🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

In the present article, our aim is to examine some useful problems including the convolution problem, sufficiency criteria, coefficient estimates and Fekete-Szeg¨o type inequalities for a new subfamily of analytic and multivalent functions associated with circular domain. In addition, we also define and study a Bernardi integral operator in its q-extension for multivalent functions.

Results & Lemmas (10)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 2.1. Lemma 2.1. [23] Let h (z) = 1 + ∞ P n=1 dnzn ≺K (z) = 1 + ∞ P n=1 knzn in D. If K (z) is convex univalent in D, then |dn| ≦|k1|, for n ≧1.
Lemma 2.1. [23] Let h (z) = 1 + ∞ P n=1 dnzn ≺K (z) = 1 + ∞ P n=1 knzn in D. If K (z) is convex univalent in D, then |dn| ≦|k1| , for n ≧1.
Lemma 2.2. Lemma 2.2. Let W contain all functions w that are analytic in D which satisfying w (0) = 0 & |w(z)| < 1. If the function w ∈W given by w(z)…
Lemma 2.2. Let W contain all functions w that are analytic in D which satisfying w (0) = 0 & |w(z)| < 1. If the function w ∈W given by w(z) = ∞ X k=1 wkzk (z ∈D) . then for λ ∈C, we have w2 −λw2 1 ≦max {1; |λ|} , (2.1) and w3 + 1 4w1w2 + 1
Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1. Let f ∈Ap has the series form (1.1) and satisfing the inequality given by ∞ X n=1 ∧n+p ([n + p, q] (1 −B) −[p, q] (1 −A))…
Theorem 3.1. Let f ∈Ap has the series form (1.1) and satisfing the inequality given by ∞ X n=1 ∧n+p ([n + p, q] (1 −B) −[p, q] (1 −A)) |an+p| ≦[p, q] (A −B) . (3.1) Then f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) .
Corollary 3.2. Corollary 3.2. Let f ∈A be given by (1.1) and satisfy the inequality ∞ X n=2 ([n, q] (1 −B) −1 + A) |an| ≦A −B. Then the function f ∈S∗ q…
Corollary 3.2. Let f ∈A be given by (1.1) and satisfy the inequality ∞ X n=2 ([n, q] (1 −B) −1 + A) |an| ≦A −B. Then the function f ∈S∗ q [A, B]. By choosing q →1−in the last corollary, we get the known result proved by Ahuja [3] and furthermore for A = 1 −α and B = −1, we obtain the result for the family S∗(ξ) which was proved by Silverman [27].
Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.3. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) be of the form (1.1). Then |ap+1| ≦ψ1 (A −B) ∧1+p, (3.2) and for n ≧2, |an+p| ≦(A −B) ψn ∧n+p n−1 Y…
Theorem 3.3. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) be of the form (1.1) . Then |ap+1| ≦ψ1 (A −B) ∧1+p , (3.2) and for n ≧2, |an+p| ≦(A −B) ψn ∧n+p n−1 Y t=1  1 + [p, q] (A −B)
Theorem 3.4. Theorem 3.4. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and be given by (1.1). Then for λ ∈C ap+2 −λa2 p+1 ≦(A −B)ψ2 Λp+2 1; |υ|, where υ is given by υ = (B…
Theorem 3.4. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and be given by (1.1) . Then for λ ∈C ap+2 −λa2 p+1 ≦(A −B)ψ2 Λp+2 {1; |υ|} , where υ is given by υ = (B −(A −B)ψ1) + Λp+2ψ2 1 Λ2 p+1ψ2 (A −B)λ. (3.9)
Theorem 3.5. Theorem 3.5. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and be given by (1.1). Then ap+3 − q + 2 q2 + q + 1 Λ1+pΛ2+p Λ3+p ap+2ap+1 + 1 [3, q] Λ3 1+p Λ3+p a3…
Theorem 3.5. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and be given by (1.1) . Then ap+3 − q + 2 q2 + q + 1 Λ1+pΛ2+p Λ3+p ap+2ap+1 + 1 [3, q] Λ3 1+p Λ3+p a3 p+1
Theorem 3.6. Theorem 3.6. Let f ∈Ap be given by (1.1). Then the function f is in the class S∗ p (q, µ, A, B), if and only if eiθ (B −[p, q] A) z …
Theorem 3.6. Let f ∈Ap be given by (1.1) . Then the function f is in the class S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) , if and only if eiθ (B −[p, q] A) z  Lµ+p−1 q f (z) ∗ (N + 1) zp −qLzp+1 (1 −z) (1 −qz)  ̸= 0, (3.12) for all
Theorem 3.8. Theorem 3.8. If f is of the form (1.1) belongs to the family S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and Fη,p (z) = zp + ∞ X n=1 bn+pzn+p, (3.19) where Fη,p is…
Theorem 3.8. If f is of the form (1.1) belongs to the family S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and Fη,p (z) = zp + ∞ X n=1 bn+pzn+p, (3.19) where Fη,p is the integral operator given by (3.17) , then |bp+1| ≦ [η + p, q] [η + p + 1, q] ψ1 (A −B) ∧1+p and for n ≧2
Theorem 3.9. Theorem 3.9. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and be given by (1.1). Also if Fη,p is the integral operator defined by (3.17) and is of the form…
Theorem 3.9. Let f ∈S∗ p (q, µ, A, B) and be given by (1.1) . Also if Fη,p is the integral operator defined by (3.17) and is of the form (3.19) , then for σ ∈C bp+2 −σb2 p+1 ≦ [η + p, q] [η + p + 2, q] (A −B)ψ2 Λp+2 {1; |υ|} , where υ = (B −(A −B)ψ1) + Λp+2ψ2 1 Λ2
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Certain subclass of Meromorphic function associated with Wright function
2026
Revisit Of Meromorphic Convex Functions
2025
Φ-like analytic functions associated with a vertical domain
2023
Some applications of q-difference operator involving a family of meromorphic har
2021
A certain subclass of meromorphically q-starlike functions associated with the J
2019
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback