🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers

Continue from this paper

Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.

Results & Lemmas (12)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 2.1 Lemma 2.1. [42] If and, then the function satisfies the recursive relation
Lemma 2.1. [42] If $p, a, c \in \mathbb{C}$ and $m \neq 0, -1, -2, ...$ , then the function $v_p$ satisfies the recursive relation $$4m\upsilon_p'(z)=-c\upsilon_{p+1}(z),\quad \forall z\in\mathbb{U}.$$
Lemma 2.2 · coeff Lemma 2.2. [27] If has the functions of the form (2.1), then In the ensuing section, we initially derive the characterization properties,…
Lemma 2.2. [27] If $f \in \Re^{\tau}(A, C)$ has the functions of the form (2.1), then $$|a_n| \le (A-C)\frac{|\tau|}{n}, \quad n \in \mathbb{N} \{0\}.$$ In the ensuing section, we initially derive the characterization properties, specifically related to the coefficient bounds, of the newly established subclasses of analytic functions $M(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ and $N(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ as expressed in Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. The necessary and sufficient conditions for the function given by Eq (2.8) to be part of the classes $M(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ and $N(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ are provided in Theorems 3.3 and 3.4. The impact of the Bessel function on the class $TN(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ is investigated in Theorems 3.5 and 3.6. The coefficient restriction proved in Theorem 3.2 is applied to investigate the impact of the hypergeometric function on the class $TN(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ in Theorems 3.7 and 3.8.
Theorem 3.1 · coeff Theorem 3.1. Let,, and. A function f defined in (2.1) belongs to if and only if
Theorem 3.1. Let $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $\nu \ge 0$ . A function f defined in (2.1) belongs to $TM(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ if and only if $$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} [n(1+\nu) - (\rho+\nu)(1+n(2\tau^2-\tau) + (2\tau^2-3\tau))]|a_n| \le 1-\rho.$$
Corollary 3.1 · coeff Corollary 3.1. For the parametric value in Theorem 3.1, we derive Theorem 2.1 in [36], which asserts if, then.
Corollary 3.1. For the parametric value $\tau = 0$ in Theorem 3.1, we derive Theorem 2.1 in [36], which asserts if $$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} [n(1+\nu) - (\rho+\nu)]|a_n| \le 1-\rho$$ , then $f \in SD(\rho, \nu)$ .
Theorem 3.2 · coeff Theorem 3.2. Let,, and. A function f given in (2.1) belongs to if and only if
Theorem 3.2. Let $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $v \ge 0$ . A function f given in (2.1) belongs to $TN(\tau, \rho, v)$ if and only if $$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n[n(1+\nu) - (\rho+\nu)(1+n(2\tau^2-\tau) + (2\tau^2-3\tau))]|a_n| \le 1-\rho.$$
Corollary 3.2 · coeff Corollary 3.2. For the parametric value in Theorem 3.2, we derive Theorem 2.2 in [36], which asserts if then. In the ensuing theorems,…
Corollary 3.2. For the parametric value $\tau = 0$ in Theorem 3.2, we derive Theorem 2.2 in [36], which asserts if $$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} n[n(1+\nu) - (\rho+\nu)]|a_n| \le 1 - \rho,$$ then $f \in Sk(\rho, \nu)$ . In the ensuing theorems, Lemma 2.1 is employed, and both the necessary and sufficient conditions for the function $z(2 - v_p(z))$ given by (2.8) to be categorized within the classes $TN(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ and $TM(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ , respectively, are given.
Theorem 3.3 Theorem 3.3. For,, and, given the conditions where b < 0 and q > 0, it follows that, as described in (2.8), belongs to if and only if (3.1)…
Theorem 3.3. For $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $\nu \ge 0$ , given the conditions where b < 0 and q > 0, it follows that $z(2 - \upsilon_p(z))$ , as described in (2.8), belongs to $TN(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ if and only if $$[1 - (2\tau^{2} - \tau)(\rho + \nu) + \nu]\upsilon_{p}''(1) + [2\nu - \rho - 2\tau(\rho + \nu)(4\tau^{2} - 3) + 3]\upsilon_{p}'(1)$$ $$+ [4\tau(\rho + \nu)(1 - \tau) + 1 - \rho][\upsilon_{p}(1) - 1] \le (1 - \rho)$$ (3.1) holds true.
Theorem 3.4 Theorem 3.4. For,, and, given the conditions where b < 0 and m > 0, it follows that, given by (2.8), belongs to if and only if (3.2) holds…
Theorem 3.4. For $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $v \ge 0$ , given the conditions where b < 0 and m > 0, it follows that $z(2 - v_p(z))$ , given by (2.8), belongs to $TM(\tau, \rho, v)$ if and only if $$[1 - (2\tau^2 - \tau)(\rho + \nu) + \nu]v_p'(1) + [1 - (4\tau^2 - 4\tau)(\rho + \nu) - \rho][v_p(1) - 1] \le (1 - \rho)$$ (3.2) holds true.
Theorem 3.5 Theorem 3.5. For,, and, consider b < 0, q > 0, and. If (3.3) then.
Theorem 3.5. For $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $v \ge 0$ , consider b < 0, q > 0, and $f \in \Re^{\tau}(A, C)$ . If $$(A - C)|\tau|\{[(1 + \nu) - (\rho + \nu)(2\tau^2 - \tau)]\nu_p'(1) + [(1 - \rho) - (\rho + \nu)(4\tau^2 - 4\tau)][\nu_p(1) - 1]\} \le (1 - \rho),$$ (3.3) then $T(b,q)f(z) \in TN(\tau,\rho,\nu)$ .
Theorem 3.6 Theorem 3.6. For,, and, given the conditions where b < 0 and m > 0, it follows that belongs to if and only if
Theorem 3.6. For $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $v \ge 0$ , given the conditions where b < 0 and m > 0, it follows that $\int_0^z (2 - v_p(t)) dt$ belongs to $TN(\tau, \rho, v)$ if and only if $$[1 + \nu - (\rho + \nu)(2\tau^2 - \tau)]v_p'(1) + [1 - \rho - (\rho + \nu)(4\tau^2 - 4\tau)][v_p(1) - 1] \le (1 - \rho). \tag{3.4}$$
Theorem 3.7 Theorem 3.7. For,, and, if i, b > -1, ib < 0, and d > i + b + 2, then zF(z) belongs to if and only if
Theorem 3.7. For $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $v \ge 0$ , if i, b > -1, ib < 0, and d > i + b + 2, then zF(z) belongs to $TN(\tau, \rho, v)$ if and only if $$\left[ (i)_2[(1+\nu) - (2\tau^2 - \tau)(\rho + \nu)](b)_2 + (d - i - b - 2)_2[1 - \rho - (4\tau^2 - 4\tau)(\rho + \nu)] + ib(d - i - b - 2)[-\rho - 2(4\tau^2 - 3)\tau(\rho + \nu) + 3 + 2\nu] \right] \ge 0.$$
Theorem 3.8 Theorem 3.8. For,, and, if d > i + b + 1 and i, b > 0, then (2z - zF(z)) belongs to the class if and only if
Theorem 3.8. For $0 \le \rho < 1$ , $0 \le \tau < 1$ , and $v \ge 0$ , if d > i + b + 1 and i, b > 0, then (2z - zF(z)) belongs to the class $TN(\tau, \rho, v)$ if and only if $$\frac{\Gamma(d-i-b)\Gamma(d)}{\Gamma(d-b)\Gamma(d-a)} \left[ \frac{[3-2\tau(\rho+\nu)(4\tau^2-3)+2\nu-\rho]ib}{(1-\rho)(d-i-b-1)} + \frac{(i)_2[(1+\nu)-(2\tau^2-\tau)(\rho+\nu)](b)_2}{(1-\rho)(d-i-b-2)_2} + 1 \right] \leq 2.$$

Definitions (2)

Def 2.1 Definition 2.1. For and, let be the subset of consisting of functions as given in (2.1) that meet the analytic criterion (2.9) If we set.…
Definition 2.1. For $0 \le \tau < 1$ and $v \ge 0$ , let $M(\tau, \rho, v)$ be the subset of $\mathbb{A}$ consisting of functions as given in (2.1) that meet the analytic criterion $$\Re\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{4(\tau-\tau^{2})z+(2\tau^{2}-\tau)zf'(z)+(2\tau^{2}-3\tau+1)f(z)}-\rho\right\} > \nu\left|\frac{zf'(z)}{4(\tau-\tau^{2})z+(2\tau^{2}-\tau)zf'(z)+(2\tau^{2}-3\tau+1)f(z)}-1\right|, \quad z \in \mathbb{U}.$$ (2.9) If we set $$\tau = \nu = 0$$ . it follows that $$\Re\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right\} > \rho,$$ which results in $$M(\tau, \rho, \nu) = S^*(\rho)$$ as defined in (2.3) (see [26]). If we assume $\tau = 0$ , it follows that $$\Re\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - \rho\right\} > \nu \left|\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - 1\right|,$$ leads to $$M(\tau, \rho, \nu) = SD(\rho, \nu)$$ as specified in ([36]). Observe that if $f \in SD(\rho, \nu)$ , then $f \in S^*(\frac{\rho-\nu}{1-\nu})$ , as illustrated in ([37]). Also, the previously mentioned class represents the generalized representation of various classes of starlike functions, which will be discussed immediately following Definition 2.2.
Def 2.2 Definition 2.2. Let be the subset of consisting of functions as given in (2.1) that meet the analytic criterion (2.10) If one assumes it…
Definition 2.2. Let $N(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ be the subset of $\mathbb{A}$ consisting of functions as given in (2.1) that meet the analytic criterion $$\Re\left\{\frac{f'(z) + zf''(z)}{4(\tau - \tau^2) + (2\tau^2 - \tau)zf''(z) + (4\tau^2 - 4\tau + 1)f'(z)} - \rho\right\}$$ $$> \nu \left| \frac{f'(z) + zf''(z)}{4(\tau - \tau^2) + (2\tau^2 - \tau)zf''(z) + (4\tau^2 - 4\tau + 1)f'(z)} - 1 \right|.$$ (2.10) If one assumes $$\tau = \nu = 0$$ it follows that $$\Re\left\{1+\frac{zf''(z)}{f'(z)}\right\} > \rho,$$ resulting in the class $M(\tau, \rho, v)$ being equivalent to $C(\rho)$ as defined in (2.4) ([26]). If we examine the case where $\tau = 0$ , then $$\Re\left\{\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - \rho\right\} > \nu \left|\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)} - 1\right|,$$ leading to $$M(\tau, \rho, \nu) = KD(\rho, \nu)$$ as defined in ([36]). It is important to recognize that if $f \in KD(\rho, \nu)$ , then it follows that $f \in K(\frac{\rho-\nu}{1-\nu})$ as illustrated in ([37]). Similarly, the previously mentioned class serves as the generalized representation of diverse subclasses of convex functions, which are elaborated upon below. From (2.9) and (2.10), it is obvious that $f \in N(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ if and only if $zf' \in M(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ . Moreover, let $$TM(\tau, \rho, \nu) = T \cap M(\tau, \rho, \nu)$$ and $$TN(\tau, \rho, \nu) = T \cap N(\tau, \rho, \nu).$$ Further, a straightforward computation shows that numerous subclasses of analytic functions introduced in different papers are particular cases of the subclasses $TM(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ and $TN(\tau, \rho, \nu)$ : In the case of $\tau=0$ , we identify the classes $TS_P(\rho,\nu)$ and $TS_P(\rho,\nu)$ which were considered by Bharati et al. in [38]. For $\tau=0$ and $\rho=0$ , we find the classes $TS_P(\nu)$ and $TK_P(\nu)$ , which were previously examined by Subramanian et al. in [39,40]. When $\tau=0$ and $\nu=1$ , we observe the classes $TS_P(\rho)$ and $TK_P(\rho)$ , studied by Bharati et al. in [38]. In the case of $\nu=0$ , we notice that $T^(\tau,\rho)$ and $C(\tau,\rho)$ are the classes previously investigated by Altintas et al. in [41]. For $\tau=0$ and $\nu=0$ , we uncover the classes $T^(\rho)$ and $C(\rho)$ , which were investigated earlier by Silverman in [26].
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Sharp Estimates of Logarithmic Coefficients for a Certain Class of Starlike Func
2026
Classes of Ma-Minda type analytic functions associated with a kidney-shaped doma
2025
Pre-Schwarzian norm estimation for functions in the Ma-Minda-type starlike and c
2025
Schwarzian Norm Estimates for Analytic Functions Associated with Convex Function
2025
Bounds and asymptotic expansions for the radii of convexity and uniform convexit
2025
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc closeall results
✦ 278 explorers have wandered the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
Usage & privacy

We use first-party site metrics to improve navigation: page visits, internal clicks, search result counts (not search terms), and approximate active time. A random tab ID groups events for seven days; GPC/DNT turns this off. The separate visitor count uses a self-hosted pseudonymous fingerprint and also respects GPC/DNT.

💬 Feedback