Continue from this paper
Indexing is not verification. Extracted statements should be checked against the source.
Abstract
In the article, we present several quadratic transformation inequalities for Gaussian
hypergeometric function and find the analogs of duplication inequalities for the
generalized Grötzsch ring function.
MSC: 33C05; 26D20
Results & Lemmas (8)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1.1
Theorem 1.1. For(a, <sup>b</sup>) ∈ (a, <sup>b</sup>)|a, <sup>b</sup> > 0, ab <sup>≥</sup> <sup>a</sup>+b–10/9, <sup>a</sup>+<sup>b</sup>…
Theorem 1.1. For(a, <sup>b</sup>) ∈ {(a, <sup>b</sup>)|a, <sup>b</sup> > 0, ab <sup>≥</sup> <sup>a</sup>+b–10/9, <sup>a</sup>+<sup>b</sup> <sup>≥</sup> <sup>2</sup>}, let x <sup>=</sup> <sup>x</sup>(r)=2√r/(1+ r), then the Landen-type inequality
$$(xx')^{(a+b-1)/2} F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; x^2\right) > (1+r) (rr')^{(a+b-1)/2} F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; r^2\right)$$
(1.7)
holds for all r ∈ (0, 1).
Theorem 1.2
Theorem 1.2. For, define the function g on (0,1) by Then g is strictly increasing from (0,1) onto. In particular, the inequality holds for…
Theorem 1.2. For $(a,b) \in \{(a,b)|a,b>0,ab \ge a+b-10/9,a+b \ge 2\}$ , define the function g on (0,1) by
$$g(r) = 2\mu_{a,b}\left(\frac{2\sqrt{r}}{1+r}\right) - \mu_{a,b}(r).$$
Then g is strictly increasing from (0,1) onto $(-\infty,0)$ . In particular, the inequality
$$2\mu_{a,b}\left(\frac{2\sqrt{r}}{1+r}\right) < \mu_{a,b}(r)$$
holds for each $r \in (0,1)$ with $(a,b) \in \{(a,b)|a,b>0,ab \ge a+b-10/9,a+b \ge 2\}$ .
The purpose of this paper is to establish several quadratic transformation inequalities for Gaussian hypergeometric function ${}_2F_1(a,b;(a+b+1)/2;x)$ (a,b>0), such as inequalities (1.4), (1.5) and (1.7), and thereby prove the analogs of Theorem 1.2.
We recall some basic facts about $\mu_{a,b}(r)$ (see [33]). The limiting values of $\mu_{a,b}(r)$ at 0 and 1 are
$$\mu_{a,b}(0^{+}) = \lim_{r \to 0^{+}} \frac{B(a,b)}{2} F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; 1-r^{2}\right)$$
$$= \begin{cases} \frac{B(a,b)}{2} H(a,b), & a+b < 1, \\ +\infty, & a+b \ge 1, \end{cases}$$
(1.8)
$$\mu_{a,b}(1^{-}) = \lim_{r \to 1^{-}} \frac{B(a,b)}{2F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^{2})} = \begin{cases} \frac{B(a,b)}{2H(a,b)}, & a+b < 1, \\ 0, & a+b \ge 1, \end{cases}$$
(1.9)
and the derivative formula of $\mu_{a,b}(r)$ is
$$\frac{d\mu_{a,b}(r)}{dr} = -\frac{\Gamma(\frac{a+b+1}{2})^2}{\Gamma(a+b)} \frac{1}{r^{a+b}r'^{a+b+1}F(a,b;(a+b+1)/2;r^2)^2}.$$
(1.10)
Here and in what follows,
$$H(a,b) = \frac{B(\frac{a+b+1}{2}, \frac{1-a-b}{2})}{B(\frac{1+b-a}{2}, \frac{1+a-b}{2})}.$$
Lemma 2.1 · radius
Lemma 2.1. ([42, Theorem 2.1]) Suppose that the power series and have the radius of convergence r > 0 with for all. Let h(x) = f(x)/g(x)…
Lemma 2.1. ([42, Theorem 2.1]) Suppose that the power series $f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n$ and $g(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^n$ have the radius of convergence r > 0 with $b_n > 0$ for all $n \in \{0, 1, 2, ...\}$ . Let h(x) = f(x)/g(x) and $H_{f,g} = (f'/g')g - f$ , then the following statements hold true:
- 1. If the non-constant sequence $\{a_n/b_n\}_{n=0}^{\infty}$ is increasing (decreasing) for all n > 0, then h(x) is strictly increasing (decreasing) on (0, r);
- 2. If the non-constant sequence $\{a_n/b_n\}_{n=0}^{\infty}$ is increasing (decreasing) for $0 < n \le n_0$ and decreasing (increasing) for $n > n_0$ , then h(x) is strictly increasing (decreasing) on (0,r) if and only if $H_{f,g}(r^-) \ge (\le)0$ . Moreover, if $H_{f,g}(r^-) < (>)0$ , then there exists an $x_0 \in (0,r)$ such that h(x) is strictly increasing (decreasing) on $(0,x_0)$ and strictly decreasing (increasing) on $(x_0,r)$ .
Lemma 2.3
Lemma 2.3. Let and for 0 < x < 1, then the function (2.13) is strictly increasing on (0,1) if. Proof Taking the derivative of f(x) yields…
Lemma 2.3. Let $D_0 = \{(a,b)|a,b>0,a+b \ge 7/4,ab \ge a+b-31/28\}$ and $x' = \sqrt{1-x^2}$ for 0 < x < 1, then the function
$$f(x) = \frac{(xx')^{\frac{a+b-1}{2}}F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^2)}{F(\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4};1;x^2)}$$
(2.13)
is strictly increasing on (0,1) if $(a,b) \in D_0$ .
Proof Taking the derivative of f(x) yields
$$f'(x) = \frac{(xx')^{\frac{a+b-3}{2}}}{x'F(\frac{1}{a},\frac{3}{4};1;x^2)^2} f_1(x), \tag{2.14}$$
where
$$f_{1}(x) = \left[\frac{a+b-1}{2}\left(1-2x^{2}\right)F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^{2}\right)\right] + \frac{4ab}{a+b+1}x^{2}x'^{2}F\left(a+1,b+1;\frac{a+b+3}{2};x^{2}\right)F\left(\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4};1;x^{2}\right) - \frac{3x^{2}x'^{2}}{8}F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^{2}\right)F\left(\frac{5}{4},\frac{7}{4};2;x^{2}\right).$$
(2.15)
We clearly see from (1.1) that
$$x'^{2}F\left(\frac{5}{4}, \frac{7}{4}; 2; x^{2}\right) = F\left(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}; 2; x^{2}\right) \le F\left(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}; 1; x^{2}\right)$$
for 0 < x < 1. This implies, in conjunction with (2.15), that
$$f_1(x) \ge F\left(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}; 1; x^2\right) f_2(x),$$
(2.16)
where
$$f_2(x) = \left[\frac{a+b-1}{2} - \left(a+b-\frac{5}{8}\right)x^2\right] F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; x^2\right) + \frac{4ab}{a+b+1}x^2\left(1-x^2\right) F\left(a+1,b+1; \frac{a+b+3}{2}; x^2\right).$$
It follows from the definition of hypergeometric function that
$$f_{2}(x) = \frac{a+b-1}{2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n)(b,n)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n)} \frac{x^{2n}}{n!} - \left(a+b-\frac{5}{8}\right) \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n)(b,n)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n)} \frac{x^{2n+2}}{n!}$$
$$+ \frac{4ab}{a+b+1} \left[ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a+1,n)(b+1,n)}{(\frac{a+b+3}{2},n)} \frac{x^{2n+2}}{n!} - \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a+1,n)(b+1,n)}{(\frac{a+b+3}{2},n)} \frac{x^{2n+4}}{n!} \right]$$
$$= \frac{a+b-1}{2} + \left[ \frac{ab(a+b-1)}{a+b+1} - \left(a+b-\frac{5}{8}\right) + \frac{4ab}{a+b+1} \right] x^{2}$$
$$+ \frac{a+b-1}{2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n+2)(b,n+2)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n+2)} \frac{x^{2n+4}}{(n+2)!}$$
$$- \left(a+b-\frac{5}{8}\right) \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n+1)(b,n+1)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n+1)} \frac{x^{2n+4}}{(n+1)!}$$
$$+ 2 \left[ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n+2)(b,n+2)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n+2)} \frac{x^{2n+4}}{(n+1)!} - \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n+1)(b,n+1)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n+1)} \frac{x^{2n+4}}{n!} \right]$$
$$= \frac{a+b-1}{2} \left[ 1 - \frac{3x^{2}}{4(a+b+1)} \right] + \frac{4ab(a+b-1) - 4(a-b)^{2} + 1}{4(a+b+1)} x^{2}$$
$$+ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a,n+1)(b,n+1)}{(\frac{a+b+1}{2},n+2)} \frac{C_{n}}{(n+2)!} x^{2n+4}, \qquad (2.17)$$
where
(ii)
$$C_{n} = \frac{a+b-1}{2}(a+n+1)(b+n+1) - \left(a+b-\frac{5}{8}\right)\left(\frac{a+b+1}{2}+n+1\right)(n+2)$$
$$+2(a+n+1)(b+n+1)(n+2) - 2\left(\frac{a+b+1}{2}+n+1\right)(n+1)(n+2)$$
$$= \left(\frac{4a+4b-7}{8}\right)n^{2} + \left[\frac{32ab+5(a+b)-29}{16}\right]n$$
$$+ \frac{4ab(a+b+3)-4(a-b)^{2}-(3a+3b+5)}{8}.$$
(2.18)
If $(a, b) \in D_0$ , namely, $a + b \ge 7/4$ and $ab \ge a + b - 31/28$ , we can verify (i)
$$4ab(a+b-1) - 4(a-b)^{2} + 1$$
$$\geq 4\left(a+b-\frac{31}{28}\right)(a+b-1) - 4(a-b)^{2} + 1$$
$$= \frac{1}{7}\left[112ab - 59(a+b) + 38\right] \geq \frac{53}{7}\left(a+b-\frac{86}{53}\right) \geq \frac{27}{28}$$
$$32ab + 5(a+b) - 29 \ge 32\left(a+b - \frac{31}{28}\right) + 5(a+b) - 29$$
$$=\frac{37}{7}\left[7(a+b)-\frac{451}{259}\right]\geq\frac{9}{28},$$
(iii)
$$4ab(a+b+3) - 4(a-b)^{2} - (3a+3b+5)$$
$$\geq 4\left(a+b-\frac{31}{28}\right)(a+b+3)$$
$$-4(a-b)^{2} - (3a+3b+5) = \frac{16}{7}\left[7ab+2(a+b)-8\right]$$
$$\geq \frac{16}{7}\left[7\left(a+b-\frac{31}{28}\right)+2(a+b)-8\right] = \frac{36}{7}\left[4(a+b)-7)\right] \geq 0.$$
This, in conjunction with ([2.17\)](#page-7-0) and [\(2.18](#page-7-1)), implies that f2(x) > 0 for 0 < x < 1. Therefore, f (x) is strictly increasing on (0, 1), which follows from ([2.14\)](#page-6-2) and ([2.16\)](#page-6-3) if (a, b) ∈ D0. -
Remark 2.4 The function f (x) defined in Lemma [2.3](#page-6-4) is not monotone on (0, 1) if two positive numbers a, b satisfy a + b < 1, since limx→0<sup>+</sup> f (x) = limx→1– f (x)=+∞ and Lemma [2.1\(](#page-3-1)1) shows the monotonicity of f (x) on (0, 1) if a + b = 1. In the remaining case a + b > 1, it follows from (2.15) that f1(0+)=(a + b – 1)/2 > 0. This, in conjunction with (2.14), implies that f (x) is strictly increasing on (0, x<sup>∗</sup>) for a sufficiently small x<sup>∗</sup> > 0. This enables us to find a sufficient condition for a, b with a + b > 1 such that f (x) is strictly increasing on (0, 1) in Lemma [2.3](#page-6-4).
The following corollary can be derived immediately from the monotonicity of f (x) in Lemma [2.3](#page-6-4) and the quadratic transformation equality [\(1.3](#page-1-3)).
Corollary 2.5
Corollary 2.5. Let x <sup>=</sup> <sup>x</sup>(r) = <sup>√</sup>8r(1 + <sup>r</sup>)/(1 + 3r), if (a, <sup>b</sup>) <sup>∈</sup>…
Corollary 2.5. Let x <sup>=</sup> <sup>x</sup>(r) = <sup>√</sup>8r(1 + <sup>r</sup>)/(1 + 3r), if (a, <sup>b</sup>) <sup>∈</sup> <sup>D</sup>0, then the inequality
$$\left(xx'\right)^{\frac{a+b-1}{2}}F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^2\right) > \sqrt{1+3r}\left(rr'\right)^{\frac{a+b-1}{2}}F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^2\right) \tag{2.19}$$
holds for all r ∈ (0, 1).
Theorem 3.1
Theorem 3.1. The quadratic transformation inequality holds for all r ∈ (0, 1) with a, b > 0 if and only if (a, b) ∈ D<sup>1</sup> and the…
Theorem 3.1. The quadratic transformation inequality
$$F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};\frac{8r(1+r)}{(1+3r)^2}\right) \le \sqrt{1+3r}F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^2\right) \tag{3.1}$$
holds for all r ∈ (0, 1) with a, b > 0 if and only if (a, b) ∈ D<sup>1</sup> and the reversed inequality
$$F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};\frac{8r(1+r)}{(1+3r)^2}\right) \ge \sqrt{1+3r}F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^2\right)$$
(3.2)
takes place for all r ∈ (0, 1) if and only if (a, b) ∈ D2, with equality only for (a, b) = p or q. In the remaining case (a, b) ∈ D<sup>3</sup> ∪ D4, neither of the above inequalities holds for all r ∈ (0, 1).
Proof Suppose that $x(r) = [8r(1+r)]/(1+3r)^2$ , then we clearly see that $x(r) > r^2$ for 0 < r < 1. It follows from Lemma 2.1(1) that $\eta(x(r)) < \eta(r^2)$ for $(a,b) \in D_1 \setminus \{p,q\}$ and $\eta(x(r)) > \eta(r^2)$ for $(a,b) \in D_2 \setminus \{p,q\}$ . This, in conjunction with the quadratic transformation formula (1.3), implies
$$F(x(r)) < \frac{\widehat{F}(x(r))}{\widehat{F}(r^2)} F(r^2) = \sqrt{1+3r} F(r^2)$$
for $(a,b) \in D_1 \setminus \{p,q\}$ , and it degenerates to the quadratic transformation equality for (a,b) = p(orq). This completes the proof of (3.1).
Inequality (3.2) can be derived analogously, and the remaining case follows easily from Lemma 2.2(1). $\Box$
Theorem 3.2
Theorem 3.2. We define the function for with a,b > 0 and. Let and. Then the following statements hold true: - 1. If, then is strictly…
Theorem 3.2. We define the function
$$\varphi(r) = \sqrt{1 + 3\sqrt{r}} F\left(a, b, ; \frac{a + b + 1}{2}; r\right) - F\left(a, b; \frac{a + b + 1}{2}; \frac{8\sqrt{r}(1 + \sqrt{r})}{(1 + 3\sqrt{r})^2}\right)$$
for $r \in (0,1)$ with a,b > 0 and $(a,b) \neq p,q$ . Let $L_1 = \{(a,b)|a+b=1,0 < a < \frac{1}{4} \text{ or } \frac{3}{4} < a < 1\}$ and $L_2 = \{(a,b)|a+b=1,\frac{1}{4} < a < \frac{3}{4}\}$ . Then the following statements hold true:
- 1. If $(a,b) \in L_1(or L_2)$ , then $\varphi(r)$ is strictly increasing (resp., decreasing) from (0,1) onto $(0, [R(a,b) \log 64]/B(a,b))$ (resp., $([R(a,b) \log 64]/B(a,b), 0)$ );
- 2. If $(a,b) \in D_1 \setminus L_1$ , then $\varphi(r)$ is strictly increasing from (0,1) onto (0,H(a,b));
- 3. If $(a,b) \in D_2 \setminus L_2$ , then $\varphi(r)$ is strictly decreasing from (0,1) onto $(-\infty,0)$ .
As a consequence, the inequality
$$F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};\frac{8r(1+r)}{(1+3r)^2}\right) \le \sqrt{1+3r}F\left(a,b,;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^2\right)$$
$$\le F\left(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};\frac{8r(1+r)}{(1+3r)^2}\right) + H(a,b) \tag{3.3}$$
holds for all $r \in (0,1)$ if $(a,b) \in D_1 \setminus L_1$ , and the following inequality is valid for all $r \in (0,1)$ :
$$F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; \frac{8r(1+r)}{(1+3r)^2}\right)$$
$$\leq (\geq)\sqrt{1+3r}F\left(a,b,; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; r^2\right)$$
$$\leq (\geq)F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; \frac{8r(1+r)}{(1+3r)^2}\right) + \frac{R(a,b) - \log 64}{B(a,b)}$$
(3.4)
$if(a,b) \in L_1(resp., L_2).$
Proof Let $z = z(r) = \frac{8\sqrt{r}(1+\sqrt{r})}{(1+3\sqrt{r})^2}$ , then we clearly see that
$$\frac{dz}{dr} = \frac{4(1-\sqrt{r})}{\sqrt{r}(1+3\sqrt{r})^3} = \frac{4(1-z)}{\sqrt{r}(1-\sqrt{r})(1+3\sqrt{r})}.$$
(3.5)
Taking the derivative of $\varphi(r)$ with respect to r and using (3.5) yields
$$\sqrt{r}(1+3\sqrt{r})\varphi'(r) = \frac{3\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}}{4}F(r) + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^3 \frac{2ab}{a+b+1}G(r) - \frac{2ab}{a+b+1} \frac{4(1-z)}{1-\sqrt{r}}G(z).$$
(3.6)
We substitute $\sqrt{r}$ for r in the quadratic transformation equality (1.3), then differentiate it with respect to r to obtain
$$\frac{4(1-z)}{1-\sqrt{r}}\widehat{G}(z) = 4\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}\widehat{F}(r) + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^3\widehat{G}(r),$$
in other words,
$$\frac{4(1-z)}{1-\sqrt{r}}\frac{\widehat{G}(z)}{\widehat{G}(r)} = 4\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}\frac{\widehat{F}(r)}{\widehat{G}(r)} + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^3. \tag{3.7}$$
If $(a,b) \in D_1 \setminus \{p,q\}$ , then it follows from Lemma 2.2(2) that $G(x)/\widehat{G}(x)$ is strictly decreasing on (0,1). This, in conjunction with z > r, implies that $G(z)/\widehat{G}(z) < G(r)/\widehat{G}(r)$ , that is,
$$G(z) < \frac{\widehat{G}(z)}{\widehat{G}(r)}G(r).$$
(3.8)
Combing (3.6), (3.7) with the inequality (3.8), we clearly see that
$$\sqrt{r}(1+3\sqrt{r})\varphi'(r) = \frac{3\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}}{4}F(r) + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^{3}\frac{2ab}{a+b+1}G(r) - \frac{2ab}{a+b+1}\frac{4(1-z)}{1-\sqrt{r}}G(z)
> \frac{3\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}}{4}F(r) + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^{3}\frac{2ab}{a+b+1}G(r) - \frac{2ab}{a+b+1}\frac{4(1-z)}{1-\sqrt{r}}\frac{\widehat{G}(z)}{\widehat{G}(r)}G(r)
= \frac{3\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}}{4}F(r) + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^{3}\frac{2ab}{a+b+1}G(r)
- \frac{2ab}{a+b+1}\left[4\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}\frac{\widehat{F}(r)}{\widehat{G}(r)} + \sqrt{r}(\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}})^{3}\right]G(r)
= 4\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}\left[\frac{3}{16}F(r) - \frac{2ab}{a+b+1}\frac{\widehat{F}(r)}{\widehat{G}(r)}G(r)\right]
= 4\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{r}}\frac{F(r)^{2}}{\widehat{G}(r)}\left(\frac{\widehat{F}(r)}{F(r)}\right)'.$$
(3.9)
It follows from Lemma 2.2(1) that $\widehat{F}(r)/F(r)$ is strictly increasing on (0,1) if $(a,b) \in D_1 \setminus \{p,q\}$ . This, in conjunction with (3.9), implies that $\varphi(r)$ is strictly increasing on (0,1) if $(a,b) \in D_1$ .
Analogously, if $(a, b) \in D_2 \setminus \{p, q\}$ , then we obtain the following inequality:
$$G(z) > \frac{\widehat{G}(z)}{\widehat{G}(r)}G(r).$$
By using a similar argument as above, we have
$$\sqrt{r}\varphi'(r) < \frac{4F^2(r)}{\widehat{G}(r)} \left(\frac{\widehat{F}(r)}{F(r)}\right)' < 0,$$
since <sup>F</sup>(r)/ <sup>F</sup>(r) is strictly increasing on (0,1) if (a, <sup>b</sup>) <sup>∈</sup> <sup>D</sup><sup>2</sup> \ {p, <sup>q</sup>} by Lemma [2.2](#page-4-4)(1). Hence, ϕ(r) is strictly decreasing on (0, 1) if (a, b) ∈ D2.
Notice that ϕ(0+) = 0 and
$$\lim_{r \to 1^{-}} \varphi(r) = \begin{cases} H(a,b), & a+b < 1, \\ \frac{R(a,b) - \log 64}{B(a,b)}, & a+b = 1, \\ -\infty, & a+b > 1. \end{cases}$$
(3.10)
Therefore, we obtain the desired assertion from [\(3.10](#page-11-0)). -
Theorem 3.3
Theorem 3.3. If we define the function for (a, b) ∈ D0, then φ(r) is strictly increasing from (0, 1) onto (–∞, 0). As a consequence, the…
Theorem 3.3. If we define the function
$$\phi(r) = 2\mu_{a,b} \left( \frac{\sqrt{8r(1+r)}}{1+3r} \right) - \mu_{a,b}(r),$$
for (a, b) ∈ D0, then φ(r) is strictly increasing from (0, 1) onto (–∞, 0). As a consequence, the inequality
$$2\mu_{a,b}\left(\frac{\sqrt{8r(1+r)}}{1+3r}\right) < \mu_{a,b}(r)$$
holds for all r ∈ (0, 1) if (a, b) ∈ D0.
Proof Remark [2.4](#page-8-2) enables us to consider the case for a + b > 1. Note that φ(1–) = 0 and
$$\lim_{r \to 0^{+}} \phi(r)$$
$$= \lim_{r \to 0^{+}} \frac{B(a,b)}{2} \left[ 2F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; \left(\frac{1-r}{1+3r}\right)^{2}\right) - F\left(a,b; \frac{a+b-1}{2}; 1-r^{2}\right) \right]$$
$$= B(a,b) \lim_{r \to 0^{+}} \left[ \left(\frac{\sqrt{8r(1+r)}}{1+3r}\right)^{1-a-b} F\left(\frac{b-a+1}{2}, \frac{a-b+1}{2}; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; \left(\frac{1-r}{1+3r}\right)^{2}\right) - \frac{1}{2}r^{1-a-b}F\left(\frac{b-a+1}{2}, \frac{a-b+1}{2}; \frac{a+b+1}{2}; 1-r^{2}\right) \right]$$
$$= \frac{1}{2}B\left(\frac{a+b+1}{2}, \frac{a+b-1}{2}\right) \lim_{r \to 0^{+}} \left[ 2\left(\frac{\sqrt{8r(1+r)}}{1+3r}\right)^{1-a-b} - r^{1-a-b} \right]$$
$$= -\infty. \tag{3.11}$$
Let <sup>x</sup> <sup>=</sup> <sup>x</sup>(r) = <sup>√</sup>8r(1 + <sup>r</sup>)/(1 + 3r) and <sup>x</sup> <sup>=</sup> √ 1 – x2. Then
$$\frac{dx}{dr} = \frac{\sqrt{2}(1-r)}{\sqrt{r(1+r)}(1+3r)^2} = \frac{x'(1+3x')^2}{4x}.$$
(3.12)
Taking the derivative of $\phi(r)$ and using (3.12) leads to
$$\phi'(r) = -2 \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a+b+1}{2})^2}{\Gamma(a+b)} \frac{1}{x^{a+b}x'^{a+b+1}F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^2)^2} \cdot \frac{x'(1+3x')^2}{4x}$$
$$+ \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a+b+1}{2})^2}{\Gamma(a+b)} \frac{1}{r^{a+b}r'^{a+b+1}F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^2)^2}$$
$$= \frac{\Gamma(\frac{a+b+1}{2})^2}{\Gamma(a+b)} \frac{(1+3x')^2}{2(1+3r)x^{a+b+1}x'^{a+b}F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^2)^2}$$
$$\times \left[ \frac{(xx')^{a+b-1}F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};x^2)^2}{(rr')^{a+b-1}F(a,b;\frac{a+b+1}{2};r^2)^2} - (1+3r) \right]. \tag{3.13}$$
Therefore, the monotonicity of $\phi(r)$ follows immediately from (2.19) and (3.13). This, in conjunction with (3.11), gives rise to the desired result.