Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Ma-Minda φ-classes studied in this paper:
Results & Lemmas (16)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 2.1
Theorem 2.1. Let, where is same as given in Definition 1.3 and satisfy If, then The bound is sharp. Proof. Since, therefore we have which…
Theorem 2.1. Let $g(z) = z + b_2 z^2 + b_3 z^3 + \cdots \in \Phi(\mathbb{U})$ , where $\Phi$ is same as given in Definition 1.3 and satisfy
$$|\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2| > 2\Phi'(0) > 0$$
If $g(z)/g'(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ , then
$$|T_{2,2}(g)| \le \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0)\right)^2 + (\Phi'(0))^2.$$
The bound is sharp.
Proof. Since $g(z)/g'(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ , therefore we have
$$G(z) := \frac{zg'(z)}{g(z)} \in \Phi(\mathbb{U}),$$
which yields $G \prec \Phi$ . For $g(z) = z + b_2 z^2 + b_3 z^3 + \cdots$ , the Taylor series expansion of G(z) is given by
$$G(z) = 1 + b_2 z + (2b_3 - b_2^2)z^2 + \cdots$$
Xu et al. [21] proved that
$$|b_3 - \lambda b_2^2| \le \frac{|\Phi'(0)|}{2} \max\left\{1, \left| \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + (1 - 2\lambda)\Phi'(0) \right| \right\}, \quad \lambda \in \mathbb{C}.$$
(2.1)
Thus, whenever $|\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2| \ge 2\Phi'(0)$ , the equation (2.1) yields
$$|b_3| \le \frac{\Phi'(0)}{2} \left| \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right|. \tag{2.2}$$
Further, using the bound $|G'(0)| \leq \Phi'(0)$ , we obtain
$$|b_2| \le \Phi'(0). \tag{2.3}$$
From (1.1), we have
$$|\det T_{2,2}(g)| = |b_3^2 - b_2^2| \le |b_3|^2 + |b_2|^2.$$
Clearly, the required bound follows directly from the above relation together with the bounds of $|b_3|$ and $|b_2|$ given in (2.2) and (2.3) respectively.
To see the sharpness of the bound, consider the function $g_{\Phi}: \mathbb{U} \to \mathbb{C}$ given by
$$g_{\Phi}(z) = z \exp \int_0^z \frac{(\Phi(it) - 1)}{t} dt = 1 + i\Phi'(0)z - \frac{1}{2} \left( (\Phi'(0))^2 + \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2} \right) z^2 + \cdots$$
(2.4)
It can be easily seen that $g_{\Phi}(z)/g'_{\Phi}(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ and
$$|\det T_{2,2}(g_{\Phi})| = \frac{1}{4} \left( (\Phi'(0))^2 + \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2} \right)^2 + (\Phi'(0))^2,$$
which shows that the bound is sharp and completes the
Theorem 2.2
Theorem 2.2. Let, where is same as given in Definition 1.3 and satisfy If, then The bound is sharp. Proof. Since, by (2.2), we obtain Also,…
Theorem 2.2. Let $g(z) = z + b_2 z^2 + b_3 z^3 + \cdots \in \Phi(\mathbb{U})$ , where $\Phi$ is same as given in Definition 1.3 and satisfy
$$2\Phi'(0) - 2(\Phi'(0))^2 \le \Phi''(0) \le 6(\Phi'(0))^2 - 2\Phi'(0).$$
If $g(z)/g'(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ , then
$$|\det T_{3,1}(g)| \le 1 + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left(3\Phi'(0) - \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)}\right) \left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0)\right).$$
The bound is sharp.
Proof. Since $\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 > 2\Phi'(0)$ , by (2.2), we obtain
$$|b_3| \le \frac{\Phi'(0)}{2} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right). \tag{2.5}$$
Also, $6(\Phi'(0))^2 - \Phi''(0) \ge 2\Phi'(0)$ holds, hence (2.1) gives
$$|b_3 - 2b_2^2| \le \frac{\Phi'(0)}{2} \left( 3\Phi'(0) - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} \right). \tag{2.6}$$
From (1.2), we have
$$|\det T_{3,1}(g)| = |2b_2^2b_3 - 2b_2^2 - b_3^2 + 1|$$
$$\leq 1 + 2|b_2|^2 + |b_3||b_3 - 2b_2^2|$$
Using the estimates for the second and third coefficients given in (2.5) and (2.2) together with the bound of $|b_3 - 2b_2^2|$ given in (2.6), required bound follows.
The estimate is sharp for the function $g_{\Phi}(z) = z + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} b_n z^n$ given by (2.4). For this function, we have
$$1 - 2b_2^2 - b_3(b_3 - 2b_2^2) = 1 + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left(3\Phi'(0) - \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)}\right) \left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0)\right),$$
which proves the sharpness of the bound.
Remark 2.1. By taking $\Phi(z) = (1+z)/(1-z)$ , $\Phi(z) = (1+(1-2\alpha)z)/(1-z)$ and $\Phi(z) = (1+Dz)/(1+Ez)$ , Theorem 2.1 and 2.2 can be deduced to Theorem A, Theorem B and Theorem C, respectively.
The bounds for other classes can also be obtained by changing the corresponding function $\Phi$ . For $\Phi(z) = ((1+z)/(1-z))^{\gamma}$ , the following result follows for the class $\mathcal{SS}^*(\gamma)$ .
Corollary 2.3
Corollary 2.3. If, then for, the followings sharp inequalities hold: and. Next, we extend the above results on the unit ball and on the…
Corollary 2.3. If $g \in SS^*(\gamma)$ , then for $\gamma \in [1/3, 1]$ , the followings sharp inequalities hold:
$$|\det T_{2,2}(q)| \le 9\gamma^4 + 4\gamma^2$$
and $|\det T_{3,1}(q)| \le 15\gamma^4 + 8\gamma^2 + 1$ .
Next, we extend the above results on the unit ball $\mathbb{B}$ and on the unit polydisc $\mathbb{U}^n$ .
Theorem 2.4
Theorem 2.4. Let with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If such that satisfy. then The bound is sharp. Proof. Xu et al. [21, Theorem…
Theorem 2.4. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B},\mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If $(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ such that $\Phi$ satisfy
$$|\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2| > 2\Phi'(0)$$
.
then
$$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} \right)^2 \right| \leq \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right)^2 + (\Phi'(0))^2.$$
The bound is sharp.
Proof. Xu et al. [21, Theorem 3.2] proved that
$$\left| \frac{l_z(D^3 G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} - \lambda \left( \frac{l_z(D^2 G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2} \right)^2 \right| \\
\leq \frac{|\Phi'(0)|}{2} \max \left\{ 1, \left| \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + (1 - 2\lambda)\Phi'(0) \right| \right\}, \quad \lambda \in \mathbb{C}, z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}.$$
(2.7)
Since $|\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2| \ge 2\Phi'(0)$ , the above inequality gives
$$\left| \frac{l_z(D^3 G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} \right| \le \frac{\Phi'(0)}{2} \left| \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right|. \tag{2.8}$$
On the other hand, applying a similar method as in [9, Theorem 7.1.14] (also see [21, Theorem 3.2]), we obtain
$$(DG(z))^{-1} = \frac{1}{g(z)} \left( I - \frac{\frac{zDg(z)}{g(z)}}{1 + \frac{Dg(z)z}{g(z)}} \right).$$
Therefore
$$(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) = z\left(\frac{zg(z)}{g(z) + Dg(z)z}\right), \quad z \in \mathbb{B},$$
which directly gives
$$\frac{\|z\|}{l_z((DG(z))^{-1}G(z))} = 1 + \frac{Dg(z)z}{g(z)}.$$
(2.9)
For fix $z \in X \setminus \{0\}$ and $z_0 = \frac{z}{\|z\|}$ , define the function $h : \mathbb{U} \to \mathbb{C}$ such that
$$h(\zeta) = \begin{cases} \frac{\zeta}{l_z((DG(\zeta z_0))^{-1}G(\zeta z_0))}, & \zeta \neq 0, \\ 1, & \zeta = 0. \end{cases}$$
Then $h \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U})$ and $h(0) = 1 = \Phi(0)$ . Further, since $(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ , we find that
$$\begin{split} h(\zeta) = & \frac{\zeta}{l_z((DG(\zeta z_0))^{-1}G(\zeta z_0))} = \frac{\zeta}{l_{z_0}((DG(\zeta z_0))^{-1}G(\zeta z_0))} \\ = & \frac{\|\zeta z_0\|}{l_{\zeta z_0}((DG(\zeta z_0))^{-1}G(\zeta z_0))} \in \Phi(\mathbb{U}), \quad \zeta \in \mathbb{U}. \end{split}$$
Taking (2.9) into consideration, we obtain
$$h(\zeta) = \frac{\|\zeta z_0\|}{l_{\zeta z_0}((Dg(\zeta z_0))^{-1}g(\zeta z_0))} = 1 + \frac{Dg(\zeta z_0)\zeta z_0}{g(\zeta z_0)}.$$
(2.10)
In view of the Taylor series expansions of $h(\zeta)$ and $g(\zeta z_0)$ , the above equation gives
$$\left(1+h'(0)\zeta + \frac{h''(0)}{2}\zeta^2 + \cdots\right) \left(1 + Dg(0)(z_0)\zeta + \frac{D^2g(0)(z_0^2)}{2}\zeta^2 + \cdots\right)
= \left(1 + Dg(0)(z_0)\zeta + \frac{D^2g(0)(z_0^2)}{2}\zeta^2 + \cdots\right) \left(Dg(0)(z_0)\zeta + D^2g(0)(z_0^2)\zeta^2 + \cdots\right).$$
Comparison of homogeneous expansions yield that $h'(0) = Dg(0)(z_0)$ . That is
$$h'(0)||z|| = Dg(0)(z). (2.11)$$
Since G(z) = zg(z), therefore, we have
$$\frac{D^2G(0)(z^2)}{2!} = Dg(0)(z)z. (2.12)$$
Moreover, from (2.12), we conclude that
$$\frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!} = Dg(0)(z)||z||. \tag{2.13}$$
Thus, equation (2.13) together with (2.11) gives
$$\left| \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!} \right| = |Dg(0)(z)||z||| = |h'(0)||z||^2|.$$
Since $h \prec \Phi$ , therefore $|h'(0)| \leq \Phi'(0)$ . Consequently, we obtain
$$\left| \frac{l_z(D^2 G(0)(z^2))}{2! \|z\|^2} \right| \le \Phi'(0). \tag{2.14}$$
Using the bounds given in (2.14) and (2.8) together with
$$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2! \|z\|^2} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3! \|z\|^3} \right)^2 \right| \le \left| \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3! \|z\|^3} \right|^2 + \left| \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2! \|z\|^2} \right|^2$$
the required bound follows.
To see the sharpness, consider the function G given by
$$G(z) = z \exp \int_0^{l_u(z)} \frac{(\Phi(it) - 1)}{t} dt, \quad z \in \mathbb{B}, \quad ||u|| = 1.$$
(2.15)
It is a simple exercise to see that $(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ and a quick calculation reveals that
$$\frac{D^2G(0)(z^2)}{2!} = i\Phi'(0)l_u(z)z \text{ and } \frac{D^3G(0)(z^3)}{3!} = -\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2} + (\Phi'(0))^2\right)(l_u(z))^2z.$$
In view of the above equations, we have
$$\frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!} = i\Phi'(0)l_u(z)||z||$$
and
$$\frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))\|z\|}{3!} = -\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2} + (\Phi'(0))^2 \right) (l_u(z))^2 \|z\|^2.$$
Setting z = ru (0 < r < 1), we get
$$\frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!\|z\|^2} = i\Phi'(0) \text{ and } \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!\|z\|^3} = -\frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2} + (\Phi'(0))^2\right). \tag{2.16}$$
Thus for the function G, we have
$$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} \right)^2 \right| = \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right)^2 + |\Phi'(0)|^2,$$
which proves the sharpness of the bound.
Theorem 2.5
Theorem 2.5. Let with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If such that satisfy then where and. The bound is sharp. Proof. Since,…
Theorem 2.5. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B},\mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If $(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ such that $\Phi$ satisfy
$$2\Phi'(0) - 2(\Phi'(0))^2 \le \Phi''(0) \le 6(\Phi'(0))^2 - 2\Phi'(0),$$
then
$$|2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1| \le 1 + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left(3\Phi'(0) - \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)}\right) \left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0)\right),$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3}$$
and $b_2 = \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2}$ .
The bound is sharp.
Proof. Since $2\Phi'(0) < \Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2$ , therefore from (2.7), we have
$$\left| \frac{l_z(D^3 G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} \right| \le \frac{\Phi'(0)}{2} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right). \tag{2.17}$$
Again, since $2\Phi'(0) + \Phi''(0) \leq 6(\Phi'(0))^2$ , the inequality (2.7) directly gives
$$\left| \frac{l_z(D^3 G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} - 2\left(\frac{l_z(D^2 G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2}\right)^2 \right| \le \frac{\Phi'(0)}{2} \left(3\Phi'(0) - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)}\right). \tag{2.18}$$
Also, we have
$$|2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1| \le 1 + 2|b_2|^2 + |b_3||b_3 - 2b_2^2|. \tag{2.19}$$
The required bound is derived by using the estimates given in (2.14) and (2.17), and the bound given by (2.18) in the above inequality.
The equality case holds for the function G(z) defined by (2.15). It follows from (2.16) that for this function, we have $b_2 = i\Phi'(0)$ , $b_3 = -(\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2)/4$ and hence
$$1 - b_3(b_3 - 2b_2^2) - 2b_2^2 = 1 + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2}{4} \left(3\Phi'(0) - \frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)}\right) \left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0)\right),$$
which shows the sharpness of the bound.
Theorem 2.6
Theorem 2.6. Let with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If such that satisfies then (2.20) The bound is sharp. Proof. For, let.…
Theorem 2.6. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}^n, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If $(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ such that $\Phi$ satisfies
$$|\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2| \ge 2\Phi'(0),$$
then
$$\left\| \left( \frac{D^{3}G(0)(z^{3})}{3!} \right)^{2} - \left( \frac{D^{2}G(0)(z^{2})}{2!} \right)^{2} \right\| \\
\leq \frac{(\Phi'(0))^{2} \|z\|^{6}}{4} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right)^{2} + \left( |\Phi'(0)| \|z\|^{2} \right)^{2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^{n}. \right\}$$
(2.20)
The bound is sharp.
Proof. For $z \in \mathbb{U}^n \setminus \{0\}$ , let $z_0 = \frac{z}{\|z\|}$ . Define $h_k : \mathbb{U} \to \mathbb{C}$ such that
$$h_k(\zeta) = \begin{cases} \frac{\zeta z_k}{p_k(\zeta z_0) \|z_0\|}, & \zeta \neq 0, \\ 1, & \zeta = 0, \end{cases}$$
(2.21)
where $p(z) = (DG(z))^{-1}G(z)$ and k satisfies $|z_k| = ||z|| = \max_{1 \le j \le n} \{|z_j|\}$ . Since $(D(G(z)))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ , we have $h_k(\zeta) \in \Phi(\mathbb{U})$ . Further, using (2.10), we have
$$h_k(\zeta) = 1 + \frac{Dg(\zeta z_0)\zeta z_0}{g(\zeta z_0)}$$
or equivalently,
$$h_k(\zeta)g(\zeta z_0) = g(\zeta z_0) + Dg(\zeta z_0)\zeta z_0.$$
A comparison of homogeneous expansions obtained by the Taylor series expansions of g and $h_k$ about $\zeta$ gives
$$h'_k(0) = Dg(0)(z_0), \quad \frac{h''_k(0)}{2} = D^2g(0)(z_0^2) - (Dg(0)(z_0))^2.$$
(2.22)
Also, using $G(z_0) = z_0 g(z_0)$ , we have
$$\frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z_0^3)}{3!} = \frac{D^2 g(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} \frac{z_k}{\|z\|} \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} = Dg(0)(z_0) \frac{z_k}{\|z\|}. \tag{2.23}$$
Thus, from (2.22) and (2.23), we obtain
$$\frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} \frac{\|z\|}{z_k} = h_k'(0),$$
which gives
$$\left| \frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} \frac{\|z\|}{z_k} \right| = |h'_k(0)| \le \Phi'(0).$$
If $z_0 \in \partial_0 \mathbb{U}^n$ , then
$$\left| \frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} \right| \le \Phi'(0). \tag{2.24}$$
Since
$$\frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!}, \quad k = 1, 2, \dots n$$
are holomorphic on $\overline{\mathbb{U}}^n$ , by virtue of the maximum modulus theorem of holomorphic functions on the unit polydisc, we obtain
$$\left| \frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} \right| \le \Phi'(0), \quad z_0 \in \partial \mathbb{U}^n, k = 1, 2, 3, \dots n.$$
That is
$$\left| \frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right| \le \Phi'(0) ||z||^2, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n, k = 1, 2, 3, \dots n.$$
(2.25)
Therefore
$$\left\| \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right\| \le \Phi'(0) \|z\|^2, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n.$$
According to the result established by Xu et al. [21, Theorem 3.3], we have
$$\left| \frac{D^{3}G_{k}(0)(z^{3})}{3!} - \lambda \frac{1}{2}D^{2}G_{k}(0)\left(z, \frac{D^{2}G(0)(z^{2})}{2!}\right) \right| \\
\leq \frac{|\Phi'(0)|||z||^{3}}{2} \max\left\{1, \left| \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + (1 - 2\lambda)\Phi'(0) \right| \right\}, \quad k = 1, 2, \dots n.$$
(2.26)
Since $|\Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2| \ge 2\Phi'(0)$ , therefore from (2.26), it follows that
$$\left| \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right| \le \frac{|\Phi'(0)| \|z\|^3}{2} \left| \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right|, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n, k = 1, 2, \dots n.$$
(2.27)
Now, using the bounds given in (2.25) and (2.27), we obtain
$$\left| \left( \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{D^2 G_k(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right)^2 \right|$$
$$\leq \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2 ||z||^6}{4} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right)^2 + (\Phi'(0))^2 ||z||^4, \quad k = 1, 2, \dots n.$$
Therefore,
$$\begin{split} \left\| \left( \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right)^2 \right\| \\ & \leq \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2 \|z\|^6}{4} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right)^2 + (\Phi'(0))^2 \|z\|^4, \end{split}$$
which is the required bound.
To prove the sharpness, consider the function
$$G(z) = z \exp \int_0^{z_1} \frac{\Phi(it) - 1}{t} dt, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n.$$
$$(2.28)$$
It is a simple exercise to check that $D(G(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ . From the above relation, we deduce that
$$\frac{D^2G(0)(z^2)}{2!} = i\Phi'(0)z_1z, \quad \frac{D^3G(0)(z^3)}{3!} = -\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\Phi''(0)}{2} + (\Phi'(0))^2\right)(z_1)^2z.$$
By taking $z=(r,0,\cdots,0)$ , the equality in (2.20) holds.
Theorem 2.7
Theorem 2.7. Let with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If such that satisfy then where and. The bound is sharp. Proof. Since G(z) =…
Theorem 2.7. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}^n, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and suppose that G(z) = zg(z). If $(DG(z))^{-1}G(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ such that $\Phi$ satisfy
$$2\Phi'(0) - 2(\Phi'(0))^2 \le \Phi''(0) \le 6(\Phi'(0))^2 - 2\Phi'(0),$$
then
$$||2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1||$$
$$\leq 1 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2||z||^6}{4} \left(3\Phi'(0) - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)}\right) \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0)\right) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2||z||^4,$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!}$$
and $b_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} D^2 G(0) \left(z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!}\right)$ .
The bound is sharp.
Proof. Since G(z) = zg(z), we have
$$\frac{1}{2}D^2G_k(0)\left(z_0, \frac{D^2G(0)(z_0^2)}{2!}\right)\frac{z_k}{\|z\|} = \left(\frac{D^2G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!}\right)^2, \quad k = 1, 2, \dots, n,$$
where $z_0 = \frac{z_k}{\|z\|}$ and k satisfies $|z_k| = \|z\| = \max_{1 \le j \le n} \{|z_j|\}$ (see [19]). If $z_0 \in \partial \mathbb{U}^n$ , then
$$\left|\frac{1}{2}D^2G_k(0)\bigg(z_0,\frac{D^2G(0)(z_0^2)}{2!}\bigg)\right| = \left|\frac{D^2G_k(0)(z_0^2)}{2!}\right|^2.$$
Consider the function $h_k(\zeta)$ defined in (2.21). Following the same method as in the proof of Theorem 2.6, we get (2.24), which together with the above relation yield
$$\left| \frac{1}{2} D^2 G_k(0) \left( z_0, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z_0^2)}{2!} \right) \right| \le |\Phi'(0)|^2.$$
Since
$$\left| \frac{1}{2} D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \right|, \quad k = 1, 2, \dots n$$
are holomorphic functions on $\overline{\mathbb{U}}^n$ . By virtue of the maximum modulus theorem of holomorphic functions on the unit polydisc, we obtain
$$\left| \frac{1}{2} D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \right| \le |\Phi'(0)|^2 ||z||^4, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n, k = 1, 2, \dots n.$$
(2.29)
Furthermore, since $2\Phi'(0) < \Phi''(0) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2$ , therefore by (2.26), we have
$$\left| \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right| \le \frac{\Phi'(0) \|z\|^3}{2} \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right), \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n, k = 1, 2, \dots n.$$
(2.30)
Again, since $\Phi$ satisfies $2\Phi'(0) + \Phi''(0) < 6(\Phi'(0))^2$ , the inequality (2.26) gives
$$\left| \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} - D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \right| \le \frac{\Phi'(0) \|z\|^3}{2} \left( 3\Phi'(0) - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} \right) \tag{2.31}$$
for $z \in \mathbb{U}^n$ and $k = 1, 2 \cdots n$ . Now, using (2.29), (2.30) and (2.31), we have
$$\begin{split} & \left| 1 + D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \left( \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right) - D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \right. \\ & \left. - \left( \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 \right| \\ & \leq 1 + \left| \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right| \left| \frac{D^3 G_k(0)(z^3)}{3!} - D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \right| \\ & \left. + \left| D^2 G_k(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \right| \\ & \leq 1 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2 \|z\|^6}{4} \left( 3\Phi'(0) - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} \right) \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 \|z\|^4 \end{split}$$
for $z \in \mathbb{U}^n$ and $k = 1, 2, \dots n$ . Therefore
$$\begin{split} & \left\| 1 + D^2 G(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \left( \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right) - D^2 G(0) \left( z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right) \\ & - \left( \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 \right\| \\ & \leq 1 + \frac{(\Phi'(0))^2 \|z\|^6}{4} \left( 3\Phi'(0) - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} \right) \left( \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Phi''(0)}{\Phi'(0)} + \Phi'(0) \right) + 2(\Phi'(0))^2 \|z\|^4, \end{split}$$
which is the required bound.
Using the same argument as in Theorem 2.6, the function G provided in (2.28) leads to the sharpness of the bound, which completes the proof.
Remark 2.2. (i) When $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ and $X = \mathbb{C}$ , Theorem 2.4 and Theorem 2.6 are equivalent to Theorem 2.1.
(ii) In case of $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ and $X = \mathbb{C}$ , Theorem 2.5 and 2.7 are equivalent to Theorem 2.2.
Corollary 3.1
Corollary 3.1. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then the following holds: If and, then All the estimates are sharp.
Corollary 3.1. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . Then the following holds:
$$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} \right)^2 \right| \le 13, \quad z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}, l_z \in T_z.$$
If $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ and $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ , then
$$\left\| \left( \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right)^2 \right\| \le 9 \|z\|^6 + 4 \|z\|^4, \ z \in \mathbb{U}^n.$$
All the estimates are sharp.
Corollary 3.2
Corollary 3.2. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then the following holds: If and, then All the estimates are sharp.
Corollary 3.2. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . Then the following holds:
$$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3} \right)^2 \right| \le (1 - \alpha)^2 (4\alpha^2 - 12\alpha + 13), \ z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}.$$
If $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ and $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ , then
$$\left\| \left( \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right)^2 \right\| \le (1 - \alpha)^2 ((3 - 2\alpha)^2 \|z\|^6 + 4\|z\|^4), \ z \in \mathbb{U}^n.$$
All the estimates are sharp.
Corollary 3.3
Corollary 3.3. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then for, the following holds: If bnd, then All the estimates are sharp.
Corollary 3.3. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{SS}^*_{\gamma}(\mathbb{B})$ . Then for $\gamma \in [1/3, 1]$ , the following holds:
$$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^2 G(0)(z^2))}{2! ||z||^2} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^3 G(0)(z^3))}{3! ||z||^3} \right)^2 \right| \le 9\gamma^4 + 4\gamma^2, \quad z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}, l_z \in T_z.$$
If $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ bnd $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ , then
$$\left\| \left( \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!} \right)^2 \right\| \le 9\|z\|^6 \gamma^4 + 4\|z\|^4 \gamma^2, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n.$$
All the estimates are sharp.
Corollary 3.4
Corollary 3.4. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then the following holds: where The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.4. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . Then the following holds:
$$|2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1| \le 24,$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3}, \quad b_2 = \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2}, \quad l_z \in T_z.$$
The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.5
Corollary 3.5. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then for, the following holds: where and,. The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.5. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . Then for $\alpha \in [0, 2/3]$ , the following holds:
$$|2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1| \le 12\alpha^4 - 52\alpha^3 + 91\alpha^2 - 74\alpha + 24$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3}$$
and $b_2 = \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2}$ , $l_z \in T_z$ .
The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.6
Corollary 3.6. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then for, the following holds: where and,. The estimate is sharp. When and, we obtain the following…
Corollary 3.6. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B},\mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{SS}^*_{\gamma}(\mathbb{B})$ . Then for $\gamma \in [1/3,1]$ , the following holds:
$$|2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1| < 15\gamma^4 + 8\gamma^2 + 1,$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{l_z(D^3G(0)(z^3))}{3!||z||^3}$$
and $b_2 = \frac{l_z(D^2G(0)(z^2))}{2!||z||^2}$ , $l_z \in T_z$ .
The estimate is sharp.
When $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ and $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ , we obtain the following bounds:
Corollary 3.7
Corollary 3.7. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then the following holds: where and. The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.7. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}^n, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . Then the following holds:
$$||2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1|| \le 15||z||^6 + 8||z||^4 + 1, \ z \in \mathbb{U}^n,$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!}$$
and $b_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} D^2 G(0) \left(z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!}\right)$ .
The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.8
Corollary 3.8. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then for, the following holds: where and. The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.8. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}^n, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*_{\alpha}(\mathbb{B})$ . Then for $\alpha \in [0, 2/3]$ , the following holds:
$$||2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1|| \le (1 - \alpha)^2(2\alpha - 3)(6\alpha - 5)||z||^6 + 8(1 - \alpha)^2||z||^4 + 1, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n,$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!}$$
and $b_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} D^2 G(0) \left(z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!}\right)$ .
The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.9
Corollary 3.9. Let with g(0) = 1 and. Then for, the following holds: where and. The estimate is sharp.
Corollary 3.9. Let $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}^n, \mathbb{C})$ with g(0) = 1 and $G(z) = zg(z) \in \mathcal{SS}^*_{\gamma}(\mathbb{B})$ . Then for $\gamma \in [1/3, 1]$ , the following holds:
$$|2b_2^2b_3 - b_3^2 - 2b_2^2 + 1| \le 15\gamma^4||z||^6 + 8\gamma^2||z||^4 + 1,$$
where
$$b_3 = \frac{D^3 G(0)(z^3)}{3!}$$
and $b_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} D^2 G(0) \left(z, \frac{D^2 G(0)(z^2)}{2!}\right)$ .
The estimate is sharp.
Definitions (3)
Def 1.1
Definition 1.1. Let be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping and. We say that g is starlike of order if In case of and, the above…
Definition 1.1. Let $g: \mathbb{B} \to X$ be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping and $\alpha \in (0,1)$ . We say that g is starlike of order $\alpha$ if
$$\left| \frac{1}{\|z\|} l_z([Dg(z)]^{-1}g(z)) - \frac{1}{2\alpha} \right| < \frac{1}{2\alpha}, \quad \forall z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}, \ l_z \in T(z).$$
In case of $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ and $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ , the above condition is equivalent to
$$\left| \frac{q_k(z)}{z_k} - \frac{1}{2\alpha} \right| < \frac{1}{2\alpha}, \quad \forall z \in \mathbb{U}^n \setminus \{0\},$$
where
$$q(z) = (q_1(z), q_2(z), \dots, q_n(z))' = (D(g(z)))^{-1}g(z)$$
is a column vector in $\mathbb{C}^n$ and k satisfies
$$|z_k| = ||z|| = \max_{1 \le j \le n} \{|z_j|\}.$$
For $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ and $X = \mathbb{C}$ , the relation is equivalent to
$$\operatorname{Re} \frac{zg'(z)}{g(z)} > \alpha, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}.$$
Let $\mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^{}(\mathbb{B})$ denote the class of starlike mappings of order $\alpha$ on $\mathbb{B}$ . When $X = \mathbb{C}$ and $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ , the class $\mathcal{S}_{\alpha}^{}(\mathbb{U})$ is denoted by $\mathcal{S}^{*}(\alpha)$ .
Def 1.2
Definition 1.2. [16] Let be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping and. We say that f is strongly starlike mapping of order if In case…
Definition 1.2. [16] Let $g: \mathbb{B} \to X$ be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping and $\gamma \in (0,1]$ . We say that f is strongly starlike mapping of order $\gamma$ if
$$\left|\arg l_z([Dg(z)]^{-1}g(z))\right| < \frac{\pi}{2}\gamma, \quad \forall z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}, \ l_z \in T(z).$$
In case of $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ and $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ , the above condition is equivalent to
$$\left|\arg\frac{q_j(z)}{z_j}\right| < \frac{\pi}{2}\gamma, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}^n \setminus \{0\}.$$
where
$$q(z) = (q_1(z), q_2(z), \dots, q_n(z))' = (D(g(z)))^{-1}g(z)$$
is a column vector in $\mathbb{C}^n$ and j satisfies
$$|z_j| = ||z|| = \max_{1 \le k \le n} \{|z_k|\}.$$
In case of $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ and $X = \mathbb{C}$ , the relation is equivalent to
$$\left|\arg \frac{zg'(z)}{g(z)}\right| < \frac{\pi}{2}\gamma, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}.$$
Let $\mathcal{SS}^_{\gamma}(\mathbb{B})$ denote the class of starlike mappings of order $\gamma$ on $\mathbb{B}$ . When $X = \mathbb{C}$ and $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ , the class $\mathcal{SS}^_{\gamma}(\mathbb{U})$ is denoted by $\mathcal{SS}^*(\gamma)$ .
For a biholomorphic function $\Phi: \mathbb{U} \to \mathbb{C}$ , which satisfies $\Phi(0) = 1$ and $\operatorname{Re} \Phi(z) > 0$ , Kohr [15] introduced the class $\mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ containing the functions $p \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B})$ such that Dp(0) = I and $||z||/l_z(p(z)) \in \Phi(\mathbb{U})$ . Here, we additionally take $\Phi'(0) > 0$ , $\Phi''(0) \in \mathbb{R}$ and define the following:
Def 1.3
Definition 1.3. Let be a biholomorphic function such that,, and. We define to be the class of mappings given by For and, the above relation…
Definition 1.3. Let $\Phi: \mathbb{U} \to \mathbb{C}$ be a biholomorphic function such that $\Phi(0) = 1$ , $\operatorname{Re} \Phi(z) > 0$ , $\Phi'(0) > 0$ and $\Phi''(0) \in \mathbb{R}$ . We define $\mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ to be the class of mappings given by
$$\mathcal{M}_{\Phi} = \left\{ p \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}) : p(0) = 0, D(p(0)) = I, \frac{\|z\|}{l_z(p(z))} \in \Phi(\mathbb{U}), z \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}, \ l_z \in T(z) \right\}.$$
For $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}^n$ and $X = \mathbb{C}^n$ , the above relation is equivalent to
$$\mathcal{M}_{\Phi} = \left\{ p \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}^n) : p(0) = 0, D(p(0)) = I, \frac{z_k}{p_k(z)} \in \Phi(\mathbb{U}), z \in \mathbb{U}^n \setminus \{0\} \right\},\,$$
where $p(z) = (p_1(z), p_2(z), \dots, p_n(z))'$ is a column vector in $\mathbb{C}^n$ and k satisfies
$$|z_k| = ||z|| = \max_{1 \le j \le n} \{|z_j|\}.$$
For $\mathbb{B} = \mathbb{U}$ and $X = \mathbb{C}$ , the relation is equivalent to
$$\mathcal{M}_{\Phi} = \left\{ p \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{U}) : p(0) = 0, p'(0) = 1, \frac{z}{p(z)} \in \Phi(\mathbb{U}), z \in \mathbb{U} \right\}.$$
Also, note that, if $g \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B})$ and $D(g(z))^{-1}g(z) \in \mathcal{M}_{\Phi}$ , then suitable choices of $\Phi$ in Definition 1.3 provide different subclasses of holomorphic mappings. For instance, when $\Phi(z) = (1+z)/(1-z)$ , $\Phi(z) = (1+(1-2\alpha)z)/(1-z)$ and $\Phi(z) = ((1+z)/(1-z))^{\gamma}$ , we easily obtain that $g \in \mathcal{S}^(\mathbb{B})$ , $g \in \mathcal{S}^_{\alpha}(\mathbb{B})$ and $g \in \mathcal{S}^*_{\gamma}(\mathbb{B})$ respectively.
In this paper, we obtain the sharp bounds of $|\det T_{2,2}(g)|$ and $|\det T_{3,1}(g)|$ for a class of holomorphic functions in the unit disk, which contain the above results as special cases. Further, these results are generalized in higher dimensions.
Function classes studied:
Coefficient bounds & claims (11)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
det T_{2,2}(g) = b_3^2 - b_2^2 ≤ 13 for class S* (sharp) [Theorem A (Ali et al. 2018, recalled)]
coefficient_bound
det T_{3,1}(g) = 2b_2^2*b_3 - 2b_2^2 - b_3^2 + 1 ≤ 24 for class S* (sharp) [Theorem A (Ali et al. 2018, recalled)]
coefficient_bound
det T_{2,2}(g) = b_3^2 - b_2^2 ≤ (1-alpha)**2*(4*alpha**2 - 12*alpha + 13) for class S*(alpha) (sharp) [Theorem B (Ahuja et al. 2021, recalled)]
coefficient_bound
MΦ (general): If g(z)/g'(z) in MΦ and |Phi''(0)+2(Phi'(0))^2| >= 2Phi'(0) > 0, then |T_{2,2}(g)| <= (Phi'(0))^2/4 * (Phi''(0)/(2*Phi'(0)) + Phi'(0))^2 + (Phi'(0))^2. (sharp) [Theorem 2.1]
coefficient_bound
MΦ (general): If g(z)/g'(z) in MΦ and 2Phi'(0)-2(Phi'(0))^2 <= Phi''(0) <= 6(Phi'(0))^2-2Phi'(0), then |det T_{3,1}(g)| <= 1 + 2(Phi'(0))^2 + (Phi'(0))^2/4 * ((3Phi'(0) - Phi''(0))/(2Phi'(0))) * (Phi''(0)/(2Phi'(0)) + Phi'(0)). (sharp) [Theorem 2.2]
coefficient_bound
det T_{2,2}(g) for SS*(gamma) ≤ 9*gamma**4 + 4*gamma**2 for class SS*(gamma) (sharp) [Corollary 2.3]
coefficient_bound
det T_{3,1}(g) for SS*(gamma) ≤ 15*gamma**4 + 8*gamma**2 + 1 for class SS*(gamma) (sharp) [Corollary 2.3]
function_family
Class S*: starlike functions, Re(zg'/g) > 0
function_family
Class S*(alpha): starlike functions of order alpha, Re(zg'/g) > alpha, 0 <= alpha < 1
function_family
Class SS*(gamma): strongly starlike functions of order gamma, |arg(zg'/g)| < pi*gamma/2, 0 < gamma <= 1
function_family
Class MΦ: class defined by zg'(z)/g(z) subordinate to Phi, general Ma-Minda type
Related Papers