🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Results & Lemmas (2)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

THEOREM 2. THEOREM 2. Let p(z) € P U, B). Then https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700021146 Published online by Cambridge University Press
THEOREM 2. Let p(z) € P U , B) . Then https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700021146 Published online by Cambridge University Press
THEOREM 3. THEOREM 3. Let f(z) € Sn A, B) and e^ as in Lerma 1. Then f(z) is convex in the disc < r* where r* = min(r, r ), r being the smallest…
THEOREM 3. Let f(z) € Sn{A, B) and e^ as in Lerma 1. Then f(z) is convex in the disc \z\ < r* where r* = min(r , r ) , r being the smallest positive root of r" + |e \r - \a \x r - x = 0 and r the smallest positive root of [l-At$>(r)) - (A-B)r<k'(r) = 0 . The estimate is sharp for r± < rQ .$

Related Papers

On analytic functions with reference to the Bernardi integral operator
1982
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,507 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback