Abstract
We study the asymptotics in n for n-dimensional Toeplitz determinants
whose symbols possess Fisher-Hartwig singularities on a smooth back-
ground. We prove the general nondegenerate asymptotic behavior as con-
jectured by Basor and Tracy. We also obtain asymptotics of Hankel de-
terminants on a finite interval as well as determinants of Toeplitz+Hankel
type. Our analysis is based on a study of the related system of orthogonal
polynomials on the unit circle using the Riemann-Hilbert approach.
Results & Lemmas (20)
Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.
Theorem 1.1
Theorem 1.1 (Ehrhardt [20]). Let f(eiθ) be defined in (1.2), V (z) be C∞on the unit circle, |||β||| < 1, ℜαj > −1/2, and αj ± βj ̸= −1,…
Theorem 1.1 (Ehrhardt [20]). Let f(eiθ) be defined in (1.2), V (z) be C∞on the unit circle, |||β||| < 1, ℜαj > −1/2, and αj ± βj ̸= −1, −2, . . . for j, k = 0, 1, . . . , m. Then as n →∞, Dn(f) = exp " nV0 + ∞ X k=1 kVkV−k # m Y j=0 b+(zj)−αj+βjb−(zj)−αj−βj (1.12)
Theorem 1.13
Theorem 1.13 holds under condition (1.28) of Remark 1.15 below. The unifor- mity in α- and β-parameters will also hold provided s is taken…
Theorem 1.13 holds under condition (1.28) of Remark 1.15 below. The unifor- mity in α- and β-parameters will also hold provided s is taken large enough. In [17], we give an independent proof of Theorem 1.1, in the spirit of [16], [28], [32], using a connection of Dn(f) with the system of polynomials orthogonal with weight f(z) (1.2) on the unit circle. These polynomials also play a central role in the proofs presented here. It follows, in particular, from Theorem 1.1 that all Dk(f) ̸= 0, k = k0,
Theorem 1.8.
Theorem 1.8. Let f(eiθ) be defined in (1.2), V (z) be analytic in a neigh- borhood of the unit circle, and φk(z) = χkzk + · · ·, bφk(z) =…
Theorem 1.8. Let f(eiθ) be defined in (1.2), V (z) be analytic in a neigh- borhood of the unit circle, and φk(z) = χkzk + · · · , bφk(z) = χkzk + · · · be the corresponding polynomials satisfying (1.16). Assume that |||β||| < 1, αj ± βj ̸= −1, −2, . . . , j, k = 0, 1, . . . , m. Let (1.20) δ = max j,k n2ℜ(βj−βk−1), where the indices j, k = 0 are omitted if α0 = β0 = 0. Then as n →∞, χ2 n−1 = exp ñ − Z 2π 0 V (eiθ) dθ
Lemma 1.12.
Lemma 1.12. There exist only the following two mutually exclusive pos- sibilities: • ∃bβ ∈Oβ such that ||| bβ||| < 1. Then such bβ is…
Lemma 1.12. There exist only the following two mutually exclusive pos- sibilities: • ∃bβ ∈Oβ such that ||| bβ||| < 1. Then such bβ is unique and it is the unique element of M = { bβ}. • ∃bβ ∈Oβ such that ||| bβ||| = 1. Then there are at least two such bβ’s and all of them are obtained from each other by a repeated application of the following rule: add 1 to a bβj with the smallest real part and subtract 1 from a bβj with the largest. Moreover, M = { bβ ∈Oβ : ||| bβ||| = 1}.
Theorem 1.13.
Theorem 1.13. Let f(z) be given in (1.2), ℜαj > −1/2, βj ∈C, j = 0, 1,..., m. Let M be nondegenerate. Then, as n →∞, (1.27) Dn(f) = X Ñ m Y…
Theorem 1.13. Let f(z) be given in (1.2), ℜαj > −1/2, βj ∈C, j = 0, 1, . . . , m. Let M be nondegenerate. Then, as n →∞, (1.27) Dn(f) = X Ñ m Y j=0 znj j én R(f(z; n0, . . . , nm))(1 + o(1)), where the sum is over all FH-representations in M. Each R(f(z; n0, . . . , nm)) stands for the right-hand side of formula (1.12), without the error term, cor-
Theorem 1.1
Theorem 1.1 holds in fact under condition (1.15). It then follows (see §6) that,
Theorem 1.1 holds in fact under condition (1.15). It then follows (see §6) that,
Theorem 1.18
Theorem 1.18 (A particular case of Theorem 1.13). Let the symbol f±(z) be obtained from f(z) (1.2) by replacing one βj0 with βj0 ± 1 for…
Theorem 1.18 (A particular case of Theorem 1.13). Let the symbol f±(z) be obtained from f(z) (1.2) by replacing one βj0 with βj0 ± 1 for some fixed 0 ≤j0 ≤m. Let ℜαj > −1 2, ℜβj ∈(−1/2, 1/2], j = 0, 1, . . . , m. Then, for sufficiently large n, (1.29) Dn(f+(z)) = z−n j0 φn(0) χn Dn(f(z)), Dn(f−(z)) = zn j0 bφn(0) χn
Theorem 1.18
Theorem 1.18, we have Dn(f(BT)(z)) = (−1)n bφn(0) χn Dn(f(z)), where φn(z), χn, Dn(f(z)) correspond to f(z) given by (1.2) with m = 1, z0 =…
Theorem 1.18, we have Dn(f(BT)(z)) = (−1)n bφn(0) χn Dn(f(z)), where φn(z), χn, Dn(f(z)) correspond to f(z) given by (1.2) with m = 1, z0 = 1, z1 = eiπ, β0 = β1 = 1/2, α0 = α1 = 0. Observing that s = 2, j1 = j0 = 1 and j2 = 0 and using (1.30), we obtain Dn(f(BT)(z)) = (−1)n((−1)nR1,−+ R0,−). Since R1,−= R0,−= (2n)−1/2G(1/2)2G(3/2)2(1 + o(1)), we obtain (1.33) Dn(f(BT)(z)) = 1 + (−1)n 2
Theorem 1.20.
Theorem 1.20. Let w(x) be defined as in (1.36) with ℜβj ∈ Ä −1 2, 1 2 ä, j = 1, 2,..., r. Then as n →∞, Dn(w) = Dn(1)e[(n+α0+αr+1)V0−α0V…
Theorem 1.20. Let w(x) be defined as in (1.36) with ℜβj ∈ Ä −1 2, 1 2 ä , j = 1, 2, . . . , r. Then as n →∞, Dn(w) = Dn(1)e[(n+α0+αr+1)V0−α0V (1)−αr+1V (−1)+ 1 2 P∞ k=1 kV 2 k ] (1.37) ×
Theorem 1.25.
Theorem 1.25. Let f(z) be defined in (1.2) with the condition f(eiθ) = f(e−iθ). Let θr+1 = π and ℜβj ∈ Ä −1 2, 1 2 ä, j = 1, 2,..., r, β0 =…
Theorem 1.25. Let f(z) be defined in (1.2) with the condition f(eiθ) = f(e−iθ). Let θr+1 = π and ℜβj ∈ Ä −1 2, 1 2 ä , j = 1, 2, . . . , r, β0 = βr+1 = 0. Then as n →∞, DT+H n = enV0+ 1 2[(α0+αr+1+s+t)V0−(α0+s)V (1)−(αr+1+t)V (−1)+P∞ k=1 kV 2 k ]
Lemma 2.2
Lemma 2.2 (Recurrence relations). Let Dn(f) ̸= 0, n ≥0. The orthogo- nal polynomials satisfy the following relations for n = 0, 1,...:…
Lemma 2.2 (Recurrence relations). Let Dn(f) ̸= 0, n ≥0. The orthogo- nal polynomials satisfy the following relations for n = 0, 1, . . . : χnzφn(z) = χn+1φn+1(z) −φn+1(0)zn+1 bφn+1(z−1), (2.3) χnz−1 bφn(z−1) = χn+1 bφn+1(z−1) −bφn+1(0)z−n−1φn+1(z), (2.4) χn+1z−1 bφn(z−1) = χn bφn+1(z−1) −bφn+1(0)z−nφn(z). (2.5) Moreover, (2.6) χ2 n+1 −χ2 n = φn+1(0)bφn+1(0).
Lemma 2.3
Lemma 2.3 (Christoffel-Darboux identity). Let Dn(f) ̸= 0, n ≥0. For any z, a ̸= 0, n = 1, 2,..., (2.7) (1 −a−1z) n−1 X k=0 bφk(a−1)φk(z) =…
Lemma 2.3 (Christoffel-Darboux identity). Let Dn(f) ̸= 0, n ≥0. For any z, a ̸= 0, n = 1, 2, . . . , (2.7) (1 −a−1z) n−1 X k=0 bφk(a−1)φk(z) = a−nφn(a)zn bφn(z−1) −bφn(a−1)φn(z). For any z ̸= 0, n = 1, 2, . . . , (2.8) n−1 X k=0 bφk(z−1)φk(z)=−nφn(z)bφn(z−1)+z Å
Lemma 2.4.
Lemma 2.4. Let the Toeplitz determinants Dn(f) with symbol f(z) be nonzero for all n ≥N0 with a fixed N0 ≥0. Let Φk(z) = φk(z)/χk, “Φk(z) =…
Lemma 2.4. Let the Toeplitz determinants Dn(f) with symbol f(z) be nonzero for all n ≥N0 with a fixed N0 ≥0. Let Φk(z) = φk(z)/χk, “Φk(z) = bφk(z)/χk, k = N0, N0 + 1, . . . be the system of monic polynomials orthogonal on the unit circle with the weight f(z). Fix an integer ℓ> 0. Then if Fk =
Lemma 2.5.
Lemma 2.5. Let f(z) have the property f(eiθ) = f(e−iθ), 0 ≤θ ≤2π and let w(x) = f(eiθ) | sin θ|, x = cos θ. Assume that Dn(f) ̸= 0, n ≥N0,…
Lemma 2.5. Let f(z) have the property f(eiθ) = f(e−iθ), 0 ≤θ ≤2π and let w(x) = f(eiθ) | sin θ|, x = cos θ. Assume that Dn(f) ̸= 0, n ≥N0, N0 ≥0. Then the polynomials pn(x) = κnxn + · · · , n = N0, N0 + 1, . . . exist which are orthonormal with respect to weight w(x) on [−1, 1], i.e., Z 1 −1 pn(x)xmw(x)dx = κ−1 k δnm, m = 0, 1, . . . , n, n ≥N0, and, for n = N0, N0 + 1, . . . , there hold the following expressions in terms of
Theorem 11.5
Theorem 11.5 in [39], and we obtain (2.17) pn(x) = 1 » 2π(1 −a2n−1) (z−nφ2n(z) + znφ2n(z−1)). Note that 1 −a2n−1 ̸= 0, n = N0, N0 + 1,...…
Theorem 11.5 in [39], and we obtain (2.17) pn(x) = 1 » 2π(1 −a2n−1) (z−nφ2n(z) + znφ2n(z−1)). Note that 1 −a2n−1 ̸= 0, n = N0, N0 + 1, . . . as follows from (2.6) which in our case can be rewritten in the form χ2 n = Ä 1 −φ2 n+1(0)/χ2 n+1
Theorem 2.6
Theorem 2.6 (Connection between Toeplitz and Hankel determinants). Let N0 ≥0 and Dn(f) ̸= 0 for all n ≥N0. Let the weights f(z) and w(x) be…
Theorem 2.6 (Connection between Toeplitz and Hankel determinants). Let N0 ≥0 and Dn(f) ̸= 0 for all n ≥N0. Let the weights f(z) and w(x) be related as in Lemma 2.5. Let, moreover, Dn(w(x)) = det ÇZ 1 −1 xj+kw(x)dx ån−1 j,k=0 , n = N0, N0 + 1, . . . be the Hankel determinant with symbol w(x) on [−1, 1]. Then, with Φn(z) = φn(z)/χn, we have (2.20) Dn(w(x))2 =
Lemma 2.4.
Lemma 2.4. □
Lemma 2.4. □
Lemma 2.7
Lemma 2.7 (Connection between Hankel and Toeplitz+Hankel deter- minants). Let fj be the Fourier coefficient fj = 1 2π R 2π 0 f(eiθ)e−ijθdθ.…
Lemma 2.7 (Connection between Hankel and Toeplitz+Hankel deter- minants). Let fj be the Fourier coefficient fj = 1 2π R 2π 0 f(eiθ)e−ijθdθ. Let f(eiθ) = f(e−iθ). Then, for n = 1, 2, . . . , (2.24) det(fj−k + fj+k)n−1 j,k=0 = 2n2−2n+2 πn Dn(v(x)), where Dn(v(x)) is the Hankel determinant with symbol v(x)=f(eiθ(x))/
Proposition 4.1.
Proposition 4.1. Let αj ± βj ̸= −1, −2,... for all j. Then a solution to the above RHP (a)–(c) for Ψj(ζ), 0 < arg ζ < 2π, is given by the…
Proposition 4.1. Let αj ± βj ̸= −1, −2, . . . for all j. Then a solution to the above RHP (a)–(c) for Ψj(ζ), 0 < arg ζ < 2π, is given by the following function in the sector I: Ψj(ζ) = Ψ(I) j (ζ) (4.32) =
Lemma 1.12.
Lemma 1.12. We have to consider only the second class; i.e., |||β(r)||| = 1. We then have, relabeling β(r) j according to increasing real…
Lemma 1.12. We have to consider only the second class; i.e., |||β(r)||| = 1. We then have, relabeling β(r) j according to increasing real part, (6.1) ℜβ(r) 1 = · · · = ℜβ(r) p < ℜβ(r) p+1 ≤· · · ≤ℜβ(r) m′−ℓ< ℜβ(r) m′−ℓ+1 = · · · = ℜβ(r) m′ for some p, ℓ> 0. Here m′ is the number of singularities: m′ = m + 1 if z = 1