_n \in \mathcal{F}$ , and
- (d) positive number $\rho_n \to 0$ such that $\rho_n^{-\alpha} f_n(z_n + \rho_n \xi) = g_n(\xi) \to g(\xi)$ locally uniformly, where g is a nonconstant holomorphic function on $\mathbb{C}$ , whose zeros have multiplicity at least k, such that $g^{\sharp}(\xi) \leq g^{\sharp}(0) = A + 1$ and $\rho(g) \leq 1$ .
Here, as usual, $g^{\sharp}(\xi) = \frac{|g'(\xi)|}{1+|g(\xi)|^2}$ is the spherical derivative and $\rho(g)$ is the order of g.
Next, we need to introduce a result, see [5, Theorem 4.1] or [10], which plays an important part in the proof of our Theorem.
Lemma 2 · coeff
Lemma 2. Let f be an entire function of order at most 1 and k be a positive integer, then Finally, we recall the theorem of Chang, Fang and…
Lemma 2. Let f be an entire function of order at most 1 and k be a positive integer, then
$$m(r, \frac{f^{(k)}}{f}) = o(\log r), \quad as \quad r \to \infty.$$
Finally, we recall the theorem of Chang, Fang and Zalcman, see [3], which is crucial to the proof of our theorem.
Lemma 3
Lemma 3. Let g be a non-constant entire function with, let be an integer, and let a be a non-zero finite value. If, and, then where is a…
Lemma 3. Let g be a non-constant entire function with $\rho(g) \leq 1$ , let $k \geq 2$ be an integer, and let a be a non-zero finite value. If $g(z) = 0 \Rightarrow g'(z) = a$ , and $g'(z) = a \Rightarrow g^{(k)}(z) = 0$ , then
$$g(z) = a(z - z_0),$$
where $z_0$ is a constant.