🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Results & Lemmas (14)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

PROPOSITION 1 PROPOSITION 1 ([1, Theorems A and A' and Proposition 5]). (i ) Let D be a domain containing r0 > 0 and having a clas- sical Green's…
PROPOSITION 1 ([1, Theorems A and A' and Proposition 5]). (i ) Let D be a domain containing r0 > 0 and having a clas- sical Green's function. Let u be the Green's function of D with pole at r0. (It is assumed here that u is defined on the extended plane by defining it to be zero on the complement of 2λ) Then u\re ίθ) = u*(re iβ) + 2π log + — r0 is subharmonic in the upper half-plane. (ii) Let D and u be as in (i) and suppose further that D is circularly symmetric. Let D
PROPOSITION 2 PROPOSITION 2 ([1, Proposition 2]). For g^L ι[—πfπ 9 g*(θ) = [' G(x)dx, 0 ^ θ ^ π, where G(x) is the symmetric nonincreasing rearrangement…
PROPOSITION 2 ([1, Proposition 2]). For g^L ι[—πfπ\9 g*(θ) = [' G(x)dx , 0 ^ θ ^ π , where G(x) is the symmetric nonincreasing rearrangement of g. (For the definition of G(x) see [1] and [2].)
PROPOSITION 3 PROPOSITION 3 ([1, Proposition 3]). For g,heL ι[—π,π) the following are equivalent. (a) For every convex nondecreasing function Φ on ( —…
PROPOSITION 3 ([1, Proposition 3]). For g,heL ι[—π,π) the following are equivalent. (a) For every convex nondecreasing function Φ on ( — 00,00), Γ Φ(g(β))dθ ^ Γ Φ{h{θ))dθ . (b) For every ίe( — «, oo), \*_ [g{θ) - t] +dθ ^ Γ [h(θ) - t] +dθ . ( c) g*(θ) ^ h*(θ), O^θ^π.
THEOREM 1. THEOREM 1. Let Φ be a convex nondecreasing function on (—00, oo). Then for all fe Σ(p) and 0 < r < 1, 'χΦ(±
THEOREM 1. Let Φ be a convex nondecreasing function on (—00, oo). Then for all fe Σ(p) and 0 < r < 1, \'χΦ(±
Theorem 1. Theorem 1. T H E O R E M 2. L e t feΣ(p), then for all λ, — oo < λ < oo, and 0 < r < 1, (2.14) 'r re ίθ) λdθ ^ 3* Applications of Theorem 2*
Theorem 1. T H E O R E M 2 . L e t feΣ(p), then for all λ , — oo < λ < oo, and 0 < r < 1, (2.14) \'r \f{re ίθ)\ λdθ ^ 3* Applications of Theorem 2*
THEOREM 3. THEOREM 3. Let fe Σ(p) and 0 < r < 1, then for — r. (3.1) Fp(-r)£
THEOREM 3. Let fe Σ(p) and 0 < r < 1, then for \z\ — r. (3.1) Fp(-r)£\
THEOREM 4. THEOREM 4. Let feΣ(p) and f(z) = 1 + M < then (3.2) p V The inequalities are sharp.
THEOREM 4. Let feΣ(p) and f(z) = 1 + M < then (3.2) p V The inequalities are sharp.
Theorem 2 Theorem 2 directly. In [4] sharp estimates on the quantity '(z)/f(z) were obtained for feΛ*(p). Making use of Theorem 4, we can now extend…
Theorem 2 directly. In [4] sharp estimates on the quantity \f'(z)/f(z)\ were obtained for feΛ*(p). Making use of Theorem 4, we can now extend the results to the class Σ(p).
THEOREM 5. THEOREM 5. Let feΣ(p) and we A, w Φ p, then (3.3) ( l - M) - | w I 2) f ) f(w) (1 + where a — (p — w)/(l — pw). Moreover, given we A, w Φ…
THEOREM 5. Let feΣ(p) and we A, w Φ p, then (3.3) ( l - M) - | w I 2) f\w) f(w) (1 + \a\Y \a\ where a — (p — w)/(l — pw). Moreover, given we A, w Φ p, there exists a function feΣ(p) for which equality is obtained on the right side o/(3.3) and similarly for the left side of (3.3).
THEOREM 6. THEOREM 6. Let Φ be a convex nondecreasing function on (-oo, oo). Then for all feΣ(p, q) and 0 < r < 1, re iθ) )dθ S π πΦ(±log p>q)(re iθ)…
THEOREM 6. Let Φ be a convex nondecreasing function on (-oo, oo). Then for all feΣ(p, q) and 0 < r < 1, {re iθ)\)dθ S \ π πΦ(±log \G{p>q)(re iθ)\)dθ .
THEOREM 7. THEOREM 7. Let fe Σ(p, q), 0 < r < 1, — oo < λ, < oo, then re iΘ) θ ^ 5* Applications of Theorem 7* Arguing as in Theorem 3 we obtain the…
THEOREM 7. Let fe Σ(p, q), 0 < r < 1, — oo < λ, < oo, then \f{re iΘ)\Hθ ^ 5* Applications of Theorem 7* Arguing as in Theorem 3 we obtain the following.
THEOREM 8. THEOREM 8. Let feΣ(p, q), then for = r.
THEOREM 8. Let feΣ(p, q), then for \z\ = r.
THEOREM 9. THEOREM 9. Let feΣ(p, q) and f(z) = 1 + Σ ϊ ^ α ^ i | s | < P» (5.1) l p ^"^K 1 "" Pg) ^ | t t ι | ^ (P + g)^ + Pg). Pg ~~ ί>g jBoίA…
THEOREM 9. Let feΣ(p, q) and f(z) = 1 + Σ ϊ ^ α ^ i | s | < P» (5.1) l p ^"^K 1 "" Pg) ^ | t t ι | ^ (P + g)^ + Pg) . Pg ~~ ί>g jBoίA inequalities are sharp.
THEOREM 10. THEOREM 10. Let feΣ(p, q) with f(z0) = 0, = q, then for
THEOREM 10. Let feΣ(p, q) with f(z0) = 0, \zo\ = q, then for
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Certain subclass of Meromorphic function associated with Wright function
2026
Revisit Of Meromorphic Convex Functions
2025
Φ-like analytic functions associated with a vertical domain
2023
Some applications of q-difference operator involving a family of meromorphic har
2021
v27,no01,1996,p015_026_OCR
2021
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,671 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback