🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

In the paper we introduce general classes of analytic functions defined by the Hadamard product. The Fekete-Szegö problem is completely solved in these classes of functions. Some consequences of the main results for new or well-known classes of functions are also pointed out. MSC: 30C45; 30C50; 30C55

Results & Lemmas (16)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1 · coeff Lemma 1. [3] If,, then The result is sharp. The functions are the extremal functions. Theorem 1 Let If, then (2) (3) where The results are…
Lemma 1. [3] If $$\omega \in \Omega$$ , $\omega(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n z^n$ $(z \in \mathcal{U})$ , then $$|c_n| \le 1$$ $(n = 1, 2),$ $|c_2| \le 1 - |c_1|^2,$ $|c_2 - \mu c_1^2| \le \max\{1, |\mu|\}$ $(\mu \in \mathbb{C}).$ The result is sharp. The functions $$\omega(z) = z,$$ $\omega_a(z) = z \frac{z+a}{1+\overline{a}z}$ $(z \in \mathcal{U}, |a| < 1)$ are the extremal functions. Theorem 1 Let $$(1-\alpha)(\beta_k-\alpha_k)+\alpha(\delta_k-\gamma_k)\neq 0 \quad (k=2,3).$$ If $f \in \mathcal{W}_{\alpha}(\Phi, \Psi; p)$ , then $$|a_2| \le \frac{|p_1|}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)|},$$ (2) $$|a_3| \le \frac{|p_1|}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3)|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ (3) $$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \frac{|p_1|}{|(1 - \alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3)|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}), \tag{4}$$ where $$\beta = \frac{p_2}{p_1} + \frac{(1 - \alpha)\alpha_2(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha\gamma_2(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)}{[(1 - \alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)]^2} p_1,\tag{5}$$ $$\gamma = \frac{(1-\alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3)}{[(1-\alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)]^2} p_1 \mu - \beta. \tag{6}$$ The results are sharp. Proof Let $f \in \mathcal{W}_{\alpha}(\Phi, \Psi; p)$ . Then there exists a function $\omega \in \Omega$ , $\omega(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n z^n$ $(z \in \mathcal{U})$ , such that $$(1-\alpha)\frac{\phif}{\varphif} + \alpha \frac{\psif}{\chif} = p \circ \omega. \tag{7}$$ It is easy to verify that $$(p \circ \omega)(z) = 1 + (p_1c_1)z + (p_1c_2 + p_2c_1^2)z^2 + \cdots \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}),$$ (8) $$(1 - \alpha) \frac{(\phi f)(z)}{(\varphi f)(z)} + \alpha \frac{(\psi f)(z)}{(\chi f)(z)} = 1 + A_2 z + A_3 z^2 + \dots \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}), \tag{9}$$ where $$A_2 = \left[ (1 - \alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2) \right] a_2,$$ $$A_3 = \left[ (1 - \alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3) \right] a_3 - \left[ (1 - \alpha)\alpha_2(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha\gamma_2(\delta_2 - \gamma_2) \right] a_2^2.$$ Thus, by (7), we have $$a_2 = \frac{p_1 c_1}{(1 - \alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)},\tag{10}$$ $$a_3 = \frac{p_1 c_2 + p_2 c_1^2 + [(1 - \alpha)\alpha_2(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha \gamma_2(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)]a_2^2}{(1 - \alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3)},$$ (11) which by Lemma 1 gives sharp estimation (2). Let $\mu$ be a complex number. Then, by (10) and (11) we obtain $$a_3 - \mu a_2^2 = \frac{p_1}{(1 - \alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3)} \{c_2 - \gamma c_1^2\},$$ where $\gamma$ is defined by (6). Thus, by Lemma 1, we have (4). Let functions $f_1, f_2 \in A$ satisfy the conditions $$(1 - \alpha) \frac{(\phi f_1)(z)}{(\varphi f_1)(z)} + \alpha \frac{(\psi f_1)(z)}{(\chi f_1)(z)} = p(z) \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}),$$ $$(1 - \alpha) \frac{(\phi f_2)(z)}{(\varphi f_2)(z)} + \alpha \frac{(\psi f_2)(z)}{(\chi f_2)(z)} = p(z^2) \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ Then the functions belong to the class $W_{\alpha}(\Phi, \Psi; p)$ and they realize the equality in the estimation (4). Thus, the results are sharp. Putting $\mu = 0$ in (4) we get the sharp estimation (3).
Theorem 2 · coeff Theorem 2. Let, -1. If, then where The results are sharp. Proof Let, where Since the results follow from Theorem 1. If we put in Theorem 1,…
Theorem 2. Let $\alpha \neq -\frac{1}{2}$ , -1. If $f \in \mathcal{M}_{\alpha}(\varphi, p)$ , then $$|a_2| \le \frac{|p_1|}{(1+\alpha)|\alpha_2|}, \qquad |a_3| \le \frac{|p_1|}{2(1+2\alpha)|\alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ $$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \frac{|p_1|}{2(1+2\alpha)|\alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = \frac{p_2}{p_1} + \frac{(1+3\alpha)}{(1+\alpha)^2} p_1, \qquad \gamma = \frac{2(1+2\alpha)\alpha_3 p_1}{(1+\alpha)^2 \alpha_2^2} \mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp. Proof Let $f \in \mathcal{M}_{\alpha}(\varphi, p) = \mathcal{W}_{\alpha}(\Phi, \Psi; p)$ , where $$\chi(z) = \phi(z) = z\varphi'(z), \qquad \psi(z) = z(z\varphi'(z))' \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ Since $$\beta_n = \gamma_n = n\alpha_n, \qquad \delta_n = n^2\alpha_n \quad (n = 2, 3),$$ the results follow from Theorem 1. If we put $\alpha = 0$ in Theorem 1, then we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3 · coeff Theorem 3. Let (k = 2, 3). If, then where The results are sharp.
Theorem 3. Let $\beta_k \neq \alpha_k$ (k = 2, 3). If $f \in \mathcal{W}(\Phi; p)$ , then $$|a_2| \le \frac{|p_1|}{|\beta_2 - \alpha_2|}, \qquad |a_3| \le \frac{|p_1|}{|\beta_3 - \alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ $$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \frac{|p_1|}{|\beta_3 - \alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = \frac{p_2}{p_1} + \frac{\alpha_2 p_1}{\beta_2 - \alpha_2}, \qquad \gamma = \frac{\beta_3 - \alpha_3}{(\beta_2 - \alpha_2)^2} p_1 \mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp.
Theorem 4 · coeff Theorem 4. Let. If, then (12) where The results (12) and (13) are sharp for and, respectively. Proof Let. Then there exists a function and…
Theorem 4. Let $\beta_2\beta_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in \mathcal{CW}(\Phi; P)$ , then $$\left|a_3 - \mu a_2^2\right| \le \frac{1}{2|\beta_3|} \left(D + \max\{0, A_\mu\} + \max\{0, B_\mu\}\right),$$ (12) $$|a_3| \le \frac{1}{2|\beta_2|} \left( D + \max\{0, A_0\} + \max\{0, B_0\} \right), \tag{13}$$ $$|a_2| = 2\frac{|p_1| + |\alpha_2||q_1|}{|\beta_2|},\tag{14}$$ where $$A_{\mu} = \left| \alpha_3 \left( q_2 + q_1^2 \right) - 2\mu \frac{\alpha_2^2 \beta_3 q_1^2}{\beta_2^2} \right| + C_{\mu} - |\alpha_3| |q_1|, \qquad D = 2|p_1| + |\alpha_3| |q_1|, \tag{15}$$ $$B_{\mu} = 2 \left| p_2 - \mu \frac{\beta_3 p_1^2}{\beta_2^2} \right| + C_{\mu} - 2|p_1|, \qquad C_{\mu} = |\alpha_2||p_1||q_1| \left| 1 - 2\mu \frac{\beta_3}{\beta_2^2} \right|. \tag{16}$$ The results (12) and (13) are sharp for $A_{\mu}B_{\mu} \geq 0$ and $A_0B_0 \geq 0$ , respectively. Proof Let $f \in \mathcal{CW}(\Phi; P)$ . Then there exists a function $g \in S^*(q)$ and functions $\omega, \eta \in \Omega$ , $$\omega(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n z^n, \qquad \eta(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} d_n z^n \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}),$$ such that $$\frac{\phi f}{\varphi g} = p \circ \omega, \qquad \frac{zg'(z)}{g(z)} = (q \circ \eta)(z) \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}). \tag{17}$$ Thus, by (8), we have $$b_2 = q_1 d_1,$$ $2b_3 = q_1 d_2 + (q_2 + q_1^2)d_1^2,$ $a_2 = \frac{c_1 p_1 + \alpha_2 d_1 q_1}{\beta_2},$ (18) $$\beta_3 a_3 = \frac{\alpha_3}{2} \left\{ q_1 d_2 + \left( q_2 + q_1^2 \right) d_1^2 \right\} + \alpha_2 p_1 q_1 c_1 d_1 + p_1 c_2 + p_2 c_1^2, \tag{19}$$ and by Lemma 1, we obtain the sharp estimation (14). Let $\mu$ be a complex number. Then, by (18), (19) and Lemma 1 we have $$2|\beta_3||a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le (A - C)|d_1|^2 + (B - C)|c_1|^2 + 2C|d_1||c_1| + D,$$ (20) or equivalently $$2|\beta_3||a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le A|d_1|^2 + B|c_1|^2 - C(|d_1| - |c_1|)^2 + D,$$ (21) where $A = A_{\mu}$ , $B = B_{\mu}$ , $C = C_{\mu}$ , D are defined by (15) and (16). Thus, we obtain $$2|\beta_3||a_3 - \mu a_7^2| \le A|d_1|^2 + B|c_1|^2 + D, (22)$$ and, in consequence, by Lemma 1 we have (12). It is easy to verify that the equality in (22) is attained by choosing $c_1 = d_1 = 1$ , $c_2 = d_2 = 0$ if $A \ge 0$ , $B \ge 0$ or $c_1 = d_1 = 0$ , $c_2 = d_2 = 1$ if $A \le 0$ , $B \le 0$ . Therefore, we consider functions $f_1, f_2 \in A$ such that $$\frac{(\phi f_1)(z)}{(\varphi g)(z)} = p(z), \qquad \frac{zg'(z)}{g(z)} = q(z) \quad (z \in \mathcal{U})$$ and $$\frac{(\phif_2)(z)}{(\phig)(z)}=p\big(z^2\big),\qquad \frac{zg'(z)}{g(z)}=p\big(z^2\big) \quad (z\in\mathcal{U}),$$ respectively. Then the functions belong to the class $\mathcal{CW}(\Phi; p)$ and they realize the equality in the estimation (12) for $AB \ge 0$ . Putting $\mu = 0$ in (12), we get the sharp estimation (13). $\square$ The following theorem gives the complete sharp estimation of the Fekete-Szegö functional in the class $\mathcal{CW}(\Phi; P)$ .
Theorem 5 · coeff Theorem 5. Let. If, then where,,, D are defined by (15) and (16). The result is sharp. Proof From Theorem 4, we have sharp estimation (23)…
Theorem 5. Let $\beta_2\beta_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in \mathcal{CW}(\Phi; P)$ , then $$|a_{3} - \mu a_{2}^{2}| \leq \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2|\beta_{3}|} (A + B + D) & if 0 \leq A \leq C \vee 0 \leq B \leq C \\ & \vee (A \geq C \wedge B \geq C), \end{cases}$$ $$\frac{1}{2|\beta_{3}|} (D + B - C + \frac{C^{2}}{C - A}) & if A < 0 \wedge B \geq C,$$ $$\frac{1}{2|\beta_{3}|} (D + A - C + \frac{C^{2}}{C - B}) & if B < 0 \wedge A \geq C,$$ $$(23)$$ where $A = A_{\mu}$ , $B = B_{\mu}$ , $C = C_{\mu}$ , D are defined by (15) and (16). The result is sharp. Proof From Theorem 4, we have sharp estimation (23) for $AB \ge 0$ . Let now $A \ge C$ and B < 0. Then, by (20) and Lemma 1 we have $$2|\beta_3||a_3-\mu a_2^2|\leq \nu(|c_1|),$$ where $$\nu(x) := -(C - B)x^2 + 2Cx + (A - C) + D.$$ Simply calculations give that the function $\nu$ attains a maximum in the interval [0,1] at the point $x = \frac{C}{C-B} \le 1$ . Thus, we have (23) for $A \ge C$ and B < 0. Moreover, the equality in (20) is attained by choosing the functions $\eta(z) = z$ , $\omega(z) = z \frac{z+a}{1+\overline{a}z}$ , for $a = \frac{C}{C-B}$ , i.e. $c_1 = \frac{C}{C-B}$ , $d_1 = 1$ and $c_2 = 1 - |a|^2$ , $d_2 = 0$ . Therefore, the result is sharp for $A \ge C$ and B < 0. Next, let A < 0 and $C \le B$ . Then, by (20) and Lemma 1 we have $$2|\beta_3||a_3-\mu a_2^2|<\widetilde{\nu}(|d_1|),$$ where $$\widetilde{\nu}(x) := -(C - A)x^2 + 2Cx + (B - C) + D.$$ Since the function $\widetilde{v}$ attains a maximum in the interval [0,1] at the point $x=\frac{C}{C-A}\leq 1$ , we have the estimation (23) for A<0 and $C\leq B$ . The equality in (20) is attained by choosing the functions $\omega(z)=z$ , $\eta(z)=z\frac{z+a}{1+\overline{a}z}$ , for $a=\frac{C}{C-A}$ , i.e. $c_1=1$ , $d_1=\frac{C}{C-A}$ and $c_2=0$ , $d_2=1-|a|^2$ . Finally, let us assume $(0\leq A\leq C\land B\leq 0)\lor (0\leq B\leq C\land A\leq 0)$ . Then, by (20) we have $$2|\beta_3||a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le F(|c_1|, |d_1|),\tag{24}$$ where $$F(x, y) = -(C - A)x^2 - (C - B)y^2 + 2Cxy + D.$$ Since F is the continuous function on $T := [0,1] \times [0,1]$ , by (24) we have $$2|\beta_3||a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \max F(T) = \max F(\partial T \cup K),\tag{25}$$ where K is the set of critical points of the function F in T. It is easy to verify that $$K \setminus \partial T = \begin{cases} \emptyset & \text{if } C^2 \neq (C - A)(C - B) \lor A = C, \\ \{(x, y) \in \text{int } T : x = \frac{C}{C - A}y\} & \text{if } C^2 = (C - A)(C - B) \land A \neq C. \end{cases}$$ If $C^2 = (A - C)(B - C) \neq 0$ , then $$F\left(\frac{C}{C-A}y, y\right) = \frac{C^2 - (C-A)(C-B)}{A-C}y^2 + D = D \quad (y \in [0,1]).$$ Moreover, we have $$F(x,0) = -(C-A)x^{2} + D \le D, \qquad F(0,y) = -(C-B)y^{2} + D \le D \quad (x,y \in [0,1]),$$ $$F(x,1) = -(C-A)x^{2} + 2Cx + B - C + D \le F(1,1) = A + B + D \quad (x \in [0,1]),$$ $$F(1,y) = -(C-B)y^{2} + 2Cy + A - C + D \le F(1,1) = A + B + D \quad (y \in [0,1]).$$ Thus, we obtain $$\max F(\partial T \cup K) = A + B + D$$ which by (25) gives (23) for $(0 \le A \le C \land B \le 0) \lor (0 \le B \le C \land A \le 0)$ . The equality in (24) is attained by choosing $c_1 = d_1 = 1$ and $c_2 = d_2 = 0$ . Therefore, the result is sharp and the proof is completed. Putting $\mu$ = 0 in Theorem 5 we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 6 · coeff Theorem 6. Let. If, then where,,, D are defined by (15) and (16). The result is sharp.
Theorem 6. Let $\beta_2\beta_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in \mathcal{CW}(\Phi; P)$ , then $$|a_{3}| \leq \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2|\beta_{3}|}(A+B+D) & if \ 0 \leq A \leq C \lor 0 \leq B \leq C \\ & \lor (A \geq C \land B \geq C), \end{cases}$$ $$\begin{cases} \frac{D}{2|\beta_{3}|} & if \ A \leq 0 \land B \leq 0, \\ \frac{1}{2|\beta_{3}|}(D+B-C+\frac{C^{2}}{C-A}) & if \ A < 0 \land B \geq C, \\ \frac{1}{2|\beta_{3}|}(D+A-C+\frac{C^{2}}{C-B}) & if \ B < 0 \land A \geq C, \end{cases}$$ where $A = A_0$ , $B = B_0$ , $C = C_0$ , D are defined by (15) and (16). The result is sharp.
Corollary 1 · coeff Corollary 1. Let. If, then where The results are sharp.
Corollary 1. Let $\alpha_2\alpha_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in S^c(\varphi, p)$ , then $$|a_2| \leq \frac{1}{2} \left| \frac{p_1}{\alpha_2} \right|, \qquad |a_3| \leq \frac{1}{6} \left| \frac{p_1}{\alpha_3} \right| \max \left\{ 1, \left| \frac{p_2}{p_1} + p_1 \right| \right\},$$ $$\left|a_3 - \mu a_2^2\right| \le \frac{1}{6} \left|\frac{p_1}{\alpha_3}\right| \max\left\{1, |\gamma|\right\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\gamma = \frac{3\alpha_3 p_1}{2\alpha_2^2} \mu - p_1 - \frac{p_2}{p_1}.$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 2 · coeff Corollary 2. Let. If, then where The results are sharp. Choosing the function p in Theorems 1-6, we can obtain several new results. Let a,…
Corollary 2. Let $\alpha_2\alpha_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in S^*(\varphi, p)$ , then $$|a_2| \le \left| \frac{p_1}{\alpha_2} \right|, \qquad |a_3| \le \frac{1}{2} \left| \frac{p_1}{\alpha_3} \right| \max \left\{ 1, \left| \frac{p_2}{p_1} + p_1 \right| \right\},$$ $$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \frac{1}{2} \left| \frac{p_1}{\alpha_3} \right| \max \left\{ 1, |\gamma| \right\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\gamma = 2 \frac{\alpha_3 p_1}{\alpha_2^2} \mu - p_1 - \frac{p_2}{p_1}.$$ The results are sharp. Choosing the function p in Theorems 1-6, we can obtain several new results. Let a, b be complex number, |b| < 1, $a \ne b$ , and let $$p(z) = \frac{1+az}{1+hz} \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ It is clear, that $$p(z) = 1 + (a - b)z - b(a - b)z^{2} + \cdots \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ Thus, by Theorems 1-3 and 5, we obtain the following four corollaries.
Corollary 3 Corollary 3. Let. If, then where The results are sharp.
Corollary 3. Let $$(1-\alpha)(\beta_k-\alpha_k)+\alpha(\delta_k-\gamma_k)\neq 0$$ $(k=2,3)$ . If $f\in\mathcal{W}_{\alpha}(\Phi,\Psi;\frac{1+az}{1+bz})$ , then $$|a_{2}| \leq \frac{|a-b|}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_{2}-\alpha_{2})+\alpha(\delta_{2}-\gamma_{2})|},$$ $$|a_{3}| \leq \frac{|a-b|}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_{3}-\alpha_{3})+\alpha(\delta_{3}-\gamma_{3})|} \max\{1,|\beta|\},$$ $$|a_{3}-\mu a_{2}^{2}| \leq \frac{|a-b|}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_{3}-\alpha_{3})+\alpha(\delta_{3}-\gamma_{3})|} \max\{1,|\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = -b + \frac{(1-\alpha)\alpha_2(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha\gamma_2(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)}{[(1-\alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)]^2}(a-b),$$ $$\gamma = \frac{(1-\alpha)(\beta_3 - \alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3 - \gamma_3)}{[(1-\alpha)(\beta_2 - \alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2 - \gamma_2)]^2}(a-b)\mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 4 Corollary 4. Let, -1. If, then where The results are sharp.
Corollary 4. Let $\alpha \neq -\frac{1}{2}$ , -1. If $f \in \mathcal{M}_{\alpha}(\varphi, \frac{1+az}{1+hz})$ , then $$|a_{2}| \leq \frac{|a-b|}{|1+\alpha||\alpha_{2}|}, \qquad |a_{3}| \leq \frac{|a-b|}{2|1+2\alpha||\alpha_{3}|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ $$|a_{3} - \mu a_{2}^{2}| \leq \frac{|a-b|}{2|1+2\alpha||\alpha_{3}|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = -b + \frac{(1+3\alpha)}{(1+\alpha)^2}(a-b), \qquad \gamma = \frac{2(1+2\alpha)(a-b)\alpha_3}{(1+\alpha)^2\alpha_2^2}\mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 5 · coeff Corollary 5. Let (k = 2, 3). If, then where The results are sharp.
Corollary 5. Let $\beta_k \neq \alpha_k$ (k = 2, 3). If $f \in \mathcal{W}(\Phi; \frac{1+az}{1+hz})$ , then $$|a_2| \le \frac{|a-b|}{|\beta_2 - \alpha_2|}, \qquad |a_3| \le \frac{|a-b|}{|\beta_3 - \alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ $$\left|a_3 - \mu a_2^2\right| \le \frac{|a-b|}{|\beta_3 - \alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = -b + \frac{(a-b)\alpha_2}{\beta_2 - \alpha_2}, \qquad \gamma = \frac{(\beta_3 - \alpha_3)(a-b)}{(\beta_2 - \alpha_2)^2}\mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 6 Corollary 6. Let. If, then where The result is sharp. Let and let It is easy to verify, that Thus, by Theorems 1-3 and 5, we obtain the…
Corollary 6. Let $\beta_2\beta_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in \mathcal{CW}(\Phi; \frac{1+az}{1+bz})$ , then $$|a_{3} - \mu a_{2}^{2}| \leq \begin{cases} \frac{|b-a|}{2|\beta_{3}|} (D+A+B) & \text{if } 0 \leq A \leq C \vee 0 \leq B \leq C \\ & \vee (A \geq C \wedge B \geq C), \end{cases}$$ $$\frac{|b-a|}{2|\beta_{3}|} D & \text{if } A \leq 0 \wedge B \leq 0,$$ $$\frac{|b-a|}{2|\beta_{3}|} (D+B-C+\frac{C^{2}}{C-A}) & \text{if } A < 0 \wedge B \geq C,$$ $$\frac{|b-a|}{2|\beta_{3}|} (D+A-C+\frac{C^{2}}{C-B}) & \text{if } B < 0 \wedge A \geq C,$$ where $$A = \left| \alpha_3(2b - a) - 2\mu \frac{\alpha_2^2 \beta_3(b - a)}{\beta_2^2} \right| + C - |\alpha_3|, \qquad D = 2 + |\alpha_3|,$$ $$B = 2 \left| b - \mu \frac{\beta_3(b - a)}{\beta_2^2} \right| + C - 2, \qquad C = |\alpha_2| |b - a| \left| 1 - 2\mu \frac{\beta_3}{\beta_2^2} \right|.$$ The result is sharp. Let $0 < \theta \le 1$ and let $$p(z) = \left(\frac{1+z}{1-z}\right)^{\theta} \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ It is easy to verify, that $$p(z) = 1 + 2\theta z + \theta(\theta + 1)z^2 + \cdots \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ Thus, by Theorems 1-3 and 5, we obtain the following four corollaries. Corollary 7 Let $(1-\alpha)(\beta_k-\alpha_k)+\alpha(\delta_k-\gamma_k)\neq 0$ (k=2,3). If $f\in\mathcal{W}_{\alpha}(\Phi,\Psi;(\frac{1+z}{1-z})^{\theta})$ , then $$|a_{2}| \leq \frac{2\theta}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_{2}-\alpha_{2})+\alpha(\delta_{2}-\gamma_{2})|},$$ $$|a_{3}| \leq \frac{2\theta}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_{3}-\alpha_{3})+\alpha(\delta_{3}-\gamma_{3})|} \max\{1,|\beta|\},$$ $$|a_{3}-\mu a_{2}^{2}| \leq \frac{2\theta}{|(1-\alpha)(\beta_{3}-\alpha_{3})+\alpha(\delta_{3}-\gamma_{3})|} \max\{1,|\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\begin{split} \beta &= \frac{1+\theta}{2} + 2\frac{(1-\alpha)\alpha_2(\beta_2-\alpha_2) + \alpha\gamma_2(\delta_2-\gamma_2)}{[(1-\alpha)(\beta_2-\alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2-\gamma_2)]^2}\theta, \\ \gamma &= 2\frac{(1-\alpha)(\beta_3-\alpha_3) + \alpha(\delta_3-\gamma_3)}{[(1-\alpha)(\beta_2-\alpha_2) + \alpha(\delta_2-\gamma_2)]^2}\theta\mu - \beta. \end{split}$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 8 · coeff Corollary 8. Let, -1. If, then where The results are sharp.
Corollary 8. Let $\alpha \neq -\frac{1}{2}$ , -1. If $f \in \mathcal{M}_{\alpha}(\varphi, (\frac{1+z}{1-z})^{\theta})$ , then $$|a_2| \le \frac{2\theta}{|(1+\alpha)\alpha_2|}, \qquad a_3 \le \frac{\theta}{|(1+2\alpha)\alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ $$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \frac{\theta}{|(1+2\alpha)\alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = \frac{1+\theta}{2} + \frac{2(1+3\alpha)}{(1+\alpha)^2}\theta, \qquad \gamma = \frac{4(1+2\alpha)\theta\alpha_3}{(1+\alpha)^2\alpha_2^2}\mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 9 · coeff Corollary 9. Let (k = 2, 3). If, then where The results are sharp.
Corollary 9. Let $\beta_k \neq \alpha_k$ (k = 2, 3). If $f \in \mathcal{W}(\Phi; (\frac{1+z}{1-z})^{\theta})$ , then $$|a_2| \le \frac{2\theta}{|\beta_2 - \alpha_2|}, \qquad |a_3| \le \frac{2\theta}{|\beta_3 - \alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\beta|\},$$ $$|a_3 - \mu a_2^2| \le \frac{2\theta}{|\beta_3 - \alpha_3|} \max\{1, |\gamma|\} \quad (\mu \in \mathbb{C}),$$ where $$\beta = \frac{1+\theta}{2} + \frac{2\alpha_2\theta}{\beta_2 - \alpha_2}, \qquad \gamma = \frac{2(\beta_3 - \alpha_3)\theta}{(\beta_2 - \alpha_2)^2}\mu - \beta.$$ The results are sharp.
Corollary 10 Corollary 10. Let. If, then where The result is sharp. Let, k > 0. Note that is the convex domain contained in the right half plane, with.…
Corollary 10. Let $\beta_2\beta_3 \neq 0$ . If $f \in \mathcal{CW}(\Phi; (\frac{1+z}{1-z})^{\theta})$ , then $$|a_{3} - \mu a_{2}^{2}| \leq \begin{cases} \frac{\theta}{|\beta_{3}|} (D + A + B) & \text{if } 0 \leq A \leq C \lor 0 \leq B \leq C \\ & \lor (A \geq C \land B \geq C), \end{cases}$$ $$\frac{\theta D}{|\beta_{3}|} & \text{if } A \leq 0 \land B \leq 0,$$ $$\frac{\theta}{|\beta_{3}|} (D + B - C + \frac{C^{2}}{C - A}) & \text{if } A < 0 \land B \geq C,$$ $$\frac{\theta}{|\beta_{3}|} (D + A - C + \frac{C^{2}}{C - B}) & \text{if } B < 0 \land A \geq C,$$ where $$A = \left| \alpha_3 \frac{1+5\theta}{2} - 4\mu \frac{\alpha_2^2 \beta_3 \theta}{\beta_2^2} \right| + C - |\alpha_3|, \qquad D = 2 + |\alpha_3|,$$ $$B = \left| 1 + \theta - 4\mu \frac{\beta_3 \theta}{\beta_2^2} \right| + C - 2, \qquad C = 2\theta |\alpha_2| \left| 1 - 2\mu \frac{\beta_3}{\beta_2^2} \right|.$$ The result is sharp. Let $\Omega_k = \{u + iv : u > k\sqrt{(u-1)^2 + v^2}\}$ , k > 0. Note that $\Omega_k$ is the convex domain contained in the right half plane, with $1 \in \Omega_k$ . More precisely, it is the elliptic domain for k > 1, the hyperbolic domain for 0 < k < 1 and the parabolic domain for k = 1. Let us denote by $h_k$ the univalent function, which maps the unit disc $\mathcal{U}$ onto the conic domain $\Omega_k$ with $h_k(0) = 1$ . Obviously, the function $h_k$ is convex in $\mathcal{U}$ . It is easy to check that $f \in \mathcal{W}(\Phi; h_k)$ if and only if $$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{(\phif)(z)}{(\varphig)(z)}\right) > k \left| \frac{(\phif)(z)}{(\varphig)(z)} - 1 \right| \quad (z \in \mathcal{U}).$$ The following lemma gives coefficients estimates for the function.
Lemma 2 Lemma 2. [13] Let ( ). Then where and is the complete elliptic integral of first kind. Using Lemma 1 in Theorems 1-5 we obtain the…
Lemma 2. [13] Let $$h_k = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} p_n z^n$$ ( $z \in U$ ). Then $$p_{1} = \begin{cases} \frac{2D^{2}(k)}{1-k^{2}} & for \ 0 \leq k < 1, \\ \frac{8}{\pi^{2}} & for \ k = 1, \\ \frac{\pi^{2}}{4\sqrt{t(1+t)(k^{2}-1)}\mathcal{K}^{2}(t)} & for \ k > 1, \end{cases}$$ $$p_{2} = \begin{cases} \frac{D^{2}(k)+2}{3}p_{1} & for \ 0 \leq k < 1, \\ \frac{2}{3}p_{1} & for \ k = 1, \\ \frac{4(t^{2}+6t+1)\mathcal{K}^{2}(t)-\pi^{2}}{24\sqrt{t(1+t)\mathcal{K}^{2}(t)}}p_{1} & for \ k > 1, \end{cases}$$ where $D(k) = \frac{2}{\pi} \arcsin k$ and $K^2(t)$ is the complete elliptic integral of first kind. Using Lemma 1 in Theorems 1-5 we obtain the solutions of the Fekete-Szegö problem for the classes $W_{\alpha}(\Phi, \Psi; h_k)$ , $\mathcal{M}_{\alpha}(\varphi, h_k)$ , $\mathcal{W}_{\alpha}(\Phi; h_k)$ , $\mathcal{CW}_{\alpha}(\Phi; h_k)$ . Remark 1 The classes $W_{\alpha}(\Phi, \Psi; h)$ , $\mathcal{M}_{\alpha}(\varphi, h)$ , $\mathcal{CW}_{\alpha}(\Phi; P)$ reduced to well-known subclasses by judicious choices of the parameters; see, for example [1–28]. In particular, they generalize several well-known classes defined by linear operators, which were investigated in earlier works. Also, the obtained results generalize several results obtained in these classes of functions.
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
On the logarithmic coefficients of Ma-Minda type convex functions
2026
Logarithmic Coefficients Problems of Geometric Subclass of Closed-to-convex Func
2026
The sharp refined Bohr inequalities for a subclass of close-to-convex harmonic m
2026
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 291 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback