🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

The known Ozaki's condition says that $\mathfrak{Re}\left\{f^{(p)}(z)\right\}>0$ for $|z|<1$ implies that $f(z)=z^p+a_{p+1}z^{p+1}+\cdots$ is at most $p$-valent in $\mathbb D$. In this paper prove an extension of Ozaki's condition. Also, we shall determine the new sufficient conditions for functions to be in the class of $p$-valent starlike of order $α$.

Results & Lemmas (6)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1.1 Lemma 1.1. [4] Let, be an analytic function in with. If there exists a point,, such that for and for some, then we have (1.1) for some,…
Lemma 1.1. [4] Let $q(z) = 1 + \sum_{n=m}^{\infty} c_n z^n$ , $c_m \neq 0$ be an analytic function in $\mathbb{D}$ with $q(z) \neq 0$ . If there exists a point $z_0$ , $|z_0| < 1$ , such that $|\arg\{q(z)\}| < \pi\gamma/2$ for $|z| < |z_0|$ and $|\arg\{q(z_0)\}| = \pi\gamma/2$ for some $\gamma > 0$ , then we have (1.1) $$\frac{z_0 q'(z_0)}{q(z_0)} = \frac{2ik \arg\{q(z_0)\}}{\pi},$$ for some $k \ge m(a+a^{-1})/2 \ge (a+a^{-1})/2 \ge 1$ , where $\{q(z_0)\}^{1/\gamma} = \pm ia$ , and a > 0. Lemma 1.1 was generalized in [14] by considering a hypothesis that $\arg\{q(z)\}\in(\pi\gamma_1/2,\pi\gamma_2/2)$ instead of $|\arg\{q(z)\}|<\pi\gamma/2$ . In this paper we need also the following lemmas.
Lemma 1.2 Lemma 1.2. [5, Th.5] If, then for all, we have (1.2)
Lemma 1.2. [5, Th.5] If $f(z) \in \mathcal{A}_p$ , then for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ , we have (1.2) $$\Re \left\{ \frac{z f^{(p)}(z)}{f^{(p-1)}(z)} \right\} > 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \forall k \in \{1, \dots, p\} : \quad \Re \left\{ \frac{z f^{(k)}(z)}{f^{(k-1)}(z)} \right\} > 0.$$
Lemma 1.3 Lemma 1.3. [5, Th.1] If, then for all, we have (1.3) then f(z) is p-valent in and
Lemma 1.3. [5, Th.1] If $f(z) \in \mathcal{A}_p$ , then for all $z \in \mathbb{D}$ , we have (1.3) $$\mathfrak{Re}\left\{p + \frac{zf^{(p+1)}(z)}{f^{(p)}(z)}\right\} > 0 \quad (z \in \mathbb{D}),$$ then f(z) is p-valent in $\mathbb{D}$ and $$\forall k \in \{1, \dots, p-1\}: \quad \mathfrak{Re}\left\{k + \frac{zf^{(k+1)}(z)}{f^{(k)}(z)}\right\} > 0 \quad (z \in \mathbb{D})..$$
Theorem 2.1 · coeff Theorem 2.1. Let be analytic in. If (2.1) for some, then (2.2)
Theorem 2.1. Let $f(z) = z^p + \sum_{n=p+1}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ . If (2.1) $$\left| \arg\{f^{(p)}(z)\} \right| < \frac{\pi}{2} \left( \alpha_1 + \frac{2}{\pi} \tan^{-1} \alpha_1 \right), \quad z \in \mathbb{D}$$ for some $\alpha_1 \in (0,1]$ , then (2.2) $$\left| \arg \left\{ \frac{f^{(p-1)}(z)}{z} \right\} \right| < \frac{\alpha_1 \pi}{2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}.$$
Theorem 2.4 · coeff Theorem 2.4. Let be analytic in. If (2.11) for some then, we have (2.12) where (2.13) for all.
Theorem 2.4. Let $f(z) = z^p + \sum_{n=p+1}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ . If (2.11) $$\left| \arg\{f^{(p)}(z)\} \right| < \frac{\pi \alpha_0}{2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}.$$ for some $\alpha_0 \in (0, 3/2]$ then, we have (2.12) $$\left| \arg \left\{ \frac{f^{(p-k)}(z)}{z^k} \right\} \right| < \frac{\pi \alpha_k}{2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D},$$ where (2.13) $$\alpha_0 \in (0, 3/2], \quad \alpha_k + \frac{2}{\pi} \tan^{-1} \frac{\alpha_k}{k} = \alpha_{k-1}$$ for all $k \in \{1, ..., p\}$ .
Theorem 2.5 · coeff Theorem 2.5. Let be analytic in. Assume that (2.18) for some, and assume that the sequence is defined by <span id="page-6-0"></span> Then…
Theorem 2.5. Let $f(z) = z^p + \sum_{n=p+1}^{\infty} a_n z^n$ be analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ . Assume that (2.18) $$\left|\arg\{f^{(p)}(z)\}\right| < \frac{\pi\alpha_0}{2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D}.$$ for some $\alpha_0 \in (0, 3/2]$ , and assume that the sequence $\{\alpha_k\}_{k=1}^{k=p}$ is defined by <span id="page-6-0"></span> $$\alpha_k + \frac{2}{\pi} \tan^{-1} \frac{\alpha_k}{k} = \alpha_{k-1}.$$ Then we have (2.19) $$\left| \arg \left\{ \frac{z f^{(p-s+1)}(z)}{f^{(p-s)}(z)} \right\} \right| < \frac{\pi}{2} (\alpha_s + \alpha_{s-1}) \quad z \in \mathbb{D},$$ for all $s \in \{2, ..., p\}$ . Furthermore, if there exists a positive integer $\sigma \in \{2, ..., p\}$ such that $\alpha_{\sigma} + \alpha_{\sigma-1} \leq 1$ , then (2.20) $$\left| \arg \left\{ \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} \right\} \right| < \frac{\pi(\alpha_{p-1} + \alpha_p)}{2} \le \frac{\pi}{2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D},$$ or f(z) is p-valently strongly starlike of order $\alpha_{p-1} + \alpha_p$ .
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
A class of analytic functions related to the generalized Marcum Q-function and i
2025
Introducing a Novel Subclass of Harmonic Functions with Close-to-Convex Properti
2025
Revisit Of Meromorphic Convex Functions
2025
Nonlinear resolvents: distortion and order of starlikeness
2025
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #3,901 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback