🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Results & Lemmas (5)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Theorem 3.1 Theorem 3.1. Let be a solution of the extremal problem. Then must satisfy a differential equation of the form for all.
Theorem 3.1. Let $f(\zeta) \in \Sigma$ be a solution of the extremal problem $\text{Re}\{J[f]\} = \max \min \pmod{\min \min}$ . Then $f(\zeta)$ must satisfy a differential equation of the form $\zeta f'(\zeta)/f(\zeta) = P(\zeta)/Q(\zeta)$ for all $|\zeta| > 1$ .
Theorem 3.2 Theorem 3.2. Suppose and are rational functions of degree n and are regular on. Let (defined in (24)) have 2k zeros not on. Then the…
Theorem 3.2. Suppose $K(\zeta)$ and $L(\zeta)$ are rational functions of degree n and are regular on $|\zeta| = 1$ . Let $Q(\zeta)$ (defined in (24)) have 2k zeros not on $|\zeta| = 1$ . Then the extremal function $f(\zeta)$ maps $|\zeta| > 1$ onto the plane cut by n - k or fewer radial slits and $f(\zeta)$ has the form (25) $$f(\zeta) = \prod_{p=1}^{m} \left(1 - \frac{\beta_p}{\zeta}\right)^{\alpha_p}, m \leqslant n - k,$$ where $$\alpha_p > 0, \sum_{p=1}^m \alpha_p = 2 \text{ and } |\beta_p| = 1.$$
Theorem 4.1 Theorem 4.1. Let <t>(w) 6 ^ - <sup>1</sup> be a solution of the extremal problem Re /[</>] = maximum for w Ç D, then <j>(w) must satisfy a…
Theorem 4.1. Let <t>(w) 6 ^ - <sup>1</sup> be a solution of the extremal problem Re {/[</>]} = maximum for w Ç D, then <j>(w) must satisfy a differential equation of the form (30) $$\frac{w\phi'(w)}{\phi(w)} = \frac{l(\phi(w)) - l\left(\frac{1}{\phi(w)}\right) + n - \bar{n}}{k(\phi(w)) + k\left(\frac{1}{\phi(w)}\right) + m - \bar{m} + 2n} = \frac{q(\phi(w))}{p(\phi(w))}$$ for all w in D. Equation (30) may also be written as $$[zf'(z)/f(z)] = p(z)/q(z)$$ for $|z| > 1$ . Another property of the extremal function is obtained upon noting that if p(<t>(w)) and q((j)(w)) are finite, non-zero, and continuous at a point w0 on T then f(z), the inverse of the extremal function 4>(w), maps an arc of \z\ = 1 containing the map of WQ onto a radial line segment. In a manner analogous to Theorem 3.2 we can also prove
Theorem 4.2 · coeff Theorem 4.2. Let k(z) and l(z), z = 4>(w), be rational functions in z of degree n and be regular on = 1. Let q(z) (defined in (30)) have 2k…
Theorem 4.2. Let k(z) and l(z), z = 4>(w), be rational functions in z of degree n and be regular on \z\ = 1. Let q(z) (defined in (30)) have 2k zeros not on \z\ = 1. Thenf(z), the inverse of the extremal function <t>{w), maps \z\ > 1 onto the w plane cut by n — k or fewer radial slits and f(z) has the form (31) $$f(z) = z \prod_{p=1}^{m} \left(1 - \frac{\beta_p}{z}\right)^{\alpha_p}, m \leqslant n - k$$ where $$\alpha_p > 0$$ , $\sum_{p=1}^{m} \alpha_p = 2$ , and $|\beta_p| = 1$ . An interesting application of Theorem 4.2 is the coefficient problem for the class $\sum^{-1}$ . In order to compute k(z) and l(z) it is necessary to rewrite the second arguments appearing in the $J_1$ functionals, namely, (32) $$\phi(w) \frac{\phi(\xi_0) + \phi(w)}{\phi(\xi_0) - \phi(w)} = -\left(\frac{2\phi(\xi_0)^2}{\phi(w) - \phi(\xi_0)} + 2\phi(\xi_0) + \phi(w)\right)$$ $$w\phi'(w) \frac{\phi(\xi_0) + \phi(w)}{\phi(\xi_0) - \phi(w)} = -\left(w\phi'(w) + 2\phi(\xi_0) \frac{w\phi'(w)}{\phi(w) - \phi(\xi_0)}\right).$$ It is well known (7) that the function (33) $$\log \frac{\phi(w) - t}{w} = -\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m} F'_m(t) w^{-m},$$ the development being valid in the neighbourhood of $w = \infty$ , generates the Faber polynomials $F_m(t)$ of degree m. Differentiating (33) with respect to t yields (34) $$\frac{1}{\phi(w) - t} = \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{m} F'_m(t) w^{-m}$$ which generates the derivatives of the Faber polynomials. Also, differentiating (33) with respect to w gives (35) $$\frac{w\phi'(w)}{\phi(w) - t} = 1 + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} F_m(t)w^{-m}.$$ Using (34), (35), and $J[\phi] = b_{\nu}$ we can now write (36) $$k(\zeta_0) = \left[ 2\phi(\xi_0)^2 \frac{1}{\nu} F'_{\nu}(\phi(\xi_0)) + b_{\nu} \right]$$ $$l(\zeta_0) = -[-\nu b_{\nu} + 2\phi(\xi_0) F_{\nu}(\phi(\xi_0))]$$ $$m = b_{\nu}$$ $$n = -\nu b_{\nu}.$$ Our problem is to find the functions of the class $\sum^{-1}$ for which $|b_r|$ is a maximum. Since $\sum^{-1}$ is a normal family we know such functions exist. We may suppose that the extremal $b_r$ is real and hence seek to maximize Re $\{b_r\}$ . Thus Theorem 4.1 applies and we have upon substituting (36) into (30) that the extremal functions f(z) must satisfy (37) $$\frac{\underline{z}f'(z)}{f(z)} = \frac{\frac{z^2}{\nu} F'_{\nu}(z) + (\nu + 1)b_{\nu} + \frac{1}{\nu z^2} \overline{F'_{\nu}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{z}}\right)}}{zF_{\nu}(z) - \frac{1}{z} F_{\nu}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{z}}\right)}, \nu \geqslant 1.$$ It is well known that $|b_0|=|a_0|\leqslant 2$ and $|b_1|=|a_1|\leqslant 1.$ For $\nu=2$ (37) becomes $$(38) \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} = \frac{z^3 - b_0 z^2 + 3b_2 - \overline{b_0}/z^2 + 1/z^3}{z^3 - 2b_0 z^2 + (b_0^2 - 2b_1)z - (\overline{b_0}^2 - 2\overline{b_1})/z + 2\overline{b_0}/z^2 - 1/z^3}$$ $$= \frac{p(z)}{q(z)}.$$ We know that p(z) has at least one zero on the unit circle, say at $z=z_0$ , so that $p(z_0)=0$ . If $p(z_0)=0$ , then $3b_2=b_0z_0^2+\bar{b}_0/z_0^2-z_0^3-1/z_0^3$ and hence $3|b_2|\leqslant 2|b_0|+2$ . If $b_0=0$ then $|b_2|\leqslant 2/3$ and if $b_0\neq 0$ then $|b_0|\leqslant 2$ , $|b_2|\leqslant 2$ . Upon computing the derivative of the third Faber polynomial we get $F_3'(z)=3(z^2-2b_0z+b_0^2-b_1)$ so that for $\nu=3$ , $p(z)=z^2-2b_0z+b_0^2-b_1+4b_3+\bar{b}_0^2-\bar{b}_1-2\bar{b}_0/z+1/z^2$ . As we reasoned before, p(z) has at least one root $z=z_0$ and we obtain $4|b_3|\leqslant 2|b_1|+2|b_0|^2+4|b_0|+2$ which implies, $b_0\neq 0$ , that $|b_3|\leqslant 5$ and, $b_0=0$ , that $|b_3|\leqslant 1$ . We have now the following
Theorem 4.3 Theorem 4.3. If belongs to the class then,, for and,,, for. All these inequalities are sharp. Unfortunately the above trend does not…
Theorem 4.3. If $\phi(w) = w + b_0 + b_1/w + \dots$ belongs to the class $\sum^{-1}$ then $$|b_{\nu}| \leqslant \frac{1}{\nu} \binom{2\nu}{\nu+1}$$ , $\nu = 1, 2, 3$ , for $b_0 \neq 0$ and $$|b_1| \leqslant 1$$ , $|b_2| \leqslant 2/3$ , $|b_3| \leqslant 1$ , for $b_0 = 0$ . All these inequalities are sharp. Unfortunately the above trend does not continue for $\nu > 3$ , that is, the sharp bounds are not obtained by solving $p(z_0) = 0$ for $b_{\nu}$ and substituting in the maximum values for the other coefficients. Springer (8) has shown for the more general class of univalent functions with $b_0 = 0$ that $|b_3| \le 1$ and has conjectured that $$|b_{\nu}| \leqslant \frac{1}{\nu} \left( 2 \frac{\nu}{n} \right),$$ $n \ge 2$ , $nk = \nu + 1$ , k an integer, where n is the least prime divisor of $\nu + 1$ . We can show, as did Springer for his class, the following: Let $D_n$ be the domain consisting of the whole w plane except for $n(n \ge 2)$ symmetric radial slits, each of length $(2)^{2/n}$ , originating at the origin. Let $\phi_n(w) = w + c_1^{(n)}/w + c_2^{(n)}/w + \ldots$ be the function mapping $D_n$ conformally on |z| > 1. The inverse of $\phi_n(w)$ is essentially $w = f_n(z) = z(1 + z^{-n})^{2/n}$ . If n is a divisor of $\nu + 1$ then $f_n(z)$ satisfies (37). As Springer shows, the $c_{\nu}^{(n)}$ are the largest when n is the least prime divisor of $\nu + 1$ . If $b_0 \neq 0$ then $w = f_1(z) = z(1+z^{-1})^2$ satisfies (37). As we have found, this function is extremal for $|b_2|$ and $|b_3|$ . Thus one might suspect in the general case with $b_0 \neq 0$ that $$|b_{\nu}| \leqslant \frac{1}{\nu} \binom{2\nu}{\nu+1}$$ which is also the bound given by Loewner for the coefficients of the inverse schlicht functions in the unit circle.
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback