🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

In this paper we develop and study some integral transforms of Caratheodory func- tions. We apply the transforms to study certain other classes of analytic and univalent functions both to obtain new results and provide new proofs of some known ones.

Results & Lemmas (21)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 2.3. Lemma 2.3. Let p ∈P(Ψγ). Then Re p(z) > γ, if 0 ≤γ < 1, < γ, if γ > 1.
Lemma 2.3. Let p ∈P(Ψγ). Then Re p(z) > γ, if 0 ≤γ < 1, < γ, if γ > 1.
Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1. Let γ ̸= 1 be a nonnegative real number. Then for each n ∈N, Re pn−1(z) > γ ⇒Re pn(z) > γ for 0 ≤γ < 1 and Re pn−1(z) < γ ⇒Re…
Theorem 3.1. Let γ ̸= 1 be a nonnegative real number. Then for each n ∈N, Re pn−1(z) > γ ⇒Re pn(z) > γ for 0 ≤γ < 1 and Re pn−1(z) < γ ⇒Re pn(z) < γ for γ > 1
Corollary 3.2. Corollary 3.2. Pn ⊂P, n ∈N.
Corollary 3.2. Pn ⊂P, n ∈N.
Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.3. Pn+1 ⊂Pn
Theorem 3.3. Pn+1 ⊂Pn
Corollary 3.4. Corollary 3.4.([1]) Let p ∈P and γ + c > 0. Then q(z) = 1 + (γ + c) ∞ X k=1 pkzk (γ + c + k), z ∈E (3.5) is also in P. The above corollary…
Corollary 3.4.([1]) Let p ∈P and γ + c > 0. Then q(z) = 1 + (γ + c) ∞ X k=1 pkzk (γ + c + k), z ∈E (3.5) is also in P. The above corollary and its extension in [6] follow easily by taking α = γ + c > 0, n = 0 in Theorem 3.3. The proofs in the two articles made use of a result of Miller and Mocanu [5, Theorem 10], which as observed in MR96j:30018, may not be applied directly except γ + c is an integer.
Theorem 3.5. Theorem 3.5. The transformation (1.3) is starlikeness-preserving. In other words, if p ∈P is starlike in E, then its transform pn is also…
Theorem 3.5. The transformation (1.3) is starlikeness-preserving. In other words, if p ∈P is starlike in E, then its transform pn is also starlike in E.
Corollary 3.6. Corollary 3.6. The transformation Ln(z) of the Moebius function is starlike and univalent in E.
Corollary 3.6. The transformation Ln(z) of the Moebius function is starlike and univalent in E.
Theorem 3.7. Theorem 3.7. The transformation (1.3) is convexity-preserving. In other words, if p ∈P is convex in E, then its transform pn is also convex…
Theorem 3.7. The transformation (1.3) is convexity-preserving. In other words, if p ∈P is convex in E, then its transform pn is also convex in E.
Corollary 3.8. Corollary 3.8. The transformation Ln(z) of the Moebius function is convex in E.
Corollary 3.8. The transformation Ln(z) of the Moebius function is convex in E.
Theorem 3.9. Theorem 3.9. Let pn ∈Pn. Then |pn(z)| ≤1 + 2 ∞ X k=1 αn (α + k)n rk, |z| = r, (3.12) Re pn(z) ≥1 + 2 ∞ X k=1 αn (α + k)n (−r)k,
Theorem 3.9. Let pn ∈Pn. Then |pn(z)| ≤1 + 2 ∞ X k=1 αn (α + k)n rk, |z| = r, (3.12) Re pn(z) ≥1 + 2 ∞ X k=1 αn (α + k)n (−r)k,
Corollary 3.10. Corollary 3.10. pn ∈Pn if and only if pn(z) ≺Ln(z).
Corollary 3.10. pn ∈Pn if and only if pn(z) ≺Ln(z).
Lemma 4.2. Lemma 4.2. Let f(z) be given by (1.2), and α, β and Dn as defined above. Then the following are equivalent: (i) f ∈T α n (β)
Lemma 4.2. Let f(z) be given by (1.2), and α, β and Dn as defined above. Then the following are equivalent: (i) f ∈T α n (β)
Theorem 4.3. Theorem 4.3. Tn+1 α(β) ⊂Tn α(β).
Theorem 4.3. Tn+1 α(β) ⊂Tn α(β).
Theorem 3.3 Theorem 3.3 (f(z)α/zα −β)/(1 −β) ∈Pn. That is f ∈Tn α(β).
Theorem 3.3 (f(z)α/zα −β)/(1 −β) ∈Pn. That is f ∈Tn α(β).
Corollary 4.4. Corollary 4.4. For n ≥1, Tn α(β) ⊂S (the class of functions f(z) given by (1.2) which are univalent in E).
Corollary 4.4. For n ≥1, Tn α(β) ⊂S (the class of functions f(z) given by (1.2) which are univalent in E).
Theorem 4.5. Theorem 4.5. Let f(z) given by (1.2) be in the class Tn α(β). Then the function F(z) defined by F(z)α = α + c zc Z z 0 tc−1f(t)αdt, α + c >…
Theorem 4.5. Let f(z) given by (1.2) be in the class Tn α(β). Then the function F(z) defined by F(z)α = α + c zc Z z 0 tc−1f(t)αdt, α + c > 0 (4.4) is also in Tn α(β).
Lemma 4.2 Lemma 4.2, F ∈Tn α(β).
Lemma 4.2, F ∈Tn α(β).
Theorem 4.6. Theorem 4.6. A function F(z) defined by F(z)α+υ = zυf(z)α (where f(z) is given by (1.2)) is in the class Tn α+υ(β) if and only if f(z) is in…
Theorem 4.6. A function F(z) defined by F(z)α+υ = zυf(z)α (where f(z) is given by (1.2)) is in the class Tn α+υ(β) if and only if f(z) is in Tn α(β).
Theorem 4.7. Theorem 4.7. Let f ∈Tn α(β) and define MT (n, α, β, r) = r n 1 + 2(1 −β)αn ∞ X k=1 rk (α + k)n o 1 α and mT (n, α, β, r) = r n
Theorem 4.7. Let f ∈Tn α(β) and define MT (n, α, β, r) = r n 1 + 2(1 −β)αn ∞ X k=1 rk (α + k)n o 1 α and mT (n, α, β, r) = r n
Theorem 4.8. Theorem 4.8. Each function f(z) in the class Tn α(β) maps the unit disk onto a domain which covers the disk |ξ| < mT (n, α, β, 1). The…
Theorem 4.8. Each function f(z) in the class Tn α(β) maps the unit disk onto a domain which covers the disk |ξ| < mT (n, α, β, 1). The result is sharp.
Theorem 4.9. Theorem 4.9. Let f ∈Tn α(β) and define M ∗ T (n, α, β, r) = rα−1n 1 + 2(1 −β) ∞ X k=1 αn−1 (α + k)n−1 rko
Theorem 4.9. Let f ∈Tn α(β) and define M ∗ T (n, α, β, r) = rα−1n 1 + 2(1 −β) ∞ X k=1 αn−1 (α + k)n−1 rko

Related Papers

On the successive coefficients of certain univalent functions
2010
On some starlike mappings involving certain convolution operators
2010
An invitation to the theory of geometric functions
2009
On $H_3(1)$ Hankel determinant for some classes of univalent functions
2009
Bounds on the coefficients of certain analytic and univalent functions
2009
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,671 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback