🧭 New here?
Take a guided tour of the site.
← Back to Papers
Abstract

In this paper, we obtain upper bounds for the first two Taylor-Maclaurin || and || for two new families Υ , ;  and Υ ∗ , ;  of holomorphic and -fold symmetric bi-univalent functions defined in the open unit disk . Further, we point out several certain special cases for our results.

Results & Lemmas (5)

Each result is auto-extracted from the paper via OCR - the math is shown verbatim and may carry occasional transcription artifacts. Click to expand the full statement.

Lemma 1.1 · coeff Lemma 1.1 [3]. If ℎ∈Q, then |R(| ≤2 for each T ∈ℕ, where Q is the family of all UO-ℎ . > 0,  ∈. Here ℎ  = 1 + R + R + ⋯,  ∈.…
Lemma 1.1 [3]. If ℎ∈Q, then |R(| ≤2 for each T ∈ℕ, where Q is the family of all UO-ℎ . > 0,  ∈. Here ℎ  = 1 + R + R + ⋯,  ∈. 2. Coefficient Bounds for the Function Family Υ , ; 
Theorem 2.1. Theorem 2.1. Let  ∈Υ, ;  0 <  ≤1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1,  ∈ℕ be given by (1.3). Then || ≤ 2 =@2 2 + 1 + 2@   −1 +   + 2 +…
Theorem 2.1. Let  ∈Υ , ;  0 <  ≤1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1,  ∈ℕ be given by (1.3). Then || ≤ 2 =@2 2 + 1 + 2@   −1 +   + 2 + 1A +  − 1 +  2.3 and || ≤ 4  1 +  +   2 + 1 . 2.4
Corollary 2.1. · coeff Corollary 2.1. Let  ∈Υ, ;  0 <  ≤1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1 be given by (1.1). Then || ≤ 2 =@2 2 + 1 + 2@   −1 + 3 + 1A +  −1 1 + …
Corollary 2.1. Let  ∈Υ , ;  0 <  ≤1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1 be given by (1.1). Then || ≤ 2 =@2 2 + 1 + 2@   −1 + 3 + 1A +  −1 1 +  and |8| ≤ 4 1 +  +  2 + 1 . 3. Coefficient Bounds for the Function Family Υ ∗ , ; 
Theorem 3.1. Theorem 3.1. Let  ∈Υ ∗, ;  0 ≤ < 1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1,  ∈ℕ, be given by (1.3). Then || ≤2  m 1 − 1 + n-n + 2 1 + o. +   −1 1…
Theorem 3.1. Let  ∈Υ ∗ , ;  0 ≤ < 1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1,  ∈ℕ, be given by (1.3). Then || ≤2  m 1 − 1 + n-n + 2 1 + o. +   −1 1 + o 3.3 and || ≤ 2  + 1 1 − -n +  1 + o.  + 1 − -n +  1 + 2o. . 3.4
Corollary 3.1. · coeff Corollary 3.1. Let  ∈Υ ∗, ;  0 ≤ < 1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1, be given by (1.1). Then || ≤2m 1 − 2 + 1 + 2   −1 + 3 + 1 and |8| ≤4 1…
Corollary 3.1. Let  ∈Υ ∗ , ;  0 ≤ < 1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1, be given by (1.1). Then || ≤2m 1 − 2 + 1 + 2   −1 + 3 + 1 and |8| ≤4 1 −  + 1 + 1 − 2 + 1 . 4. Conclusion This paper has introduced a new subfamilies Υ , ;  and Υ ∗ , ;  of < and find estimates on the coefficients || and || for functions in each of these new

Definitions (2)

Def 2.1. Definition 2.1. A function  ∈< given by (1.3) is said to be in the family Υ, ;  0 ≤ ≤1, ≥0,0 ≤ ≤1 if it satisfies the following…
Definition 2.1. A function  ∈< given by (1.3) is said to be in the family Υ , ;  0 ≤ ≤1, ≥0,0 ≤ ≤1 if it satisfies the following conditions: Xarg Z 1 −  G 1 − $    +  01 + "  ′  5K + "  + ′  $  + 1 − ]X < ^ 2 ,  ∈ 2.1
Def 3.1. Definition 3.1. A function  ∈< given by (1.3) is said to be in the family Υ ∗, ;  0 ≤ < 1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1 if it satisfies the following…
Definition 3.1. A function  ∈< given by (1.3) is said to be in the family Υ ∗ , ;  0 ≤ < 1, ≥0, 0 ≤ ≤1 if it satisfies the following conditions: UO i 1 −  G 1 − ′    +  01 + "  ′  5K + "  + ′  ′  + 1 − j > , 3.1 and UO i 1 −  G 1 − /6′ /
Function classes studied:

Related Papers

Geometric Properties of Analytic Functions Defined by the Miller–Ross-Type Poiss
2026
Texture enhancement of skin lesion images via Hankel determinants of $\lambda$-g
2026
Stud. Univ. Babe¸s-Bolyai Math. 71(2026), No. 2, 235–252
2026
Coefficient Estimates and Distortion Bounds for Rabotnov Functions with Applicat
2026
On some properties of bi-univalent functions in the unit disc
2026
↑↓ navigate openesc close
✦ You're explorer #4,671 to wander the registry - thanks for stopping by. Tell us what you'd like to see →
💬 Feedback