Abstract
Family of function classes constructed using Gauss hypergeometric function with sharp coefficient estimates obtained and connections to Ma-Minda starlike functions established via filtration approach.
Results & Lemmas (12)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1.1
Theorem 1.1. If and Re f'(z) > 0, then f is univalent in. Thanks to this theorem, it begs to consider the class which is usually called the…
Theorem 1.1. If $f \in \text{Hol}(\mathbb{D}, \mathbb{C})$ and Re f'(z) > 0, then f is univalent in $\mathbb{D}$ .
Thanks to this theorem, it begs to consider the class
$$\mathcal{R} := \{ f \in \mathcal{A} : \operatorname{Re} f' \in \mathcal{P} \},$$
which is usually called the Noshiro-Warschawski class. More detailed information on this class can be found in [6, 8, 21, 23].
Recently, in several works [5, 14, 19] it was noticed that every function $f \in \mathcal{R}$ is a semigroup generator (see Definition 1.3 below). Moreover, elements of $\mathcal{R}$ have very
Date: December 29, 2025.
<sup>2020</sup> Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 47H20, 30C45; Secondary 30C80, 58D07.
$Key\ words\ and\ phrases.$ infinitesimal generators; filtrations; semigroups; starlike functions; analytic extension.
specified geometric and dynamical properties. These facts among others served a base to develop theory of so-called filtrations of semigroup generators (see Definition 1.9).
It can be easily seen that if we replace the Noshiro-Warschawski condition by a weaker one, namely,
$$f \in \mathcal{A}, \quad \operatorname{Re} f'(z) > -\alpha$$
(1.1)
for some $\alpha > -1$ , then there are non-univalent functions satisfying the last inequality. At the same time, we will see that for some positive $\alpha$ each function that satisfies (1.1) forced to be a generator.
Assume f satisfies (1.1). In this paper the following questions are studied.
Question 1. What geometric properties does the function f exibit?
Question 2. What analytical features characterize the function f?
Question 3. For which $\alpha$ does f serve as a semigroup generator?
Question 4. If f is a semigroup generator, what are dynamical properties of this semi-group?
Note in passing, that the inequality (1.1) is closely connected the work [9], where the set-theoretic properties of the two-parameter family of function classes defined by
$$\operatorname{Re}\left((s-1)\frac{f(z)}{z} + f'(z)\right) \ge st, \quad s > 0, \ t \in [0,1),$$
were studied. Observe that (1.1) extends the last formula for s = 1 to classes of functions whose derivatives may have negative real parts. In that work the Gauß hypergeometric function ${}_{2}F_{1}(1, s; s + 1; z)$ plays a crucial role. Substituting s = 1 we get
$$_{2}F_{1}(1,1;2;z) = -\frac{\log(1-z)}{z}$$
.
This function will also prove to be important in the present study.
In what follows, we need an additional notion. Let $f, g \in \text{Hol}(\mathbb{D}, \mathbb{C})$ and
$$\Omega = \{ \omega \in \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D}) : \ \omega(0) = 0 \}.$$
One says that f is subordinate g and writes $f \prec g$ , if there exists a function $\omega \in \Omega$ such that $f(z) = g(\omega(z))$ for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ . In the case where g is univalent, conditions $f \prec g$ and $f(\mathbb{D}) \subseteq g(\mathbb{D})$ are equivalent.
We will also make use of the main notions and facts from semigroup theory. For more details the reader can be referred to [4, 18, 33].
Theorem 1.4
Theorem 1.4. Let. Then if and only if there are a point and a function with,, such that (1.3) Moreover, this representation is unique. We…
Theorem 1.4. Let $f \in \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D}, \mathbb{C})$ . Then $f \in \mathcal{G}$ if and only if there are a point $\tau \in \overline{\mathbb{D}}$ and a function $q \in \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D}, \mathbb{C})$ with $\operatorname{Re} q(z) \geq 0$ , $z \in \mathbb{D}$ , such that
$$f(z) = (z - \tau) (1 - z\overline{\tau}) q(z), \quad z \in \mathbb{D}.$$
(1.3)
Moreover, this representation is unique.
We notice that formula (1.3) was obtained by Berkson and Porta in [3] and is called the Berkson-Porta representation.
We further focus on the case $\tau \in \mathbb{D}$ . Up to the Möbius transformation $M_{\tau}$ $\left(M_{\tau}(z) = \frac{\tau - z}{1 - z\overline{\tau}}\right)$ of the unit disk, one can always consider generators such that f(0) = 0, or, what is the same, $\phi_t(0) = 0$ for all $t \geq 0$ . It follows from Theorem 1.4 that $f \in \mathcal{A}$ is an infinitesimal generator if and only if $\operatorname{Re} \frac{f(z)}{z} > 0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{D} \setminus \{0\}$ . We denote
$$\mathcal{G}_0 := \mathcal{A} \cap \mathcal{G} = \left\{ f \in \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D}, \mathbb{C}) : \frac{f(z)}{z} \in \mathcal{P} \right\}.$$
The class $\mathcal{G}_0$ is very important for the study of non-autonomous problems and geometric function theory (see, for example, [4, 6, 16, 18, 29]).
Over the years, the study of the asymptotic behavior of semigroups was mainly focused on the local/global rate of convergence and the growth estimates of a semigroup with respect to its parameter. Different estimates of the rate of convergence of semigroups were obtained, see, for example, the books [4, 18, 33], the survey [25] and references therein.
In view of subsequent results, we recall the following notion.
Theorem 1.6
Theorem 1.6. Let and be the semigroup generated by f. Then is exponentially squeezing with squeezing ratio k>0 if and only if on. Another…
Theorem 1.6. Let $f \in \mathcal{G}_0$ and $\{\phi_t\}_{t\geq 0}$ be the semigroup generated by f. Then $\{\phi_t\}_{t\geq 0}$ is exponentially squeezing with squeezing ratio k>0 if and only if $\operatorname{Re}\frac{f(z)}{z}\geq k$ on $\mathbb{D}$ .
Another direction of research on semigroup properties is focuses on the possibility of analytic extension with respect to the semigroup parameter into a complex domain. The problem is to identify conditions that allow such an extension, along with estimates of the sector in $\mathbb{C}$ to which this extension can be performed. For recent results in this direction see [2, 20, 10], see also [17].
More specifically, fix $\theta \in (0, \frac{\pi}{2}]$ and denote
$$\Lambda(\theta) = \{ \zeta \in \mathbb{C} : |\arg \zeta| < \theta \}. \tag{1.4}$$
Theorem 1.7
Theorem 1.7. (Theorem 2.12 in [20]). Let be a semigroup of holomorphic self-mappings of generated by, and let. Then extends analytically to…
Theorem 1.7. (Theorem 2.12 in [20]). Let $\{\phi_t\}_{t\geq 0}$ be a semigroup of holomorphic self-mappings of $\mathbb D$ generated by $f\in\mathcal G_0$ , and let $\alpha\in[0,1)$ . Then $\{\phi_t\}_{t\geq 0}$ extends analytically to the sector $\Lambda\left(\frac{\pi(1-\alpha)}{2}\right)$ in $\mathbb C$ if and only if $\left|\arg\frac{f(z)}{z}\right|\leq \frac{\pi\alpha}{2}$ on $\mathbb D\setminus\{0\}$ .
In the same work [20] a criterion for analytic extension was established.
Theorem 1.8
Theorem 1.8. Let and. Then the semigroup generated by f extends analytically to the sector in if and only if These directions in study of…
Theorem 1.8. Let $f \in \mathcal{G}$ and $\theta \in [0,1)$ . Then the semigroup generated by f extends analytically to the sector $\Lambda\left(\frac{\pi(1-\theta)}{2}\right)$ in $\mathbb{C}$ if and only if
$$\left|\arg\frac{f(z)}{z}\right| \le \frac{\pi\theta}{2} \text{ for all } z \in \mathbb{D} \setminus \{0\}.$$
These directions in study of dynamical systems highlight the importance of classifying generators according to the dynamical properties of the semigroups they generate. To this end, we introduce a filtration (or parametric embedding) of infinitesimal generators.
Lemma 2.4
Lemma 2.4. The functions have the following properties: - (i) Taylor's coefficients of are and,; - (ii) The Fekete-Szegö functional is -…
Lemma 2.4. The functions $\varphi_{\alpha}$ have the following properties:
- (i) Taylor's coefficients of $\varphi_{\alpha}(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \rho_n z^n$ are $\rho_0 = 1$ and $\rho_n = \frac{2(1+\alpha)}{n+1}$ , $n \ge 1$ ;
- (ii) The Fekete-Szegö functional is $|\rho_3 \lambda \rho_2^2| = \frac{1+\alpha}{18} \cdot |9-8\lambda|, \ \lambda \in \mathbb{C};$
- (iii) The function $\varphi_{\alpha}$ , $\alpha > -1$ , is a univalent convex function;
- (iv) Let $-1 < \alpha < \beta$ , then $\varphi_{\alpha} \prec \varphi_{\beta}$ .
Corollary 2.5 · coeff
Corollary 2.5. If then. Estimates on coefficient operators remain a topic of ongoing interest in the geometric function theory community.
Corollary 2.5. If
$$f \in \mathcal{L}_{\alpha}$$
then $\frac{f(z)}{z} \prec \varphi_{\alpha}(z)$ .
Estimates on coefficient operators remain a topic of ongoing interest in the geometric function theory community.
Proposition 2.6
Proposition 2.6. Let and is its Taylor series. Then (i) (ii) for all and this inequality is sharp.
Proposition 2.6. Let $f \in \mathcal{L}_{\alpha}$ and $1 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \phi_n z^n$ is its Taylor series. Then
(i)
$$|\phi_n| \le \frac{2(1+\alpha)}{n}, \ n \ge 1;$$
(ii)
$$|\phi_3 - \lambda \phi_2^2| \le \frac{2(1+\alpha)}{3} \max\{1, |6\lambda - 1|\}$$
for all $\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$ and this inequality is sharp.
Theorem 2.7
Theorem 2.7. Let, then - (i) - (ii) The following are equivalent: - - (2) The image of does not contain the origin; - (3) -
Theorem 2.7. Let $\alpha \geq -1$ , then
- (i) $K(\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}) = -(1+2\alpha) + 2(1+\alpha)\log(2);$
- (ii) The following are equivalent:
- $(1) \ \alpha \leq \alpha_*;$
- (2) The image of $\frac{f(z)}{z}$ does not contain the origin;
- (3) $B(\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}) = \frac{2}{\pi} \cdot \max_{0 < \theta < \pi} \arg \varphi_{\alpha}(e^{i\theta});$
- $(4) \mathcal{L}_{\alpha} \subset \mathcal{G}$
Corollary 2.8
Corollary 2.8. Let, then each element of is generator of exponentially squeezing semigroup with sharp squeezing ratio. If, then by Theorem…
Corollary 2.8. Let $-1 \le \alpha \le \alpha_* = \frac{2 \log 2 - 1}{2 - 2 \log 2}$ , then each element of $\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}$ is generator of exponentially squeezing semigroup with sharp squeezing ratio $K(\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}) = -(1 + 2\alpha) + 2(1 + \alpha) \log(2)$ .
If $B(\mathcal{G}_1) < 1$ , then by Theorem 1.8 semigroups generated by elements of $\mathcal{G}_1$ admit analytic extension to the sector $\Lambda\left(\frac{\pi}{2}(1-B(\mathcal{G}_1))\right)$ and the angle of opening of this sector is the maximal one.
Corollary 2.9
Corollary 2.9. Let and. Then semigroups generated by any admit analytic extension to the sector and this sector is the maximal one. 2.3.…
Corollary 2.9. Let $-1 \le \alpha \le \alpha_*$ and $B(\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}) = \frac{2}{\pi} \cdot \max_{0 < \theta < \pi} \arg \varphi_{\alpha}(e^{i\theta})$ . Then semigroups generated by any $f \in \mathcal{L}_{\alpha}$ admit analytic extension to the sector $\Lambda\left(\frac{\pi}{2}(1 - B(\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}))\right)$ and this sector is the maximal one.
2.3. The family $\mathcal{L}$ . Consider the family $\mathcal{L} = \{\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}\}_{{\alpha \geq -1}}$ . The following result characterizes this family from a set-theoretic perspective.
Theorem 2.10
Theorem 2.10. The following assertions hold: - (a) The family forms a filtration with, and - (b) The filtration admits a net of totally…
Theorem 2.10. The following assertions hold:
- (a) The family $\mathcal{L} = \{\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}\}_{\alpha \in [-1,\alpha_]}$ forms a filtration with $\mathcal{L}_{-1} = \{\mathrm{Id}\}$ , $\mathcal{L}_0 = \mathcal{R}$ and $\mathcal{L}_{\alpha} = \left\{ f \in \mathcal{A} : \frac{f(z)}{z} = \frac{-\log 2 + \int_{\partial \mathbb{D}^2} F_1(1,1;2;z\overline{\zeta}) d\mu(\zeta)}{1 \log 2} \right\}.$
- (b) The filtration $\mathcal{L}$ admits a net $\{f_{\alpha}\}_{{\alpha}\in[-1,\alpha_{*}]}$ of totally extremal functions $f_{\alpha}(z):=z\varphi_{\alpha}(z)$ .
(c) For every $\alpha \in [-1, \alpha_*]$ we have $f_{\alpha} \in \partial \mathcal{L}_{\alpha} := \mathcal{L}_{\alpha} \setminus \bigcup_{-1 \leq s < \alpha} \mathcal{L}_s$ .
Consequently, the filtration $\mathcal{L}$ is strict.
Definitions (6)
Def 1.2
Definition 1.2. A family is called a one-parameter continuous semi-group (or just semigroup) if (a),; and (b), where is the identity map on…
Definition 1.2. A family $\{\phi_t\}_{t\geq 0} \subset \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D})$ is called a one-parameter continuous semi-group (or just semigroup) if
(a)
$$\phi_{t+s} = \phi_t \circ \phi_s$$
, $t, s \ge 0$ ; and
(b) $\lim_{t\to 0^+} \phi_t = \operatorname{Id}$ , where $\operatorname{Id}$ is the identity map on $\mathbb D$ and the limit is taken with respect to the topology of uniform convergence on compact sets in $\mathbb D$ .
Moreover, according to the fundamental result by Berkson and Porta [3] the family $\{\phi_t\}_{t>0}$ is differentiable with respect to its parameter $t \geq 0$ , and the limit
$$f = \lim_{t \to 0^+} \frac{1}{t} \left( \operatorname{Id} - \phi_t \right), \tag{1.2}$$
exists, and defines a holomorphic function on $\mathbb{D}$ . Furthermore, $\phi_t$ is the solution of the Cauchy problem:
$$\frac{\partial \phi_t(z)}{\partial t} + f(\phi_t(z)) = 0$$
and $\phi_0(z) = z \in \mathbb{D}$ .
Def 1.3
Definition 1.3. The function defined by (1.2) is called the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup. Denote by the class of all…
Definition 1.3. The function $f \in \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D}, \mathbb{C})$ defined by (1.2) is called the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup $\{\phi_t\}_{t\geq 0} \subset \operatorname{Hol}(\mathbb{D})$ .
Denote by $\mathcal{G}$ the class of all holomorphic generators on $\mathbb{D}$ . The following assertion contains a parametric representation of this class.
Def 1.5
Definition 1.5. (see [5]). Let be a semigroup. If there exists a constant k>0 such that for all, then is said to be exponentially squeezing…
Definition 1.5. (see [5]). Let $\{\phi_t(z)\}_{t\geq 0}$ be a semigroup. If there exists a constant k>0 such that
$$|\phi_t(z)| \le e^{-kt}|z|$$
for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ ,
then $\{\phi_t\}_{t>0}$ is said to be exponentially squeezing semigroup with squeezing ratio k.
The following criterion for a semigroup to be exponentially squeezing holds.
Def 1.9
Definition 1.9. (see [5, 14, 19]). Let J be a connected subset of. A filtration of is a family,, such that whenever and. Moreover, if for s…
Definition 1.9. (see [5, 14, 19]). Let J be a connected subset of $\mathbb{R}$ . A filtration of $\mathcal{G}_0$ is a family $\mathfrak{F} = \{\mathfrak{F}_s\}_{s \in J}$ , $\mathfrak{F}_s \subseteq \mathcal{G}_0$ , such that $\mathfrak{F}_s \subseteq \mathfrak{F}_t$ whenever $s, t \in J$ and $s \leq t$ . Moreover, if $\mathfrak{F}_s \subseteq \mathfrak{F}_t$ for s < t $s, t \in J$ , then we say that the filtration $\{\mathfrak{F}_s\}_{s \in J}$ is strict. In this case for $t \in J$ we set
$$\partial \mathfrak{F}_t = \mathfrak{F}_t \setminus \bigcup_{s \in J, s < t} \mathfrak{F}_s. \tag{1.5}$$
Let a filtration $\mathfrak{F} = {\{\mathfrak{F}_s\}}_{s \in J}$ be given. We now split Question 4 into two detailed parts for clarity.
- Determine the sharp squeezing ratio for all semigroups generated by elements of each filtration set Fs;
- Identify the maximal sector into which all these semigroups admit an analytic extension.
Note that if the boundaries defined by (1.5) are not empty for every t ∈ J, then the filtration F is strict although for a strict filtration boundaries of its elements might be empty.
The study of different classes of functions involves the searching for extremals. We will use the following notion:
Definition 1.10 (see [5]). Let F ⊂ A. We say that a function f<sup>∗</sup> ∈ F is totally extremal for F if for every λ ∈ C and r ∈ [0, 1]
$$\min_{|z|=r} \operatorname{Re}\left(\lambda \frac{f(z)}{z}\right) \ge \min_{|z|=r} \operatorname{Re}\left(\lambda \frac{f_*(z)}{z}\right) \text{ for all } f \in \mathcal{F}.$$
Def 1.11
Definition 1.11. We say that a filtration F = Fs s∈<sup>J</sup> admits a net fs s∈<sup>J</sup> of totally extremal functions if for every s…
Definition 1.11. We say that a filtration F = {Fs}s∈<sup>J</sup> admits a net {fs}s∈<sup>J</sup> of totally extremal functions if for every s ∈ J, the function f<sup>s</sup> is totally extremal for the class Fs.
Def 2.1
Definition 2.1. For α ≥ −1 define Obviously, if α < β then L<sup>α</sup> ⊊ Lβ. Example 2.2. Fix α < −1. The function f(z) = zφα(z) where…
Definition 2.1. For α ≥ −1 define
$$\mathcal{L}_{\alpha} := \{ f \in \mathcal{A} : \operatorname{Re} f'(z) \ge -\alpha \}. \tag{2.1}$$
Obviously, if α < β then L<sup>α</sup> ⊊ Lβ.
Example 2.2. Fix α < −1. The function f(z) = zφα(z) where
$$\varphi_{\alpha}(z) = -(1+2\alpha) - 2(1+\alpha) \frac{\log(1-z)}{z}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}$$
(2.2)
belongs to the class Lα.
Indeed, a straightforward computation shows that Re f ′ (z) = <sup>−</sup>(1+2α)+2(1+α) Re <sup>1</sup> 1 − z and inf z∈D Re <sup>1</sup> 1 − z = 1 2 . Hence, Re f ′ (z) > −α as required.
2.1. Analytic and geometric features of $\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}$ . The next result establishes a representation of the elements in $\mathcal{L}_{\alpha}$ .
Coefficient bounds & claims (5)
Machine-extracted from the paper text - useful for cross-referencing, not a verified fact.
coefficient_bound
|phi_n| ≤ 2*(1+alpha)/n for class L_alpha (sharp) [Proposition 2.6(i)]
coefficient_bound
|phi_3 - lambda*phi_2^2| ≤ 2*(1+alpha)/3 * max(1, |6*lambda - 1|) for class L_alpha (sharp) [Proposition 2.6(ii)]
function_family
Class L_alpha: f in A such that Re f'(z) >= -alpha, alpha >= -1
function_family
Class R: Noshiro-Warschawski class: f in A with Re f'(z) > 0
function_family
Class G_0: A ∩ G = {f in Hol(D,C): f(z)/z in P}, infinitesimal generators with f(0)=0
Related Papers