Results & Lemmas (7)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Proposition 1.
Proposition 1. For any two particular solutions f0 and f1 of (2), where f0 is assumed to be nonvanishing, the function w = f0∂z(f −1 0 f1)…
Proposition 1. For any two particular solutions f0 and f1 of (2), where f0 is assumed to be nonvanishing, the function w = f0∂z(f −1 0 f1) is a solution of the equation wz = −∂zf0 f0 w (3) which is equivalent to the system ∂xu −∂yv = −∂xf0 f0 u + ∂yf0 f0 v, ∂yu + ∂xv = ∂yf0
Proposition 2.
Proposition 2. Let f0 be a nonvanishing particular solution of (2) and w be a solution of (3). Then the function f = Sw is a solution of…
Proposition 2. Let f0 be a nonvanishing particular solution of (2) and w be a solution of (3). Then the function f = Sw is a solution of (2).
Proposition 3.
Proposition 3. Let f be a solution of (2). Then SPf = f + Cf0, where C is an arbitrary real constant.
Proposition 3. Let f be a solution of (2). Then SPf = f + Cf0, where C is an arbitrary real constant.
Proposition 4.
Proposition 4. [11] Let W be a solution of (9). Then the function w = i ˙W is a solution of (3). The (F, G)-integral is defined as follows…
Proposition 4. [11] Let W be a solution of (9). Then the function w = i ˙W is a solution of (3). The (F, G)-integral is defined as follows [2]: Z Γ Wd(F,G)z = F(z1) Re Z Γ G∗Wdz + G(z1) Re Z Γ F ∗Wdz, where Γ is a rectifiable curve leading from z0 to z1, F ∗= − 2F
Proposition 5.
Proposition 5. Let w be a solution of (3). Then the function W(z) = − Z z z0 iwd(F,G)z = − 1 f0(z) Re Z z z0 if0wdz −if0(z) Re Z z z0 w f0…
Proposition 5. Let w be a solution of (3). Then the function W(z) = − Z z z0 iwd(F,G)z = − 1 f0(z) Re Z z z0 if0wdz −if0(z) Re Z z z0 w f0 dz
Theorem 1.
Theorem 1. Let f0 be a nonvanishing particular solution of (2)and Φ = u+iv be an 1 f2 0 -analytic function. Then W = u f0 +ivf0 is a…
Theorem 1. Let f0 be a nonvanishing particular solution of (2)and Φ = u+iv be an 1 f2 0 -analytic function. Then W = u f0 +ivf0 is a solution of (9), w = i · W = i(Wz + ∂zf0 f0 W) is a solution of (3) and f = Sw is a solution of (2). We have an inverse result also.
Theorem 2.
Theorem 2. Let f0 be a nonvanishing particular solution of (2) and f be another solution of (2). Then w = Pf is a solution of (3), the…
Theorem 2. Let f0 be a nonvanishing particular solution of (2) and f be another solution of (2). Then w = Pf is a solution of (3), the function W(z) = − R z z0 iwd(F,G)z is a solution of (9), and Φ = f0 Re W + i f0 Im W is a 1 f2 0 -analytic function. Thus due to Theorem 1 we are able to convert p-analytic functions into solutions of the Schr¨odinger equation and due to Theorem 2 we have an inverse result.
Related Papers