Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
In this paper, by studying the famous theorem of Pang and Zalcman, we find a normal family and obtain a result, which is an improvement of Pang and Zalcman's theorem in some sense. Meanwhile, several examples are provided to show that our result's conditions are necessary.
Results & Lemmas (4)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1
Theorem 1. Let be a family of functions holomorphic on a domain D, all of whose zeros are of multiplicity (at least) 2. If there exist a…
Theorem 1. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions holomorphic on a domain D, all of whose zeros are of multiplicity (at least) 2. If there exist a non-zero constant b and a positive constant b such that for every $f \in \mathcal{F}$ ,
- (1) $f(z) = 0 \Rightarrow f''(z) = b$ ,
- (2) $f''(z) = b \Rightarrow 0 < |f'''(z)| \le M$ and
- (3) $f'^{2}(z) = Bf(z)$ whenever $z \in \overline{E}_{f''}(b)$ ,
where B is a non-constant, then $\mathcal{F}$ is normal in D.
Remark 1. Here, if f omits a constant b, we can say that all the zeros of f - b are of multiplicity $\infty$ .
Remark 2. For the special cases that $\mathcal{F}$ is holomorphic functions and k=2 of Theorem A, from $\overline{E}_f(0) = \overline{E}_{f''}(b)$ , it is easy to deduce $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies the condition (3) of Theorem 1. Thus, in some sense, our result is an improvement of Theorem A. Meanwhile, we know that the condition $\overline{E}_f(0) = \overline{E}_{f^{(k)}}(b)$ is not necessary for holomorphic functions in Theorem A.
Remark 3. We give an example to show that there exists a normal family $\mathcal{F}$ satisfying the conditions of Theorem 1.
Consider the family $\mathcal{F} = \{f_n, n = 1, 2, \ldots\}$ on the unit disc, where
$$f_n(z) = e^{\frac{z}{n}},$$
so that
$$f'_n(z) = \frac{1}{n} e^{\frac{z}{n}}$$
and $f''_n(z) = \frac{1}{n^2} e^{\frac{z}{n}}$ .
Let b be a non-zero constant and B = b. Then, it is easy to see the family $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies the conditions of Theorem 1 and $\mathcal{F}$ is normal on the unit disc.
Remark 4. The assumption $0 < |f''(z)| \le M$ cannot be replaced by $|f''(z)| \le M$ . We have a counter-example [11] to show it.
Consider the family $\mathcal{F} = \{f_n, n = 1, 2, \ldots\}$ on the unit disc, where
$$f_n(z) = \frac{1}{n^2}(e^{nz} + e^{-nz} - 2) = \frac{1}{n^2}e^{-nz}(e^{nz} - 1)^2,$$
so that
$$f_n^{(j)}(z) = n^{(j-2)}[e^{nz} + (-1)^j e^{-nz}], \quad j = 1, 2, \dots$$
It is easy to see all the zeros of $f_n$ are of multiplicity 2 and
$$f_n(z) = 0 \Leftrightarrow f_n''(z) = 2 \Rightarrow f_n'''(z) = 0.$$
While the family $\mathcal{F}$ is not normal on the unit disc.
Lemma 1
Lemma 1. Let be a family of functions holomorphic on the unit disc, all of whose zeros have multiplicity at least k, and suppose that there…
Lemma 1. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of functions holomorphic on the unit disc, all of whose zeros have multiplicity at least k, and suppose that there exists $A \geq 1$ such that $|f^{(k)}(z)| \leq A$ whenever f(z) = 0, if $\mathcal{F}$ is not normal, then there exist, for each $0 \leq \alpha \leq k$ ,
- (a) a number 0 < r < 1;
- (b) points $z_n$ , $z_n < r$ ;
- (c) functions $f_n \in \mathcal{F}$ , and
- (d) positive number $\rho_n \to 0$ such that $\rho_n^{-\alpha} f_n(z_n + \rho_n \xi) = g_n(\xi) \to g(\xi)$ locally uniformly, where g is a nonconstant holomorphic function on $\mathbb{C}$ , whose zeros have multiplicity at least k, such that $g^{\sharp}(\xi) \leq g^{\sharp}(0) = A + 1$ and $\rho(g) \leq 1$ .
Here, as usual, $g^{\sharp}(\xi) = \frac{|g'(\xi)|}{1+|g(\xi)|^2}$ is the spherical derivative and $\rho(g)$ is the order of g.
Next, we need to introduce a result, see [5, Theorem 4.1] or [10], which plays an important part in the proof of our Theorem.
Lemma 2 · coeff
Lemma 2. Let f be an entire function of order at most 1 and k be a positive integer, then Finally, we recall the theorem of Chang, Fang and…
Lemma 2. Let f be an entire function of order at most 1 and k be a positive integer, then
$$m(r, \frac{f^{(k)}}{f}) = o(\log r), \quad as \quad r \to \infty.$$
Finally, we recall the theorem of Chang, Fang and Zalcman, see [3], which is crucial to the proof of our theorem.
Lemma 3
Lemma 3. Let g be a non-constant entire function with, let be an integer, and let a be a non-zero finite value. If, and, then where is a…
Lemma 3. Let g be a non-constant entire function with $\rho(g) \leq 1$ , let $k \geq 2$ be an integer, and let a be a non-zero finite value. If $g(z) = 0 \Rightarrow g'(z) = a$ , and $g'(z) = a \Rightarrow g^{(k)}(z) = 0$ , then
$$g(z) = a(z - z_0),$$
where $z_0$ is a constant.