🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Results & Lemmas (7)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 1 · radius Theorem 1 provides a lower bound for the radius of /3-starlikeness of ^Γ(α, 7, c) and Theo- rem 3 gives the radius of /3-starlikeness of…
Theorem 1 provides a lower bound for the radius of /3-starlikeness of ^Γ(α, 7, c) and Theo- rem 3 gives the radius of /3-starlikeness of <^(α, 7, c). We begin by stating a slight generalization of the result obtained by Lewandowski et al mentioned above. Since our result follows directly from the techniques used in [8], the proof will be omitted.
LEMMA 1. · radius LEMMA 1. // F(z) and f(z) satisfy (2), f(z) is in S*(a) and c ^ 0, then F z) is in S*(a). This lemma now enables us to determine a lower…
LEMMA 1. // F(z) and f(z) satisfy (2), f(z) is in S*(a) and c ^ 0, then F{z) is in S*(a). This lemma now enables us to determine a lower bound for the radius of /3-starlikeness of <^Γ(α, 7, c).
THEOREM 1. THEOREM 1. If F(z) is in J^ia, 7, c), then F(z) is β-starlike for < σ = σ(a, β, 7, c), where σ is the least positive root of the equation (…
THEOREM 1. If F(z) is in J^ia, 7, c), then F(z) is β-starlike for \z\ < σ = σ(a, β, 7, c), where σ is the least positive root of the equation ( 5 ) 1 - β - r[2(l - a) + 2c(l - 7)] - r\2a - 1 - β + 2c(l - 7)] = 0 .
LEMMA 2. LEMMA 2. // ω(z) is analytic and satisfies <o(z) ^ in E and
LEMMA 2. // ω(z) is analytic and satisfies \<o(z)\ ^ \z\ in E and
LEMMA 3. LEMMA 3. // p(z) and a)(z) satisfy the conditions of Lemma 2, then for any K;> B we have on — r Re κp(z) 1 ^ p(«)ί (P^r) /or Ro ^ R, (P2(r)…
LEMMA 3. // p(z) and a)(z) satisfy the conditions of Lemma 2, then for any K ;> B we have on \z\ — r Re \κp(z) 1 ^ p(«)ί (P^r) /or Ro ^ R, (P2(r) for Ro ^ Λj where PM = P^r, K, B, D) = P.2{r) = P,{r, K, B, D)
THEOREM 2. THEOREM 2. min min Re,:„(«,,•,.> l«|=r ( f z) ( 6 ) (7 ) 2Z? - - K) 1 — D H 1 K-1 + 2D
THEOREM 2. min min Re , :„(«,,•,.> l«|=r ( f{z) ( 6 ) (7 ) 2Z? - - K) 1 — D H 1 K-1 + 2D
THEOREM 3. · radius THEOREM 3. Let r* = r*(a, y, c, β) be the radius of β-starlike- ness of J^2(a, y, c). Let D = 2d - 1, δ = (a + cy)/(l + c), c ^ 0, 0 ^ α <…
THEOREM 3. Let r* = r*(a, y, c, β) be the radius of β-starlike- ness of J^2(a, y, c). Let D = 2d - 1, δ = (a + cy)/(l + c), c ^ 0, 0 ^ α < 1, αm£ 0 ^ 7 ^ 1. i^or eαc/^ ^ e d c in [0, 00), Ze£ r{D) be the
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

On Geometric properties and Coefficient bounds for starlike functions associated
2026
Moduli difference of initial inverse logarithmic coefficients for starlike and c
2026
Sharp Estimates of Logarithmic Coefficients for a Certain Class of Starlike Func
2026
The second and third Hankel determinants for starlike MA--Minda subclass associa
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,835 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback