🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Results & Lemmas (12)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

LEMMA 1. LEMMA 1. ([2]). Let q z) be univalent in the unit disc U, and let 0(w) and <j)(w) be analytic in a domain D containing q(U), with <f>(w) ^…
LEMMA 1. ([2]). Let q{z) be univalent in the unit disc U, and let 0(w) and <j)(w) be analytic in a domain D containing q(U), with <f>(w) ^ 0 when w G q(U). Set Q(z) = zq'(z)(j>(q{z)), h{z) = 0{q{z)) + Q(z), and suppose that (i) Q{z) is starlike in the unit disc U, and (ii) IU{(zh'(z))/(Q(z))} = Re{(fl'(g(z)))/(^(g(z))) + (zQ'(^))/(Q(z))} >o (zeu). If p(z) is analytic in U, with p(0) = g(0), p(U) C D and (1.4) 6(p(z)) + zp'(z)<f>(p(z)) * 6(q(z)) + zq'{z)4>(q(z)) = h(z), then p(z) -< q(z), and q(z
LEMMA 2. LEMMA 2. ([3]). If f(z) eA and (1.5) | a r g ( / ' ( z ) ) | < ^ =0.968... (z e U), where 70 = 0.6165... is the unique root of the equation…
LEMMA 2. ([3]). If f(z) eA and (1.5) | a r g ( / ' ( z ) ) | < ^ =0.968... (z e U), where 70 = 0.6165 ... is the unique root of the equation 2 arctan (1 - 7) + TT(1 - 27) = 0, then f(z) 6 5*. 2. DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION AND SOME CRITERIA FOR UNIVALENCY We first prove: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700018360 Published online by Cambridge University Press
THEOREM 1. THEOREM 1. Let p(z) be analytic in U, with p(0) = 1, and let 0 < A ^ 1. If (2.1) (1 - A)p(z) + XzP'(z) -< (l± 0 < 7 ^ 1, then and this is…
THEOREM 1. Let p(z) be analytic in U, with p(0) = 1, and let 0 < A ^ 1. If (2.1) (1 - A)p(z) + XzP'(z) -< (l± 0 < 7 ^ 1, then and this is the best dominant of (2.1). PROOF: We choose q(z) = ((1 + z)/(l - z))7, 0 < 7 ^ 1, <f>(w) = A and 6(w) = (1 — X)w in Lemma 1. Then the function q(z) is convex in U and g(0) = 1. Further Q(z) = zq'{z)<f>(q(z)) = \zq\z) is starlike, and for the function h(z) = 0(q(z)) + Q(z) = (1 - X)q(z) + Xzq'(z), Therefore the conditions (i) and (ii) in Lemma 1 are satisfied.
THEOREM 2. THEOREM 2. Let p z) be analytic in U with p(0) = 1, and 0 < A ^ 1. If (2.2) Re (l - A)P(z) + Xzp'(z) > - | (26 U), then Re p(z) > 0 (z G…
THEOREM 2. Let p{z) be analytic in U with p(0) = 1, and 0 < A ^ 1. If (2.2) Re{(l - A)P(z) + Xzp'(z)} > - | (26 U), then Re{p(z)} > 0 (z G U). PROOF: Taking 7 = 1 in Theorem 1, we have q(z) = (1 + z)/(l - z) and (2.3) fc(,) = (i_A)l±i+A^-jy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700018360 Published online by Cambridge University Press
COROLLARY 1. COROLLARY 1. Let f(z) e A and o < A < l. If Re (l - X)f'(z) + Xzf'(z) > -± (z G U), then Re /'(2) > 0 (z £ U). If we take A = 1 and…
COROLLARY 1. Let f(z) e A and o < A < l. If Re{(l - X)f'(z) + Xzf'(z)} > -± (z G U), then Re{/'(2)} > 0 (z £ U). If we take A = 1 and zf'(z)/f(z) or 1 + zf"(z)/f'(z) instead of p(z) in Theorem 2, we obtain:
COROLLARY 2. COROLLARY 2. I / / ( z ) e 4 a n d then f(z) e S*.
COROLLARY 2. I / / ( z ) e 4 a n d then f(z) e S*.
COROLLARY 3 COROLLARY 3. If f(z) e A and > o where /(z), 2 denotes the Schwarzian derivative defined by then /(zJeJfif. By a similar method to that…
COROLLARY 3 . If f(z) e A and > o where {/(z), 2} denotes the Schwarzian derivative defined by then /(zJeJfif. By a similar method to that used in Theorem 2, we may obtain the answer for the case 0 < 7 < 1, but this is more complicated than the case 7 = 1. Namely, we have: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700018360 Published online by Cambridge University Press
THEOREM 3 THEOREM 3. Let p(z) be analytic in U with p(0) - 1, and let 0 < A < 1 and 0 < 7 < 1. If (2.4) where (2.5) Re (l - X)p(z) + '(z) > C, 7)…
THEOREM 3 . Let p(z) be analytic in U with p(0) - 1, and let 0 < A < 1 and 0 < 7 < 1. If (2.4) where (2.5) Re{(l - X)p(z) + \zp'(z)} > C{\, 7) U), , 7) = j 7 1-A - 7 ) «n (7*72), o = to = cot (TT/2), a + \/a2 + 1 - 72
COROLLARY 4 COROLLARY 4. Let f(z) £ A, and let 0 < A < 1 and 0 < 7 < 1. If (2.13) Re (l - A)/'(z) + Az/"(z) > <?(A, 7o) (z G U), where y0 is as in…
COROLLARY 4 . Let f(z) £ A, and let 0 < A < 1 and 0 < 7 < 1. If (2.13) Re{(l - A)/'(z) + Az/"(z)} > <?(A, 7o) (z G U), where y0 is as in Lemma 2 and C(A, 7) is defined by (2.5), then f(z) £ 5*. EXAMPLE 2. For A = 1 in Theorem 3, we have that if p(z) is analytic in U with p(0) = 1 and 0 < 7 < 1, then the following implication Re{zp'(z)} > C(l, 7) ^ ' — ' - ' - « ' - 7 7 r where is true. Therefore, from Corollary 4, we obtain Re{zf"(z)} > C(l, 70) - -0.414076... = * f(z) where 70 is as in Lemma 2.
Lemma 2 Lemma 2, this type of problem was treated by Mocanu [3]. By using the result of
Lemma 2, this type of problem was treated by Mocanu [3]. By using the result of
Theorem 3 Theorem 3, we may find other subsets which imply starlikeness, whenever f' z) belong to them for all z g U.
Theorem 3, we may find other subsets which imply starlikeness, whenever f'{z) belong to them for all z g U.
THEOREM 4 THEOREM 4. Let f(z) e A, and let f'(z) satisfy (2.14) |arg (f'(z)) < ^ (70 < 7 < 1; * € U), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700018360…
THEOREM 4 . Let f(z) e A, and let f'(z) satisfy (2.14) |arg (f'(z))\ < ^ (70 < 7 < 1; * € U), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700018360 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Related Papers

Some sufficient problems for strongly close-to-convex of order μ
2013
Some sufficient problems for certain univalent functions
2013
Starlikeness problems for certain analytic functions concerned with subordinatio
2013
Starlikeness and convexity for analytic functions concerned with Jack's lemma
2013
Starlikeness of order α rerated to Mocanu functions
2013
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,343 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback