Abstract
Investigation of coefficient problems for the subclass of normalized analytic starlike functions defined by subordination condition with exponential function. Sharp upper bounds established for initial inverse logarithmic coefficients and second-order inverse logarithmic Hankel determinant.
Results & Lemmas (9)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Lemma 2.1
Lemma 2.1. [6, Lemma 2.4] If is of the form (2.1), then <span id="page-2-1"></span> <span id="page-2-2"></span> and <span…
Lemma 2.1. [6, Lemma 2.4] If $p \in \mathcal{P}$ is of the form (2.1), then
<span id="page-2-1"></span>
$$p_1 = 2\tau_1, \tag{2.2}$$
<span id="page-2-2"></span>
$$p_2 = 2\tau_1^2 + 2(1 - |\tau_1|^2)\tau_2 \tag{2.3}$$
and
<span id="page-3-0"></span>
$$p_3 = 2\tau_1^3 + 4(1 - |\tau_1|^2)\tau_1\tau_2 - 2(1 - |\tau_1|^2)\overline{\tau_1}\tau_2^2 + 2(1 - \tau_1^2)(1 - |\tau_2|^2)\tau_3$$
(2.4)
for some $\tau_1, \tau_2, \tau_3 \in \overline{\mathbb{D}} := \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| \leq 1\}$ . For $\tau_1 \in \mathbb{T} := \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| = 1\}$ , there is a unique function $p \in \mathcal{P}$ with $p_1$ as in (2.2), namely,
$$p(z) = \frac{1 + \tau_1 z}{1 - \tau_1 z}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}.$$
For $\tau_1 \in \mathbb{D}$ and $\tau_2 \in \mathbb{T}$ , there is a unique function $p \in \mathcal{P}$ with $p_1$ and $p_2$ as in (2.2) and (2.3), namely,
$$p(z) = \frac{1 + (\overline{\tau}_1 \tau_2 + \tau_1)z + \tau_2 z^2}{1 + (\overline{\tau}_1 \tau_2 - \tau_1)z - \tau_2 z^2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}.$$
For $\tau_1, \tau_2 \in \mathbb{D}$ and $\tau_3 \in \mathbb{T}$ , there is a unique function $p \in \mathcal{P}$ with $p_1, p_2$ , and $p_3$ as in (2.2-2.4), namely,
$$p(z) = \frac{1 + (\overline{\tau}_2 \tau_3 + \overline{\tau}_1 \tau_2 + \tau_1)z + (\overline{\tau}_1 \tau_3 + \tau_1 \overline{\tau}_2 \tau_3 + \tau_2)z^2 + \tau_3 z^3}{1 + (\overline{\tau}_2 \tau_3 + \overline{\tau}_1 \tau_2 - \tau_1)z + (\overline{\tau}_1 \tau_3 - \tau_1 \overline{\tau}_2 \tau_3 - \tau_2)z^2 - \tau_3 z^3}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}$$
Following a well-known result due to Choi et al. [7].
Lemma 2.2
Lemma 2.2. [7] Let A, B, C be real numbers and let (i) If, then (ii) If AC < 0, then where
Lemma 2.2. [7] Let A, B, C be real numbers and let
$$Y(A, B, C) := \max_{z \in \overline{\mathbb{D}}} \{ |A + Bz + Cz^2| + 1 - |z|^2 \}.$$
(i) If $AC \geq 0$ , then
$$Y(A, B, C) = \begin{cases} |A| + |B| + |C|, & \text{if } |B| \ge 2(1 - |C|), \\ 1 + |A| + \frac{B^2}{4(1 - |C|)}, & \text{if } |B| < 2(1 - |C|). \end{cases}$$
(ii) If AC < 0, then
$$Y(A,B,C) = \begin{cases} 1 - |A| + \frac{B^2}{4(1-|C|)}, & \text{if } -4AC(C^{-2}-1) \leq B^2 \text{ and } |B| < 2(1-|C|), \\ 1 + |A| + \frac{B^2}{4(1+|C|)}, & \text{if } B^2 < \min\left\{4(1+|C|)^2, -4AC(C^{-2}-1)\right\}, \\ R(A,B,C), & \text{otherwise}, \end{cases}$$
where
$$R(A,B,C) := \begin{cases} |A| + |B| - |C|, & \text{if } |C|(|B| + 4|A|) \leq |AB|, \\ -|A| + |B| + |C|, & \text{if } |AB| \leq |C|(|B| - 4|A|), \\ (|C| + |A|)\sqrt{1 - \frac{B^2}{4AC}}, & \text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$
Lemma 2.3
Lemma 2.3. [34] Let be given by (2.1). Then Moreover, for v < 0 or v > 1, equality holds if and only if or one of its rotations. For 0 < v…
Lemma 2.3. [34] Let $p \in \mathcal{P}$ be given by (2.1). Then
$$|p_2 - vp_1^2| \le \begin{cases} -4v + 2, & v < 0, \\ 2, & 0 \le v \le 1, \\ 4v - 2, & v > 1. \end{cases}$$
Moreover, for v < 0 or v > 1, equality holds if and only if
$$h(z) = \frac{1+z}{1-z}$$
or one of its rotations.
For 0 < v < 1, equality holds if and only if
$$h(z) = \frac{1+z^2}{1-z^2}$$
or one of its rotations.
Lemma 2.4
Lemma 2.4. [42] Let J, K, and L be numbers such that,, and. Let be of the form (2.1) and define a function by Then and where M = |4K + 2L|.
Lemma 2.4. [42] Let J, K, and L be numbers such that $J \geq 0$ , $K \in \mathbb{C}$ , and $L \in \mathbb{R}$ . Let $p \in \mathcal{P}$ be of the form (2.1) and define a function by
$$\Phi(p_1, p_2) = |Kp_1^2 + Lp_2| - |Jp_1|.$$
Then
$$\Phi(p_1, p_2) \le \begin{cases} |4K + 2L| - 2J, & \text{if } |2K + L| \ge |L| + J, \\ 2|L|, & \text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$
and
$$-\Phi(p_1, p_2) \le \begin{cases} 2J - M, & when \ J \ge M + 2|L|, \\ 2J\sqrt{\frac{2|L|}{M + 2|L|}}, & when \ J^2 \le 2|L|(M + 2|L|), \\ 2|L| + \frac{J^2}{M + 2|L|}, & otherwise \end{cases}$$
where M = |4K + 2L|.
Theorem 3.1
Theorem 3.1. Let and define the parameter. For any function, the initial inverse logarithmic coefficients satisfy the following sharp…
Theorem 3.1. Let $0 < \alpha \le 1$ and define the parameter $\alpha_0 = \sqrt{\frac{12}{29}} \approx 0.6432$ . For any function $f \in \mathcal{S}_{ex}^*$ , the initial inverse logarithmic coefficients satisfy the following sharp bounds:
<span id="page-4-2"></span>
$$|\Gamma_1| \le \frac{\alpha}{2},\tag{3.1}$$
<span id="page-4-3"></span>
$$|\Gamma_2| \le \begin{cases} \frac{\alpha}{4}, & \text{if } 0 < \alpha \le \frac{2}{3}, \\ \frac{3\alpha^2}{8}, & \text{if } \frac{2}{3} < \alpha \le 1, \end{cases}$$
$$(3.2)$$
<span id="page-4-1"></span>
$$|\Gamma_3| \le \begin{cases} \frac{\alpha}{6}, & \text{if } 0 < \alpha \le \alpha_0, \\ \frac{29\alpha^3}{72}, & \text{if } \alpha_0 < \alpha \le 1. \end{cases}$$
$$(3.3)$$
Equality is attained in each case for the extremal functions $f_{Koebe}(z)$ , $f_{odd}(z)$ , or $f_{tri}(z)$ .
Theorem 4.1
Theorem 4.1. Let. If and the inverse logarithmic coefficients (n = 1, 2) are defined by (1.8), then <span id="page-8-0"></span> These…
Theorem 4.1. Let $0 < \alpha \le 1$ . If $f \in \mathcal{S}_{ex}^*$ and the inverse logarithmic coefficients $\Gamma_n$ (n = 1, 2) are defined by (1.8), then
<span id="page-8-0"></span>
$$-\frac{\alpha}{2}\sqrt{\frac{2}{3\alpha+2}} \le |\Gamma_2| - |\Gamma_1| \le \frac{\alpha}{4}.\tag{4.1}$$
These inequalities are sharp for all $\alpha \in (0,1]$ .
Theorem 5.1
Theorem 5.1. Let. If and the inverse logarithmic coefficients (n = 1, 2, 3) defined by (1.8), then the second-order inverse logarithmic…
Theorem 5.1. Let $0 < \alpha \le 1$ . If $f \in \mathcal{S}_{ex}^*$ and the inverse logarithmic coefficients $\Gamma_n$ (n = 1, 2, 3) defined by (1.8), then the second-order inverse logarithmic Hankel determinant $H_{2,1}(F_{f^{-1}}/2)$ satisfies the sharp inequalities:
$$\left| H_{2,1} \left( F_{f^{-1}} / 2 \right) \right| \le \begin{cases} \frac{\alpha^2}{16}, & \text{if } 0 < \alpha \le \frac{2}{5}, \\ \frac{\alpha^2 (15\alpha^2 + 10\alpha + 4)}{4(35\alpha^2 + 60\alpha + 12)}, & \text{if } \frac{2}{5} < \alpha \le 1. \end{cases}$$
(5.1)
These inequalities are sharp for all $\alpha \in (0,1]$ .
Theorem 6.1
Theorem 6.1. Let. If is given by (1.2), then the third-order Hermitian–Toeplitz determinant satisfies the sharp inequalities: Both bounds…
Theorem 6.1. Let $0 < \alpha \le 1$ . If $f \in \mathcal{S}_{ex}^*$ is given by (1.2), then the third-order Hermitian–Toeplitz determinant satisfies the sharp inequalities:
$$1 - 2\alpha^2 + \frac{15\alpha^4}{16} \le T_{3,1}(f) \le 1. \tag{6.3}$$
Both bounds are sharp for all $\alpha \in (0,1]$ .
Theorem 7.1 · coeff
Theorem 7.1. Let,, and. If is given by (1.2), then the generalized Fekete–Szegő functional satisfies the sharp inequalities where the upper…
Theorem 7.1. Let $0 < \alpha \le 1$ , $\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$ , and $\mu > 0$ . If $f \in \mathcal{S}_{ex}^*$ is given by (1.2), then the generalized Fekete–Szegő functional satisfies the sharp inequalities
$$\mathcal{B}_L \le |a_3 - \lambda a_2^2| - \mu |a_2| \le \mathcal{B}_U, \tag{7.2}$$
where the upper bound $\mathcal{B}_U$ is given by
$$\mathcal{B}_{U} = \begin{cases} \frac{\alpha}{2}, & \text{if } |\alpha(2-\lambda)+1| < 1+2\mu, \\ \frac{\alpha|\alpha(2-\lambda)+1| - 2\alpha\mu}{2}, & \text{if } |\alpha(2-\lambda)+1| \ge 1+2\mu, \end{cases}$$
(7.3)
and the lower bound $\mathcal{B}_L$ is given by
$$\mathcal{B}_{L} = \begin{cases} -\frac{\alpha}{2}(2\mu - |\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1|), & \text{if } \mu - 1 \ge |\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1|, \\ -\alpha\mu\sqrt{\frac{1}{|\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1| + 1}}, & \text{if } \mu^{2} - 1 \le |\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1|, \\ -\frac{\alpha}{2}\left(\frac{|\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1| + \mu^{2} + 1}{|\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1| + 1}\right), & \text{if } \mu - 1 < |\alpha(2-\lambda) + 1| < \mu^{2} - 1. \end{cases}$$
$$(7.4)$$
Both bounds are sharp.
Function classes studied:
Coefficient bounds & claims (13)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_1| ≤ alpha/2 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 3.1]
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_2| ≤ alpha/4 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 3.1]
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_2| (upper branch) ≤ 3*alpha**2/8 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 3.1]
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_3| ≤ alpha/6 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 3.1]
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_3| (upper branch) ≤ 29*alpha**3/72 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 3.1]
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_2| - |Gamma_1| (upper) ≤ alpha/4 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 4.1]
coefficient_bound
|Gamma_2| - |Gamma_1| (lower) ≤ -alpha/2*sqrt(2/(3*alpha+2)) for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 4.1]
coefficient_bound
H_{2,1}(F_{f^{-1}}/2) ≤ alpha**2/16 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 5.1]
coefficient_bound
H_{2,1}(F_{f^{-1}}/2) (upper branch) ≤ alpha**2*(15*alpha**2 + 10*alpha + 4)/(4*(35*alpha**2 + 60*alpha + 12)) for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 5.1]
coefficient_bound
T_{3,1}(f) (upper) ≤ 1 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 6.1]
coefficient_bound
T_{3,1}(f) (lower) ≤ 1 - 2*alpha**2 + 15*alpha**4/16 for class S*_ex (sharp) [Theorem 6.1]
coefficient_bound
S*_ex: BL <= |a3 - lambda*a2^2| - mu*|a2| <= BU, where BU = alpha/2 if |alpha(2-lambda)+1| < 1+2mu, else BU = alpha*|alpha(2-lambda)+1| - 2*alpha*mu)/2. Both bounds are sharp. (sharp) [Theorem 7.1]
function_family
Class S*_ex: f in A with zf'/f subordinate to exp(alpha*z), 0 < alpha <= 1
Related Papers