🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

This paper establishes sharp bounds for the second and third-order Toeplitz determinants associated with starlike functions $f$ in the unit disk such that $f(z)-z$ has a zero of order $k+1$ at $z=0$. These bounds are further extended to starlike mappings defined on the unit ball in a complex Banach space and on bounded starlike circular domains in $\mathbb{C}^n$. The derived results generalize several known bounds as special cases.

Results & Lemmas (8)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1 Lemma 1. [13] Let be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping. The mapping f is said to be starlike on if and only if The class of all…
Lemma 1. [13] Let $f : \mathbb{B} \to X$ be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping. The mapping f is said to be starlike on $\mathbb{B}$ if and only if $$\operatorname{Re}(l_z[Df(z)]^{-1}f(z)) > 0, \quad x \in \mathbb{B} \setminus \{0\}, \quad l_z \in T_z.$$ The class of all starlike mappings on $\mathbb{B}$ is denoted by $\mathcal{S}^*(\mathbb{B})$ .
Lemma 2 Lemma 2. [11] is said to be a bounded starlike circular domain if and only if there exists a unique real-valued continuous function, called…
Lemma 2. [11] $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}^n$ is said to be a bounded starlike circular domain if and only if there exists a unique real-valued continuous function $\rho : \mathbb{C}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ , called the Minkowski functional of $\Omega$ , such that 1. $$\rho(z) \ge 0$$ , $z \in \mathbb{C}^n$ ; $\rho(z) = 0 \Leftrightarrow z = 0$ , 2. $$\rho(tz) = |t|, \rho(z), t \in \mathbb{C}, z \in \mathbb{C}^n,$$ 3. $$\Omega = \{ z \in \mathbb{C}^n : \rho(z) < 1 \}$$ . Furthermore, if $\rho(z)$ , $z \in \Omega$ , belongs to $\mathcal{C}^1$ except on some lower-dimensional manifold $E \subset \mathbb{C}^n$ , then $\rho(z)$ satisfies the following properties: <span id="page-2-0"></span> $$2\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z}z = \rho(z), \quad z \in \mathbb{C}^n \setminus E,$$ $$2\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z}\Big|_{z=z_0} = 1, \quad z_0 \in \partial\Omega \setminus E,$$ $$\frac{\partial \rho(\lambda z)}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z}, \quad \lambda \in (0, \infty), \ z \in \mathbb{C}^n \setminus E,$$ $$\frac{\partial \rho(e^{i\theta}z)}{\partial z} = e^{-i\theta}\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z}, \quad \theta \in \mathbb{R}, \ z \in \mathbb{C}^n \setminus E,$$ where $$\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z} = \left(\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z_1}, \dots, \frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z_n}\right)$$ .
Lemma 3 Lemma 3. [11] Let be a bounded starlike circular domain containing 0, whose Minkowski functional belongs to except on some…
Lemma 3. [11] Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}^n$ be a bounded starlike circular domain containing 0, whose Minkowski functional $\rho(z)$ belongs to $C^1$ except on some lower-dimensional manifolds $E \subset \mathbb{C}^n$ . Let $f: \Omega \to \mathbb{C}^n$ be a normalized locally biholomorphic mapping. Then f is starlike on $\Omega$ if and only if $$\operatorname{Re}\left(\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z} (Df(z))^{-1} f(z)\right) > 0, \quad z \in \Omega \setminus E.$$ The class of all starlike mappings on $\Omega$ is denoted by $S^*(\Omega)$ .
Theorem 5 Theorem 5. If, then The estimate is sharp k = 1, 2, 3.
Theorem 5. If $f(z) = z + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_{nk+1} z^{nk+1} \in \mathcal{S}^*$ , then $$\left|1 - a_{2k+1}^2 - 2a_{k+1}^2 + 2a_{k+1}^2 a_{2k+1}^2\right| \le \begin{cases} 1 + \frac{8}{k^2} + \frac{(k+2)(6-k)}{k^4}; & 1 \le k \le 3, \\ 1 + \frac{8}{k^2} + \frac{2+k}{k^3}; & k \ge 3, \end{cases}$$ The estimate is sharp k = 1, 2, 3.
Theorem 6 Theorem 6. Let and. If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then The bound is sharp.
Theorem 6. Let $f \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ and $F(z) = zf(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then $$\left| \left( \frac{l_z(D^{2k+1}F(0)(z^{2k+1}))}{(2k+1)!||z||^{2k+1}} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{l_z(D^{k+1}F(0)(z^{k+1}))}{(k+1)!||z||^{k+1}} \right)^2 \right| \le \frac{(k+2)^2}{k^4} + \frac{4}{k^2}.$$ The bound is sharp.
Theorem 7 Theorem 7. Let and. If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then where <span id="page-7-0"></span> (16) The bound is sharp for k =…
Theorem 7. Let $f \in \mathcal{H}(\mathbb{B}, \mathbb{C})$ and $F(z) = zf(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\mathbb{B})$ . If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then $$\left|1 - a_{2k+1}^2 - 2a_{k+1}^2 + 2a_{k+1}^2 a_{2k+1}^2\right| \le \begin{cases} 1 + \frac{8}{k^2} + \frac{(k+2)(6-k)}{k^4}; & 1 \le k \le 3, \\ 1 + \frac{8}{k^2} + \frac{2+k}{k^3}; & k \ge 3, \end{cases}$$ where <span id="page-7-0"></span> $$a_{2k+1} = \frac{l_z(D^{2k+1}F(0)(z^{2k+1}))}{(2k+1)!||z||^{2k+1}} \quad and \quad a_{k+1} = \frac{l_z(D^{k+1}F(0)(z^{k+1}))}{(k+1)!||z||^{k+1}}.$$ (16) The bound is sharp for k = 1, 2, 3.
Theorem 8 Theorem 8. Let and. If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then The estimate is sharp.
Theorem 8. Let $f \in \mathcal{H}(\Omega, \mathbb{C})$ and $F(z) = zf(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\Omega)$ . If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then $$\left| \left( 2 \frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z} \frac{D^{2k+1} F(0)(z^{2k+1})}{(2k+1)! \rho^{2k+1}(z)} \right)^2 - \left( 2 \frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z} \frac{D^{k+1} F(0)(z^{k+1})}{(k+1)! \rho^{k+1}(z)} \right)^2 \right| \le \frac{(k+2)^2}{k^4} + \frac{4}{k^2}.$$ The estimate is sharp.
Theorem 9 Theorem 9. Let and. If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then where <span id="page-10-1"></span> The bound is sharp for k = 1,…
Theorem 9. Let $f \in \mathcal{H}(\Omega, \mathbb{C})$ and $F(z) = zf(z) \in \mathcal{S}^*(\Omega)$ . If F(z) - z has a zero of order k + 1 at z = 0, then $$\left|1 - a_{2k+1}^2 - 2a_{k+1}^2 + 2a_{k+1}^2 a_{2k+1}^2\right| \le \begin{cases} 1 + \frac{8}{k^2} + \frac{(k+2)(6-k)}{k^4}; & 1 \le k \le 3, \\ 1 + \frac{8}{k^2} + \frac{2+k}{k^3}; & k \ge 3, \end{cases}$$ where <span id="page-10-1"></span> $$a_{2k+1} = 2\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z} \frac{D^{2k+1} F(0)(z^{2k+1})}{(2k+1)! \rho^{2k+1}(z)} \quad and \quad a_{k+1} = 2\frac{\partial \rho(z)}{\partial z} \frac{D^{k+1} F(0)(z^{k+1})}{(k+1)! \rho^{k+1}(z)}. \tag{28}$$ The bound is sharp for k = 1, 2, 3

Related Papers

Second-Order Toeplitz Determinant for Quasi-Convex Mappings
2026
Generalized Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Several Complex Variable
2026
Zalcman Conjecture for Starlike Mappings in Higher Dimensions
2026
Toeplitz Determinants for Inverse Functions and their Logarithmic Coefficients A
2025
Starlike Functions Associated with a Non-Convex Domain
2024
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #3,847 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback