🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Abstract

In this paper we use a method based on the Grunsky coefficients to find upper bounds of the modulus of the initial coefficients, difference of the moduli of two consecutive initial coefficients, of the modulus of the initial logarithmic coefficient, and of the second Hankel determinant for the class of normalized bi-univalent functions.

Results & Lemmas (5)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1 · coeff Lemma 1. Grunsky coefficient for a function satisfies where The first inequality is a consequence of the inequality, obtained from, valid…
Lemma 1. Grunsky coefficient $w_{13}$ for a function $f \in \mathcal{S}$ satisfies $$|w_{13}| \le \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}(1+|w_{11}|^2) & , |w_{11}| \in [0,b] \\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}(1-|w_{11}|^2)} & , |w_{11}| \in [b,1] \end{cases},$$ where $$b = \sqrt{\frac{2\sqrt{7}-5}{3}} = 0.311...$$ The first inequality is a consequence of the inequality $|2w_{13} - w_{11}^2| \le 1$ , obtained from $|a_3 - a_2^2| \le 1$ , valid for $f \in \mathcal{S}$ . The second one follows from the inequality (7). As it has been shown in [7, p. 57], if f is given by (1) then the coefficients $a_2$ , $a_3$ , $a_4$ and $a_5$ are expressed by Grunsky's coefficients $\omega_{2p-1,2q-1}$ of the function $f_*$ given by (4) in the following way: $$a_{2} = 2\omega_{11},$$ $$a_{3} = 2\omega_{13} + 3\omega_{11}^{2},$$ $$a_{4} = 2\omega_{33} + 8\omega_{11}\omega_{13} + \frac{10}{3}\omega_{11}^{3},$$ $$a_{5} = 2\omega_{35} + 8\omega_{11}\omega_{33} + 5\omega_{13}^{2} + 18\omega_{11}^{2}\omega_{13} + \frac{7}{3}\omega_{11}^{4},$$ $$0 = 3\omega_{15} - 3\omega_{11}\omega_{13} + \omega_{11}^{3} - 3\omega_{33},$$ $$0 = \omega_{17} - \omega_{35} - \omega_{11}\omega_{33} - \omega_{13}^{2} + \frac{1}{3}\omega_{11}^{4}.$$ A comprehensive overview of the application of Grunsky coefficients in the general class of univalent functions is given in [15].
Theorem 1 · coeff Theorem 1. Let be given by (1). Then - (i), - -
Theorem 1. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_b$ be given by (1). Then - (i) $|a_3| \leq 2.427...$ , - $(ii) |a_4| \leq 3.461 \dots,$ - $(iii) |a_5| \le 4.993 \dots$
Theorem 2 · coeff Theorem 2. Let be given by (1). Then - (i), - Proof. (i) At the beginning we consider critical points of on. For this reason we look for…
Theorem 2. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_b$ be given by (1). Then - (i) $|a_4| |a_3| \le 1.174...$ , - $(ii) |a_5| |a_4| \le 1.822 \dots$ Proof. (i) At the beginning we consider critical points of $f_4$ on $\Omega$ . For this reason we look for the solutions of the following system $$\begin{cases} \frac{\partial f_4(x,y)}{\partial x} = \left(\frac{9}{a} - 12\right)x^2 + \left(6 - \frac{2}{a}\right)y - \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\frac{x}{\sqrt{1 - x^2 - 3y^2}} = 0\\ \frac{\partial f_4(x,y)}{\partial y} = \left(6 - \frac{2}{a}\right)x - \frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\frac{y}{\sqrt{1 - x^2 - 3y^2}} = 0 \end{cases}$$ Hence. $$3y \frac{\partial f_4(x,y)}{\partial x} - x \frac{\partial f_4(x,y)}{\partial y} = \frac{1}{a} \left[ -x^2 [9y(4a-3) + 6a - 2] + 6(3a-1)y^2 \right] = 0$$ $$x = \frac{y\sqrt{6}\sqrt{3a-1}}{\sqrt{9y(4a-3)+6a-2}} := h_1(y)$$ Putting it into the second equation of the system we receive an equation of variable y. Numerical calculation shows that this equation has only one real solution in (0,1), that is $y'_6 = 0.358...$ , such that $(h_1(y'_6), y'_6) =$ $(0.634..., 0.358...) \in \Omega$ and $f_4(h_1(y_6), y_6) = 1.174...$ - Finally, we need to find the greatest value of $f_4$ on the edges of $\Omega$ : $f_4(0,y) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}} \sqrt{1-3y^2} \le f_4(0,0) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}} = 0.894...,$ $f_4(a,y) \le f_4(a,y_7') = 1.139...$ , where $y_7' = 0.327...$ is the unique real solution of the equation $f'_4(a,y) = 0$ on the interval (0,d), - $-f_4(x,0) = \left(\frac{3}{a}-4\right)x^3 + \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\sqrt{1-x^2} \le f_4(0,0) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}} = 0.894..., \text{ since }$ - $f_4(x,0)$ is a decreasing function on (0,a), $g_5(x) := f_4(x,(1+x^2)/2) = \frac{1}{5}\sqrt{5-50x^2-15x^4}-x\left[\left(1-\frac{2}{a}\right)x^2-3+\frac{1}{a}\right]$ , so $g_5(x) \le g_5(x_8') = 0.709\dots$ , where $x_8' = 0.252\dots$ is the unique real solution of $g'_5(x) = 0$ on the interval (0, b), - $g_6(x) := f_4(x, \sqrt{1-x^2}/\sqrt{3}) = 2\left(1-\frac{1}{3a}\right)\sqrt{3(1-x^2)} + \left(\frac{3}{a}-4\right)x^3$ , so $g_6(x) \le g_6(x_9') = 0.969\ldots$ , where $x_9' = 0.715\ldots$ is the unique real solution of $g_3'(x) = 0$ on the interval (b, a). So, on the domain $\Omega$ , the function $f_4$ achieves the greatest value 1.174.... Consequently, $$|a_4| - |a_3| \le 1.174\dots$$ - (ii) Using Wolfram Mathematica we receive that the system of equations $\frac{\partial f_5(x,y)}{\partial x}=0$ and $\frac{\partial f_5(x,y)}{\partial y}=0$ , has only one solution in the interior of $\Omega$ , that is (0.717..., 0.312...) with value 1.822... On the edges of $\Omega$ we - $f_5(0,y) = 3y^2 + \frac{2}{\sqrt{7}}\sqrt{1-3y^2} \le f_5(0,1/2) = 1.127...$ since $f_5(0,y)$ is increasing on (0, 1/2), - $f_5(a,y) \le f_5(a,y'_{10}) = 1.819...$ , where $y'_{10} = 0.300...$ is the unique real solution of the equation $f_5'(a, y) = 0$ on the interval (0, ), - $f_5(x,0) = \left(\frac{4}{a} 5\right) x^4 + \left[\frac{2}{\sqrt{7}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} \left(6 \frac{2}{a}\right) x\right] \sqrt{1 x^2} \le f_5(a, y'_{11}) =$ 1.374..., where $y'_{11} = 0.667...$ is the unique real solution of $f'_5(x,0) =$ 0 on (0, a), $$\begin{array}{l} -g_7(x):=f_5(x,(1+x^2)/2)=\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{7}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\left(3-\frac{1}{a}\right)x\right]\sqrt{1-10x^2-3x^4}+\\ \frac{1}{4}(3+30x^2+7x^4)+\frac{1}{a}(x^4-3x^2), \text{ so } g_7(x)\leq g_7(x_{12}')=1.317\ldots, \text{ where } x_{12}'=0.247\ldots \text{ is the unique real solution of } g_7'(x)=0 \text{ on } (0,b),\\ -g_8(x):=f_5(x,\sqrt{1-x^2}/\sqrt{3})=2\left(2-\frac{1}{a}\right)x^2\sqrt{3(1-x^2)}+1-x^2+\left(\frac{4}{a}-5\right)x^4 \text{ and } g_8(x)\leq g_8(a)=1.402\ldots, \text{ since } g_8 \text{ is strictly increasing} \end{array}$$ So, on the domain $\Omega$ , the function $f_5$ takes the greatest value 1.822... and for this reason $$|a_5| - |a_4| \le 1.822 \dots$$
Theorem 3 Theorem 3. Let be given by (1). Then
Theorem 3. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_b$ be given by (1). Then $$|H_{2,2}(f)| \le 1.280\dots$$
Theorem 4 Theorem 4. Let be given by (1). Then
Theorem 4. Let $f \in \mathcal{S}_b$ be given by (1). Then $$|\gamma_3| \leq 0.551....$$
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
Properties of some univalent functions associated with balloon-shaped domain
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Geometric Properties of Analytic Functions Defined by the Miller–Ross-Type Poiss
2026
Estimates of coefficients for bi-univalent Ma–Minda-type functions associated wi
2025
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 279 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback