Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Results & Lemmas (7)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1 · coeff
Theorem 1. A function is in if and only if This result is sharp. Proof. Let |z| = 1. Then Hence, by the maximum modulus theorem,. For the…
Theorem 1. A function
$$f(z) = z - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |a_n| z^n$$
is in $P^*(\alpha, \beta)$ if and only if
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n(1+\beta) |a_n| \le 2\beta(1-\alpha) .$$
This result is sharp.
Proof. Let |z| = 1. Then
$$\begin{split} \left| f'(z) - 1 \right| - \beta \left| f'(z) + (1 - 2\alpha) \right| &= \left| -\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| z^{n-1} \right| - \beta \left| 2(1 - \alpha) - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| z^{n-1} \right| \\ &\leq \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n (1 + \beta) |a_n| - 2\beta (1 - \alpha) \\ &\leq 0 \text{, by hypothesis.} \end{split}$$
Hence, by the maximum modulus theorem, $f \in P^*(\alpha, \beta)$ .
For the converse, assume that
$$\left| \frac{f'(z) - 1}{f'(z) + (1 - 2\alpha)} \right| = \left| \left( -\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| z^{n-1} \right) / \left( 2(1 - \alpha) - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| z^{n-1} \right) \right| < \beta \quad (|z| < 1) .$$
Since $|Re(z)| \le |z|$ for all z, we have
(2.1)
$$\operatorname{Re}\left\{\left(\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| z^{n-1}\right) / \left(2(1-\alpha) - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| z^{n-1}\right)\right\} < \beta.$$
Choose values of z on the real axis so that f'(z) is real. Upon clearing the denominator in (2.1) and letting $z \to 1$ through real values, we obtain
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| \leq 2\beta(1-\alpha) - \beta \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n|.$$
This gives the required condition.
The result is sharp, the extremal function being
$$f(z) = z - [2\beta(1-\alpha)/n(1+\beta)]z^n$$
Theorem 2 · coeff
Theorem 2. If f € P (a, g), then* (3.1) and (3.2) Proof. In view of Theorem 1, we have Hence and Thus (3.1) follows. Also and This…
Theorem 2. If f € P\(a, g) , then*
(3.1)
$$r - \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r^2 \le |f(z)| \le r + \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r^2 \quad (|z| = r) ,$$
and
(3.2)
$$1 - \frac{2\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r \le |f'(z)| \le 1 + \frac{2\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r \quad (|z| = r).$$
Proof. In view of Theorem 1, we have
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |a_n| \le \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} .$$
Hence
$$|f(z)| \le r + r^2 \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |a_n|$$
$$\le r + \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r^2$$
and
$$|f(z)| \ge r - r^2 \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |a_n|$$
$$\ge r - \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r^2.$$
Thus (3.1) follows.
Also
$$|f'(z)| \le 1 + r \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n|$$
$$\le 1 + \frac{2\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r$$
and
$$|f'(z)| \ge 1 - \frac{2\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} r$$
This completes the proof of the theorem.
REMARK. The bounds in (3.1) and (3.2) are sharp since the equalities are attained for the function
$$f(z) = z - \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{1+\beta} z^2 \quad (z = \pm r)$$
.
Theorem 3
Theorem 3. Let f Z P *(a, 3). Then the disc < 1 is mapped onto a domain that contains the disc < P. The result is sharp with extremal •…
Theorem 3. Let f Z P\*(a, 3) . Then the disc \z\ < 1 is mapped onto a domain that contains the disc \w\ < P . The result is sharp with extremal • function z ~ ~ / z .
Theorem 4 · coeff
Theorem 4. If f € C *(a, B), then f i ^[3^, 3^ ) • This result is sharp with the extremal function -L+p. Proof. In view of Theorem 1, it is…
Theorem 4. If f € C\*(a, B) , then f i ^[3^ , 3^ ) • This result is sharp with the extremal function
-L+p
$$f(z) = z - [\beta(1-\alpha)/1+\beta(3-2\alpha)]z^2$$
.
Proof. In view of Theorem 1, it is sufficient to show that
$$\sum n(2-\beta)|a_n| \leq \frac{2(1-\alpha)}{3-2\alpha}.$$
But / € C\*(a, B) implies, [/],
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n\{(n-1) + \beta(n+1-2\alpha)\} |a_n| \le 2\beta(1-\alpha) .$$
Also, we note that
$$\frac{n\{(n-1)+\beta(n+1-2\alpha)\}}{2\beta(1-\alpha)} \geq \frac{n(2-\beta)(3-2\alpha)}{2(1-\alpha)},$$
since
$$(n-1) + (n+1-2\alpha) \ge \beta(2-\beta)(3-2\alpha) \quad (n = 2, 3, 4, ...)$$
Hence the result follows.
Theorem 5 · radius
Theorem 5. If f t. P *(a, &), then f is convex in the disc < r = r(a, 3), where This result is sharp, the extremal function being of the…
Theorem 5. If f t. P\*(a, &) , then f is convex in the disc \z\ < r = r(a, 3) , where
$$r(\alpha, \beta) = \inf_{n} \left(\frac{1+\beta}{2\beta n(1-\alpha)}\right)^{1/(n-1)}$$
$(n = 2, 3, \ldots)$
This result is sharp, the extremal function being of the form
$$f(z) = z - [2\beta(1-\alpha)/n(1+\beta)]z^n$$
.
Proof. It suffices to show that $\left|\frac{zf''}{f'}\right| \le 1$ for $|z| \le 1$ . First, we note that
$$\left|\frac{zf''}{f''}\right| \leq \left(\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n(n-1)\left|a_n\right|\left|z\right|^{n-1}\right) / \left(1 - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n\left|a_n\right|\left|z\right|^{n-1}\right).$$
Thus the result follows if
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n(n-1) |a_n| |z|^{n-1} \le 1 - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n |a_n| |z|^{n-1}$$
which is equivalent to
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n^2 |a_n| |z|^{n-1} \le 1.$$
But by Theorem 1,
$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n(1+\beta) |a_n| \le 2\beta(1-\alpha) .$$
Hence f is convex if
$$n^2 |z|^{n-1} \le \frac{n(1+\beta)}{2\beta(1-\alpha)}, \quad n = 2, 3, \ldots;$$
that is,
$$|z| \le \left(\frac{1+\beta}{2\beta n(1-\alpha)}\right)^{1/(n-1)}, \quad n = 2, 3, \ldots$$
This completes the proof.
4.
In this section we assert that the class $P^*(\alpha, \beta)$ is closed under 'arithmetic mean' and 'convex linear combinations'.
Theorem 6 · coeff
Theorem 6. If and are in, then is also in.
Theorem 6. If
$$f(z) = z - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |a_n| z^n$$
and
$$g(z) = z - \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |b_n| z^n$$
are in $P^*(\alpha, \beta)$ , then
$$h(z) = z - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} |a_n + b_n| z^n$$
is also in $P^*(\alpha, \beta)$ .
Theorem 7
Theorem 7. Let,. Then if and only if it can be expressed in the form where, and Proofs of Theorems 6 and 7 follow on the lines of the…
Theorem 7. Let
$$f_1(z) = z$$
, $f_n(z) = \frac{2\beta(1-\alpha)}{n(1+\beta)} z^n$ $(n = 2, 3, ...)$ .
Then $f \in P^*(\alpha, \beta)$ if and only if it can be expressed in the form
$$f(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lambda_n f_n(z) ,$$
where $\lambda_n \geq 0$ , and
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lambda_n = 1.$$
Proofs of Theorems 6 and 7 follow on the lines of the proofs of Theorems 8 and 9 in [1]. The details are omitted.
Related Papers