🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Results & Lemmas (4)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1 Theorem 1. For every domain Ω in C that omits an open set we have that 3
Theorem 1. For every domain Ω in C that omits an open set we have that $$\sigma_H(\Omega) \le \sigma_H(\mathbb{D}) \le 3/2.$$ 3
Lemma 1 Lemma 1. Let be a holomorphic self-mapping of. Then
Lemma 1. Let $\omega$ be a holomorphic self-mapping of $\mathbb{D}$ . Then $$\left| \frac{(1 - |z|^2)^2 \omega''(z)}{2(1 - |\omega(z)|^2)} - \overline{z}\omega^(z) + \overline{\omega(z)}\omega^(z)^2 \right| \le 1 - |\omega^*(z)|^2, \qquad z \in \mathbb{D}$$
Theorem 2 Theorem 2. Let f be a locally univalent harmonic mapping in with dilatation. If then f is injective.
Theorem 2. Let f be a locally univalent harmonic mapping in $\mathbb{D}$ with dilatation $\omega : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}$ . If $$(1-|z|^2)^2|S_f(z)|+2|\omega^(z)A_f(z)| \le \frac{1}{2}|\omega^(z)|^2, \qquad z \in \mathbb{D},$$ then f is injective.
Theorem 3 Theorem 3. Let be a locally univalent harmonic mapping in. If, where is the first no negative solution of the equation, then f is…
Theorem 3. Let $f = h + \overline{g}$ be a locally univalent harmonic mapping in $\mathbb{D}$ . If $|Sh(z)| \leq 2c^2$ , where $c \approx 0,6533$ is the first no negative solution of the equation $2x \tan x = 1$ , then f is injective. Proof. Let a and b be complex numbers for which ah''(0) + b = 0, and set $f_1 = af + b = h_1 + \overline{g_1}$ . Then $h''_1(0) = 0$ and $Sh_1 = Sh$ . In view of Theorem 5.2 in [2], the normalization of $h_1$ along with the condition $|Sh_1(z)| \leq 2c^2$ imply that $h_1$ is convex. Hence, $f_1$ is injective by [7]. It follows that f is injective. Acknowledgements. The authors wish to thank María José Martín for drawing their attention to the non-injective harmonic mapping constructed in [19] and suggesting its use in the proof of the second inequality in Theorem 1.
Function classes studied:

Coefficient bounds & claims (5)

Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
harmonic inner radius sigma_H(D) ≤ 3/2 for class harmonic mappings [Theorem 1]
coefficient_bound
harmonic mappings with dilatation omega: D -> D: If (1-|z|^2)^2|S_f(z)| + 2|omega*(z) A_f(z)| <= (1/2)|omega*(z)|^2 for all z in D, then f is injective. [Theorem 2]
coefficient_bound
Schwarzian criterion via convexity of analytic part ≤ 0.4272 for class harmonic mappings f = h + g [Theorem 3]
function_family
Class harmonic mappings in D with ||S_f||_D <= c: Locally univalent sense-preserving harmonic mappings f in the unit disk with Schwarzian norm at most c
function_family
Class holomorphic functions in D: Standard class of analytic locally univalent functions

Related Papers

Sharp Bohr-Type inequalities for certain classes of close-to-convex functions
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
On the coefficients estimate of K-quasiconformal harmonic mappings
2025
Bohr inequality and Bohr-Rogosinski inequality for K-Quasiconformal harmonic map
2025
On certain subclasses of analytic and harmonic mappings
2025
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #3,901 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback